ebook img

The Post-Combat Couple Adjustment Questionnaire: A Preliminary Validation PDF

136 Pages·2017·2.23 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The Post-Combat Couple Adjustment Questionnaire: A Preliminary Validation

Antioch University AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses Dissertations & Theses 2013 The Post-Combat Couple Adjustment Questionnaire: A Preliminary Validation Valerie Maine Antioch University - New England Follow this and additional works at:http://aura.antioch.edu/etds Part of theClinical Psychology Commons,Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Psychiatry and Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Maine, Valerie, "The Post-Combat Couple Adjustment Questionnaire: A Preliminary Validation" (2013).Dissertations & Theses. 34. http://aura.antioch.edu/etds/34 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses at AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses by an authorized administrator of AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive. For more information, please [email protected], [email protected]. The Post-Combat Couple Adjustment Questionnaire: A Preliminary Validation by Valerie E. Maine B.A., Oberlin College, 2003 M.S., Antioch University New England, 2010 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Psychology in the Department of Clinical Psychology at Antioch University New England, 2013 Keene, New Hampshire POST-COMBAT ADJUSTMENT QUESTIONNAIRE ii   Department  of  Clinical  Psychology   DISSERTATION  COMMITTEE  PAGE     The  undersigned  have  examined  the  dissertation  entitled:   THE  POST-­‐COMBAT  COUPLE  ADJUSTMENT  QUESTIONNAIRE:  A   PRELIMINARY  VALIDATION     presented  on  January  24,  2013       by     Valerie  E.  Maine    Candidate  for  the  degree  of  Doctor  of  Psychology   and  hereby  certify  that  it  is  accepted*.     Dissertation  Committee  Chairperson:   Theodore  J.  Ellenhorn,  PhD     Dissertation  Committee  members:   Ann  Johnson,  PsyD   Jodi  Ceballos,  PsyD     Accepted  by  the     Department  of  Clinical  Psychology  Chairperson     Kathi  A.  Borden,  PhD     on  1/24/13     *  Signatures  are  on  file  with  the  Registrar’s  Office  at  Antioch  University  New  England. POST-COMBAT ADJUSTMENT QUESTIONNAIRE iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank everyone who helped me along this journey, both those directly involved with my dissertation and those who helped me get through graduate school in one piece. I would like to thank my advisor, Ted Ellenhorn, for his support and guidance, as well as the rest of my committee, Ann Johnson and Jodi Ceballos. I would like to thank my dissertation group for listening and offering suggestions, help, and feedback along the way. Specifically, I would like to thank Tracy Shannon and Vince Pignatiello for their friendship and support. Vince, your guidance through my statistical analyses was invaluable and I could not have done this without you. I would also like to thank my cohort as a whole for being loud, rambunctious, and never boring! I would like to thank Donna Moxley for giving me a home in New Hampshire for four years and for giving me something to look forward to on my long drives to school. Lastly, I would like to thank my friends and family for their support and understanding over the last six years. To my parents, Ron and Eugenie Maine, I would like to say thank you for your love and support, for housing me, feeding me, and taking care of me for two of those years. I don’t think I could have finished without you. To my sister, Sarah Maine, I would like to say thank you for your unwavering love, support, and protection of your little sis. I’m so glad we got to overlap at Antioch and that you are a part of my memories of Keene. Lastly, I would like to thank my husband, Jordan Rosenblum. It is hard to put into words my gratitude and love for you. Thank you for teaching me how to write, for reading every single paper I wrote, and for always believing I could do it, even when I thought I couldn’t. This degree is as much your achievement as mine and I could not have done it without you. POST-COMBAT ADJUSTMENT QUESTIONNAIRE iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ iii   List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... vii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1   Chapter 1 ......................................................................................................................................... 3   Overview ................................................................................................................................. 3   Statement of the Problem ........................................................................................................ 3   Purpose .................................................................................................................................... 6   Research Questions and Hypotheses ...................................................................................... 7   Significance of the Study ........................................................................................................ 8   Conceptual Framework ......................................................................................................... 11   Summary of Methodology .................................................................................................... 13   Definition of Terms............................................................................................................... 13   Chapter 2 ....................................................................................................................................... 20   Review of Literature ................................................................................................................. 20   Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 20   Domain 1: Redefining Roles, Expectations, and Division of Household Responsibilities .. 20   Domain 2: Managing Strong Emotions ................................................................................ 32   Domain 3: Managing Emotional Constriction and Creating Intimacy in Relationships ...... 38   Domain 4: Creating a Sense of Shared Meaning Surrounding the Deployment Experience ............................................................................................................................. 43   Chapter 3 ....................................................................................................................................... 49   Research Design and Methodology .......................................................................................... 49   Development of the PCCAQ ................................................................................................ 49   Other Measures ..................................................................................................................... 51   Participants ............................................................................................................................ 53   Procedures ............................................................................................................................. 54   Chapter 4 ....................................................................................................................................... 58   Results ....................................................................................................................................... 58   Descriptive Statistics ............................................................................................................. 58   Research Question 1 Results ................................................................................................. 68   Research Question 2 Results ................................................................................................. 70   Research Question 3 Results ................................................................................................. 70   Research Question 4 Results ................................................................................................. 73   Research Question 5 Results ................................................................................................. 74   Exploratory Analyses Results ............................................................................................... 76   Chapter 5 ....................................................................................................................................... 80   Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 80 POST-COMBAT ADJUSTMENT QUESTIONNAIRE v Interpretations ....................................................................................................................... 80   Limitations of the Present Study ........................................................................................... 85   Conclusions and Future Prospects ........................................................................................ 87   References ..................................................................................................................................... 89   Appendix A ................................................................................................................................... 96   Appendix B ................................................................................................................................. 101   Appendix C ................................................................................................................................. 102   Appendix D ................................................................................................................................. 104   Appendix E ................................................................................................................................. 106   Appendix F.................................................................................................................................. 107   Appendix G ................................................................................................................................. 108   Appendix H ................................................................................................................................. 119 POST-COMBAT ADJUSTMENT QUESTIONNAIRE vi List of Tables 1 Summary of Research Questions and Proposed Data Analytic Strategy ...............................57 2 Descriptive Statistics for Veteran Scores ...............................................................................61 3 Descriptive Statistics for Partner Scores ................................................................................65 4 Convergent Validity of the Veteran PCCAQ with the RDAS Total, RDAS Subscales (Consensus, Satisfaction, and Cohesion), and the RAS Total ...............................................69 5 Convergent Validity of the Partner PCCAQ with the RDAS Total, RDAS Subscales (Consensus, Satisfaction, and Cohesion), and the RAS Total ...............................................70 6 Internal Consistency of the Entire PCCAQ ..........................................................................71 7 Internal Consistency of the Other Veteran Measures ...........................................................72 8 Internal Consistency of the Other Partner Measures .............................................................73 9 Internal Consistency of Each Domain of the PCCAQ ...........................................................74 10 Pearson’s r for Veteran PCCAQ Domains (n = 31) ...............................................................75 11 Pearson’s r for Partner PCCAQ Domains (n = 60) ................................................................76 12 Means and Standard Deviations for the PTSD (n = 15) and No PTSD (n = 14) Groups ......77 13 Impact of PTSD Diagnosis on Veteran PCCAQ Score (PTSD n = 15; No PTSD n = 14) ...78 POST-COMBAT ADJUSTMENT QUESTIONNAIRE vii List of Figures 1 Age distribution for the entire sample ...................................................................................58 2 Distribution of veteran total scores on the PCCAQ ...............................................................61 3 Distribution of veteran total scores on the RAS ....................................................................62 4 Distribution of veteran total scores on the RDAS .................................................................62 5 Distribution of veteran total scores on the RDAS Consensus Subscale ................................63 6 Distribution of veteran total scores on the RDAS Satisfaction Subscale ..............................63 7 Distribution of veteran total scores on the RDAS Cohesion Subscale .................................. 64 8 Distribution of partner total scores on the PCCAQ ...............................................................66 9 Distribution of partner total scores on the RAS .....................................................................66 10 Distribution of partner total scores on the RDAS ..................................................................66 11 Distribution of partner total scores on the RDAS Consensus Subscale.................................67 12 Distribution of partner total scores on the RDAS Satisfaction Subscale ..............................67 13 Distribution of partner total scores on the RDAS Cohesion Subscale...................................68 14 Scree plot for veteran and partner PCCAQ (n = 92) ..............................................................79 POST-COMBAT ADJUSTMENT QUESTIONNAIRE 1 Abstract This dissertation presents the results of a psychometric study regarding the preliminary validation of The Post-Combat Couple Adjustment Questionnaire (PCCAQ). This measure was designed to assess post-combat and post-deployment adjustment for male veterans and their female partners. The measure was created using existing literature on veterans, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and couples. The PCCAQ consists of four domains of couple functioning, including: (a) redefining roles, expectations, and division of household responsibilities; (b) managing strong emotions; (c) abandoning emotional constriction and creating intimacy in relationships; and (d) creating a sense of shared meaning surrounding the deployment experience. The PCCAQ was compared to two other couples measures: the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS; Busby et al., 1995) and the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS; Hendrick, 1988). The survey was distributed online through surveymonkey.com and was completed by 31 male veterans (from Operation Enduring Freedom [OEF] and Operation Iraqi Freedom [OIF]) and 60 female partners of OEF and OIF veterans. The results were analyzed using quantitative methods. Results indicate that the PCCAQ has strong internal consistency and strong split-half reliability. The four domains of the PCCAQ were highly correlated with one another, indicating that the four domains fit together into a larger construct (i.e., post-deployment adjustment). In addition, results indicated moderate to strong correlations between the PCCAQ and the RDAS and RAS. The female partner form was more strongly correlated with the other two measures than the veteran form, indicating the likely presence of additional adjustment issues for veterans (i.e., adjustment to PTSD symptoms and civilian life). Overall, the PCCAQ appears to be a sound assessment tool for the measurement of post-deployment adjustment in POST-COMBAT ADJUSTMENT QUESTIONNAIRE 2 couples. Interpretations, as well as discussions regarding the limitations of this study and future research are offered. Keywords: PTSD, post-combat, post-deployment, couple adjustment, OEF, OIF

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.