Trans Dimensional Unified Field Theory - The Anderson Institute

270 Pages·2010·2.43 MB·English

by  George James Ducas

G J D
EORGE AMES UCAS

Trans-Dimensional
Unified Field Theory ©
Physics Theory
A Theory that Advances the Unification of Relativity with Quantum
Mechanics and String Theory

1974-2010
D AL L AS, T EX AS, U S A
Trans-Dimensional Unified Field Theory

Please review the following theory. It explains the matrix and periodic table of a multi-
dimensional universe.

Introduction

Our universe is a multidimensional universe where processes and procedures involving natural
physics relate and exist simultaneously in multiple dimensions. Natural occurrences are
multidimensional. Historically we identify our existence within three dimensions or vectors of
space. However, the matrix of space needs to be redefined as a periodic table of "components" or
"vectors" which build up space-time and relate all physics within the relationship of space
"component vectors" and "component matrixes". For simplification these components will be
called "components or vectors", not to be understood as our modern use of the term energy. The
basic building blocks of space "vectors" are velocity (V), time (T), and dimension (D), which
will also be defined later as superstrings. Each represents a separate vector or component, the
basic of these components is D or dimension, and from this all the relationships of physics are
established by its combination with velocity and time, and multiplications of said components.
This theory proposes to unite all of physics within a unified field of mathematical relationships,
building on the components of velocity, time, and dimension. When these components are
combined in various dimensional states, they form the more complex systems of natural
occurring phenomena of physics. Hence, the Universe is defined by Trans Dimensional Unified
Field Theory, where components can be explained in terms of mathematical relationships to the
same or other components, and its action and existence acts simultaneously in different
dimensional planes.

The composition of the natural order of this universe is founded upon on basic vectors VT or
components that are repeatedly added or better “multiplied” in each dimension D^N and
properties altered by such combinations. A single alteration or multiplication of VT to a higher
dimension is a minute step that increases the degree of complexity of the properties of that
combination or dimension. This will be explained and expressed below by a periodic table of
composition. Evolution in complexity of components and dimensions is the nature of
the dynamic universe, and also in the basic structure of space. The philosophy of composition
from basic elements to complexity is a universal principle.

The rules of a Trans Dimensional Unified Field Universe are as follows:

1.) Basic components (superstrings) or vectors are combined and properties altered in steps
to form simple to more complex systems by multiplying a VT to each successive and
higher dimension. This is one of the periodicities of this theory. VT or D is the “thing”
that everything is made from. If there is a God particle, it is superstring D.

2.) All naturally occurring phenomenon and components is representative of basic
mathematical relationships that are connected via unified field of physics-mathematics.

2
3.) All natural phenomena and components in the construct of space-time are related and can
be explained mathematically.

4.) The universe is a multi-dimensional world where processes can be studied and viewed
simultaneously in space-time.

5.) All dimensions exist in stability, and hence their effects are experienced as naturally
occurring events.

6.) Space and matter are symbiotic, additive, and stable, where one coexists with the other.
Space is proportionately related to matter by the cube root. So to divide the matter nearly
doubles the space by proportion. Matter generates a force. Space generates a force.
Matter creates space. Space creates matter.

7.) C is a limiting factor for all dimensional relationships and represents balance in the
universe. C represents the elastic collision of D^3. Space is an elastic superconductor.

8.) An expanding universe suggests the "big bang" or creation is still in process. An
expanding universe is explained by space as components created or related to matter.

9.) The universe is a mechanical process analogous to cellular growth where divisions in
matter accelerate the expansion of the universe.

10.) A dimension is so by reference to another and including something of the other. In the
case of the theory I propose a dimension is tied to another by relationship or mathematics,
and in this case, by a defined order or set of rules. Basic superstrings V, T, and D are
multiplied dimension per dimension and create varied properties from simplicity (low
energy and dimension) to complexity (high energy and dimension).

The Periodic Table of the Universe Energies and Dimensional Relationships

D^1 = VT: Dimension 1 represents a vector of velocity and a vector of time working together in
complementary balance or polarity. As demonstrated in relative physics, velocity is inversely
proportional to time, with the constant C or the speed of light as the limiting factor. So as time
increases, velocity diminishes. Time is a polar velocity. The basic building elements of the
universe are the constant C for velocity of light and D. Space (D^3 in 3 dimensions) constitutes
the building block of all elements, components, and matrixes. Hence D^1 = CT.

By space I mean space as several applications, D^1 is space in dimension 1, D^2 are space as
area and D^3 are volumetric space. Space D^3 is a limited extent in 1, 2 or 3 dimensions. To
understand these dimensions 1 through to 3, you have to know that in each a component of VT is
multiplied. The addition of these components vastly changes the nature of the resultant, yet, it is
possible to understand the most complex components in terms if the simplest working back
through the dimensions. This unified theory takes you from simplicity to complexity in 23 steps,
and in doing so; you never really get away from the simple while explaining the complex. That
makes it all the more challenge in understanding all the steps and what is suggested. Just as

3
revolutionary as E=MC^2, is D^5=MC^2, or M=D^3T^2, so mass is explained as volume, time,
velocity, going up in dimensions we see mass related to electricity, and a whole host of
subatomic nuclear events. These components and their relationships, although invisible, create
the particles that we see.

D^10 is gravity as volume, which induces by rotational motion D^7 gravity as density, which
also I might add is related to the force of an object in D^4. D^10 induces D^7, so then I
interpreted circular (area) motion of an electron in a helical orbit to generate gravity. The task is
in the interpretation. The qualities if Gravity extend to a black hole in D^20 where gravity is
squared (G^2). It may be that the highest dimension is D^21 where the Force of E^4 is
singularity.

Also remember that as we add VT to each dimension, new units need to be created. Take for
Example D/T=V. We know that Distance/Time = Velocity. Now M = D^3*T^2. If I only knew
D and T, what is to tell me what the combinations of those are, namely M is mass? So you see, as
we progress up the scale, it will be a discovery to create new units, because by each dimension
up, the nature of the dimension changes drastically the properties of that dimension, even to the
point at first glance you might say, they are not related, but they are. And by the discovery that
they are, the true physics emerges, and understanding of how the most remote concepts and
phenomena are connected.
The analogy of the atom (neutron, proton, electron, three parts in one) is to show D as neutral. D
is space in one dimension, and in three dimensions D is volumetric space. I would go on to
describe space as any combination of powers of D such as vector (D), area (D^2), and volume
(D^3) and continuing up. Just as I describe gravity as vector, area, and volume, which is the
same as a gravitational vector (force), area, and volume, I can do so for other concepts. As we
know, space, time, and velocity are all related, and at the most basic level, they are connected.
As a concept I imagine D=CT, where T can be converted to D multiplied by constant C. So D
and T are equivalent just like matter and energy is traditionally viewed. V and T are inversely
proportional, when one increases the other decreases. I like to call that polar, yet acting together.
D and T are different manifestations of the same thing. Very small amounts of time can be
converted to very large amounts of D and vice versa. This is particularly true in hyperspace to be
discussed later.

The relation of V and T means if you have motion, you have time. You can understand the
relationship of these more clearly by the concept of induction by rotation in this theory. The
rotation of T^4 induces T^1. T^4 includes space, so the rotation of D^3 (space) induces T. V^4
induces V^1, V^4=D^3*A/T^2, and interpreted I understand that the rotation and acceleration of
space induces V. So the difference in V and T is solely due to rate of change. In the first instance
its D affected by V to induce time, and in the second it’s D affected by T to induce velocity.

How to see this visually: Well the D particle is neutral and does it incorporate circular motion in
this picture as it appears that everything we see or imagine has this characteristic? Yes! Perhaps
all components are related by rotational motion. Or perhaps this D is a line or a string, spinning
or rotating on itself like a sphere, while inducing T or another line or string like a sphere that is

4
also rotating and produces a third string that is related to the other two which we call V? Yes!
We may have a geometry of 3 intersecting spheres which induces 3 dimensional space in D^3
and is the construction of space, which is similar to the tetrahedral structures used by
Buckminster Fuller. These geometries may subdivide into higher complexity in the higher
dimensions. D^3 dimension may allow both Cartesian and radial geometries by the relationship
of geometries of three combinations of 3 (D^3), which is three combinations of VT (D=VT) or
nine intersecting and rotating strings. D^3 and consecutive dimensions upwards may be fractal
geometries and the geometries of space. D, T, and V are the three basic superstrings, and when
combined in 3 dimensions and also in positive, negative, and neutral results in 27 strings for D^3
in a tetrahedral arrangement. Strings form the construct of space. Space in interference and
packed rotating spherical geometries produces particles.

I would better prefer imagining 2 vectors together VT and the combination of those we call D to
simplify the balance of polar components or polarity and for the sake of simple discussion. Then
I can imagine space more in a Cartesian way rather than spherical, but the geometric
combination of three appears to be tetrahedral and multiple. Their nature may allow various
geometries to superimpose over another.
Meaning of a Dimension

By dimension I mean the VT (Velocity*Time) or powers thereof, not items selected as different
like mass. So D^5=MC^2 means that there are 5 dimensions of VT. Each dimension increases by
a power of VT. The periodicity of the dimensions here is the increase or multiplication of
dimension per dimension, and also as they do, create the complexity of different phenomena we
know, but are all related. There are other periodicities that will be discussed later. When Einstein
said mass and energy are different manifestations of the same “thing”, he did not say what the
"thing" was, but he used the word "thing", which is a half solution and not very scientific. Now I
propose to you that the "thing" is VT (Velocity*Time). Mass and Energy are different
manifestations of V (Velocity) and T (Time). VT is the “thing” from which everything is made.
If Einstein realized this, he would have had his unified field theory. The construct of all that
exists is a manifestation of motion. All dimensions are distance or spatial dimensions. The point
of talking about VT is equivalency. Now you can talk about mass (M) in terms of D, V, and T,
where before you talked about mass as M with its separate and unique units such as kg. In this
theory you can define everything by superstrings V, T, and D, from mass to gravity and beyond.
The point of VT is that it is the multiplier dimension per dimension, and creating vastly different
characteristics as we move up, so much so that upon inspection, they may seem unrelated.
Other equations for D^1 is as follows:
D^1 = A (acceleration)*Density
D^2 =VTVT = V^2 (squared) T^2 (squared): This 2nd dimension represents 2 components of
VT acting in 2 directions as in an area.

D^3 =VTVTVT = V^3 (cubed) T^3 (cubed) = A^3 (acceleration)*Density^3: This represents the
third dimension where we experience movement in three dimensions, with components of

5
velocity and time also in three dimensions. Movement in all directions is allowed by a radial and
spherical tetrahedral space matrix.

D^4 = VTVTVTVT = F = MA = A^3(acceleration)*D*Density^3: The fourth dimension is
represented by VT acting on the third dimension. This VT on the third dimension is essentially a
resultant force. So the fourth dimension is force or forces. This is not to be mistaken with gravity
as naturally occurring phenomena which Newtonian physics has done. D^4=MA, which means
that force is a dimensional property or a space field property. I believe that when 2 more strings
of space are added in three dimensions, you get asymmetry in the field of space which causes the
force to be.

D^5 = VTVTVTVTVT = MV^2 (squared) = E: This is MV^2 (squared) typically identified as
Kinetic Energy, however, I will explain this "MV^2 squared" as a specific scientific relationship,
and the word "components" is now used liberally to replace my word "energies". All elements
within this table are to be considered components. Here we can associate the equation with
MC^2 (squared), but it is a 5 dimensional phenomena. I am exchanging E for D^5 to fifth power,
correcting Einstein if you will. You cannot have a unified field theory by presenting parts. Even
so a theory is an idea that needs to be tested and from it you establish laws. A law would be D^5
to 5th power = MC^2 squared. Let’s use D^5 instead of E. The units are in kg meters and
seconds, when you calculate D it is in meters. C is in meters and seconds. Take the equation
D^5=MC^2 and calculate D for the mass of the sun to measure the extent of D or space vector.
So run the numbers, mass of the sun, speed of light, and you have a distance D near to Neptune’s
orbit. That’s the whole point of the theory, it combines everything in the equations and notice
that in each dimension you add a V and a T, a periodic table, you add dimensional vectors. The
correct equation is D^5 5th power = MV^2 squared, but I use the limit C to determine a
maximum. The fact that one might say the units don't go together is what's puzzling, they do and
the relationships have been redefined. Suffice it to say since everything is a subset of one string
D, the units can all be thrown out and express in magnitude until more accurate labels for units
are derived.

A joule is a force of one Newton moving one meter. In this theory D^4 = MA; so D^5 = D^4
(force) * Distance (meter); so a question about units should now move down to D^4=MA. There
is no mystery then in D^5, but the task is to reevaluate MA or Mass in terms of distance, time,
and velocity, and when you get there, you have the strings that make up all matter and correct
units expressed.

There are three strings that are distance, time, and velocity; these 3 combine to form all space
and all matter, and they are transparent until they superimpose, and the interference patterns of
special superposition are the particles that we see. The relationship of string-dimensions is also
mathematical in inter-dimensional relationships. Particles are the minor portion of reality.

A basic idea of this theory was to reinterpret mass mathematically into more basic component of
space, if it was possible. As you jump from dimension to dimension, the "nature" of the units of
each dimension varies drastically. Then you have the questions surrounding units such as the
joule for D^5, which is a typical and fundamental question of a unified field theory; why does
the "nature" of units vary so much from simplicity to complexity? This is a mystery in physics,

6
but also the same happens similarly in the periodic table of elements though perhaps, as in the
periodic table, instead of addition perhaps multiplication was the ladder to complexity, and the
component was velocity and time, VT (D). So to get to D^4, conceptually I thought of a vector
VT (D) in space D^3, and got D^4=ma. D^5=mv^2 was a naturals step, then came D^5=mc^2.
Distance is in meters and mass in kilograms.
D^6 = F*D^2 (squared) = VTVTVTVTVTVT: force acting over an area is magnetism. As an
electron is moving, the subsequent magnetic field acts over an area.

D^7 = F*D^3 (cubed) = VTVTVTVTVTVTVT: The 7th dimension is force acting on the third
dimension, which is gravity density. This is a naturally occurring force.

So for the seventh dimension, an explaining equation will be G (gravity density) = F (force) D^3
(cubed) or F V (volume) = Gravity Density

From FV=G (density) we can determine the F or force of gravity (G density) and volume (V) are
inversely proportional. Hence F is inversely proportional to 1/volume. To understand these
equations correctly, remember that components on the same line of an equation are inversely
proportional and directly proportional when divided.

So if the earth there is a 100 pound person, and we know that Saturn has a gravity/mass 95 times
of earth, and a volume 769 times the earth, from this equation we can calculate the weight of a
man 100 pounds on earth to be 108 on Saturn.

95 inversely proportional to 1/769 = 0.1235
95 inversely proportional to 1/.1235 = 8.0

100 pounds > 108 pounds by the ratio........So the equation has demonstrated the relationship of
volume to gravity, that gravity diminishes in proportion to the volume of a planet when the mass
is constant. By these equations gravity is related to the diameter of the planet, and came up with
the weight of a man on Saturn. Saturn is near the gravity of the earth, and is related by density
and diameter and expressed here as a vector.

Now my gravity equation was arrived at by progression, D^7 = F * Volume (D^3) or
gravitational density, now is this not a more complete understanding of gravity, a naturally
occurring force in space. With that assumption I get a relationship that tells me that gravity is
influenced by volume, mass, acceleration. The current gravity equations need to be rewritten in
terms of observable components, like real entities of physics, not abstract things like radius.
Using radius is like describing atoms in terms of half electrons...and to go further, what about the
connection to electricity, magnetism, and so on. If you don't have a pure or true equation, you'll
never have a unified field theory. You have to eliminate all the abstract shortcuts like radius, but
talk in real terms such as volumes. Now if you run the equations, you find that “gravity density”
for Saturn is approximately 8000 times greater than the earth, attributed to 2 things, the first is
the volume of the planet, and the second is the mass. These 2 variables are density. Small g or a
as I call it A (the component of acceleration) is nearly the same. At D^10 we find the true value

7
for gravity volume or energy, then D^7 becomes the density and D^4 the force. And by ratio we
can establish the relative gravity vectors between planets. But the true nature of gravity is
something much larger and multidimensional, and has a force component in this dimension.
What is true in a larger dimension has a three dimensional shadow and for gravity in this
dimension it is force.

So you ask, how to apply, well this theory will explain the true relationships, from which you can
derive the Newtonian rules of thumb or secondary equations to run comparative analysis. The
equations are connected, and can be, but the understanding of them depends on use. The
equations will reveal avenues of research. I think the gravity equations presented here fully
explain gravity and tell me volume is a component, and mass, and acceleration and how it is
reinterpreted in various dimensions.
The dimensions keep rising in relationship to further complexities

D^8 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT: The 8th dimension is F^2 (squared) which I associate with
mechanical-chemical reactions; or MV^2 (squared) acting on D^3 (cubed) or third dimension.
This could be associated with nuclear forces that hold matter together. Kinetic energy in three
dimensions is also an issue here since it combines D^5 or 5th dimension (MV^2 squared) with
D^3 or third dimension (D cubed).

D^9 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT: The 9th dimension is magnetism D^6 acting on D^3
(cubed) which is related to electricity. This is also E * F or force of energy.

D^10 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT: 10th dimension is MV^2 (squared) to an additional
(squared), or E^2 (squared), which could be a nuclear reaction or kinetic nuclear orbital motion.
Associated with this is electromagnetic force or D^4 or fourth dimension acting with D^6 or
sixth dimension (magnetism). This could be electromagnetic force due to orbiting electrons.
What we measure as gravity is what we find useful. I think gravity goes beyond the way it is
understood. I believe that the nature of gravity is different in its various dimensional states.
Gravity has components of mass, acceleration, volume according to this theory, so it is more than
force here. Acting in three dimensions Gravity is E^2. The density component of gravity (D^7) is
8000 times on Saturn than the Earth. The force component is what we know about gravity, which
is very limited. The value of acceleration or what you know as g is nearly the same due to
density. Why does Saturn have so many moons? Could it be that all the moons are because of the
larger component of volumetric gravity in D^10? And such a component would be very large
and far reaching, as gravity is. Perhaps also contributing to its additive strength as mass
accumulates. And also something so large would be far reaching even with an inverse square
law. I did say volumetric gravity is energy squared. E^2 = D^10 = Gravity (D^7) * D^3 (space),
E would be a kinetic linear line or orbit, perhaps E^2 is circular orbital motion along with a
pattern of small circles as in a helical orbit in 3d. So the Energy is acting across an area(s) as it
moves in 3d. What I am trying to explain is that there may be multiple levels in understanding
Gravity. I do believe the understanding of gravity and relationship to electricity has to do with
understanding the orbits of the electrons around a nucleus. When we normally think of a particle,
we think it has components that interact with other particles. So the relationship of particles

8
causes the actions, but what if the relationship of actions results in the particle. Perhaps the
interaction of components or the interface of these is the particle, so opposite to our current
thinking, the actions create the particle rather than the particle creates the actions. So the forces
between the mass creates the particle rather than vice versa. So what is D, well it is a component
that by relationship creates mass or the thing we see. At the most basic level D is T or Time, and
balanced with V. Components balanced or inversely proportional exist together perhaps as
polarity or polar-balanced vector. Opposite sides of a coin is a model. I think of Time as a
velocity in polarity with Velocity, as a balancing counter motion. And Distance nearly the same
as Time, but where the 2 meet or at the border. Time is compressed Distance; D^1 = C*T; Just
like Mass is compressed Energy. Now to jump to a wilder thought, maybe each D dimension is a
particle or at least particles may be linked to these equations somehow as interfaces. I don’t
claim to be absolutely correct, but I believe I am asking the right questions.

D^7 = Space (D^3) * Force (D^4).........or mass*acceleration* D^3. So you have a factor of
density in gravity. Gravity at this level is a vector, interpreting force as a vector. Here force and
volume are inversely proportional as mentioned before.

D^10 = Gravity* D^3 is volumetric and could be in consideration of gravity beyond its source as
a volume through space and its effect far away. When the components are on the same line in an
equation, they are inversely proportional. So, D^10=D^4 (force) * Volume^2(D^6) ...Hence
gravitational force is inversely proportional to Volume^2= (D^3) ^2.

Other Equations for D^10 are as follows:

1.) D^10 = M^3*A/Density^2
2.) D^10 = A^4*Density^2*M^2
3.) D^10 = F*Volume^2
4.) D^10 = A^4*Density^4*Volme^2

D^11 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT: The 11th dimension is gravitational force (D^7
or seventh dimension) in Four Dimensions (D^4) or Force. D^11 = D^8 * D^3 could be chemical
reaction in space that induces D^8.

D^12 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT: The 12th dimension is Dimension 8 or nuclear
force acting in D^4 or Fourth Dimension or Force F. This F is also:

Gravity (D^7) and Kinetic Energy (D^5) = Magnetism (D^9) and Space (D^3).

Magnetism (D^9) = Gravity (D^7) * D2 = Gravity (D^7) * V^2T^2; T^2 Squared = Density or
Magnetism (D^9) = Gravity (D^7) * C^2 Squared * Density which implies that electricity can be
harvested from a gravitational field in vast quantities. There could be free energy in unlimited
amounts for all.

D^12 induces D^9 is Electricity inducing Magnetism respectively.

9
D^13 = VTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVT = Magnetism (D^9) * Force (D^4) which is
equivalent to electromagnetic force.

The dimensions keep rising and I suppose represent more complex and fundamental forces
acting at the subatomic level. The higher the dimension the greater the kinetic energy required in
the system. Kinetic Energy in the universe is rotational, and when transferred into linear motion
is great relative to our experience. But when contained in stable rotational paths, particles exist in
harmonious relationship at the subatomic level, and also in relation to planetary. Hence to take
matter and break it up in a supercollider is to go from higher dimensions (subatomic) to lower
dimensions (exo-atomic), the lowest particle is space fabric or D. So it may seem a waste of
energy to use high amounts of energy to bring us from high dimensional subatomic to the
smallest particle which is space or D of the 1st dimension. But I believe that is where the
analysis of supercollider will lead.

Dimension^23 would be

D^23 = E^4 (4th power) * D^3 or what I call the force of energy E^4 in the third dimension,
which perhaps might be the end of the periodic chart. This table leaves out the physics of
polarity, which includes antimatter and subsequent relationships opposite to the balance or
natural construct of nature that we experience in the universe of 23 dimensions. To discover
these polarities would be the door to time travel and anti-gravity. A black hole would be the most
complex arrangement of space at D^23 = E^4 * D^3, which means that D^23 = Gravity^2 * D^3.
This means to me that the amount of energy is increased by a power of 4, and gravity by the
power of 2. Gravity is accelerating in space and the resultant energy is enormous. The geometry
of space is accelerating into the black hole, and thus pulling the fabric of space (the medium
through which light travels) away from you. Hence it is black since the medium through which
light travels or space (D^3) is falling away faster than light moves through it to get out of the
black hole. There is order even in a black hole. We might assume that higher dimensions are
higher spatial densities. And so the dimensions progress from D^23 to D^1, in an ordered
relationship of physics, hence we can conclude that where there are generators of space, there are
black holes that generate space, maybe even in each atom, center of galaxy, and planet. The
universe is from singularity to singularity, from the singularity of D^1 to the infinite singularity
of D^23.

This universe is a particular qualification of infinity. And perhaps here the space matrix is in its
highest superposition and fractal pattern approaching infinity. This is either a point of fractal
subdivision toward infinity. Here E^4 = Gravity^2 or E^2 = Gravity. The very nature of a black
hole suggests that the space generated by its great mass at E^4 could be generating space and
gravitational field at a value square compared to a natural star.

Black Hole

A Black hole is the superposition of space in 23 dimensions. At this level, and as has been
discussed, the amount of energy is increased by a power of 4, and gravity by a power of 2. Hence
the normal manner of estimating gravity, generation of space, and energy has changed. Space has
compressed to limits where the strings that make up the matrix of space are in geometry of the

10