Self-Appraisal Report

283 Pages·2017·2.49 MB·English

by  Latha Bhat

Self-Appraisal Report 2016

SELF-APPRAISAL REPORT 2016

Tetri Chandravanshi College of Education,
Garwha

To be submitted to
NAAC, Bangalore

1
Self-Appraisal Report 2016

Table of Contents

PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................... 3
PART I-INSTITUTIONAL
DATA…………………………………………………………………………………………………..5
PART II-EVALUATIVE REPORT ...................................................................................................... 38
a) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 38
b) CRITERION-WISE
ANALYSIS……………………………………………………………………………………………7
CRITERION I: CURRICULAR ASPECTS ..................................................................................... 39
CRITERION – II: TEACHING – LEARNING AND EVALUATION ........................................... 48
CRITERION III: RESEARCH, CONSULTANCY AND EXTENSION ......................................... 65
CRITERION IV: INFRASTRUCTURE AND LEARNING RESOURCES .................................... 75
CRITERION V: STUDENT SUPPORT AND PROGRESSION ..................................................... 88
CRITERION VI: GOVERNANCE ANDLEADERSHIP ................................................................ 98
CRITERION VII: INNOVATIVE PRACTISES ............................................................................ 116
PART III- MAPPING OF ACADEMIC ACTIVITIES OF THE INSTITUTION ............................. 122
TEACHER APPRAISAL REPORTS ............................................................................................. 12123
DECLARATION BY THE HEAD OF THE INSTITUTION ............................................................ 244

2
Self-Appraisal Report 2016

PREFACE

It’s a golden opportunity for our college to submit Self Appraisal Report (SAR) of our
college to National Assessment & Accreditation Council (NAAC), Bangalore (Cycle-I) for
improvement of quality of our college. The internal quality assurance cell was established in
the year 2015.
Our college is an urban college that is affiliated to Nilambar Pitambar University. Our aim is
to provide good quality education to all the students in and around Ranchi. As the college is
situated in rural area, hence we aim at promoting education to all class of people in and
around Garhwa.
In view of the above, the institution looks forward to getting validated and accredited as
well as getting into process of institutional self-development through cycles of re-
accreditations.
Asserting our firm conviction in the methodology of NAAC assessment I invite the
NAAC to help us in our onward journey towards further improvement and sustenance of
quality.
Principal
Dr Rajesh Babu

3
Self-Appraisal Report 2016

PART I-INSTITUTIONAL DATA
A. Profile of the Institution

1. Name and address of the institution: Tetri chandravanshi college of
education

2. Website URL- www.tccedu.in/

3. For communication:Tetri chandravanshi college of education , village -
pindra, district - Garhwa

Office
Name Telephone Fax E-Mail Address
Number with No
STD Code
Head/Principal [email protected]
Dr Ramji Goswami
Vice-Principal 9570007060 [email protected]
Sunil Kumar Sah
Self - appraisal 7677162892 [email protected]
Co-ordinator
Dr Rajendra prasad
yadav

Residence

Name Telephone Number Mobile Number
with STD Code
Head/Principal 9304739332 [email protected]
Dr Rajesh Babu
Vice-Principal 9570007060 [email protected]
Sunil Kumar sah
Self - appraisal Co- 7677162892 [email protected]
ordinator
Dr Rajendra prasad
yadav

4
Self-Appraisal Report 2016

4. Location of the Institution:

Urban Semi-urban Rural Tribal
Any other (specify and indicate)

5. Campus area in acres: 3.2
6. Is it a recognized minority institution? Yes No

7. Date of establishment of the institution:
Month & Year

MM YYYY

10 2007
8. University/Board to which the institution is affiliated:

Nilambar Pitambar University

9. Details of UGC recognition under sections 2(f) and 12(B) of the UGC Act.
Month & Year

MM YYYY

2f

Month & Year

MM YYYY

12B

10. Type of Institution
a. By funding i. Government
ii. Grant-in-aid
iii. Constituent
iv. Self-financed
v. Any other (specify and indicate)

b. By Gender i. Only for Men
5
Self-Appraisal Report 2016

ii. Only for Women
iii. Co-education
c.By Nature i. University Dept.
ii. IASE
iii. Autonomous College
iv. Affiliated College
v. Constituent College
vi. Dept. of Education of Composite
College
vii. CTE
Viii. Any other (specify and indicate)

11. Does the University / State Education Act have provision for autonomy?

Yes No

If yes, has the institution applied for autonomy?

Yes No

12. Details of Teacher Education programmes offered by the institution:

Sl. Level Programme Entry Nature of Duration Medium of
No. / Course Qualificati Award instruction
on
Certificate
i) Pre-primary Diploma
Degree
Certificate
Primary/
ii) D.Eled 10+2 Diploma 2 years English
Elementary
Degree
Certificate
Secondary/
iii) Diploma
Sr. secondary
B.Ed Graduate Degree 2 years English
iv. Post Diploma
Graduate Degree
v. Other Certificate
(specify) Diploma
6
Self-Appraisal Report 2016

Degree
(Additional rows may be inserted as per requirement)
13. Give details of NCTE recognition (for each programme mentioned in Q.12 above)
Level Programme Order No. & Date Valid Sanctioned
upto Intake
Pre-primary
D.El.Ed ERC/7- 50
165.6.16/NCTE/D.El.Ed-
Additional
Primary/Elementary
course/2013/22413
13/12/2013
B.Ed ERC/7- 100
79.6(1).25/2007/9405
Secondary/
Sr.secondary
11-09-2007
Post Graduate
Other (specify)
(Additional rows may be inserted as per requirement)

B) Criterion-wise inputs

Criterion I: Curricular Aspects

1. Does the Institution have a stated
Vision
Yes No
Yes No
Mission
Yes No
Values
Yes No
Objectives

Yes No
2. a) Does the institution offer self-financed programme(s)?
7
Self-Appraisal Report 2016

If yes,
2
a) How many programmes?
b) Fee charged per programme B.Ed – 70,000 per year
D.Eled 60,000 per year
3. Are there programmes with semester system no
Is the institution representing/participating in the curriculum development/ revision
processes of the regulatory bodies?

Yes No

If yes, how many faculty are on the various curriculum development/vision
committees/boards of universities/regulating authority.

4. Number of methods/elective options (programme wise)
D.Ed. 10
B.Ed. 13
M.Ed. (Full Time)
M.Ed. (Part Time)
Any other (specify and indicate)

5. Are there Programmes offered in modular form
Yes No

Number

6. Are there Programmes where assessment of teachers by the students has been
introduced

Yes No

8N um ber
Self-Appraisal Report 2016

7. Are there Programmes with faculty exchange/visiting faculty
Yes No

Number 1
9
Self-Appraisal Report 2016

8. Is there any mechanism to obtain feedback on the curricular aspects from the
 Heads of practice teaching schools Yes No
 Academic peers Yes No
 Alumni Yes No
Yes No
 Students
Yes No
 Employers

9. How long does it take for the institution to introduce a new programme within the
existing system?

1 year
10. Has the institution introduced any new courses in teacher education during the last
three years?
Yes No

Number 1

11. Are there courses in which major syllabus revision was done during the last five years?

Yes No

Number 14
12. Does the institution develop and deploy action plans for effective implementation of the
curriculum?
Yes No
13. Does the institution encourage the faculty to prepare course outlines?

Yes No

10