RISK APPETITE IN PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATION IRM SOUTH AFRICA REGIONAL GROUP MEETING DE BEERS;CROWN MINES 11 FEBRUARY 2014 THE EXPERIENCE OF EMBEDDING A CULTURE OF MANAGING RISK IN THE GAUTENG DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENT CONTENT • Background • Risk Appetite - implementation • Way forward • Conclusion BACKGROUND – RISK AND CHANGE BACKGROUND – SIZE OF THE ORGANISATION • Entire Department Staff Complement - 1590 • Budget Allocation Human Settlement Development Grant + Equitable Share = 4.4 Billion • Enterprise Risk Management Unit (staff complements)- 12 • Five Regions Tshwane Johannesburg Ekurhuleni Mogale & Meyerton Westonaria • Four Urban Renewal Project Evarton Alexandra Bekkersdal Winterveld BACKGROUND - TONE AT THE TOP OFFICE OF THE MEC MEC'S OFFICE HEAD OF DEPARTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISE ANTI-FRAUD INFORMATION CORPORATE RISK AND SECURITY GOVERNANCE MANAGEMENT CORRUPTION HUMAN SETTLEMENT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, POLICY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT AND MONITORING AND INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT EVALUATION BACKGOUND – RISK UNIVERSE 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 Housing Merged Merged Merged 20 risk exposures 21 Risk Exposures 14 Risk Exposures 8 risk exposures Budgetary constraints to Rapid urbanization, Inability to meet targets for Inability to meet expected eradicate housing backlog. population growth and in – Human Settlement Projects targets for Human migration into Gauteng. Settlement Projects Delays in processing of Service delivery protest. Lack of Integrated Lack of Integrated payments. Information Information Technology Technology System System 2 Lack of suitable and well Lack of suitable and well Housing backlog and rapid Limited well-located land located land for housing located land for human increase in housing for Human Settlement development. settlement development. demand Development Inability to manage growth Insufficient Budget to Difficulty in acquiring Service delivery protests of informal settlements as a provide and develop suitable result of emigration and integrated infrastructure. and well-located land immigration into the province. Lack of integrated and Poor management of land. Lack of integrated cohesive Fraud and corruption coordinated plan between planning amongst the National, Province, spheres Municipalities, of Government to Agencies/stakeholders i.e. deal with Human Eskom, Department of Settlement Public Transport, Road and Works etc. RISK APPETITE - DERTEMINANTS • Personalities/People – Culture & Behavior – Leadership – Power – Decision making • Business Model and Strategy – Mandate, Vision, Mission, Structure • Compliance with Rules and Regulations • External environment – Community needs – Stakeholders needs – Services Rendered – Ethos , Values and Batho Pele – Political will RISK APPETITE - LEGISLATIVE MANDATE • Corporate Governance King Report III – Chapter 4 The role of HOD, CRO, Line managers and other officials • PFMA Section 38 – Responsibility of the HOD Section 45 – Responsibility of other officials • Treasury Regulations Sec. 3.2 – Annual Risk Assessment(emerging risks) Risk Management Strategy which include Fraud Prevention Plan • Public Sector Risk Management Framework • GPG Framework - COSO Guideline for Risk Management Processes – Adapt to our own environment • GPG Standards & Policy Ensures implementation of ERM and uniformity in the province – Adopt as is RISK APPETITE – OVERSIGHT Oversight bodies Role Executive Authority – Governance of ERM in Province EXCO/Board Head of Dept.(HOD)/CEO Forum Quarterly reviews Top risks Audit Committee(AC) Quarterly reviews Top risks GPG Risk Management Forum CRO meet quarterly – Status on ERM Implementation General Audit Services(GAS)- Conduct Risk based audit & test Internal Audit ERM Implementation annually Auditor General(AG) – External Annual reviews Audit SCOPA Review AG Report on Risk Matters Public Service Commission Annual review ERM Implementation National Treasury Test maturity levels (SSP) National Human Settlement Annual review DORA - Grant RISK APPETITE LEADERSHIP AND OWNERSHIP • HOD Understood the need to embed risk management culture – PFMA Sec 38 Mandate for RM processes He gave unqualified support and priority – “Setting the Tone at the Top” • MANAGEMENT(DDGs, CD &Directors) Difficult group to convince Own perception on risk appetite We had to fight for their time and attention with other departmental priorities Rank was critical to them • CRO Embed risk management to entire organization – Coordination and Facilitation Get buy – in from all stakeholders Empower the leadership and the rest in risk management
Description: