Principles of Australian equity and trusts

603 Pages·2019·231.412 MB·English

by  Cameron Stewart, Peter Radan

,,
...
-
,
-
~
-i-t
J: :-:,· ~-.·.·,~··.;;".- '. . - -• ..
Principles of Australian Equity and Trusts mn I ,. •• ., /,{!• ·
..... '/~~-
0~ -g-,_·
4TH EDITION • Peter Radan • Cameron Stewart
- tD
An accessible and well-structured account of the principles and rules of 0 c,,
z. o
equity arid tr1;1sts ....
Principles of Australian Equity and • Paciocco v Australia and New
Trusts is designed to equip students Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016)
~ )>
with the skills to analyse fact
• Pipikos v Trayans (2018) on part ro
situations and correctly identify the C
relevant principles of the law of equity performance ' c,,
:::0 ,...
and trusts applicable to the resolution • Simic v NSW Land Housing
QJ -.:
of problems. The clear and accessible Corporation (2016) on rectification
~
style of the authors makes this an Q_
• Crown Melbourne Ltd v .
essential resource for students new to :Q)J 0-1·
Cosmopolitan Hotel (Vic) Pty Ltd
the study of equity and trusts. ::,
(2016) dn equitable estoppel
The fourth edition has been fully n m
revised and updated to include recent The text is suitable for standalone .c
QJ
developments in case law, including: use or with the companion casebook 3 C
Radan, Stewart & Vickovich, Principles ,...
• City of Mandurah v Australian of Australian Equity and Trusts: Cases '(1 ) -·
Flying Corps and Royal Australian '<
and Materials. The textbook and 0
Air Force Association (WA Division) :)
casebook follow the same chapter
Inc (2016) on charitable trusts (f) 01
order and structure and plentiful ::J
rt"
• Thorne v Kennedy (2017) on undue cross-referencing makes it easy to use
~ a.
influence and unconscionability the books in tandem.
-I
~
M" -.:
C
,...
c,,
Principles of Australian 4TH EDITION
u,
About the Authors
Equity and Trusts
Peter Radan is Professor of Cameron Stewart is Professor Peter Radan
Law at Macquarie Law School, of Health, Law and Ethics at the
Macquarie University. Sydney Law School, University Cameron Stewart
of Sydney.
Related LexisNexis Titles
• Radan, Stewart & Vickovich, Principles of Australian Equity and Trusts:
Cases and Materials, 4th ed, 2019
• Barkehall Thomas & Vann, LexisNexis Study Guide: Equity,
ISBN 978-0-40934-821-7
3rd ed, 2015
• Barkehall Thomas & Vann, LexisNexis Study Guide Trusts,
3rd ed, 2016
· LexisNexis"
[email protected]
www.lexisnexis.com.au 9 780409 348217 Butterworths
Lexis Nexis
AUSTRALIA LexisNexis Butterworths
475--495 Victoria Avenue, Chatswood NSW 2067
On the internet at: www.lexisnexis.com.au
ARGENTINA LexisNexis Argentina, BUENOS AIRES CONTENTS
AUSTRJA LexisNexis Verlag ARD Orac GmbH & Co KG, VIENNA
BRAZIL LexisNexis Latin America, SAO PAULO
CANADA LexisNexis Canada, Markham, ONTARIO
CHILE LexisNexis Chjle, SANTIAGO Preface to the Fourth Edition vii
CHINA LexisNexis China, BEIJING, SHANGHAI
CZECH REPUBLIC NakJadatelstvi Orac sro, PRAGUE Preface to the Third Edition ix
FRANCE LexisNexis SA, PARIS
Preface to the Second Edition xi
GERMANY LexisNexis Germany, FRANKFURT
HONGKONG LexisNexis Hong Kong, HONG KONG Preface to the First Edition xiii
HUNGARY HVG-Orac, BUDAPEST
Table of Cases xvii
INDIA LexisNexis, NEw DELHI
ITALY Dott A Giuffre Edi tore SpA, MILAN Table of Statutes cxxi
JAPAN LexisNexis Japan KK, TOKYO
KOREA LexisNexis, SEOUL
MALAYSIA LexisNexis Malaysia Sdn Bhd, PETALING JAYA, SELANGOR PART I: HISTORY AND NATURE OF EQUITY 1
NEW ZEALAND LexisNexis, WELLINGTON
POLAND Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis, WARSAW HISTORY OF EQUITY 3
SINGAPORE LexisNexis, SINGAPORE
2 THE NATURE OF EQUITY 29
SOUTH AFRJCA LexisNexis Butterworths, DURBAN
SWITZERLAND Staempfli Verlag AG, BERNE 3 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LAW AND EQUITY 49
TAIWAN LexisNexis, TAIWAN
UNITED KINGDOM LexisNexis UK, LONDON, EDINBURGH
PART II: EQUITABLE INTERESTS AND TRANSACTIONS 61
USA LexisNexis Group, New York, NEwYoRK
LexisNexis, Miamisburg, OHIO
4 NATURE OF EQUITABLE ESTATES AND INTERESTS 63
A catalogue record for this
book is available from the 5 THE LAW OF ASSIGNMENT 80
NATIONAL
LIBRARY National Library of Australia 6 DISPOSITIONS OF EQUITABLE INTERESTS AND THE REQUIREMENT OF WRITING 110
OF AUSTRALIA
ISBN: 9780409348217 (pbk). 7 PROPERTY WITH A LIMITED CAPABILITY OF BEING ASSIGNED 122
9780409348224 (e bk). 8 PRIORITIES 133
© 2019 Reed International Books Australia Pty Limited trading as LexisNexis.
First edition, 2009 (reprinted 2012). Second edition, 2013 (reprinted 2017). Third edition, 2015. PART Ill: RELATIONSHIPS OF TRUST 175
This book is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be 9 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 177
reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner.
Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. 10 FIDUCIARY OBLIGATIONS 232
Inquiries should be addressed to the publishers. 11 UNDUEINFLUENCE 284
Typeset in Myriad Pro and Minion Pro.
Printed in China. PART IV: UNCONSCIENTIOUS DEALINGS 313
Visit LexisNexis Butterworths at www.lexisnexis.com.au
12 FRAUD IN EQUITY 315
13 UNCONSCIONABLE TRANSACTIONS 324
14 EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL 351
15 RELIEF AGAINST FORFEITURE 382
16 PENALTIES 399
V
PRINCIPLES OF AUSTRALIAN EQUITY AND TRUSTS
PART V: UNFAIR OUTCOMES 415
17 SUBROGATION 417
18 CONTRIBUTION 424 PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION
19 MARSHALLING 433
PART VI: TRUSTS 439
In revising and updating this book, we have taken into account materials available to us as at
20 INTRODUCTION TO TRUSTS 441 12 September 2018. In this respect, some of the more significant cases include City of Mandurah
21 CREATION OF EXPRESS TRUSTS 475 v Australian Flying Corps and Royal Australian Air Force Association (WA Division) Inc (2016) on
charitable trusts, Crown Melbourne Ltd v Cosmopolitan Hotel (Vic) Pty Ltd (2016) on equitable
22 VARIATION AND TERMINATION OF TRUSTS 526
estoppel, Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) and Cavendish Square
23 CHARITABLE TRUSTS 565
Holding BV v Makdessi; ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis (2016) on penalties, Pipikos v Trayans (2018) on the
24 ADMINISTRATION OF CHARITABLE TRUSTS 608 doctrine of part performance, Simic v NSW Land Housing Corporation (2016) on rectification, and
25 RESULTING TRUSTS 628 Thorne v Kennedy (2017) on undue influence and unconscionability.
26 TRUSTEES 658 In preparing this edition, Peter took primary responsibility for revising Chapters 1-8, 10-11,
13-17, 19, 26, 28-34 and 38-39, and Cameron took primary responsibility for revising Chapters 9,
27 BENEFICIARIES 718
12, 18, 20-25, 27 and 35-37.
As with the previous editions of this book, we acknowledge the support of our families, friends,
PART VII: EQUITABLE REMEDIES AND DEFENCES 755
and colleagues. In particular, the support, love and enduring patience of our wives, Sybil Radan
28 DECLARATIONS 757 and Nerida Stewart, and our children, Rade, Andrija and Alexsandra Radan, and Maxwell, Hannah,
Beth, Angus and Eadie Stewart, were, again, indispensable to completing this edition of the book. It
29 SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE 774
is to them that it is dedicated.
30 INJUNCTIONS 801
At LexisNexis, we wish, in particular, to thank our commissioning editor Jocelyn Holmes and
31 FREEZING AND SEARCH ORDERS 834
editor Annabel Adair for their patience and understanding as well as their expertise and efficiency.
32 EQUITABLE COMPENSATION AND DAMAGES 850 It has been a delight to again work with them.
33 RESCISSION 877 Peter Radan
34 RECTIFICATION 890 Cameron Stewart
12 September 2018
35 INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS 904
36 REMEDIAL CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS · 965
37 TRACING 991
38 OTHER EQUITABLE REMEDIES 1012
39 EQUITABLE DEFENCES 1023
Index 1047
vi vii
PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION
In preparing the third edition of this book, we took the opportunity to expand the range of topics
covered, as well as attend to revising and updating the topics covered in the previous editions. The
expansion took the form of new chapters on Fraud in Equity, Subrogation, Contribution, and
Marshalling. Material covered in single chapters in previous editions on The Law of Assignment,
Charitable Trusts, and Constructive Trusts is, in each case, now covered in two chapters.
In revising and updating the book, we have taken into account materials available to us as
at the end of September 2015. In this respect, significant cases include Vestergaard Frandsen A!S
v Bestnet Europe Ltd (Chapter 9), Streetscape Projects (Australia) Pty Ltd v City ofS ydney ( Chapters 9,
10 and 35), Howard v Commissioner of Taxation (Chapter 10), Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd
(Chapter 13), Sidhu v Van Dyke (Chapter 14), Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking
Group Ltd (Chapters 13 and 16), ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis (Chapter 16), Korda v Australian Executor
Trustees (SA) Ltd and Lewis v Condon (Chapter 21), Re Dion Investments Pty Ltd (Chapter 22),
Re Greenpeace (Chapter 23), R (on the application of Hodkin) v Registrar of Births, Deaths and
Marriages (Chapter 23), Pitt v Holt (Chapter 26), Lawrence v Fen Tigers Ltd (Chapter 32), Marley
v Rawlings (Chapter 34), FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC (Chapter 35),
Hasler v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (Chapter 35), V-Flow Pty Ltd v Holyoake Industries (Vic) Pty Ltd
(Chapter 37) and Gerace v Auzhair Supplies Pty Ltd (Chapter 39).
The most significant legislative development since the previous edition has been the Charities
Act 2013 (Cth).
In preparing this edition, Peter took primary responsibility for revising or writing Chapters 1-8,
10-11, 13-17, 19, 26, 28-34 and 38-39, and Cameron took primary responsibility for revising or
writing Chapters 9, 12, 18, 20-25, 27 and 35-37.
As with the previous edition of this book, we must acknowledge the support of our families,
friends, and colleagues. Once again, the support, love, and enduring patience of our wives, Sybil
Radan and Nerida Stewart, and our children, Rade, Andrija and Alexsandra Radan, and Maxwell,
Hannah, Beth, Angus and Eadie Stewart, were indispensable to the completion of this edition of the
book. It is to them that this edition is dedicated.
At LexisNexis, we wish, in particular, to thank Jocelyn Holmes, Geraldine Maclurcan and
Jeanette Maree for the expertise, care and efficiency with which they converted our manuscript
into a book.
Peter Radan
Cameron Stewart
1 October 2015
ix
PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION
In writing the second edition of this book we were, of course, required to take into account new
cases and legislation that have come into being in the three years since the publication of the first
edition. Of the many new cases referred to throughout this edition perhaps the most significant
Australian cases are the High Court of Australia decisions in Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Haxton
(Chapter 5), John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (Chapter 9), Andrews
v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Chapter 14), Byrnes v Kendle (Chapter 16), Aid!
Watch Incorporated v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (Chapter 18);
the decisions of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia in Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining
Pty Ltd (No 2) (Chapters 9 and 28) and Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY
Technology Pty Ltd (Chapter 22); and the decision of the Court of Appeal in Western Australia in
Westpac Banking Corporation v The Bell Group Ltd (in liq) (No 3) (Chapters 9, 12 and 28). In the
United Kingdom, the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Jones v Kernott
(Chapter 19) and of the Court of Appeal in Pitt v Holt (Chapter 20) are also important. The most
significant legislative development has been the introduction of the Australian Consumer Law
which has a particular relevance to the area of statutory unconscionability (Chapter 11 ). Apart from
the updating of the book, we also took the opportunity to refine and improve the text and expand
on the breadth of analysis.
In preparing this edition Peter took primary responsibility for the writing of Chapters 1-7,
10-14, 22-27 and 30-31 and Cameron took primary responsibility for the writing of
Chapters 8-9, 15-21 and 28-29. This edition is based upon materials available to us as at the end
of September 2012.
As with the previous edition of this book, we must acknowledge the support of our families,
friends and colleagues. Once again, the support, love and enduring patience of our wives, Sybil Radan
and Nerida Stewart, and our children, Rade, Andrija and Alexsandra Radan and Maxwell, Hannah,
Beth, Angus and Eadie Stewart, were indispensable to the completion of this edition of the book.
At LexisNexis, we wish, in particular, to tha~k Geraldine Maclurcan, Kerry Paul, Jocelyn Holmes
and Tim Vaughan-Sanders for the skill, care and efficiency with which they converted our manuscript
into a book.
Peter Radan
Cameron Stewart
2 October 2012
xi
PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION
In the early 1970s, observant users at the University of Sydney law library, upon entering a place to
which, to quote an old Serbian proverb, 'even the king must walk', would have noticed a graffiti item
which boldly declared:
They say crime doesn't pay - that's why I'm studying equity.
The few, if any, who took this advice seriously, would have found precious few Australian books
in that law library dealing with the subject that would 'pay' as promised. More than likely they
would have pored over established English texts such as Hanbury or Pettit. Jacobs, as it has always
been known, the first edition of which was published in 1958, would have been a partial exception
in so far as trusts were concerned. So too with Spry's Equitable Remedies, first published in 1971.
Sir Frederick Jordan's masterly Chapters in Equity, correctly described by Sir Anthony Mason as 'for
many decades the most authoritative exposition of equity in New South Wales', 1 could have been
consulted, but it would not have been of much assistance to students, such as one of the authors
of this book (Radan), who were then trying to come to grips with the series of lectures they had
survived that dissected the 10 speeches given by their Lordships in the then recent cases of Pettitt
v Pettitt2 and Gissing v Gissing. 3
However, the winds of change were brewing. Three members of what the current Chief Justice
of New South Wales has referred to as 'an international bastion of evangelical equity scholarship
[in New South Wales]'4 were busy writing the first edition of what has, since its publication in 1975,
almost universally been known as Meagher, Gum mow & Lehane. 5 This blockbuster of a book saw off
its established English counterparts in much the same way that Lillee and Thompson saw off their
English counterparts in that year's glorious summer of cricket.
Now in its fourth edition, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane is a deeply learned and scholarly treatise
which, in highly opinionated terms, asserts the view that equity's doctrines and remedies are, and
should remain, distinct and separate from those of the common law. It has relentlessly opposed any
suggestion that the legislative fusion of the formerly separate courts of common law and equity
mandated, or at least facilitated, the fusion of the principles of equity and the common law.
Meagher, Gummow & Lehane has become for equity purists what the 12 volumes of The
Fundamentals, first published from 1910-1915, are for conservative evangelical Christians. Even for
1. Sir Anthony Mason, 'Supreme Court of New South Wales: Opening of Law Term Judges' Dinner' (2008)
82 Australian Law Journal 839 at 839.
2. [1970] AC 777.
3. [1971] AC 886.
4. J J Spigelman, 'Lord Mansfield and the Culture of Improvement' (2008) 82 Australian Law Journal 764
at 766.
5. R P Meagher, W M G Gummow and J R F Lehane, Equity, Doctrines and Remedies, Butterworths,
Sydney, 1975. The second and third editions were published in 1983 and 1992 respectively. The fourth edition
by R P Meagher, J D Heydon and M J Leeming was published in 2002.
xiii
PRINCIPLES OF AUSTRALIAN EQUITY AND TRUSTS PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION
those who do not subscribe to the school of 'evangelical equity scholarship', Meagher, Gummow Tim Paine, Patrick Parkinson, Joellen Riley, Greg Tolhurst and Ilija Vickovich. We also acknowledge
& Lehane is an important work, and no serious Australian scholar or practitioner in the field can the valuable research assistance provided to us by Zoe Hutchinson, Rowan Platt and Andrija Radan.
ignore it. The same can be said of Jacobs, which, since its second edition, published in 1967, has been At LexisNexis we wish, in particular, to thank Kate Hickey, Elise Carney, Annabel Adair,
written by one or more of the authors, from time to time, of Meagher, Gummow & Lehane. Jocelyn Holmes and Geraldine Maclurcan for their support and understanding, as well as efficiency
This, however, is not to say that Meagher, Gummow & Lehane and the school of'evangelical equity in turning a manuscript into a book.
scholarship' from which it emerged do not have their critics. Thus, Wilson, writing in 2004, said: Although this book is a collaborative effort that reflects a considerable degree of discussion and
analysis of its contents, each of us did, nevertheless, take the lead in writing individual chapters.
The most recent edition of Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's has adopted an almost religious Furthermore, its writing was informed by the experiences we both have benefited from in academia
tone, devoting itself to the 'rooting out of error' and the repulse of'cultural vandals' with suitably
and private practice. For the record, Peter took responsibility for writing Chapters 1-7, 10-14, 22-27
Jesuitical fervour ... [Its] authors are conservatives in a field whose history provides few firm
and 30-31,8 and Cameron did the same for Chapters 8-9, 15-21 and 28-29.
foundations for an assertion that 'it was ever thus'.6
This book is based upon materials available to us in Sydney to the end of October 2009.
The 'cultural vandals' to whom Wilson refers are those who reject Meagher, Gummow &
Peter Radan
Lehane's views on the relationship between common law and equity and suggest that a fusion of
Cameron Stewart
their principles is, and should be, taking place. The manner in which they are attacked in Meagher,
17 November 2009
Gummow & Lehane has also drawn criticism. Thus, Justice Michael Kirby (as he then was), after
referring to its various 'purple passages', observed:
Those familiar with the successive 'rooting out' of heretics in England under the later Tudors will
recognise the genre of this denunciatory writing. Burning at the professional stake would seem too
kind a fate for such doctrinal rascals.7
In the decades since the appearance of Meagher, Gummow & Lehane, Australian scholarship in
equity has flourished in terms of general equity texts, specialist monographs and articles. The field
now also has its own specialist journal - The Journal ofE quity. The present volume is but a modest
contribution to this array of work. Although we stand apart from the school of 'evangelical equity
scholarship', we acknowledge its influence and importance. Nor, in our view, are we doctrinal rascals
(even though, admittedly, some passages of this text were written with a wry smile). Nevertheless,
we do acknowledge the significance of scholarship that is less evangelical in inspiration and less
fervent in tone. We hope that we have been fair to both approaches.
The research and writing of this book has been an arduous, but rewarding, experience. However,
its completion was not solely the result of our efforts. Indeed, it is hardly likely that it would ever have
seen the light of day but for the support and encouragement of our families, friends and colleagues.
First, and foremost, we must acknowledge the love, support, encouragement and, most of all,
the understanding of our wives, Sybil Radan and Nerida Stewart, and our children, Rade, Andrija
and Aleksandra Radan and Maxwell, Hannah, Beth, Angus and Eadie Stewart. Over the last few
years, this book has been as much a part of their lives as it has been a part of ours. It is to them that
it is dedicated.
In a variety of ways, a number of our friends and colleagues generously provided their time and
expertise in assisting us to complete the book's manuscript, thereby making it much better than it
would otherwise have been. We thus express our heartfelt thanks to Fiona Burns, Ros Croucher,
Bryan Horrigan, Patricia Lane, Andrew Lynch, Keith Mason, Shae McCrystal, Nicola McGarrity,
6. Peter Wilson, 'Unconscionability and Fairness in Australian Equitable Jurisprudence' (2004) 11 Australian
Property Law Journal 1 at 3.
7. Hon Justice Michael Kirby, 'Equity's Australian Isolationism' (2008) 8 Queensland University of Technology 8. Some of these chapters, or parts thereof, were also written for, and published as part of, his contribution to
Law & Justice Journal 444 at 449. P Radan and J Gooley, Principles ofA ustralian Contract Law, 2nd ed, LexisNexis Butterworths, Sydney, 2010.
xiv xv
TABLE OF CASES
References are to paragraphs
5 Ridge Pty Ltd v Tryname Pty Ltd (2017] Abigail v Lapin ( 1934) 51 CLR 58 .... 8.24, 8.25,
NSWSC 371 .... 15.30 8.32, 8.112, 8.122
Ability One Financial Management Pty Ltd v JB
A by his Tutor AB (2014] NSWSC 245 .... 10.54
Av B pie (2003] QB 195 .... 9.46, 9.117 Abjornson v Urban Newspapers Ltd (1989]
- v Hayden (1984) 156 CLR 532; 56 ALR 82 WAR 191 .... 21.128
.... 9.111 ABN AMRO Bank NV v Bathurst Regional
- v N (2012] NSWSC 354 .... 12.9, 12.11 Council (2014) 224 FCR l; 309 ALR 445
A & B v Persons Unknown (2016] EWHC 3295 .... 32.18, 32.20
(Ch) .... 9.50 Aboody v Ryan [2012] NSWCA 395 .... 11.39,
A H McDonald & Co Pty Ltd v Wells ( 1931) 45 13.2
CLR 506 Aboriginal Evangelical Fellowship Australia Inc
A Little Company Ltd v Peters (2007] NSWSC v Aboriginal Evangelical Church Inc (2018]
833 .... 12.11 VSC 208 .... 30.38
AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd (2012] Aboriginal Hostels Ltd v Darwin City Council
EWHC 2103 (QB) .... 9.138 (1985) 55 LGRA 414 .... 23.104
Aarons v Advance Commercial Finance Ltd AC v VC (2013) 275 FLR 299 .... 22.74, 22.77
(1995) NSWConvR 55-746 .... 29.86 Accident Compensation Corporation v Stafford
AB v CD (2014) 3 All ER 667 .... 30.10 (2018] NZHC 218 .... 27.28
Abacus Trust Co (Isle of Man) v Barr (2003] Accurate Financial Consultants Pty Ltd v Koko
Ch 409; (2003] 1 All ER 763 .... 26.185 Black Pty Ltd [2008] VSCA 86 .... 14.54
Abbey Forwarding Ltd (in liq) v Hone (No 3) ACE Insurance Ltd v Trifunovski (2013) 209
(2014] 3 WLR 1676 .... 30.56 FCR 146; 295 ALR 407 .... 7.26
Abbey Laboratories Pty Ltd v Australian ACES Sogutlu Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq)
Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2014)
Authority (2016) 245 FCR 6 .... 9.31 89 NSWLR 209 .... 20.5, 26.59
Abbott v Abbott (Antigua and Barbuda) (2007] ACLBDD Holdings Ltd v Staechelin (2018]
UKPC 53 .... 25.86, 36.15 EWHC 44 (Ch) .... 26.156
Abbott, Re; Ex parte Trustee of the Property ACN 004 443 627 (Southern Region) Ltd
of the Bankruptcyv Abbott [1983] 1 Ch 45 v Wallington Hardware & Timber Pty Ltd
.... 2.36 (No 2) (2010] VSC 174 .... 28.18
Abbott Fund Trust, Re [1900] 2 Ch 326 ACN 005 490 540 Pty Ltd v Robert Frederick
.... 25.20 Jane Pty Ltd (2016] VSC 219 .... 26.13
Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Brothers ACN 074 971 109 (as trustee for the Argot Unit
(1843-60] All ER Rep 249 .... 10.106 Trust) v National Mutual Life Association
Abernethy v Hutchinson (1825) 47 ER 1313 of Australasia Ltd (2008) 21 VR 351
.... 9.29 .... 14.82, 14.88
xvii
PRINCIPLES OF AUSTRALIAN EQUITY AND TRUSTS TABLE OF CASES
Acohs Pty Ltd v RA Bashford Consulting Pty Aged Care Services Pty Ltd v Kanning Services Air Express Ltd v Ansett Transport Industries Alexander v Alexander [2011] EWHC 2721
Ltd (1997) 144 ALR 528 .... 18.24 (2013) 86 NSWLR 174; 315 ALR 336 (Operations) Pty Ltd (1981) 146 CLR 249; (Ch) .... 22.16
Acorn Computers Ltd v MCS Microcomputer .... 17.1, 17.5, 17.6, 17.23 33 ALR 578 .... 30.50, 30.51, 30.52, 30.53 - v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd (2003) 216
Systems Pty Ltd (1984) 6 FCR 277 .... 35.25 Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson [1991] Ch 547; Air Jamaica Ltd v Charlton [1999] 1 WLR 1399 CLR 109; (2004) 204 ALR 417 .... 27.49
Across Australia Finance Pty Ltd v Kalls [2008] [1992] 4 All ER 385 .... 35.144, 37.7 .... 22.114, 25.3, 25.8 Alexiadis v Zirpiadis (2013) 302 ALR 148
NSWSC 783 .... 19.8, 19.9, 19.14 AGL Energy Ltd v Hardy (No 2) [2017] AIT Investment Group Pty Ltd v Markham .... 22.34
Active Leisure (Sports) Pty Ltd v Sportsman's FCA 863 .... 2.53, 2.54 Property Fund No 2 Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC Alfred McAlpine Capital Projects Ltd v Tilebox
Australia Ltd [1991] 1 Qd R 301 .... 30.47 Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd 216 .... 20.20, 26.124, 26.126, 27.3, 27.30 Ltd [2005] EWHC 281 .... 16.14, 16.29
Adams v Zen 28 Pty Ltd [2010] QSC 36 .... 26.64 v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570; 251 ALR Akcine Bendrove Bankas Snoras v Antonov Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown
Adams and the Kensington Vestry, Re (1884) 322 .... 39.72, 39.76 [2013] EWHC 131 (Comm) .... 31.13 Ltd [2001] 1 AC 518; [2000] 4 All ER 97
27 Ch D 394 .... 21.34 Agricultural Land Management Ltd v Jackson Akers v Samba Financial Group [2017] AC 424; .... 29.37, 29.38, 29.39
Adamson v Hayes (1973) 130 CLR 276 .... 6.9, (No 2) (2014) 48 WAR l; 285 FLR 121 [2017] 2 All ER 799 .... 2.21, 2.58, 4.2, 4.4, Ali v Channel 5 Broadcast Ltd [2018] EWHC
21.117, 21.118 .... 20.5, 21.143, 27.94, 27.98, 39.52, 39.56 37.51 298 (Ch) .... 9.162
Adamson, Ex parte (1878) 8 Ch D 807 Agriculturist Cattle Insurance Co, Re (1870) LR Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 Ali & Fahd Shobokshi Group v Moneim [1989]
.... 27.94, 32.2 5 Ch App 725 .... 10.50 NSWLR 155 .... 11.62 2 All ER 404 .... 31.13
Adamstoun Holdings Pty Ltd v Brogue Tableau Agripay Pty Ltd v Byrne [2011] 2 Qd R 501 Akita Holdings Ltd v Honourable Attorney Alice Springs Town Council v Mpweteyerre
Pty Ltd [2007] WASCA 43 .... 20.9 .... 11.69, 11.76 General of the Turks and Caicos Islands Aboriginal Corporation (1997) 139 FLR
Addenbrooke Pty Ltd v Duncan (No 2) (2017) Agusta Pty Ltd v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2017] AC 590 .... 37.2 236 .... 23.61, 23.104
348 ALR 1 .... 33.1, 35.168 [2009] NSWCA 129 .... 26.35 Ak-Tankiz v Ak [2014] NSWSC 1044 .... 36.17 Aljaro Pty Ltd v Weidmann [2001] NSWSC 206
Adderley v Dixon (1824) 57 ER 239 .... 29.14, - v Provident Capital Ltd [2012] NSWCA 26 Al Muderis v Duncan (No 4) [2018] NSWSC .... 21.163
29.17, 29.20 .... 17.6, 22.61, 26.36, 26.54 925 .... 31.6 Allan v Allan (2009) 41 Fam LR 565 .... 27.38
Addstead Pty Ltd (in liq) v Liddan Pty Ltd Ahern v LA Wilkinson (Northern) Ltd [1929] Alan Synman Family Trust, Re [2013] VSC 364 - v Allan [2014] FamCA 250 .... 20.13
(1997) 70 SASR 21 .... 35.183 St R Qd 66 .... 3.36 .... 22.28 Allcard v Skinner (1887) 36 Ch D 145 .... 11.6,
Adlam v Savage [2017] 2 NZLR 309 .... 38.3 Ahmad v Secret Garden (Cheshire) Ltd [2013] Alati v Kruger (1955) 94 CLR 216 .... 33.2, 11.11, 11.19, 11.49
ADM v FDGK [2018] NSWSC 442 .... 14.54, EWCA Civ 1005 .... 34.9 33.7, 33.20, 33.21 Allco Funds Management Ltd (recs and mgrs
14.71, 14.90 AHRKalimpa Pty Ltd v Schmidt [2017] VSC Albacruz (Cargo Owners) v Albarzera apptd) (in liq) v Trust Company (RE
Advan Investments Pty Ltd v Dean Gleeson 701 .... 10.29 (Owners) (The Albazero) [1977] AC 774; Services) Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1251 .... 10.28
Motor Sales Pty [2003] VSC 201 .... 2.53 AIB Group (UK) pie v Mark Redler & Co [1976] 3 All ER 129 .... 29.32, 29.35, 29.36 Allco Securities Pty Ltd, Re [2011] NSWSC
Adventure Golf Systems Australia Pty Ltd Solicitors [2015] AC 1503; [2015] 1 All Albion Insurance Co Ltd v Government 1250 .... 21.119
v Belgravia Health & Leisure Group Pty ER 747 .... 27.94, 27.97, 27.98, 27.108, Insurance Office (NSW) (1969) 121 CLR Allen v Jambo Holdings Ltd [1980] 2 All ER
Ltd [2017] VSCA 326 .... 10.1, 10.5, 10.17, 27.109, 27.110, 32.4, 32.9, 32.17 342 .... 18.1, 18.18 1259 .... 31.14
10.70, 10.78 Aid/Watch Incorporated v Commissioner Albrow v Cunningham [2000] NSWSC 103 - v Snyder [1977] 2 NSWLR 685 .... 20.24,
AED Oil Ltd v Back (No 2) [2010] VSC 43 of Taxation of the Commonwealth of .... 35.53, 35.59 36.16, 36.21, 36.22, 36.23, 36.32
.... 35.155 Australia (2010) 241 CLR 539; 272 ALR 417 Alcoa of Australia Retirement Plan Pty Ltd Allen, Re; Faith v Allen [1953] Ch 810; [1953] 2
Aequitas Ltd v Sparad No 100 Ltd (formerly .... 23.34, 23.36, 23.37 v Frost (2012) 36 VR 618 .... 26.169 All ER 898 .... 22.93
Australian European Finance Corp Ltd) AIIB Pty Ltd v Beard [2009] NSWSC 1001 Aldrich v Cooper (1803) 32 ER 402 .... 17.3, Allen's Asphalt Pty Ltd v SPM Group Ltd
[2001] NSWSC 14 .... 35.80 .... 9.60 19.9 [2009] QCA 134 .... 20.86
AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP Aikman v Owners of Strata Plan 48817 - 16 Alec Finlayson Pty Ltd v Royal Freemason Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis (2015] EWHC 1300
v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC Dolphin Drive Mandurah [2016] WASC Benevolent Institution of New South (Ch) .... 10.29
[2014] 1 All ER 335; [2013] 1 WLR 1889 380 .... 30.30 Wales Nominees Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1168 Allgood v Blake (1873) LR 8 Exch 160 .... 24.16
.... 30.93 Ailakis v Olivero (No 2) [2014] WASCA 127 .... 39.58 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Olver [2003]
AG Australia Holdings Ltd v Burton (2002) 58 .... 32.77 Alemite Lubrequip Pty Ltd v Adams (1996) 41 vsc 101 .... 35.168
NSWLR464 .... 9.115, 9.119, 9.127 Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission NSWLR 45 .... 27.114 Allied Mills Industries Pty Ltd v Trade
Agarwala v Agarwala [2013] EWCA Civ 1763 (1992) 175 CLR 564; 106 ALR 11 .... 28.13, Alesco Corporation Ltd v Te Maari [2015] Practices Commission (1981) 34 ALR 105
.... 36.15 28.17, 28.31 NSWSC 469 .... 35.117, 35.169, 37.10, 37.56 .... 9.111
xviii xix
PRINCIPLES OF AUSTRALIAN EQUITY AND TRUSTS TABLE OF CASES
Allison v Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd [2011] Amway Corporation v Eurway International Ansett Australia Ltd v Travel Software Solutions Archbold v Scully (1861) 11 ER 769 .... 39.37,
TASSC 52 .... 10.41 Ltd (1974] RPC 82 .... 9.54 Pty Ltd (2007) 214 FLR 203 .... 5.51 39.59
Allnutt v Wilding [2007] EWCA Civ 412 Anderson v Anderson [2013] QSC 8 .... 11.22, Ansett Australia Ltd, Re (2006) 151 FCR 41 Ardlethan Options Ltd v Easdown (1915) 20
.... 34.14, 34.29, 34.32 11.39 .... 22.17, 22.22 CLR 285 .... 35.90
Alma Hill Constructions Pty Ltd v Onal (2007) - v - [2016] NSWSC 1204 .... 5.100 Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes Arfaras v Vosnakis (2016] NSWCA 65 .... 14.61
16 VR 190 .... 5.21 - v - (2017) 94 NSWLR 591 .... 8.77, 8.87, 8.91 Ltd (1976] 1 Ch 55; [1976] 1 All ER 779 Argyll v Argyll (1967] Ch 302; [1965] 1 All ER
Alsop Wilkinson (a firm) v Neary [1996] 1 - v McPherson (No 2) [2012] WASC 19 .... 31.3, 31.41 611 .... 9.30, 9.43, 9.83
WLR 1220 .... 26.48 .... 11.7, 13.10, 13.17, 25.89, 25.97, 25.100 AntonyvWeerasekera [1953] 1 WLR 1007 Ari v Decevic [2013] NSWSC 1967 .... 15.30
Alstom Ltd v Yokogawa Australia Pty Ltd - v Westpac Banking Corporation [2018] .... 11.6 Aribisala v St James Homes (Grosvenor Dock)
(No 7) [2012] SASC 49 .... 14.59 VSCA 226 .... 13.72 ANZ Banking Group v Fuller [2004] Ltd (2007] EWHC 1694 (Ch) .... 15.30
Alston v Cormack Foundation Pty Ltd [2018] Andrew v Dobson (1788) 29 ER 1232 .... 21.65 NSWSC 305 .... 11.83 Arida v Arida (No 2) (2014] NSWSC 579
FCA 895 .... 21.8, 21.89, 21.91, 21.101, - v Zant Pty Ltd (2004) 213 ALR 812 .... 22.60 ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Intagro Projects Pty .... 26.84
22.129 Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Ltd [2004] NSWSC 1054 .... 26.56 Aristoc Industries Pty Ltd v RA Wenham
- v Equity Trustees, Executors & Agency Ltd Group Ltd (2011) 288 ALR 611 .... 3.20, 16.4 ANZ Executors & Trustees Ltd v Humes Ltd (Builders) Pty Ltd (1965] NSWR 581
(1912) 14 CLR 341 .... 26.90 - v - (2012) 247 CLR 205; 290 ALR 595 (1990] VR 615 .... 29.13, 29.15, 39.9, 39.17 .... 29.17, 29.19, 30.11
Aluminium Industrie Vaassen BV v Romalpa .... 3.20, 16.3, 16.9, 16.19 ANZ Trustees Ltd v Attorney-General (NSW) Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
Aluminium Ltd [1976] 2 All ER 552 .... 20.98 - v Parker [1973] Qd R 93 .... 22.80, 22.81 (2008] NSWSC 1081 .... 24.23 v Allam (2016) 327 ALR 595 .... 30.22
Amalgamated Pest Control Pty Ltd v SM & SE - v Partington (1791) 29 ER 610 .... 22.126 Anzac Cottages Trust, Re (2000] QSC 175 Armitage v Nurse (1998] Ch 241; (1997] 2 All
Gillece Pty Ltd [2016] QCA 260 .... 30.9 Andtrust v Andreatta [2015] NSWSC 38 .... 24.38 ER 705 .... 26.52, 26.101, 27.121, 27.122,
Ambridge Investments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Baker .... 22.2, 22.26 AP-Fon den v Bank of New York Mellon 27.123
[2010] vsc 59 .... 28.39 Angas Law Services Pty Ltd (in liq) v Carabelas SA/NV (2013] EWHC 3127 (Comm) Armitage, Re [1893] 3 Ch 337 .... 26.143
Ambrose v Poumako [2012] FCA 889 .... 22.47 (2005) 226 CLR 507; 215 ALR 110 .... 10.91, 10.92 Armstrongv Jackson (1917] 2 KB 822
Amcor Ltd v Barnes [2016] VSC 707 .... 14.19 .... 10.37, 10.148 Apotex Pty Ltd v Les Laboratories Servier .... 10.116, 10.154
AMEC Group Ltd v Universal Steels (Scotland) Angelic Grace, The [1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep 87 (No 2) (2012) 293 ALR 272 .... 30.60, Armstrong (dec'd), Re [1960] VR 202 .... 21.6,
Ltd [2009] EWHC 560 (TCC) .... 30.42 .... 30.93 30.61 21.8, 21.16
American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] Anglican Development Fund Diocese of Appleby's Estate, Re (1930) 25 Tas LR 126 Armstrong Scalisi Holdings Pty Ltd v Abboud
AC 396; [1975] 1 All ER 504 .... 30.34 Bathurst v Palmer (2015) 336 ALR 372 .... 21.50 [2012] NSWSC 268 .... 35.127, 37.51
Amerind Pty Ltd (in liq), Re (2017) 320 FLR .... 24.1 Anglican Property Trust Diocese of Bathurst, Armstrong Strategic Management and
118 .... 26.36, 26.59, 26.60 Anglican Development Fund Diocese of Re Application of the (2016] NSWSC 13 Marketing Pty Ltd v Expense Reduction
AMEV-UDC Finance Ltd v Austin (1986) 162 Bathurst Board, Re [2017] NSWSC 967 .... 26.83 Analysts Group Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 704
CLR 170; 68 ALR 185 .... 2.20, 16.2, 16.5, .... 38.20 APT Finance Pty Ltd v Bajada (2008] .... 35.162
16.9, 16.21, 16.26, 16.27, 16.33 Anglican Trusts Corporation of the Diocese of WAS CA 73 .... 5.20, 5.28 - v - (2012) 295 ALR 348 .... 9.81
Amit Laundry Pty Ltd v Jain [2017] NSWSC Gippsland v Attorney-General (2008] VSC APT Technology Pty Ltd v Aladesaye (No 2) Arnold v National Westminster Bank pie [1991]
1495 .... 25.21, 25.29, 25.35, 25.63 352 .... 23.92, 23.126 (2016) 259 IR 335 .... 9.134 2 AC 93; [1991] 3 All ER 41 .... 14.10
AMM v mew [2010] EWHC 2457 (QB) Angus' Will Trusts, Re [1960] 1 WLR 1296 Aquaculture Corp v New Zealand Green Arnott v Kiss [2014] NSWSC 1385 .... 27.62
.... 9.120, 9.166 .... 27.88 Mussel Co Ltd [1990] 3 NZLR 299 .... 3.12 Arogen Pty Ltd v O'Meley [2013] NSWSC 1197
Ammon v Consolidated Minerals Ltd (No 3) Annesley Plant Hire Pty Ltd v Wilson (No 2) Arab Bank Australia Ltd v Sayde Developments ... 21.32
[2007] WASC 232 .... 9.106 [2014) vsc 350 .... 27.55 Pty Ltd (2016) 93 NSWLR 231 .... 16.14, Artcraft Pty Ltd v Dickson [2014] SASC 108
Amos v Fraser (1906) 4 CLR 78 .... 26.92 Anning v Anning (1907) 4 CLR 1049 .... 5.38, 16.16, 16.21 .... 35.127
AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 5.95, 5.97, 5.99 Araci v Fallon [2011] EWCA Civ 668 .... 29.14 Arthur v Attorney General of the Turks
(TCC) .... 9.163, 9.164 Anscor Pty Ltd v Clout (2004) 135 FCR 469 Arakella Pty Ltd v Paton (2004) 60 NSWLR 334 and Caicos Islands [2012] UKPC 30
AMP Bank Ltd v Brown and Kavanagh [2017] .... 22.47 .... 22.12, 22.15, 22.18, 22.20 .... 35.133
NSWSC 313 .... 18.5, 18.25, 18.32 Ansell Rubber Co Pty Ltd v Allied Rubber Aravanis (Trustee), Re Gillespie (Bankrupt) - v Public Trustee (1988) 90 FLR 203 .... 21.19
Ampthill Peerage Case, The [1977] AC 547 Industries Pty Ltd (1967] VR 37 .... 9.55, v Gillespie [2014] FCA 630 .... 25.45 - v State of Queensland [2004] QSC 456
.... 12.21, 12.23 9.57, 9.98, 9.135 Arbuthnot v Norton (1846) 18 ER 565 .... 7.2 .... 10.61
xx xxi