the language of architecture Dedication To all of our students, from whom we have learned so much. And to Eva and Dax, who have not only tolerated but infinitely enriched our endless excursions in the interest of architecture. © 2014 Rockport Publishers All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission of the copyright owners. All images in this book have been reproduced with the knowledge and prior consent of the artists concerned, and no responsibility is accepted by producer, publisher, or printer for any infringement of copyright or otherwise, arising from the contents of this publication. Every effort has been made to ensure that credits accurately comply with information supplied. We apologize for any inaccuracies that may have occurred and will resolve inaccurate or missing information in a subsequent reprinting of the book. First published in the United States of America in 2014 by Rockport Publishers, a member of Quarto Publishing Group USA Inc. 100 Cummings Center Suite 406-L Beverly, Massachusetts 01915-6101 Telephone: (978) 282-9590 Fax: (978) 283-2742 www.rockpub.com Visit RockPaperInk.com to share your opinions, creations, and passion for design. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Simitch, Andrea, author. The language of architecture : 26 principles every architect should know / Andrea Simitch + Val Warke. pages cm Summary: “Learning a new discipline is similar to learning a new language; in order to master the foundation of architecture, you must first master the basic building blocks of its language - the definitions, function, and usage. Language of Architecture provides students and professional architects with the basic elements of architectural design, divided into twenty-six easy-to-comprehend chapters. «-- Provided by publisher. ISBN 978-1-59253-858-4 (paperback) 1. Architecture. I. Warke, Val K., author. II. Title. NA2550.S56 2014 720--dc23 2014008552 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ISBN: 978-1-59253-858-4 Digital edition published in 2014 eISBN: 978-1-62788-048-0 Design: Poulin + Morris Inc. Page layout and production: tabula rasa graphic design Cover image: Pezo von Ellrichshausen/www.pezo.cl Photo: Cristobal Palma Printed in China Andrea Simitch and Val Warke With essays contributed by Iñaqui Carnicero Steven Fong K. Michael Hays David J. Lewis the Richard Rosa II Jenny Sabin Jim Williamson language of architecture 26 Principles Every Architect Should Know contents Introduction 6 ELEMENTS PHYSICAL SUBSTANCES 1 Analysis 7 Mass 8 64 2 Concept 8 Structure 18 72 3 Representation 9 Surface 26 82 10 Materials GIVENS 88 4 Program 36 EPHEMERAL SUBSTANCES 5 Context 11 Space 48 100 6 Environment 12 Scale 58 108 13 Light 116 14 Movement 124 CONCEPTUAL DEVICES CONSTRUCTIVE POSSIBILITIES 15 Dialogue 24 Fabrication 132 196 16 Tropes 25 Prefabrication 138 202 17 Defamiliarization 144 CONCLUDING 26 Presentation 208 18 Transformation 150 Glossary 216 ORGANIZATIONAL DEVICES 19 Infrastructure Bibliography 156 217 Contributor Directory 218 20 Datum 164 Photographer Credits 219 21 Order 172 Index 220 22 Grid About the Authors 180 224 Acknowledgments 224 23 Geometry 188 introduction It is our hope to stimulate old and new interests in architecture, to share an enthusiasm for some venerable sheds and evocative cathedrals, and to introduce the limitless poetics that can be composed in architecture’s language. Tireless debate has always focused on the the stop near my home.” But it is clear that our elementary concept of the meaning of qualities that could cause a building to be those constructions we describe as “works of “dog” becomes complicated by the various described as “architecture.” Nikolaus Pevsner, architecture” tend to convey countless levels affects of context, by our knowledge of who famously declared that “A bicycle shed of meaning to numerous unique observers dramatic genres, of precedent, of poetic is a building; Lincoln Cathedral is a piece of over an indefinite number of years. Perhaps, language, and, if heard during a perfor- architecture,” assumes that human habitation then, architecture might be understood to mance, by the actor’s verbal and physical is a characteristic of all buildings, while be comparable to a “thick,” poetic language. inflections. Clearly, Shakespeare’s “dog” is architecture transcends building because of One of the traits of any language is much more than that furry four-legged beast its aesthetic aspirations. Other arguments that it provides a system that can convey once in the room. have been based on issues as indeterminate meaning. When being introduced to a new Meaning in architecture is similarly as emotional resonance (in other words, language—when one first learns to speak as complex, both profound and open ended. architecture, unlike building, stirs our an infant or when one attempts to learn a Such meaning is inevitably compounded by emotions), as reductive as professionalism second language—meaning is generally architecture’s lengthy processes of production, (architecture is by architects), as evaluative direct and singular. To the infant, a “dog” is by the vast array of individuals responsible for as historical appraisal (architecture is what a the furry four-legged beast in the room. To every stage of that production, by the final culture has deemed as significant, or what the first-time speaker of Italian, “cane” is construction’s relationships with its various has proven to be significant through time), directly associated with one among that contexts, by its interrelationships with other and as limitless as inclusivism (all construc- general group of animals we know as “dogs.” known elements of architectural expression, tions are architecture, perhaps even those by However, after becoming familiar with more and by the unique pasts and presents of each other species, such as the hives of bees or complex levels of language—with poetry, individual who observes the final construc- the dams of beavers). slang, mythology, and allegory, for example— tion. Architecture is further complicated by Parallel to these discussions, analogies a more sophisticated notion of meaning is the fact that each design is a testing ground to language have been frequent, varied, and required. For example, when Shakespeare for a number of associated concepts drawn inevitable throughout the history of archi- has Hamlet say: from history, theory, technology, and even tecture. The fact is that every building, from representation. For this reason, many attempts a bicycle shed to a bus stop, is capable of “Let Hercules himself do what he may, at defining a language of architecture have meaning something to someone: “Here, I can The cat will mew and dog will have his day.” necessarily been reductive. Like textbook protect my bike from the rain,” or “This is Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act V, Scene 1 translations of elementary Italian, they become simple exercises in decoding, with but more ephemeral substances—space, scale, We address this book to several no regard for syntax, idioms, voice, genre, light, and movement—that serve to make different audiences. For those just com- and so on. the physical substances legible. Four chapters mencing studies in architecture, we hope to For these reasons, this book is not on the conceptual devices that frequently introduce the potential breadth and depth of intended to be an exhaustive or definitive contribute to what might be understood as the field while showing some of the works— lexicon of architectural ideas. Such an effort the poetics of architecture—dialogue, tropes, by both students and well-known practitio- would be futile. It is instead an introduction defamiliarization, and transformation—are ners—that might inspire or even provoke. to what we believe—after over sixty years followed by five chapters that discuss the Those who have already embarked on one of of combined experience in architectural operations of architecture’s diverse organiza- the various aspects of architectural practice education—to be some of the more vital tional devices: infrastructure, datum, order, might find in the text a series of subtle fundamentals of architectural design. Just as grid, and geometry. Finally, two chapters reminders, a mine of possibilities. Each the English alphabet is arbitrarily limited to concerning some of the considerations chapter includes a short essay that brings twenty-six letters, we have limited ourselves an architect might have for the implicit greater depth to the chapter’s theme and to just twenty-six elements, each described possibility of construction—fabrication may suggest further inquiry for those in its own chapter. and prefabrication—are followed by a final interested in architectural history, theory, We have organized the text so that we chapter on what is usually the culmination or criticism. And finally, for those of our begin with three chapters that introduce the of the design process for most architects colleagues interested in developing a essential elements one needs to develop a and students of architecture: presentation. curriculum in beginning design, we intend visual language and the skills for critical And we illustrate these chapters each chapter to germinate an idea that thinking: analysis, concept, and representa- throughout with some of the more might foster its own design exercise or that tion. We follow with three of the elements distinctive and expressive examples of could suggest more elaborate problems that are generally considered to be among architecture’s language. From the gran- when combined with other themes. 6 the givens of any design process: program, diloquent to the slang, from the epic to In short, it is our hope to stimulate old context, and environment. Then, we turn to the everyday, projects are culled from and new interests in architecture, to share 7 what might be considered the substances of the great masters of architecture, from an enthusiasm for some venerable sheds and architecture. After introducing the physical notable contemporary practitioners and evocative cathedrals, and to introduce the substances—mass, structure, surface, and from students around the world who have limitless poetics that can be composed in material—we consider the equally palpable, confronted these issues in their studies. architecture’s language. Analysis is the process of exploration and E R U T discovery with which an architect develops C E T I H C a familiarity with the assumptions, R A F O E expectations, and conditions that are G A U G N given and then establishes the conceptual A L E H T lens through which all design decisions are subsequently made.
Description: