ebook img

The Mid-Atlantic shore to the Appalachian highlands: field trip guidebook for the 2010 joint meeting of the Northeastern and Southeastern GSA Sections (GSA Field Guide 16) PDF

134 Pages·2010·14.47 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The Mid-Atlantic shore to the Appalachian highlands: field trip guidebook for the 2010 joint meeting of the Northeastern and Southeastern GSA Sections (GSA Field Guide 16)

The Mid-Atlantic Shore to the Appalachian Highlands: Field Trip Guidebook for the 2010 Joint Meeting of the Northeastern and Southeastern GSA Sections edited by Gary M. Fleeger Pennsylvania Geological Survey 3240 Schoolhouse Road Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057-3534 USA and Steven J. Whitmeyer Department of Geology and Environmental Science James Madison University 800 S. Main Street, MSC 6903 Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807 USA Field Guide 16 3300 Penrose Place, P.O. Box 9140 Boulder, Colorado 80301-9140 USA 2010 Copyright © 2010, The Geological Society of America (GSA), Inc. All rights reserved. GSA grants permission to individual scientists to make unlimited photocopies of one or more items from this volume for noncommercial purposes advancing science or education, including classroom use. For permission to make photocopies of any item in this volume for other noncommercial, nonprofit purposes, contact The Geological Society of America. Written permission is required from GSA for all other forms of capture or reproduction of any item in the volume including, but not limited to, all types of electronic or digital scanning or other digital or manual transformation of articles or any portion thereof, such as abstracts, into computer-readable and/or transmittable form for personal or corporate use, either noncommercial or commercial, for-profit or otherwise. Send permission requests to GSA Copyright Permissions, 3300 Penrose Place, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, Colorado 80301-9140, USA. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Copyright is not claimed on any material prepared wholly by government employees within the scope of their employment. Published by The Geological Society of America, Inc. 3300 Penrose Place, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, Colorado 80301-9140, USA www.geosociety.org Printed in U.S.A. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Mid-Atlantic shore to the Appalachian highlands : field trip guidebook for the 2010 joint meeting of the Northeastern and Southeastern GSA Sections / edited by Gary M. Fleeger and Steven J. Whitmeyer. p. cm. -- (Field guide ; 16) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-8137-0016-8 (pbk.) 1. Geology--Piedmont (U.S. : Region)--Fieldwork. 2. Geology--Blue Ridge Mountains Region-- Fieldwork. 3. Geology--Middle Atlantic States--Fieldwork. 4. Geology--Appalachian Mountains-- Fieldwork. I. Fleeger, Gary M. (Gary Mark) II. Whitmeyer, Steven J. QE78.3.M53 2010 557.5--dc22 2010000940 Cover, front: View to the northeast of Germany Valley, West Virginia, from an overlook on Route 33. The exposed ledges on the left and right margins and the distant center of the picture are outcrops of Silurian Tuscarora sandstone; the floor of the valley is composed of Ordovician carbonate rocks. Thus, Germany Valley is a several kilometer-scale breached anticline that plunges shallowly to the northeast. Photo by Steve Whitmeyer. Back: View from Bearfence Mountain in Shenandoah National Park, looking north toward the ridges of Massanutten Mountain, with outcrop of Catoctin greenstone in the foreground. Photo by Chuck Bailey. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ii Contents Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .v 1. The Peach Bottom area in the Pennsylvania-Maryland Piedmont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 R.T. Faill and R.C. Smith II 2. Soils, geomorphology, landscape evolution, and land use in the Virginia Piedmont and Blue Ridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31 W.C. Sherwood, A.S. Hartshorn, and L.S. Eaton 3. Magmatic layering and intrusive plumbing in the Jurassic Morgantown Sheet, Central Atlantic Magmatic Province . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51 L. Srogi, T. Lutz, L.D. Dickson, M. Pollock, K. Gimson, and N. Lynde 4. The early through late Pleistocene record in the Susquehanna River Basin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69 D.D. Braun 5. Stratigraphy, structure, and tectonics: An east-to-west transect of the Blue Ridge and Valley and Ridge provinces of northern Virginia and West Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .103 L.S. Fichter, S.J. Whitmeyer, C.M. Bailey, and W. Burton 6. Teachers guide to geologic trails in Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, Pennsylvania–New Jersey J.B. Epstein This guide is available at http://fieldguides.gsapubs.org/ (open access) or as GSA Data Repository item 2010097 posted at www.geosociety.org/pubs/ft2010.htm or on request from editing@ geosociety.org, Documents Secretary, GSA, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301, USA. iii Preface This guidebook features fi eld trips offered during the joint meeting of the Northeastern and Southeast- ern Sections of the Geological Society of America (GSA) held in Baltimore, Maryland, in March 2010. Chapters in this guide refl ect the meeting’s theme (“Linking North and South: Exploring the Connections between Continent and Sea,”) in that they span the lowlands of eastern Pennsylvania to the highlands of northeastern West Virginia (Fig. 1). Four physiographic provinces are covered: Piedmont (Piedmont Upland and Gettysburg-Newark Lowland Sections), Blue Ridge, Valley and Ridge, and Appalachian Plateau. The geologic foci are likewise variable, ranging from Precambrian basement rocks to Pleistocene sediments. The chapters are organized alphabetically, with premeeting trips listed fi rst (Faill and Smith, Sherwood et al., Srogi et al.), followed by postmeeting trips (Braun, Fichter et al.) Topics range from surfi cial materi- als and landscape evolution (Sherwood et al., Braun) to magmatism and igneous processes (Srogi et al.) to stratigraphy, structure and tectonics (Faill and Smith, Fichter et al.) In addition, at least two of the fi eld guides are specifi cally targeted at teachers and instructional pedagogy of fi eld-oriented education (Fichter et al., Epstein). Field Trip 6, by Epstein, is based on a fi eld guide originally published in conjunction with the 2006 GSA Annual Meeting in Philadelphia. As a result, the fi eld guide for this trip is not being published in this volume. However, an updated guide, which includes additional material not included in the 2006 version, is available (open access) at http://fi eldguides.gsapubs.org/, or as GSA Data Repository item 2010097 at www.geosociety.org/pubs/ft2010.htm. The editors would like to thank all of the authors, fi eld trip organizers, and leaders for the countless hours that went into producing this volume. Special thanks to the reviewers who helped improve this volume: Alan Benimoff, Duane Braun, Lee Daniels, Rick Diecchio, David Eggler, John Haynes, Louis Heidel, Dan Richter, Bill Sevon, Steve Shank, Scott Southworth, Aaron Thompson, and Gil Wiswall. Many thanks to the GSA Publications Department staff for help in preparing, formatting, and generally shepherding this guide through the production process. We hope that geoscientists and educators alike will fi nd the contents of this fi eld guide thought provoking in discussions of regional geology and pedagogy, as well as useful for planning future fi eld excursions. Gary M. Fleeger and Steven J. Whitmeyer v Figure 1. Google Maps relief map of the Mid-Atlantic region showing the approximate locations for the fi eld trips covered by the chapters in this volume. Field Trip 1—Faill and Smith; Field Trip 2— Sherwood et al.; Field Trip 3—Srogi et al., Field Trip 4—Braun; Field Trip 5— Fichter et al.; Field Trip 6—Epstein. 6 p Tri d el Fi 3 p Tri d el 1 Fi p Tri d el Fi e p 4 mor eld Tri Balti Fi 2 p Tri d el Fi 5 p Tri d el Fi vi The Geological Society of America Field Guide 16 2010 The Peach Bottom area in the Pennsylvania-Maryland Piedmont Rodger T. Faill* 3407 Rutherford Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17111-1850, USA Robert C. Smith II* 22 Longview Drive, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17050, USA ABSTRACT The Appalachian Piedmont in south-central Pennsylvania and north-central Maryland contains metasedimentary siliciclastic rocks (phyllites to quartzites) that were deposited largely offshore of Laurentia, prior to and during the early history of the Iapetan Ocean. The Peach Bottom area is centered on the belt of Peach Bot- tom Slate and overlying Cardiff Quartzite, which is surrounded by the late Neopro- terozoic and early Paleozoic rocks of the Peters Creek and Scott Creek (new name) Formations. Their provenance was the Brandywine and Baltimore microcontinents that lay farther offshore of the Laurentian coast. This area also includes an ophiolitic mélange that formed in front of an advancing island arc in Iapetus. All these rocks lay largely undisturbed throughout much of the Paleozoic, experiencing only chlorite- grade greenschist facies metamorphism through deep burial. Alleghanian thrusting associated with the growth of the Tucquan anticline imparted their present wide- spread, monocline, steep southeast dip of the bed-parallel foliation. INTRODUCTION The rocks within the Peach Bottom area have long been considered part of a regional syncline (Knopf and Jonas, 1923, The Peach Bottom study covers an ~40 km × 13 km 1929), with the Peach Bottom Slate as the youngest stratigraphic quadrilateral-shaped area located in Lancaster and York Coun- unit. Traditionally, this core was presumed to be underlain by the ties, Pennsylvania and Harford and Cecil Counties, Maryland Cardiff Quartzite and Peters Creek Formation, which lay adjacent (Fig. 1). The south-southeast fl owing Susquehanna River crosses on both the northwest and the southeast limbs. None of the rocks midway along its length. The boroughs of Delta, Pennsylvania, in the Peach Bottom area support this traditional interpretation. and Cardiff, Maryland, lay some 10 km southwest of the river. The distinctive Peach Bottom Slate underlies a narrow out- GEOLOGIC SETTING crop belt (0.25–2 km wide) for 30 km along the middle of the Peach Bottom area. The Cardiff Quartzite, which conformably The dominant structure in the south-central Pennsylvania overlies the slate, surrounds the slate along much of its perimeter. Piedmont siliciclastics is the Tucquan anticline (Frazer, 1880), Together, they constitute the Peach Bottom Slate Belt. a very large, west-southwest–trending, gently plunging, upright *[email protected]; [email protected] Faill, R.T., and Smith, R.C., II, 2010, The Peach Bottom area in the Pennsylvania-Maryland Piedmont, in Fleeger, G.M., and Whitmeyer, S.J., eds., The Mid- Atlantic Shore to the Appalachian Highlands: Field Trip Guidebook for the 2010 Joint Meeting of the Northeastern and Southeastern GSA Sections: Geological Society of America Field Guide 16, p. 1–30, doi: 10.1130/2010.0016(01). For permission to copy, contact [email protected]. ©2010 The Geological Society of America. All rights reserved. 1 2 Faill and Smith fold (Fig. 2). Its east end lies at or near the southwest terminus middle Ordovician (barring some intervening structure(s)). If a of Mine Ridge; its west end in the vicinity of the Maryland- thrust, the Peach Bottom area rocks could be much older. Pennsylvania border is not well defi ned; it either dies out or is The Laurentian carbonate shelf consists of a thick sequence truncated. The dominant foliation that pervades the metasedi- of largely carbonate rocks ranging in age from lower Cambrian mentary schists parallels bedding and best displays Tucquan to middle Ordovician. This sequence overlies a thinner sequence anticline form: subhorizontal along the hinge, northwest dip- of siliciclastic rocks (quartzites to mudstones) that in turn over- ping north of the hinge, and southeast dipping to the south lies the metabasalts and metarhyolites of the Catoctin Formation. (Freedman et al., 1964). The Catoctin Formation itself overlies an even thinner sequence The schists of the Tucquan anticline are bounded on the of the Neoproterozoic Chilhowee siliciclastics to the west. The northwest by the Martic Line, a fairly sharp transition between Catoctin Formation is Neoproterozoic to lower Cambrian in age the Tucquan schists and the slope carbonates to the southeast, (564 ± 9 Ma in the north-central Appalachians, Aleinikoff et al., and schists to the northwest that accumulated on the Laurentian 1995; Tollo et al., 2004). continental margin. The nature of the Martic Line lies at the cen- The Baltimore Mafi c Complex and equivalent rocks to the ter of a long-standing, contentious issue (Miller, 1935; Cloos and southwest in Maryland bound the southeast side of the Tucquan Hietanen, 1941; Rodgers, 1970; Higgins, 1972; Wyckoff, 1990; schists (Fig. 2). The Baltimore Mafi c Complex consists in large and Wise and Ganis, 2009), as to whether it is a conformal strati- part of peridotites and pyroxenites that intruded the lower reaches graphic contact or a thrust fault. The nature of the Martic Line of an island arc (herein called Cecil Island Arc, following Faill, bears on the Peach Bottom area. If the Line is a conformal con- 1997) in Iapetus at 489 ± 7 Ma (Sinha et al., 1997). The peridotites tact, the age of the Peach Bottom area rocks may be younger than and pyroxenites have since been altered largely to serpentinites, Figure 13 Figure 9 HHHHoooollllttttwwwwoooooooodddd WWWWaaaakkkkeeeeffffiiiieeeelllldddd DDDDeeeellllttttaaaa CCCCoooonnnnoooowwwwiiiinnnnggggoooo DDDDaaaammmm McGuigan Quarries Bald Friar Hill Figure 10 Figure 1. Geologic map of the Peach Bottom area in south-central Pennsylvania and north-central Maryland, within portions of the Conowingo Dam, Delta, Holtwood, and Wakefi eld 7½-minute quadrangles. The Delta Duplex is the fault-bounded zone that contains the Peach Bottom Slate, Cardiff Quartzite, and Sykesville (north) Formation. Peach Bottom area, Pennsylvania-Maryland Piedmont 3 talcs, and carbonates (mostly magnesite). During the advance of locally, with subvertical axial surfaces and steeply southeast- the Baltimore Mafi c Complex, sediments, basalts, and ultramafi c plunging axes. Local faults of various orientations are also pres- fragments accumulated as a precursory mélange, the Sykesville ent, with displacements of a few meters at most. Crenulations are Formation (Muller et al., 1989) in front of Baltimore Mafi c Com- common, many of them plunging moderately to the northeast, plex. The sharp contact of the Sykesville schists, metabasalts, and but gently southwest-plunging crenulations are present as well. steatized ultramafi tes with the Tucquan schists, the striking lithic contrast, and the very different provenances support the probabil- THE OCTORARO BASIN ity of a thrust fault contact between the two at the Martic Line. The Tucquan schists have been metamorphosed to green- The Rodinian continent was amalgamated by the Gren- schist facies. Almandine garnets are common in the hinge of villian orogeny (from ca. 1200 to 1000 Ma) at the end of the the fold. The rocks on either side are at biotite grade, and authi- Mesoproterozoic. What was to become the Peach Bottom area genic albite is common. Farther away from the hinge, chlorite lay well within Rodinia during the subsequent Neoproterozoic, is the dominant mineral in the pelitic fractions. This pattern of underlain by rocks of the Grenville orogen. It appears that signifi - higher-grade metamorphism in the presumably older rocks in cant rifting activity occurred within Rodinia during the middle of the hinge implies a greater depth of burial for those rocks, and the Neoproterozoic, from 760 to 700 Ma (Tollo and Aleinikoff, suggests that the metamorphism occurred prior to the develop- 1996; Tollo et al., 2004), as evidenced by the development of the ment of the anticline. Robertson River Igneous Suite in Virginia (Tollo and Aleinikoff, Structurally, the Tucquan anticline appears to be simple (Fig. 1996) and possibly the Ocoee basin. Whether true oceanic crust 2). Throughout much of the anticline, the dominant foliation was formed in the rifts, or continental crust was simply attenu- tends to parallel the compositional layering. This suggests that ated, one or more basins seemed to have developed, which accu- the foliation (defi ned by the phyllosilicate minerals) developed mulated siliciclastic sediment derived largely from the surround- concurrently with the burial metamorphism, while the beds were ing Rodinian highlands. The pre-Catoctin Octoraro Formation, horizontal. The growth of the Tucquan anticline thus postdated if it is indeed Neoproterozoic in age, may have accumulated in the burial metamorphism. one of the rift basins developed at that time. Additionally, it was A steeply dipping to subvertical, east-northeast–trending at ca. 735 Ma that the igneous magmas that would become the foliation transects much of the Tucquan anticline (Freedman et Baltimore Mafi c Complex (Smith and Barnes, 2008) and the 433 al., 1964). This foliation postdates the dominant foliation but is ± 2 Ma Sword Mountain Olivine Melilitite (Smith et al., 2004) not as penetrative. Its age, character, and attitude suggest it may were separated from the mantle. be axial-planar, and thus coeval, to the upright Tucquan anticline. Late in the Neoproterozoic, additional crustal attenuation by Smaller folds (from decimeter to meters in size) are present mantle forces led to a second rifting that split Rodinia largely EXPLANATION TR 77°M aYrortki c LLaauurreennttiiaann 76° 30’ Lancaster TR 76° 12 ---- BBaraltnimdyowrein em masassifssifs 3 -- Honey Brook Upland M a r b u rTgU C Q U ASuNsquehannaThruAstNssThhIeeCllffLIN44E 4 -- Mine Ridge75° 30’ 33 T R PEACH BOTTOM AREA 1 PA 22 CCeecciill IIssllaanndd AArrcc 40° Baltimore R MD Philadelphia iv e r C o a s t a l 333999°°° 333000’’’ Plain DE NJ Figure 2. Regional geologic map of the Piedmont surrounding the Peach Bottom area, illustrating the locations of the Tucquan anticline, the microcontinental fragments (Brandywine and Baltimore), and the Cecil Island Arc that contains the Baltimore Mafi c Complex, the Sykesville Formation, and the James Run Formation.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.