ebook img

West Mojave Route network project : final California Desert Conservation Plan amendment and supplemental environmental impact statement for the California Desert District PDF

2019·5.3 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview West Mojave Route network project : final California Desert Conservation Plan amendment and supplemental environmental impact statement for the California Desert District

Designated Applicable Proposed Proposed Proposed WEMO Route # &/or Length 43 CFR Asset Designation Subdesignation Designation Decision Justification and Impact Minimization ID CN # &/or (Miles) 8342.1 Classification Alternative 5 Alternative 5 route name Section Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   18 865471 0.0841 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   20 865468 0.25972 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   27 887160 0.3804 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   28 TBD 1.39243 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after   review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have   been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated   travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking   Primitive   (a),  (b),   and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  29 884798 0.4077 Road:  Primary Motorized None (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   32 887155 4.20084 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Designated Applicable Proposed Proposed Proposed WEMO Route # &/or Length 43 CFR Asset Designation Subdesignation Designation Decision Justification and Impact Minimization ID CN # &/or (Miles) 8342.1 Classification Alternative 5 Alternative 5 route name Section This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after  review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have   been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated   travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking   Primitive  (a),  (b),   and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  34 SC69,  887361 1.98106 Road:  Primary Motorized None (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after   review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have   been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated   travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking   Primitive  (a),  (b),   and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  35 TBD 0.46519 Road:  Primary Motorized None (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after  review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  LA2,  887154,  been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated  2nd  Los   travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking  Angeles  Primitive  (a),  (b),   and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  36 Aqueduct  Rd 9.93435 Road:  Primary Motorized None (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  Translinear  Translinear  (a),  (b),  classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,  37 887363 1.21755 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Designated Applicable Proposed Proposed Proposed WEMO Route # &/or Length 43 CFR Asset Designation Subdesignation Designation Decision Justification and Impact Minimization ID CN # &/or (Miles) 8342.1 Classification Alternative 5 Alternative 5 route name Section This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after   review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have   been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated   travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking   Primitive  (a),  (b),   and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  38 TBD 0.06992 Road:  Primary Motorized None (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   39 TBD 0.05511 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   40 887419 0.51255 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after   review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have   been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated   travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking   Primitive   (a),  (b),   and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  41 887360 4.54041 Road:  Primary Motorized None (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   42 TBD 0.21528 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Designated Applicable Proposed Proposed Proposed WEMO Route # &/or Length 43 CFR Asset Designation Subdesignation Designation Decision Justification and Impact Minimization ID CN # &/or (Miles) 8342.1 Classification Alternative 5 Alternative 5 route name Section Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   43 887481 2.40016 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   44 SC50,  887356 1.07878 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   45 TBD 1.66881 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   46 887447 0.84877 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   47 887351 0.17457 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after   review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have   been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated   travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking   Primitive   (a),  (b),   and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  48 MK14 0.45895 Road:  Primary Motorized None (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. Designated Applicable Proposed Proposed Proposed WEMO Route # &/or Length 43 CFR Asset Designation Subdesignation Designation Decision Justification and Impact Minimization ID CN # &/or (Miles) 8342.1 Classification Alternative 5 Alternative 5 route name Section Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   49 TBD 0.18947 Disturbance Disturbance None (a),  (b),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   50 885517 1.61713 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   51 887164 0.14557 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  Translinear   Translinear   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   52 TBD 0.07412 Disturbance Disturbance None (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  Translinear   Translinear   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,  53 TBD 0.18402 Disturbance Disturbance None (a),  (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  Translinear  Translinear  classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,  54 TBD 0.13342 Disturbance Disturbance None (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Designated Applicable Proposed Proposed Proposed WEMO Route # &/or Length 43 CFR Asset Designation Subdesignation Designation Decision Justification and Impact Minimization ID CN # &/or (Miles) 8342.1 Classification Alternative 5 Alternative 5 route name Section This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after   review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have   been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated   travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking   Primitive  and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  55 TBD 0.2786 Road:  Primary Motorized None (a),  (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   56 TBD 0.30255 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   57 885422 0.00137 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,  58 TBD 0.20075 Disturbance Disturbance None (a),  (b),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after  review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated   travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking  Primitive  and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  59 TBD 0.24262 Road:  Primary Motorized None (b),  (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. Designated Applicable Proposed Proposed Proposed WEMO Route # &/or Length 43 CFR Asset Designation Subdesignation Designation Decision Justification and Impact Minimization ID CN # &/or (Miles) 8342.1 Classification Alternative 5 Alternative 5 route name Section Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   60 885700 3.43692 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after   review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have   been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated   travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking   Primitive   and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  61 MK90 0.25384 Road:  Primary Motorized None (b),  (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),  classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,  62 885519 0.12541 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use  consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after  review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have   been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated   travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking   Primitive  (a),  (b),  and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  63 887355 1.31433 Road:  Primary Motorized None (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   64 TBD 3.5172 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Designated Applicable Proposed Proposed Proposed WEMO Route # &/or Length 43 CFR Asset Designation Subdesignation Designation Decision Justification and Impact Minimization ID CN # &/or (Miles) 8342.1 Classification Alternative 5 Alternative 5 route name Section Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   65 TBD 0.59355 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   66 885638 0.52925 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   67 887416 0.47288 Disturbance Disturbance None (a),  (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   68 887483 5.23311 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   69 885640 0.72303 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   70 885655 1.36377 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   71 885691 2.25003 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Designated Applicable Proposed Proposed Proposed WEMO Route # &/or Length 43 CFR Asset Designation Subdesignation Designation Decision Justification and Impact Minimization ID CN # &/or (Miles) 8342.1 Classification Alternative 5 Alternative 5 route name Section This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after  review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have   been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated  travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking   SC228,  Primitive  (a),  (b),   and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  72 885673 2.76603 Road:  Primary Motorized None (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   73 885658 0.69118 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   74 TBD 0.04048 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),  classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   75 885660 0.15327 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),  classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,  76 885690 0.89529 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Designated Applicable Proposed Proposed Proposed WEMO Route # &/or Length 43 CFR Asset Designation Subdesignation Designation Decision Justification and Impact Minimization ID CN # &/or (Miles) 8342.1 Classification Alternative 5 Alternative 5 route name Section This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501  and  Section  601  (4),  after   review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have   been  minimized  by  implementation  of  the  components  of  the  associated   LA1,  887482,  travel  management  plan,  imposing  restrictions  on  the  stopping,  parking   Los  Angeles  Primitive   (a),  (b),   and  camping  distance,  limiting  the  extent  of  potential  disturbance  created  77 Aqueduct  Rd 9.44983 Road:  Primary Motorized None (c),  (d) by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  Translinear   Translinear   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   78 TBD 0.81311 Disturbance Disturbance None (a),  (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. This  segment  has  been  determined  to  be  appropriate  for  motorized  use   consistent  with  FLPMA  Section  302a,  Section  501,  and  Section  601  (4),   after  review  of  relevant  factors.  Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by  adding  subdesignations,  and  implementation  of   the  components  of  the  associated  travel  management  plan,  resulting  in  a  Primitive  (a),  (b),   reduction  in  intensity  of  use  and  providing  additional  management  control   79 TBD 0.75317 Road:  Primary Motorized ATV\UTV (c),  (d) over  users. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   80 TBD 0.41638 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment. Impacts  to  the  aforementioned  resources  have  been  minimized  by   Translinear   Translinear   (a),  (b),   classification  of  the  segment  as  a  Transportation  Linear  Disturbance,   81 TBD 1.04377 Disturbance Disturbance None (c),  (d) eliminating  potential  impacts  created  by  use  of  the  segment.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.