Andrea Bernhard Quality Assurance in an International Higher Education Area VS RESEARCH Andrea Bernhard Q uality Assurance in an International Higher Education Area A Case Study Approach and Comparative Analysis With a foreword by Prof. Dr. Hans Pechar VS RESEARCH Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografi e; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. Dissertation University of Klagenfurt, 2011 Gedruckt mit Unterstützung der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, des Amtes der Steiermärkischen Landesregierung, Abteilung 3 – Wissenschaft und Forschung sowie des Alfred Schachner Gedächtnisfonds in Graz. 1st Edition 2012 All rights reserved © VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2012 Editorial Offi ce: Dorothee Koch | Anita Wilke VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften is a brand of Springer Fachmedien. Springer Fachmedien is part of Springer Science+Business Media. www.vs-verlag.de No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo- copying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Registered and/or industrial names, trade names, trade descriptions etc. cited in this publication are part of the law for trade-mark protection and may not be used free in any form or by any means even if this is not specifi cally marked. Cover design: KünkelLopka Medienentwicklung, Heidelberg Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany ISBN 978-3-531-18566-8 Foreword Quality assurance is one of the controversial topics in higher education policy. The doctoral thesis by Andrea Bernhard deals with recent developments on this topic. These developments are strongly shaped by the internationalization of higher education which she calls the “International Higher Education Area”. This is a theoretical construct, because in its present legally codified form, each sys- tem of higher education is still a national entity. Bernhard’s thesis addresses the tensions that result from the fact that national higher education regimes are in- creasingly weakened by global trends. Internationalization is only one of the many factors that have radically changed higher education in OECD countries over the last few decades. Expan- sion of higher education has reached unprecedented levels since the mid-20th century. All other trends and developments that are addressed in Bernhard’s thesis – including internationalization, diversification, and privatization – can to some degree be regarded as a by-product of this massification. Bernhard explores how quality assurance in teaching and research, a primary concern of universities at all times, has changed under the condition of mass higher education systems and how a formalized framework of quality assurance has emerged. This book contributes significantly to a better understanding of these new arrangements. Prof. Dr. Hans Pechar University of Klagenfurt Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies (IFF): Vienna Location Institute of Science Communication and Higher Education Research Preface Many different stakeholders are involved in higher education issues, transfor- mation processes are continuously going on, various stakeholders imply different opinions, perspectives and interests – hence, quality assurance of higher educa- tion is ever-present. This research study – which is based on a doctoral thesis – tried to create a new understanding of quality assurance in higher education, identified new and emerging issues within this field of research and worked out explanations and recommendations for the future. I had the possibility to write this research study based on my job setting in terms of a quality assurance agen- cy (Austrian Accreditation Council) as well as a higher education institution (University of Graz). From the different perspectives of a student, a staff member of a quality assurance agency and a researcher at a higher education institution I considered the field of quality assurance in higher education. This gave me the opportunity to and benefit of always being in touch and tightly involved with the relevant stakeholders of my field of research. Furthermore, it was also inspiring to comprehensively discover the different complexities and intricacies of higher education systems but also entails that it is not always easy to restrain oneself and to formulate objective and general assumptions without involving one’s personal attitude and perspectives. Writing this book gave me the possibility to discover the rise of quality as- surance within an international higher education area. Moreover I had the chance to study six country cases, to discover their history, culture and politics and to get in touch with people from different national backgrounds as well as with leading national and international organisations and networks dealing with quali- ty assurance. Having experienced this diversity and variety for the last four years was among what I enjoyed most but also challenged me to a high extent. There is a lot of research on higher education by different individual researchers and research teams, international organisations and networks eager to understand the complexity of this field of research, which challenged me during my research. To come to an end was tightly linked to the enthusiasm for this research topic, the extensive literature and the ongoing discussions in the media about it. I very much appreciated to have the chance to write about such a complex, highly con- troversially and up-to-date issue. 8 Preface Many thanks to everybody who supported me in writing my doctoral thesis. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisors, Prof. Hans Pechar (University of Klagenfurt) and Prof. Werner Lenz (University of Graz), who encouraged me to write this thesis and guided me along the path. I would like to thank them for granting me the needed freedom to pursue my research questions in an academic but also self-guided way to grow into a community of researchers and develop an understanding of these diverse higher education systems, which have been highly rewarding opportunities. Furthermore, thanks to all experts that assisted me with essential feedback and their expert opinion on my research questions. I owe my thanks also to these numerous reviewers and interviewees from Austria, Germany, Finland, the Unit- ed Kingdom, the United States of America and Canada as well as to international organisations and researchers affiliated with quality assurance in higher educa- tion (all of them are listed in the annex). Especially the feedback to my initial country reports helped me to get the facts in the six case-studies right. Due to their invaluable cooperation and assistance this comparative analysis was made possible. Also thanks to various colleagues at the Universities of Graz, Klagenfurt and Vienna with whom I had a lot of discussions and got different angles and perspectives on my research topic during several doctoral seminars. I would like to especially thank the participants of the Career Program for Women Scholars at the University of Graz which supported me to develop a network, to exchange knowledge and expertise as well as to give and receive assistance in terms of scientific but also personal matters. Thanks to Hemma Jarnig for proofreading of this rather long thesis. A special word of thanks I owe to my parents, my sister and Stefan for al- ways supporting the choices I have made in life and helping me to reach my goals. Thank you to my family and my friends who kept constantly asking me about my progress and thus animated me. ‘When are you finished with your thesis?’, kept me on track to do so. Many thanks! Andrea Bernhard Graz 2011 Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................... 5 Preface .................................................................................................................. 7 Contents ................................................................................................................ 9 Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 13 Theoretical Approach ....................................................................................... 17 1 Transformative Higher Education ............................................................... 19 1.1 The Rise of Higher Education Systems ................................................ 23 1.2 The Concept of Massification............................................................... 25 1.3 The Concept of Diversification ............................................................ 29 1.4 Privatisation of Higher Education ........................................................ 31 1.5 Internationalisation of Higher Education .............................................. 36 2 Quality Assurance in Higher Education...................................................... 39 2.1 The Rise of Quality Assurance ............................................................. 40 2.2 Quality / Quality Assurance Definitions............................................... 44 2.3 Quality Assurance Systems and their Critics ........................................ 60 2.4 Quality Assurance in an International Perspective ............................... 64 Research Design ................................................................................................ 69 3 Methodology and Operationalisation .......................................................... 71 3.1 Methodological Approach .................................................................... 73 3.2 Research Instruments............................................................................ 76 Country Reports ............................................................................................... 83 4 Austria ........................................................................................................ 85 4.1 Facts and Figures .................................................................................. 85 4.2 Governance and Funding ...................................................................... 86 4.3 Quality Assurance ................................................................................ 89 5 Germany ..................................................................................................... 95 5.1 Facts and Figures .................................................................................. 95 5.2 Governance and Funding ...................................................................... 96 5.3 Quality Assurance ................................................................................ 98 10 Contents 6 Finland ...................................................................................................... 105 6.1 Facts and Figures ................................................................................ 105 6.2 Governance and Funding .................................................................... 106 6.3 Quality Assurance .............................................................................. 109 7 United Kingdom (UK) .............................................................................. 115 7.1 Facts and Figures ................................................................................ 115 7.2 Governance and Funding .................................................................... 116 7.3 Quality Assurance .............................................................................. 119 8 United States of America (U.S.) ............................................................... 127 8.1 Facts and Figures ................................................................................ 127 8.2 Governance and Funding .................................................................... 129 8.3 Quality Assurance .............................................................................. 131 9 Canada ...................................................................................................... 139 9.1 Facts and Figures ................................................................................ 139 9.2 Governance and Funding .................................................................... 142 9.3 Quality Assurance .............................................................................. 144 Expert Interviews ............................................................................................ 155 10 Basic Considerations................................................................................. 157 11 Operationalisation and Data ...................................................................... 163 12 Analysis and Evaluation ........................................................................... 171 12.1 Interviews with International Experts ................................................. 173 12.2 Interviews with National Experts ....................................................... 188 12.2.1 Austria ....................................................................................... 188 12.2.2 Germany.................................................................................... 193 12.2.3 Finland ...................................................................................... 199 12.2.4 United Kingdom ....................................................................... 203 12.2.5 United States of America .......................................................... 211 12.2.6 Canada ...................................................................................... 216 Comparison and Future Challenges .............................................................. 225 13 Comparative Analysis ............................................................................... 227 13.1 International Perspectives ................................................................... 229 13.2 National Key Actors and Elements .................................................... 234 13.3 National Perspectives ......................................................................... 238 13.4 Theoretical Concepts and Assumptions .............................................. 246 14 Theory, Methodology and Reality ............................................................ 257 References ........................................................................................................ 261 Annex ............................................................................................................... 287
Description: