ebook img

Studies on Geocalycaceae VII. Subspecific differentiation of Chiloscyphus semiteres together with further refinements on Chiloscyphus (s. lat.) PDF

5 Pages·1992·2.2 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Studies on Geocalycaceae VII. Subspecific differentiation of Chiloscyphus semiteres together with further refinements on Chiloscyphus (s. lat.)

Contr.Univ.Mich.Herb. 18:107-111. 1992. STUDIESONGEOCALYCACEAEVII. SUBSPECIFIC DIFFERENTIATIONOFCHILOSCYPHUS SEMITERESTOGETHERWITHFURTHERREFINEMENTS IN CHILOSCYPHUS (S. LAT.) JohnJ. Engel DepartmentofBotany FieldMuseumofNaturalHistory Chicago,IL60605,U.S.A. Chiloscyphussemiteresisapan-southtemperatespeciesoccurringintheAus- tralasian, American and African sectors (Fig. 1). The species occurs in variable frequencies in different parts ofits range. It is veryrare in the Falkland Islands (Engel, 1990),probablylackingintheMagellanianzoneofsouthernSouthAmer- ica(IdidnotrecorditfortheBrunswickPeninsula[Engel, 1978],andthefewother Magellanianrecordsaresuspect),andsomewhatcommonintheValdivianzoneand onJuanFernandez.IntheAfricansectorthespeciesisrestrictedtoCapeProvince, South Africa, where apparently it israthercommonjudgingfrom the numberof specimen citations in Grolle (1959). The species is of variable frequency within Australasia:itisrathercommoninNewZealand,butinTasmaniaandAustraliaC. semiteres is one ofthe most common orperhapsthemostcommon hepatic. The speciesalsooccursintheoceanicIslesofScilly(Paton, 1965)andScotland(Long, 1982). Chiloscyphussemiteresischaracterizedbya)undivided,entireleavesthatare broadly rounded to truncate at the apex; b) conspicuous, deeply divided un- derleavesthatfrequentlyareasymmetricallyinsertedandhavethelaminalmargin oneachsidewithaprocessgradingfromdentiformtolobuliform;andc)avariable gynoecial position: some to many on short lateral-intercalary branches lacking normalleaves,whileothersareonterminalbranchesandmainshoots. ThespeciesexhibitssubspecificdifferentiationonlyintheAustralasiansector, whereitmaybeseparatedintotwovarietiesasfollows: KeytoVarietiesofChiloscyphussemiteres 1. Underleafdisclateral armaturewell-developed: mostlylaciniatetolobu- late; trigones minute to small, only occasionally medium and straight- sided;underleavesoften 1.5-3x stemwidth;plantstranslucent C.semiteresvar.semiteres 1. Underleafdisclateralarmature reduced: mostlydentiformtociliiformor lacking, only sporadically small-laciniiform; trigones normally large and bulgingtoknotlike (inshadeformsmediumandstraight-sidedtoweakly bulging);underleavesnormally 1-1.5x stemwidth;plantsduU-opaquc C.semiteresvar.canaiiculatus Chiloscyphussemiteres(Lehm.)Lehm.&Lindenb.var.semiteres Jungermanniasemiteres Lehm., Linnaea4: 363. 1829; Chiloscyphussemiteres (Lehm.) Lehm. & Lindenb. in G. L. & N., Syn. Hep. 190. 1845; 107 o Chiloscyphussemiteres(Lehm.)Lehm&Lindenb. • var.semiteres A var.canaliculatus(Hook.f.&Tayl.)Engel FIG.1. DistributionofthetwovarietiesofChiloscyphussemiieres. 1992 ENGEL:CHILOSCYPHUS 109 Lophocolea semiteres (Lehm.) Mitt., J. Linn. Soc, Bot. 16: 188. 1877. OriginalMaterial. South Africa: Cape Prov., (Cap. BonaeSpei), ''la- tereorientalimontisTeufelsbcrg",Ecklon(G!). Plantstranslucent.Trigonesminutetosmall,occasionallymediumandstraight- sided,2.4-4.8/xm, the ratiooftrigonediametertolengthofinterveningthinwall between trigones 1:2-5.6. Underleaf disc often 1.5-2x stem width; the lateral armaturewelldeveloped:mostlylaciniiform,attimeslobuliform. Distribution:Pan-southtemperate(Fig. 1). Chiloscyphussemiteresvar. canaliculatus (G. L. & N.) Engel, comb. &stat. nov. Chiloscyphus canaliculatus G. L. & N., Syn. Hep. 710. 1847; Jungermannia canaliculataHook.f.&Tayl.,LondonJ.Bot.3:563.1844,horn,illeg.,nonJ. canaliculata Nees, Hep. Javanicae 10. 1830; Lophocoleaheterophylloides var. canaliculata(G. L. & N.)Carring. & Pears., Pap. & Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania1887:51.1888;Lophocoleacanaliculata(G.L.&N.)Steph.,Bull. Herb.Boissier6(9):786. 1906(=Spec.Hep.3;86)—.Lectotype{nov.).New Zealand: "FallsofWaitangi",Hookers. n. (FH! c. per. + S). Plantsdull-opaque. Trigonesnormallylargeandbulgingtoknotlike, inshade forms medium and straight-sided to weakly bulging, (4.8-)6-7.2(-8.4) /xm, the ratiooftrigonediametertolengthofinterveningthinwall between trigonesvari- able: l:(0.9-)1.2-2.6(-3.2). Underleafdiscusually 1-1.5x stemwidth;thelateral armature reduced: mostly dentiform to ciliiform or lacking, only sporadically small-laciniiform. Distribution: NewZealand,TasmaniaandsoutheastAustralia(Fig. 1). FURTHERREFINEMENTSINCHILOSCYPHUS 1)SuBSPECiFicDifferentiationofChiloscyphusnovae-zeelandiae ThispolymorphicspeciesoccursinNewZealand,TasmaniaandsoutheastAus- tralia. Itmaybesubdividedintothreeunits,asfollows: a)Chiloscyphusnovae-zeelandiaevar.novae-zeelandiae Jungermannia novae-zeelandiae Lehm. & Lindenb. in Lehmann, Nov. Min. Cogn. Stirp. Pug. 6: 33. 1834; Lophocolea novae-zeelandiae (Lehm. & Lindenb.)Nees/// G. L. & N.,Syn. Hep. 168. 1845; Chiloscyphusnovae- zeelandiae(Lehm. & Lindenb.)Engel&Schust.,NovaHedwigia39:420. 1984[1985]. OriginalMaterial.NewZealand: SouthIs.,DuskyBay.s. coll. [Menzies](BM!,G!,S![2],exhb. Hooker—c. per.). b)Chiloscyphus novae-zeelandiaevar. meridionalis (Steph.) Engel, comb. & stat. nov. LophocoleameridionalisSXcph.,Bull.Herb.Boissier6(10):888.1906(^Spec. Hep. 3: 113). OriginalMaterial. NewZealand: "Insulameridionalis", Waimate(Canterbury), May 1901,Beckett2737{G\-c. d). 110 CONTR.DNIVI-RSITYOFMICHIGANHERBARIUM VOLUME18 c) Chiloscyphus novae-zeelandiae var. grandistipulus (Schilfn.) Engel. comh. & Stat. nov. LophocoleagrandisdpulaSchilfn.inNaumann,Forschungsr. Gazelle4: 12,/;/. 3, f. 29-32. 1890. ORicaNAi, Maihriai,. New Zealand: Auckland, (S Nov 1875,Naumann(FH!,suhL.stipularis, nam.hb.). 2)Chiloscyphusperpusiill'Scomh. nov. Chiloscyphusperpusillus(Hook.f.&Tayl.)Engel,comb. nov. Jungermannia perpusilla Hook. f. & Tayl., London .1. Bot. 3: 380. 1844; Lophocoleaperpiisilla(Hook.f.&Tayl.)G.L.&N.,Syn.Hep. 163. 1845. Originai Material.Ni;wZi;alanixCampbellIs.,Hooker{BM\\-\].PH!). 3)Thi:TaxonomilPosihonofChiioscyphusstriathllusMass. This species occurs in both the Valdivian and Magellanian zonesofsouthern SouthAmerica. Ithaselongate,longitudinallyorientedlamellaeonthestem,and1 am unaware of any other member of .lungermanniales with such processes. It bclont'its" inasectionofitsown,asfollows: Chiloscyphussect.StriatelliEngel,sect. nov. Folia caulinaet amphigastria caulinaprofunde bilobata, superliciehus levibis. Caulislamellisparallelis,longitudinalibus,latitudine2-5cellularibusornata. Type: ChiloscvphussiriatellusMass. Leavesandundcrleavesdeeplybifid,smooth. Stemsonallsideswithparallel, longitudinallamellae2-5cellshigh. 4)Tnr:Taxonomk PosrnoNoeChiioscyphusaposinensisPiippo Chiloscyphus aposmensis ofChina issimilar to the pan-tropical C niuricalus (Lehm.) Engel & Schust. ofsect. MicrolophocoleaSpruce in havingspinose leaf surfacesanddeeplydividedleavesandundcrleaves,butdiffersfromthatspeciesin 1)theformoftheleafspines(thelumenofeachprotuberanceisconfluentwiththat ofthesubtending laminal cell and not separated from it by a crosswall [lig. 4 in Chang&Gao, 1984]):2)theplacementofleafspinesonlyonthedorsalsurfaceof theleaf;and3)thedenseclustersofspinesatthedorsalbaseofeachleaf(fig.4in Chang&Gao, 1984). Chiloscyphusaposinensisbelongsinanindependentsection, asfollows: Chilosc-yphussect. AposinensesEngel,sect. nov. Folia caulina pagina dorsali spinosa; spinae dispersae (cellula quaque spina unica ornata), sparsae ad basin ventralem, dense fasciculatae ad basin dorsalem. digitiformes. luminibuscontluentibuscumluminibuslaminae; foliacaulinapagina leviinstructa. Type. Lophocolea chinensis Gao & Chang, Bull. Boi. Res. 4: 87. 1984 = ChiloscyphusaposinensisPiippo(cf. Piippo, 1990). Dorsal leafsurfacespinesscattered, 1 each percell,sparse atventral base, in denseclustersatposticalbase,fingerlike,theluminaconfluentwiththatt>flamina; ventralleafsurfacesmooth. 1992 ENGEL:CHILOSCYPHUS 111 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IamgratefultoDr.RolfSingerforassistancewiththeLatindiagnoses. LITERATURECITED Engel,J.J. 1978.AtaxonomicandphytogeographicstudyofBrunswickPeninsula(StraitofMagellan) HepaticaeandAnthocerotae.Fieldiana,Bot.41:i-viii,1-319. 1990.FalklandIslands(IslasMalvinas)HepaticaeandAnthocerotophyta: Ataxonomicand phytogeographicstudy.Fieldiana,Bot.N.S.25:i-viii,1-209. Chang,Kuang-chuandChienGao.1984.Plantaenovaehcpaticarumsinarum.Bull.Bot.Res.4:83-99. Grolle,R. 1959.BcitragzurKenntnisderafrikanischenLophocoleen.Trans.Brit.Bryol.Soc.3:582- 598,pi. 1-3. Long,D. G. 1982. Lophocoleasemiteres(Lehm.)Mitt,establishedinArgyll,Scotland.J.Bryol. 12: 113-115. Paton,J.A.1965.Lophocoleasemiteres(Lehm.)Mitt,andTelaraneamurphyaesp.nov.establishedon Tresco.Trans.Brit.Bryol.Soc.4:775-779,f.L Piippo.S.,1990.AnnotatedcatalogueofChineseHepaticaeandAnthocerotae.J.HattoriBot.Lab.68: 1-192.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.