ebook img

Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008 PDF

441 Pages·2008·7.22 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008

COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications FAIA covers all aspects of theoretical and applied artificial intelligence research in the form of monographs, doctoral dissertations, textbooks, handbooks and proceedings volumes. The FAIA series contains several sub-series, including “Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases” and “Knowledge-Based Intelligent Engineering Systems”. It also includes the biennial ECAI, the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, proceedings volumes, and other ECCAI – the European Coordinating Committee on Artificial Intelligence – sponsored publications. An editorial panel of internationally well-known scholars is appointed to provide a high quality selection. Series Editors: J. Breuker, R. Dieng-Kuntz, N. Guarino, J.N. Kok, J. Liu, R. López de Mántaras, R. Mizoguchi, M. Musen, S.K. Pal and N. Zhong Volume 172 Recently published in this series Vol. 171. P. Wang et al. (Eds.), Artificial General Intelligence 2008 – Proceedings of the First AGI Conference Vol. 170. J.D. Velásquez and V. Palade, Adaptive Web Sites – A Knowledge Extraction from Web Data Approach Vol. 169. C. Branki et al. (Eds.), Techniques and Applications for Mobile Commerce – Proceedings of TAMoCo 2008 Vol. 168. C. Riggelsen, Approximation Methods for Efficient Learning of Bayesian Networks Vol. 167. P. Buitelaar and P. Cimiano (Eds.), Ontology Learning and Population: Bridging the Gap between Text and Knowledge Vol. 166. H. Jaakkola, Y. Kiyoki and T. Tokuda (Eds.), Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XIX Vol. 165. A.R. Lodder and L. Mommers (Eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems – JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference Vol. 164. J.C. Augusto and D. Shapiro (Eds.), Advances in Ambient Intelligence Vol. 163. C. Angulo and L. Godo (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Vol. 162. T. Hirashima et al. (Eds.), Supporting Learning Flow Through Integrative Technologies Vol. 161. H. Fujita and D. Pisanelli (Eds.), New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques – Proceedings of the sixth SoMeT_07 Vol. 160. I. Maglogiannis et al. (Eds.), Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering – Real World AI Systems with Applications in eHealth, HCI, Information Retrieval and Pervasive Technologies Vol. 159. E. Tyugu, Algorithms and Architectures of Artificial Intelligence ISSN 0922-6389 Computational Models of Argument Proceedings of COMMA 2008 Edited by Philippe Besnard CNRS, IRIT, Université Toulouse 3, France Sylvie Doutre IRIT, Université Toulouse 1, France and Anthony Hunter Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK Amsterdam • Berlin • Oxford • Tokyo • Washington, DC © 2008 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher. ISBN 978-1-58603-859-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008925574 Publisher IOS Press Nieuwe Hemweg 6B 1013 BG Amsterdam Netherlands fax: +31 20 687 0019 e-mail: [email protected] Distributor in the UK and Ireland Distributor in the USA and Canada Gazelle Books Services Ltd. IOS Press, Inc. White Cross Mills 4502 Rachael Manor Drive Hightown Fairfax, VA 22032 Lancaster LA1 4XS USA United Kingdom fax: +1 703 323 3668 fax: +44 1524 63232 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] LEGAL NOTICE The publisher is not responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. PRINTED IN THE NETHERLANDS Computational Models of Argument v Ph. Besnard et al. (Eds.) IOS Press, 2008 © 2008 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved. Preface Modelsofargumentation,thattakeprosandconsforsomeconclusionintoaccount, have been extensively studied over a number of years, and some basic principles have now been clearly established. More recently, there has been interest in computational modelsofargumentationwheretheaimistodevelopsoftwaretoolstoassistusersincon- structing and evaluating arguments and counterarguments and/or to develop automated systemsforconstructingandevaluatingargumentsandcounterarguments. After the very successful First Conference on Computational Models of Argument that was instigated by the members of the EU-funded ASPIC Project, and hosted by theUniversityofLiverpoolinSeptember2006,thepapersinthisvolumeformthepro- grammefortheSecondConferenceonComputationalModelsofArgumenthostedbythe InstitutdeRechercheenInformatiquedeToulouse(IRIT)inMay2008. The range of papers in the volume provides a valuable snapshot of the leading re- searchquestionsintheareaofcomputationalmodelsofargument.Thisvolumeincludes papers drawing on the wealth of research on the philosophical questions surrounding the notions arising in argumentation, papers that are addressing knowledge representa- tion and reasoning issues emerging from modelling argumentation, and papers that are consideringappropriatemodelsofwiderrhetoricalissuesarisinginargumentation.This volumealsoincludespapersthatareproposingandevaluatingalgorithmicsolutionsas- sociated with generating and judging constellations of arguments, and papers that are proposing standards for exchanging information associated with argumentation so that different systems can work together. We are also pleased to include some papers that reportpracticalworkingtoolsforcomputationalargumentation. We would like to thank the programme committee who did an excellent job in se- lecting the 37 papers in this volume from the 60 papers that were originally submit- ted.WewouldalsoliketothanktheLocalOrganizationCommittee(i.e.LeilaAmgoud, Claudette Cayrol, Véronique Debats, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Jérôme Men- gin,LaurentPerrussel,andHenriPrade)forallthehardworktheyputintomakingthe conferenceasuccess. March2008 PhilippeBesnard(ConferenceChair) SylvieDoutre(LocalOrganizationChair) AnthonyHunter(ProgrammeChair) vi Programme Committee LeilaAmgoud(CNRSToulouse) RonLoui(Washington) PietroBaroni(Brescia) NicolasMaudet(Paris-Dauphine) TrevorBench-Capon(Liverpool) PeterMcBurney(Liverpool) GerhardBrewka(Leipzig) JérômeMengin(Toulouse) SimonBuckinghamShum(OpenUniv.) SanjayModgil(King’sCollegeLondon) MartinCaminada(Luxembourg) TimNorman(Aberdeen) ClaudetteCayrol(Toulouse) SimonParsons(CityUniv.ofNewYork) CarlosChesñevar(Univ.NacionaldelSur) HenriPrade(CNRSToulouse) SylvieCoste(Artois) HenryPrakken(Utrecht&Groningen) PhanMinhDung(AsianInst.ofTechnologies) IyadRahwan(BritishUniv.inDubai) PaulE.Dunne(Liverpool) ChrisReed(Dundee) JohnFox(Oxford) GuillermoSimari(Univ.NacionaldelSur) MassimilianoGiacomin(Brescia) FrancescaToni(ImperialCollegeLondon) TomGordon(FraunhoferFOKUS) PaoloTorroni(Bologna) FlorianaGrasso(Liverpool) BartVerheij(Groningen) AntonisKakas(Cyprus) GerardVreeswijk(Utrecht) GabrieleKern-Isberner(Dortmund) DougWalton(Winnipeg) PaulKrause(Surrey) MichaelWooldridge(Liverpool) vii Contents Preface v Philippe Besnard, Sylvie Doutre and Anthony Hunter Programme Committee vi A Level-Based Approach to Computing Warranted Arguments in Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming 1 Teresa Alsinet, Carlos Chesñevar and Lluís Godo Measures for Persuasion Dialogs: A Preliminary Investigation 13 Leila Amgoud and Florence Dupin De Saint Cyr Resolution-Based Argumentation Semantics 25 Pietro Baroni and Massimiliano Giacomin A Systematic Classification of Argumentation Frameworks Where Semantics Agree 37 Pietro Baroni and Massimiliano Giacomin Asking the Right Question: Forcing Commitment in Examination Dialogues 49 Trevor J.M. Bench-Capon, Sylvie Doutre and Paul E. Dunne Ontological Foundations for Scholarly Debate Mapping Technology 61 Neil Benn, Simon Buckingham Shum, John Domingue and Clara Mancini Investigating Stories in a Formal Dialogue Game 73 Floris Bex and Henry Prakken Modeling Persuasiveness: Change of Uncertainty Through Agents’ Interactions 85 Katarzyna Budzyńska, Magdalena Kacprzak and Paweł Rembelski Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation 97 Simon Buckingham Shum On the Issue of Contraposition of Defeasible Rules 109 Martin Caminada Political Engagement Through Tools for Argumentation 116 Dan Cartwright and Katie Atkinson A Computational Model of Argumentation in Everyday Conversation: A Problem-Centred Approach 128 Jean-Louis Dessalles Towards Argumentation-Based Contract Negotiation 134 Phan Minh Dung, Phan Minh Thang and Francesca Toni The Computational Complexity of Ideal Semantics I: Abstract Argumentation Frameworks 147 Paul E. Dunne viii Focused Search for Arguments from Propositional Knowledge 159 Vasiliki Efstathiou and Anthony Hunter Decision Rules and Arguments in Defeasible Decision Making 171 Edgardo Ferretti, Marcelo L. Errecalde, Alejandro J. García and Guillermo R. Simari Hybrid Argumentation and Its Properties 183 Dorian Gaertner and Francesca Toni Requirements for Reflective Argument Visualization Tools: A Case for Using Validity as a Normative Standard 196 Michael H.G. Hoffmann Argumentation Using Temporal Knowledge 204 Nicholas Mann and Anthony Hunter Strong and Weak Forms of Abstract Argument Defense 216 Diego C. Martínez, Alejandro J. García and Guillermo R. Simari Basic Influence Diagrams and the Liberal Stable Semantics 228 Paul-Amaury Matt and Francesca Toni Integrating Object and Meta-Level Value Based Argumentation 240 Sanjay Modgil and Trevor Bench-Capon Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs 252 Sanjay Modgil and Henry Prakken A Methodology for Action-Selection Using Value-Based Argumentation 264 Fahd Saud Nawwab, Trevor Bench-Capon and Paul E. Dunne Semantics for Evidence-Based Argumentation 276 Nir Oren and Timothy J. Norman Argument Schemes and Critical Questions for Decision Aiding Process 285 Wassila Ouerdane, Nicolas Maudet and Alexis Tsoukias Arguments in OWL: A Progress Report 297 Iyad Rahwan and Bita Banihashemi + AIF : Dialogue in the Argument Interchange Format 311 Chris Reed, Simon Wells, Joseph Devereux and Glenn Rowe Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game-Theoretical Investigation 324 Régis Riveret, Henry Prakken, Antonino Rotolo and Giovanni Sartor Argument Theory Change: Revision Upon Warrant 336 Nicolás D. Rotstein, Martín O. Moguillansky, Marcelo A. Falappa, Alejandro J. García and Guillermo R. Simari Diagramming the Argument Interchange Format 348 Glenn Rowe and Chris Reed Dungine: A Java Dung Reasoner 360 Matthew South, Gerard Vreeswijk and John Fox ix Agent Dialogue as Partial Uncertain Argumentation and Its Fixpoint Semantics 369 Takayoshi Suzuki and Hajime Sawamura A Distributed Argumentation Framework Using Defeasible Logic Programming 381 Matthias Thimm and Gabriele Kern-Isberner On the Relationship of Defeasible Argumentation and Answer Set Programming 393 Matthias Thimm and Gabriele Kern-Isberner Arguments from Experience: The PADUA Protocol 405 Maya Wardeh, Trevor Bench-Capon and Frans Coenen Modelling Judicial Context in Argumentation Frameworks 417 Adam Wyner and Trevor Bench-Capon Author Index 429

Description:
This volume of Computational Models of Argument focuses on the aim to develop software tools to assist users in constructing and evaluating arguments and counterarguments and/or to develop automated systems for constructing and evaluating arguments and counterarguments. Some articles provide a valua
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.