1 1 π pi 3 G Newton’sconstant 7·10−11 kg−1m3s−1 c speedoflight 3·108 ms−1 kB Boltzmann’sconstant 10−4 eVK−1 e electroncharge 1.6·10−19 C σ Stefan–Boltzmannconstant 6·10−8 Wm−2K−4 msun Solarmass 2·1030 kg R Earthradius 6·106 m earth θmoon/sun angulardiameter 10−2 ρair airdensity 1 kgm−3 ρ rockdensity 5 gcm−3 rock (cid:126)c 200 eVnm Lwater heatofvaporization 2 MJkg−1 vap γwater surfacetensionofwater 10−1 Nm−1 a Bohrradius 0.5 Å 0 a typicalinteratomicspacing 3 Å NA Avogadro’snumber 6·1023 E combustionenergydensity 9 kcalg−1 fat E typicalbondenergy 4 eV bond e2/4π(cid:15)0 fine-structureconstantα 10−2 (cid:126)c p airpressure 105 Pa 0 νair kinematicviscosityofair 1.5·10−5 m2s−1 νwater kinematicviscosityofwater 10−6 m2s−1 day 105 s year π·107 s F solarconstant 1.3 kWm−2 AU distancetosun 1.5·1011 m P humanbasalmetabolicrate 100 W basal Kair thermalconductivityofair 2·10−2 Wm−1K−1 K ... ofnon-metallicsolids/liquids 1 Wm−1K−1 K ... ofmetals 102 Wm−1K−1 metal cair specificheatofair 1 Jg−1K−1 p cp ... ofsolids/liquids 25 Jmole−1K−1 1 1 2 2 s g n xity spri plen) actualcomcompressio cretization ngsy dis dios ar(l c s s di se a c al xity peci e s pl m gco ysis din nal r a a disc onal si n e ry) dim et m m plexity omplexity(sycompression) onalreasoning dlecom fakeardingc(lossless proporti n sc n ha di atio v r o e s t n o w c d o n h a y r et m m y s n plexity stractio m b a o c g nizin quer a n g o or c d n a e d vi di 2 2 3 3 Contents Preface v Part 1 Organizing complexity 1 1 Divide and conquer 3 2 Abstraction 27 Part 2 Lossless compression 45 3 Symmetry and conservation 47 4 Proportional reasoning 67 5 Dimensions 85 Part 3 Lossy compression 113 6 Easy cases 115 7 Lumping 133 8 Probabilistic reasoning 151 9 Springs 175 Part Backmatter 231 Long-lasting learning 233 Bibliography 237 2010-05-13 00:43:32 / rev b667c9e4c1f1+ 3 3 4 4 iv Index 241 2010-05-13 00:43:32 / rev b667c9e4c1f1+ 4 4 5 5 Preface An approximate analysis is often more useful than an exact solution! This counterintuitive thesis, the reason for this book, suggests two ques- tions. One question is: If science and engineering are about accuracy, how can approximate models be useful? They are useful because our minds are a small part of the world itself. When we represent a piece of the world in our minds, we discard many aspects – we make a model – in order that the model fit in our limited minds. An approximate model is all that we can understand. Making useful models means discarding less important information so that our minds may grasp the important features that remain. This perhaps disappointing conclusion leads to a second question: Since every model is approximate, how do we choose useful approximations? The American psychologist William James said [10, p. 390]: ‘The art of being wise is the art of knowing what to overlook.’ This book therefore developsintelligenceamplifiers: toolsfordiscardingunimportantaspects of a problem and for selecting the important aspects. These reasoning tools are of three types: 1. Organizing complexity − Divide and conquer − Abstraction 2. Lossless compression − Symmetry and conservation − Proportional reasoning − Dimensions 3. Lossy compression 2010-05-13 00:43:32 / rev b667c9e4c1f1+ 5 5 6 6 vi Preface − Easy cases − Probabilistic reasoning − Lumping − Spring models The first type of tool helps manage complexity. The second type helps remove complexity that is merely apparent. The third type helps discard complexity. With these tools we explore the natural and manmade worlds, using ex- amplesfromdiversefieldssuchasquantummechanics,generalrelativity, mechanical engineering, biophysics, recreational mathematics, and cli- mate change. This diversity has two purposes. First, the diversity shows how a small toolbox can explain important features of the manmade and engineered worlds. The diversity provides a library of models for your own analyses. Second, the diversity separates the tool from the details of its use. A tool is difficult to appreciate Technique Example abstractly, without an example. However, if you see only one use of a tool, the tool is difficult to distinguish from the example. An expert, familiar with the tool, knows where the idea ends and the details begin. But when you first learn a tool, you need to learn the boundary. Ananswerisasecondexample. Totheextentthat the second example is similar to the first, the tool plus first use overlaps the tool plus second use. Penumbra T Theoverlapincludesapenumbraaroundthetool. The penumbra is smaller than it is with only one example: Two uses delimit the boundaries of the tool more clearly than one example does. 2010-05-13 00:43:32 / rev b667c9e4c1f1+ 6 6 7 7 Preface vii More clarity comes using an example from a dis- tantfield. Thepenumbrashrinks,whichseparates the tool from examples of its use. For example, using dimensional analysis in a physics problem and an economics analysis clarifies what part of the illustration is specific to physics or economics T and what part is transferable to other problems. Focus on the transferable ideas; they are useful in any career! This book is designed for self study. Therefore, please try the problems. The problems are of two types. The first type are problems marked with a wedge in the margin. They are breathers during an analysis: a place to developyourunderstandingbyworkingoutthenextstepsinananalysis. Thoseproblemsareansweredinthesubsequenttextwhereyoucancheck your thinking and my analysis – please let me know of any errors! The second type of problem, the numbered problems, give practice with the tools, extend a derivation, or develop a useful or enjoyable model. Most numbered problems have answers at the end of the book. Ihopethatyoufindthetools,problems,andmodelsusefulinyourcareer. And I hope that the diversity of examples connects with and aids your curiosity about how the world is put together. Bon voyage! 2010-05-13 00:43:32 / rev b667c9e4c1f1+ 7 7 8 8 0 2010-05-13 00:43:32 / rev b667c9e4c1f1+ 8 8 9 9 1 Part 1 Organizing complexity 1 Divide and conquer 3 2 Abstraction 27 The first solution to the messiness and complexity of the world, just as with the mess on our desks and in our living spaces, is to organize the complexity. Two techniques for organizing complexity are the subject of Part 1. The first technique is divide-and-conquer reasoning: dividing a large problem into manageable subproblems. The second technique is abstrac- tion: choosing compact representations that hide unimportant details in 2010-05-13 00:43:32 / rev b667c9e4c1f1+ 9 9 10 10 2 order to reveal important features. The next two chapters illustrate these techniques with many examples. 2010-05-13 00:43:32 / rev b667c9e4c1f1+ 10 10
Description: