(cid:1)he federal appointments process T Constitutional Conflicts ASerieswiththeInstitute of Billof RightsLawatthe Collegeof WilliamandMary (cid:2)eal(cid:3)evins,serieseditor (cid:1)he f e de r a l a p p o i n t m e n t s p r o c e s s T AConstitutionaland HistoricalAnalysis MichaelJ.Gerhardt duke university press DurhamandLondon 2003 ©2000DukeUniversityPress Allrightsreserved PrintedintheUnitedStates ofAmericaonacid-freepaper(cid:4) DesignedbyRebeccaGiménez TypesetinAdobeCaslonby TsengInformationSystems,Inc. LibraryofCongressCataloging- in-PublicationDataappearonthe lastprintedpageofthisbook. Paperbackedition©2003 Idedicatethisbookto mylovingwife,Deborah, withoutwhosesupport,faith, andpatiencenothingIdowould havemeaning;andtoourson, BenjaminSamuel,whom welovebeyondmeasure foreverandalways. contents T Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi IntroductiontothePaperbackEdition . . . . . . . . . . . . xv Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 (cid:4)art(cid:5)ne the origins, structure, and evolution of the federal appointments process chapter one: the original understanding of the federal appointments process . . . . . . . . 15 TheFounders’DeliberationsonAllocating theFederalAppointmentsAuthority . . . . . . . . . . . 17 TheSenate’sPrenominationRole. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29 TheConstitutionalLimitsonPresidentialand SenatorialDiscretionintheAppointmentsProcess . . . .34 chapter two: the structure of the federal appointments process . . . . . . . . . . 39 TheSignificanceofaSingleAppointmentsClause . . . . . 39 ThePresumptionofConfirmation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 AgendaSetting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43 Consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 chapter three: historical changes and patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 TheIndispensabilityofClearContext . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Social,Political,andHistoricalDevelopments . . . . . . . 50 ConfirmationPatterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 (cid:4)art(cid:1)wo evaluating the roles of the major players in the federal appointments process chapter four: the president’s role in the federal appointments process . . . . . . . . 81 TheLimitationsofaPersonalizedEvaluation . . . . . . . . 81 TheSignificanceof InstitutionalAnalysis . . . . . . . . . . 87 ThePresidentialLearningCurveRegardingthe ChallengesPosedbytheAppointmentsProcess . . . . . 101 TheRelationshipbetweenPresidents’Nominating AuthorityorSelectionCriteriaandControlof ExecutivePerformanceandJudicialPolicymaking . . . 128 chapter five: the advice and consent of the senate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 EvaluatingSenatePerformanceGenerally . . . . . . . . . 136 AnalyzingSenatorialPowerstoInfluence FederalAppointments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 OtherSignificantPatternsandPractices . . . . . . . . . . 162 chapter six: the nominee’s functions . . . . . . . 180 TheRolesof Nominees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 NomineesasActiveAgentsonTheirOwnBehalf . . . . . 194 WhatKindsof PeopleQualifyasNominees? . . . . . . . 201 chapter seven: public and interest group participation in the appointments process . . . . 212 ThePublic’sParticipationinthe FederalAppointmentsProcess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 InterestGroupParticipationinthe FederalAppointmentsProcess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217 TheDilemmaoftheAmericanBarAssociation . . . . . . 229 TheSignificanceof InformalAdvisers intheAppointmentsProcess. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231 Contents viii chapter eight: the impact of media and technology on the federal appointments process . . . . . . . 234 TheMediaasEducator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 TheMediaasParticipant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 TheMediaasOmbudsman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248 (cid:4)art(cid:1)hree reforming the federal appointments process chapter nine: the need for reform . . . . . . . . . 253 PreliminaryClarifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254 GeneralSeparation-of-PowersConcernsinReforming theFederalAppointmentsProcess . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 TheFeasibilityof LegislatingMinimalQualifications . . . 273 InfluencingtheTermsof Debate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 ThePossibilityof ReducingSomeConflict intheAppointmentsProcess. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 EnhancingPublicParticipation byMeansoftheInternet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 chapter ten: on the future of judicial selection: structure, rules, and norms . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290 RethinkingtheConstitutionalStructure forJudicialSelection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291 ProceduralRulesandNorms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298 Postscript . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 Afterword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397 Contents ix
Description: