ebook img

The Acoustic Reflex. Basic Principles and Clinical Applications PDF

531 Pages·1984·8.21 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview The Acoustic Reflex. Basic Principles and Clinical Applications

THE ACOUSTIC REFLEX Basic Principles and Clinical Applications Edited by SHLOMO SILMAN Audio logy and Speech Pathology Service Veterans Administration Medical Center East Orange, New Jersey Department of Otolaryngology University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Newark, New Jersey Department of Communication Arts and Sciences New York University New York, New York With a Foreword by Donald D. Dirks 1984 ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers) Orlando San Diego San Francisco New York London Toronto Montreal Sydney Tokyo Sâo Paulo COPYRIGHT © 1984, BY ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE REPRODUCED OR TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC OR MECHANICAL, INCLUDING PHOTOCOPY, RECORDING, OR ANY INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, WITHOUT PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM THE PUBLISHER. ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. Orlando, Florida 32887 United Kingdom Edition published by ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. (LONDON) LTD. 24/28 Oval Road, London NW1 7DX Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: The acoustic reflex. Includes index. 1. Audiometry. 2. Acoustic reflex. I. Silman, Shlomo. [DNLM: 1. Reflex, Acoustic. WV 272 A1855] RF294.A26 1983 617.8 83-22318 ISBN 0-12-643450-6 (alk. paper) PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 84 85 86 87 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contributors Numbers in parentheses indicate the pages on which the authors' contributions begin. MICHAEL BENNETT1 (35), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brunei University, Uxbridge, England MICHAEL G. BLOCK (387), Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 ERIK BORG (63, 413), Department of Audiology, Karolinska Hospital, and Department of Physiology II, Karolinska Institute, S-104 01, Stockholm, Sweden ANDREA BOSATRA (301), Ear, Nose, and Throat Clinic, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy S. ALLEN COUNTER (63), Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, and the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 STANLEY A. GELFAND (137, 187), Audiology and Speech Pathology Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, East Orange, New Jersey 07019; and Department of Neurosciences and Surgery, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey KATHLEEN W. GREEN (275), Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, State University College at Cortland, Cortland, New York 13045 'Present address: Nicolet Biomedical, 5225-4 Verona Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53711-0287. xi xii CONTRIBUTORS RHÖN A HELLMAN (469), Communication Sciences Laboratory, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 DAVID J. LILLY2 (101, 329), Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, and Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 A AGE R. M0LLER (1), Department of Neurological Surgery, Presbyterian University Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 CHARLES A. MANGHAM (441), Subsection of Otology and Neurotology, The Mason Clinic, Seattle, Washington 98101 ROBERT H. MARGOLIS (275), Communicative Disorders Program, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13210 ROLAND NILSSON (413), Research Department, Project Lindholmen, Göteborg, Sweden S-402 75 NEIL PIPER (187), Audiology and Speech Pathology Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, East Orange, New Jersey 07019 GÜNTER RÖSLER (63), Department of Physiology II, Karolinska Institute, S-104 01 Stockholm, Sweden MARIO RUSSOLO (301), Ear, Nose, and Throat Clinic, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy BERTRAM SCHARF (469), Auditory Perception Laboratory, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 JANET E. SHANKS (329), Audiology Section, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Long Beach, California 90822; and Division of Otolaryngology/Head-Neck Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92717 SHLOMO SILMAN (187, 225), Audiology and Speech Pathology Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, East Orange, New Jersey 07019; Department of Otolaryngology, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey; and the Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, New York University, New York, New York CAROL ANN SILVERMAN (187, 301), Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Mary mount Manhattan College, New York, New York 10021 TERRY L. WILEY (387), Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 2Present address: Audiology Department, Good Samaritan Hospital, Portland, Oregon 97210. CONTRIBUTORS xiii RICHARD H. WILSON (329), Audiology Section, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Long Beach, California 90822; and Division of Otolaryngology/Head-Neck Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92717 LESLIE VAN FRANK3 (187), PhD. Program in Speech and Hearing Science, Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York, New York, New York 10036 3Present address: 52 Carolin Road, Montclair, New Jersey 07043. Foreword Although the middle-ear muscles in humans were described anatomically more than 400 years ago, the purpose of the middle-ear reflex continues to be the subject of scientific interest and considerable speculation. During the past 40 years significant technological advancements in instrumentation have enabled investigators and clinicians to make increasingly more precise measurements of the response from middle-ear muscle activation. In general, results from these experiments have led to elimination of some of the older theories of middle-ear muscle function; however, a definitive and comprehensive theory concerning the role of the middle-ear muscles in hearing awaits further development and inves- tigation. The response of the middle-ear muscles, especially to loud sound, acquired new significance following the now classic monograph of Metz in 1946 concern- ing the use of impedance measurements in the diagnosis of auditory impair- ments. Subsequently, investigators, particularly in the Scandinavian countries, developed and investigated methods for the clinical measurement of the middle- ear muscle reflex. In the late 1960s, and thereafter, interest and investigations in the diagnostic use of the middle-ear muscle response grew rapidly here in the United States. As a consequence, the measurement of the middle-ear muscle reflex has become a routine clinical procedure in nearly all comprehensive eval- uations of hearing impairments. The widespread use and investigation of this powerful objective technique has expanded so rapidly in the past decade that a critical and comprehensive review of the significant experiments and theories of middle-ear muscle function in one volume have become highly desirable, if not necessary. These considerations became the primary impetus for the current book devoted to the theory and clinical implications of the middle-ear muscle reflex. xv xvi FOREWORD This book contains chapters that amply characterize the international and multidisciplinary interest in the middle-ear muscle reflex. The contributors are a group of international experts with academic backgrounds in engineering, au- diology, medicine, and physiology. As a consequence, the chapters reflect the impressive diversity of approaches to the basic and clinical investigation of the middle-ear muscles. In this sense, the book represents a genuine multidiscipli- nary appraisal of the middle-ear reflex in man. A concerted attempt has been made in this volume to present a balanced evaluation of the current knowledge concerning the middle-ear muscle reflex. Besides chapters on the basic neuroanatomy and physiology of the middle-ear muscles, the reader will find comprehensive reviews of the various characteris- tics of the reflex that are predictive of the anatomical site of an auditory lesion or may be employed in the objective estimation of auditory threshold. In addition, the reader will quickly recognize that the purpose and utility of the middle-ear muscles in man go far beyond clinical diagnosis. For example, chapters are included that describe the protection afforded the middle-ear muscle reflex against the adverse effects of industrial noise, the possible enhanced detection and recognition of auditory signals embedded in a high-intensity interfering masker, and the complicated and controversial relationship of the reflex response to loudness. This book will no doubt have special interest to professionals involved in auditory diagnosis. However, the comprehensive approach taken in the book should provide significant background and stimulation for researchers and stu- dents interested in the auditory system. DONALD D. DIRKS Head and Neck Surgery UCLA School of Medicine Preface Since Metz's finding in 1946 that the acoustic reflex is a potential tool in clinical diagnosis of otic pathology, worldwide research on the acoustic reflex has rapidly proliferated. Subsequent research has revealed new parameters, and a body of knowledge concerning its clinical utility has amassed. The results of the investigations have been made known in the journals of various disciplines— otolaryngology, neurology, physiology, audiology, hearing science, psychology, etc. So many facts about the acoustic reflex have been revealed that they cannot be described even in a few chapters. A complete book on the acoustic reflex is warranted. The need for dissemination of recent findings is evident in the ever- growing number of courses, seminars, and workshops on this topic. Although previous books on impedance have provided excellent coverage of the acoustic reflex, they have not discussed the following topics, which are comprehensively detailed in this book: (1) methods and instrumentation for controlling the occurrence of artifacts during ipsilateral stimulation; (2) acoustic- reflex magnitude in differential diagnosis; (3) normative data for the contralateral acoustic-reflex threshold, the acoustic-reflex latency and interaural latency, and acoustic-reflex adaptation; (4) the temporal characteristics of acoustic-im- mittance devices; and (5) prediction of mild, high-frequency, and nonorganic hearing-loss ears from the acoustic reflex. Furthermore, the effects of drugs and systemic disease on the acoustic reflex has never been the topic of a chapter in previous books on impedance. Moreover, previous books on impedance have concentrated on the concept of impedance during the resting state. In this book, the concept of impedance during acoustic-reflex contraction and the interaction of the impedance components with various probe tones in infants and adults are described. In various studies, the relation between loudness and the acoustic reflex has been debated, but the issue in its physiological and psychoacoustic xvii xviii PREFACE aspects has never been fully explored as it is here. A controversy exists regarding the role of the acoustic reflex in noise. In this book, research evidence is pre- sented that details the role of the acoustic reflex in noise and discusses its potential as an index of noise susceptibility. Although previous books have covered the classical theories of acoustic-reflex function, it is here that the classical concepts are integrated into one comprehensive theory. Coverage of diagnostic acoustic-reflex and nonacoustic-reflex profiles in this book is based on the results of the most recent investigations. Because of the dimensions of this book, it was necessary to include a chapter that expanded on the neurophysiology of the acoustic reflex so that phenomena such as latency, magnitude, fatigue, adaptation, and temporal integration could be more fully understood. Clinicians and researchers in audiology, deaf education, engineering, hear- ing science, neurology, otolaryngology, physiology, and psychology will find this book invaluable for enriching their knowledge of clinical diagnosis of otic pathology, as well as for guiding future research on the acoustic reflex. This book can also serve as a reference text in a course on impedance. I am indebted to Dr. Roy Sullivan, who was my first professor of impedance and who stimulated my interest in this area; to Dr. Gerald R. Popelka, who was a great influence on my research on the acoustic reflex and who served on my doctoral committee; to Dr. Maurice H. Miller, my very dear friend and colleague and former professor who has continually supported and encouraged my profes- sional development; to Dr. Stanley A. Gelfand, my best friend and colleague, who enlightened me with his wisdom; to the staff at the East Orange Veterans Administration Medical Center—John Lutolf, Neil Piper, Jean Sullivan, Theresa Showers, Ella Taliaferro, Valerie Adams—and lastly, but not least, to my colleague and friend, Dr. Carol Ann Silverman, for her constructive and thought- ful advice on this book. Neurophysiological Basis of the Acoustic Middle-Ear Reflex AAGE R. M0LLER ANATOMY OF THE STAPEDIUS-REFLEX ARC DIRECT PATHWAYS It has long been known that the two middle-ear muscles are innervated by two different cranial nerves: the facial nerve (Ν VII) innervates the stapedius muscle, whereas the trigeminal nerve (Ν V) innervates the tensor tympani muscle (Pol- itzer, 1861). Although it may be inferred from earlier work that the superior olivary complex is most likely the reflex center (Hammerschlag, 1899, 1901), the details of the reflex arc have not been studied until relatively recently (Borg, 1973). The anatomical organization of the reflex arc for the acoustic middle-ear reflex (for both the tensor tympani and stapedius muscles) has been studied mostly through experiments in rabbits (Borg, 1973). Contrary to what is believed to be the case in humans, the tensor tympani muscle in the rabbit contracts in response to sound as an acoustic reflex. In these rabbit experiments, lesions were made at various locations on the ascending auditory pathway. After sufficient time had THE ACOUSTIC REFLEX 1 Copyright © 1984 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. ISBN 0-12-643450-6

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.