Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks CEC Theses and Dissertations College of Engineering and Computing 2013 Promoting the Affective Domain Within Online Education Stephen Roche Nova Southeastern University,[email protected] This document is a product of extensive research conducted at the Nova Southeastern UniversityCollege of Engineering and Computing. For more information on research and degree programs at the NSU College of Engineering and Computing, please clickhere. Follow this and additional works at:http://nsuworks.nova.edu/gscis_etd Part of theComputer Sciences Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Stephen Roche. 2013.Promoting the Affective Domain Within Online Education.Doctoral dissertation. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences. (292) http://nsuworks.nova.edu/gscis_etd/292. This Dissertation is brought to you by the College of Engineering and Computing at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in CEC Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please [email protected]. Promoting the Affective Domain Within Online Education by Stephen H. Roche A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computing Technology in Education Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences Nova Southeastern University 2013 We hereby certify that this dissertation, submitted by Stephen H. Roche, conforms to acceptable standards and is fully adequate in scope and quality to fulfill the dissertation requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________ ______________ Steven R. Terrell, Ph.D. Date Chairperson of Dissertation Committee _______________________________________________ ______________ Timothy J. Ellis, Ph.D. Date Dissertation Committee Member _______________________________________________ ______________ Ling Wang, Ph.D. Date Dissertation Committee Member Approved: _______________________________________________ _____________ Eric S. Ackerman, Ph.D. Date Dean An abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to Nova Southeastern University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Promoting the Affective Domain Within Online Education by Stephen H. Roche March 2013 In the past decade Higher Education Institutions have experienced tremendous growth in enrollments. To meet this demand, many higher education institutions have embraced online education and its requisite technologies. Online education has matured, and studies focusing on the cognitive domain indicate that distance education is as effective as the traditional face-to-face instructional modality. However, there is a scarcity of affective domain studies due to: a) the need for the institutions of higher education to perform quantitative studies to establish the quality of online education b) the affective domain’s inherent subjective nature, and c) the educational research environment has slow recognition of the validity and value of qualitative research. This scarcity of research has created a reluctance to engage in online education on the part of a large number of private and public mission-driven educational institutions. Historically these institutions place great emphasis on the affective domain and currently believe that the affective domain cannot be effectively promoted in the online environment. Therefore, the conclusion is drawn that if online education cannot provide the affective component, then it is counterproductive to the mission of the institution desiring to provide a transformative education. This reluctance threatens the existence of many mission-driven institutions by falling behind in the distance education market place. Quality research is needed in the area of the affective domain in distance education to convince these institutions that the affective domain can effectively be taught in the online environment. This grounded theory study of an established online Bachelors of Radiography Program has developed a theory as to why students report a strong sense of mission when compared with other like institutions in the Mission Engagement Consortium for Independent Colleges (MECIC). Through a series of interviews with eight students, two alumni, four faculty, and the requisite coding, six contributing pedagogical phenomena and three central categories emerged. The three central categories, Instructor Persistence, Synchronous Encounters, and Integrated Institutional Mission, when working together, were found to have created continued and significant impact on the affective domain for the students of the Radiography program. Further research will be needed to quantitatively test the theory developed in this study and establish a baseline of best practices in promoting the affective domain in the online learning environment. Acknowledgements I would like to express my deep appreciation to my chairperson Dr. Steven Terrell whose personal integrity, encouragement, patience and caring guidance sustained my spirits through-out this journey. In addition I would like to express my appreciation and gratitude to my committee members, Dr. Timothy Ellis and Dr. Ling Wang. Their expert advice and recommendations were pivotal in the completion of this research. To all three I would like to express my gratitude for your commitment to education; experiencing each of you in the classroom was a joy and inspiration. Thank you for giving of yourselves to this noble profession. I would like to thank my colleagues at Adventist University of Health Sciences who supported, assisted, and encouraged me in my studies, Dr. David Greenlaw, Dr. Don Williams, Dr. Wanda Hopkins, and the entire Library Staff. In closing I would like to dedicate this work to Dr. Robert Williams, whose sixty plus years of experience in higher education has informed, inspired, and directed thousands of faculty and students. I am so fortunate to have learned from, and served with, such an inspirational human being and academic. I am forever changed for knowing him. Table of Contents Abstract iii List of Tables viii List of Figures ix Chapters 1. Introduction 1 Problem Statement and Goal 1 Background 3 Relevance and Significance 10 Limitations and Delimitations 13 Definitions of Terms 14 Summary 15 2. Review of the Literature 17 Introduction 17 Affective Domain History and Development in Higher Education 17 Affective Domain and Online Education 31 Affective Domain and Institutional Mission 42 Summary 44 3. Methodology 46 Introduction 46 Description of Study 46 Methods 49 4. Results 56 Introduction 56 Participant Demographics 57 Six Phenomena that emerged from Data Analysis 58 Educators Influence and Dedication 58 Sharing 58 Encouragement 59 Reducing Fears 61 Lifelong Learning 62 Connecting 63 Four Word: Nurture, Excellence, Stewardship, and Spirituality 64 Consistency 65 Desire for Understanding 66 Caring 67 v Growth Opportunities 67 Opportunity for Advancement 68 Self-Actualization 70 Self-Discipline 71 Personal Mission 72 Self-Confidence 73 Management Skills 74 Ethics 75 Educational Milieu 77 Mission 77 Human Need 82 Critical Thinking 83 Accountability 85 Unique Online Components 86 Organization 86 Community 87 Assessment 89 Capacity for Personal Change 91 Reflection 92 Desire for Change 93 Desire to Contribute 95 Past Experiences 96 High Level Communication 97 Prayer 97 Sharing 99 Help Assessment 100 High Stakes Subject Matter 102 Theoretical Model 103 5. Conclusion, Implications, Recommendations, and Summary 107 Conclusions 107 Tie to Values and Mission 108 Contributing Online Practices 109 Improvement on Current Practices 110 Implications 111 Recommendations 111 Summary 112 Appendixes A. University Vision and Bachelors’ of Radiography Philosophy Statements 116 B. Mission Perception Inventory 117 C. Mission Perception Inventory License 121 D. American Society of Civil Engineers Vision Statement 122 E. American Society of Civil Engineers Professional Outcomes 123 vi F. American Society of Civil Engineers License 125 G. Kang: Conceptual Framework 126 H. Kang License 127 I. New Millennium Learners Educational Measurement Tool 128 J. Garrison: Community of Inquiry 130 K. Garrison: Community of Inquiry (Elements, Categories and Indicators) 131 L. Garrison: Cognitive Presence 132 M. Elsevier License 133 N. Hill: Major Factors of Social Learning Theory 139 O. Social Learning Theory License 140 P. Student Interview One Protocol 141 Q. Faculty Interview One Protocol 143 R. Course Instructor Responsibilities 145 S. Section Adjunct Responsibilities 149 T. General Education Requirements 152 U. Example of Course Project 153 V. Healthcare as Ministry: Four Assumptions 154 W. Healthcare as Ministry: Dimensions of Learning 155 X. Healthcare as Ministry: Beyond Healthcare 156 Y. Healthcare as Ministry License 157 Z. Adventist University of Health Sciences Learning Outcomes 158 AA. Learning Outcomes License 160 BB. Course Development Manual 161 CC. Grading Metric 164 References 168 vii List of Tables Tables 1. Expressions towards weekly written devotions 60 2. Student Comments 68 viii List of Figures Figures 1. Six Phenomena and Refined Categories 56, 108 2. The Theoretical Model 103, 107, 115 ix
Description: