Copyright by Melissa Dae Murphy 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Melissa Dae Murphy certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: THE ROLE OF TYPOLOGICAL DRIFT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROMANCE SUBJUNCTIVE: A STUDY IN WORD-ORDER CHANGE, GRAMMATICALIZATION AND SYNTHESIS Committee: ____________________________________ Brigitte L. M. Bauer, Supervisor ____________________________________ Frederick Hensey, Supervisor ____________________________________ Chiyo Nishida ____________________________________ Knud Lambrecht ____________________________________ Máximo R. Salaberry THE ROLE OF TYPOLOGICAL DRIFT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROMANCE SUBJUNCTIVE: A STUDY IN WORD-ORDER CHANGE, GRAMMATICALIZATION AND SYNTHESIS by Melissa Dae Murphy, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2008 3324483 3324483 2008 For my family Acknowledgements I consider myself extremely fortunate to have been influenced by a wide range of academic experiences and would like to thank the people who, over the years, have contributed in some way to the achievement of this goal. First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Brigitte L.M. Bauer. As my dissertation supervisor, she continuously provided thoughtful comments and suggestions, yet always encouraged me to work independently, developing my own hypotheses and reaching my own conclusions. I truly believe this process has been much more meaningful as a result. Brigitte has been incredibly generous with her time, both while in the Netherlands and while in the United States. I am extremely indebted to her for her guidance and support. I would also like to thank my co-supervisor, Frederick Hensey, for his energetic enthusiasm toward my somewhat unconventional topic; it is greatly appreciated. Many thanks also go to Knud Lambrecht, for his attention to detail and constant willingness to provide valuable feedback, and to Chiyo Nishida and Rafael Salaberry, who offered perspectives that were extremely useful during the revision of my final manuscript. Finally, I would like to acknowledge several professors who have made an impact on me over the years. Special thanks go to: Jean-Pierre Montreuil and Carlos Solé, for their advice and encouragement during the early stages of my v doctoral program and candidacy, John B. Jensen, from Florida International University, who was my link to the world of linguistics while I was pursuing my M.A. in Spanish literature, and Robert Trammell, my first linguistics professor at Florida Atlantic University, without whom I might not have embarked on this journey. vi THE ROLE OF TYPOLOGICAL DRIFT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROMANCE SUBJUNCTIVE: A STUDY IN WORD-ORDER CHANGE, GRAMMATICALIZATION AND SYNTHESIS Publication No.__________ Melissa Dae Murphy, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2008 Supervisors: Brigitte L. M. Bauer and Frederick Hensey In spite of the vast amount of research on mood in Romance languages, certain fundamental issues are clearly underrepresented, particularly in the field of diachronic linguistics. With this in mind, the primary goal of this dissertation is to provide a comprehensive explanation for developments in Romance mood distribution. Unlike the majority of existing research, this approach does not analyze mood in isolation, nor does it look outward for language-external explanations. Instead, changes in mood usage are related to major typological developments via several interconnected analyses which rely heavily on data from Latin and medieval Spanish and French. This investigation, which takes as its starting point the well-attested typological shift from OV to VO word order, addresses four major issues. The vii first of these is branching congruency, whereby post-posed subordinate clauses are more closely associated with explicit subordinating conjunctions. This hypothesis is tested via a quantitative analysis of Latin data, in order to establish a link between conjunctions and VO word order. The development of these subordinating elements is then analyzed within the grammaticalization framework, which provides insight into the nature of specific Latin and Romance forms, in addition to demonstrating the usefulness of certain theoretical notions. The outcome of this process is a highly generalized Romance subordinator, which is argued to have undergone partial synthesis with the subjunctive, evidenced by an increase in both obligatoriness and contiguity. Finally, these cumulative changes in the linguistic system are shown to have had substantial destabilizing effects on the existing subjunctive / indicative contrast. The significance of this claim is that, already in Latin, mood selection is characterized by a loss of motivation and an increase in automaticity. As a result, subsequent changes in mood distribution in Romance languages are not viewed merely as reductive phenomena, but rather as signs of the refunctionalization of a destabilized, yet viable, paradigm. viii Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES AND ILLUSTRATIONS...................................................... xiii ABBREVIATIONS FOR GRAMMATICAL TERMS......................................... xv ABBREVIATIONS FOR LANGUAGES............................................................ xvi ABBREVIATIONS FOR TEXTS CITED.......................................................... xvii CHAPTER 1: THE ROMANCE SUBJUNCTIVE 1.1. Introduction........................................................................................... 1 1.2. Mood and Modality...............................................................................2 1.3. The Latin Subjunctive........................................................................... 6 1.4. Romance “Mood Loss” Phenomenon................................................. 13 1.4.1. Reduction in Subjunctive Morphology................................ 14 1.4.2. Reduction in Subjunctive Usage.......................................... 16 1.5. The Present Study............................................................................... 23 1.5.1. Hypotheses........................................................................... 23 1.5.2. Methodology........................................................................ 25 CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 2.1. Introduction......................................................................................... 27 2.2. Synchronic Research on the Romance Subjunctive............................ 28 2.2.1. Syntactic Analyses............................................................... 29 2.2.2. Semantic Analyses............................................................... 38 2.2.3. Pragmatic Analyses.............................................................. 54 2.2.4. Contributions of Synchronic Research................................ 62 2.3. Diachronic Research on the Romance Subjunctive............................ 64 2.3.1. Language-Specific Approaches........................................... 65 2.3.1.1. The Role of Phonology......................................... 66 2.3.1.2. The Role of Language Contact............................. 68 2.3.1.3. The Role of Semantic Shift................................... 72 2.3.2. Pan-Romance Approaches................................................... 76 ix