PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC Philosophical logic addresses fundamental questions about truth and meaning. Often considered oneofthe most intellectually demandingofsubjects, it provides a basis for muchofwhatis discussed in philosophy and other fields. This book provides a first introduction to the subject. Lucid, up-to-date, and comprehensive, it is based on over twenty years oflectures given by the authorat Oxford University. Sybil Wolfram introduces philosophical logic primarily by focussing on a numberofrelated topics and issues in it, describing views held about them, arguing about them, and generallyoffering an opinion on ways ofclarifying or resolving them. She shows by example how to set about considering the kinds ofquestions that philosophical logic addresses. Questions at the end ofchapters are designed to encourage going beyond what she has written; suggested reading frequently contains otherviews not necessarily discussed in the text. Written simply and clearly, employing as few technical terms as possible, PhilosophicalLogicassumes no prior knowledge ofeither philosophy or logic. It is designed for use as the basis for a one- or two-term undergraduate course, and will be ofinterest to anyone concerned with understanding the most fundamental intellectual questions. Sybil Wolfram is University Lecturerin Philosophyatthe Universityof Oxford PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC An introduction SYBIL WOLFRAM ,~ ROUTLEDGE LONDON AND NEW YORK Firstpublished 1989 byRoutledge 2ParkSquare,MiltonPark,Abingdon, Oxon, OX144RN 270Madison,AveNewYorkNY 10016 Routkdge is an imprint ofthe Taylor (5 Francis Group TransferredtoDigitalPrinting2005 © 1989Sybil Wolfram Typeset by Columns ofReading All rights reserved. Nopartofthis bookmaybe reprinted orreproducedorutilizedinany form or byanyelectronic, mechanical,orothermeans, now knownorhereafterinventt,ad,includingphotocopying and recording,orin anyinformationstorageor retrievalsystem,without pennission inwritingfrom thepublishers. BritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationDala Wolfram, Sybil Philosophical logic: an introduction. I. Philosophical logic I. rride 160 ISBN0415023173 ISBN041502318 I Pbk LibraryofCongress Gata/oginginPublicalionData Wolfram, Sybil, 1931- Philosophical logic. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Logic. I.rritle. B(~7I.W65 1989 160 88-23963 ISBN0415023173 ISBN041502318 I (pbk.) TO STEPHEN AND CONRAD This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS Preface Xl11 CHAprrER 1INrrRODUCTION 1 Section 1 What is philosophical logic? 1 1.1.1 Philosophical logicand formal logic 1 Two sorts oflogic - Propositional calculus and philosophical logic - Examples - Predicate calculus and philosophical logic - Exanlples 1.1.2 Philosophical logicand philosophy 6 Exampl~s 1.1.3 Philosophical logicin itsown right 8 Section 2 Some preliminaries 10 l.2.1 Validity, consistency and soundness 10 \'alidity and invalidity - Consistency and inconsistency Soundness and unsoundness - Good and bad arguments 1.2.2 Sufficient and necessary conditions 15 l'he terms explained - Sufficient vs necessary conditions - Relation ofsufficient and necessary conditions - 'Logically' vs 'contingently' sufficient or necessary conditions - 'Causally' sufficient and necessary condidons - Inferellces based on necessary and sufficient conditions 1.2.3 Problenls about proof 21 Notes to Chapter 1 22 Questionsandsuggestedreading 24 CHAP1~ER 2 REFERENCE AND TRUTH VALUE 26 Section 1 Typography, meaning, and whatis stated 26 vii CONTENTS 2.1.1 Words 26 'roken and type words - Words with a meaning 'Vords with the same meaning - Different 'word counts' - Problems about the word 'word' 2.1.2 Sentences 31 'fokcn sentences - ·fhe 1l1eaning ofsentences - Sentence ambiguity and synonymy - 'Propositions' 2.1.3 Statements 35 l~he sentence-statement distinction - COl1ntin~ staternents - Meaningful sentences that do not make statements Section 2 The problem ofthe KingofFrance 39 2.2.1 Howshould 'The KingofFrance is wise' beanalysed? 39 l'he problem - l~he 'rheory ofDcscriptions - 'rhe '""hcory of Presupposition 2.2.2 Relerencefailure and the Neglected Case 43 'I\vo sorts ofcase - The Ne1{lected Case - Should \ve introduce a third truth value? - Some implications of the Neglected (~ase- Failure ofreference Non-radical reference failure - 'Identifying references', 'inessential', and 'referential' uses of expressions - Radical reference failure - When do nleaningful declarative sentences fail to make statenlcnts? - \\That kinds ofexpressions can fail radically to refer? Section 3 Vocabulary ofreference 52 2.3.1 Dcfiniteand indefinitereference 52 2.3.2 Expressions nlakingdefinite references 53 2.3.3 Referring expressions S5 Different uses of'referring expression' - Relations ofuses - Choice ofusc - References to particulars vs references to non-particulars 2.3.4 Rigid and nonri~idd~signat()rs 60 Strongly rigid, not stron~ly rigid and nonri~id Designators and reference - Advantages and problenls Section 4 Should weadmitstatements? 63 2.4.1 The initialcase for staterncnts 63 ()ne sentence/proposition, many statelnents - One statenlcnt, many s(~ntences/propositions 2.4.2 ()bjections tostaterrlcnts 65 Ar~ type statenlents superfluous? - l'ype statements and criteria ofidentity - l""ype staterncnts and referential opacity - l'ypc statements and asscrtions 2.4.3 'I'wocommentsabout statenlents 71 ~lultipli('ation ofentities? - l~rutll conditions viii CONTENTS Notes to CYhapter2 72 Questionsandsuggestedreading 76 CHAprrER 3 NECESSARY TRUTH AND THE ANALY1'IC-SYNTHErrIC DISTINCrrION 80 Section 1 Map ofdistinctions andtheories 80 3.1.1 'Necessary' and 'contingent', 'analytic' and 'synthetic', 'apriori' and 'empirical' 80 3.1.2 l"hree theories about necessary truth 82 Section 2 Conventionalism 85 3.2.1 l'heLogical Positivist picture 85 Division ofpropositions - Division oftruths - 1'he role ofambiguity 3.2.2 Self-evidenceand logical truth 88 Self-evidence - Logical truths 3.2.3 Necessityand certainty 91 Examples considered - Perception is unreliable Section 3 Scepticism 93 3.3.1 Necessary truth and referential opacity 93 Positivist conventionalism and reference - Quine's Necessity Argument - What does Quine's Necessity Ar~ument show? - Necessary truths and non-analytic propositions - Contingent truths and analytic propositions - Prenlise 2 ofQuine's Necessity Argulnent revised - 'Analytic' and 'necessarily true' - Premise 1 ofQuine's Necessity Argument revised - Positive results ofQuine's Necessity Argument 3.3.2 Jlefinitions of'analytic' 102 Relation ofNecessity and Analyticity Argutnents Quine's i\nalyticity ArKunlcnt - Two discarded d~finitionsof'analytic' - Three groups ofdefinitions of'analytic' - Use of'analytic' Section 4 Essentialism 110 3.4·.1 Kripkc's necessary truths 110 3.4-.2 What is essentialism? 112 'Essentialism': sense I (not analytic) - Sense 2 (not meaning- ofwords) - Senses 3a (objects) and 3b (particulars) 3.4.3 Kripke'sweaksenseof'necessarily true' I16 3.4.4 In what senseis Kripkran essentialist? II7 Kripke's old-stylejustification - Kripkc's new-style justification - Kripke's sense of'necessarily true' and essentialistn - necessary truth and Kripke's csscntialislll ix