Paul Tillich, Carl Jung, and the Recovery of Religion This book compares the theology of Tillich with the psychology of Jung, arguing that they were both concerned with the recovery of a valid religious sense for contemporary culture. Paul Tillich, Carl Jung, and the Recovery of Religion explores in detail the diminution of the human spirit through the loss of its contact with its native religious depths, a problem on which both spent much of their working lives and energies. Both Tillich and Jung work with a naturalism that grounds all religion on processes native to the human being. Tillich does this in his efforts to recover that point at which divinity and humanity coincide and from which they differentiate. Jung does this by identifying the archetypal unconscious as the source of all religions now working toward a religious sentiment of more universal sympathy. This book identifies the dependence of both on German mysticism as a common ancestry and concludes with a reflection on how their joint perspective might affect religious education and the relation of religion to science and technology. Throughout the book, John Dourley looks back to the roots of both men’s ideas about mediaeval theology and Christian mysticism, making it ideal reading for analysts and academics in the fields of Jungian and religious studies. John P. Dourley is Professor Emeritus, Department of Religion, at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. He graduated as a Jungian analyst from the Zurich/Kusnacht Institute and has published widely on Jung and religion. Paul Tillich, Carl Jung and the Recovery of Religion John P. Dourley First published 2008 by Routledge 27 Church Road, Hove, East Sussex BN3 2FA Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2008. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Copyright © 2008 John P. Dourley All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. This publication has been produced with paper manufactured to strict environmental standards and with pulp derived from sustainable forests. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dourley, John P. Paul Tillich, Carl Jung, and the recovery of religion / John P. Dourley. p. cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-415-46023-1 (hardback) – ISBN 978-0-415-46024-8 (pbk.) 1. Tillich, Paul 1886-1965. 2. Jung, C. G. (Carl Gustav), 1875-1961. 3. Religion. I. Title BX4827 T53D68 2008 230.092–dc22 2007042007 ISBN 0-203-92905-5 Master e-book ISBN ISBN: 978-0-415-46023-1 (hbk) ISBN: 978-0-415-46024-8 (pbk) Contents Preface vii 1 Toward a salvageable Tillich: the implications of his late confession of provincialism 1 2 The problem of essentialism: Tillich’s anthropology versus his Christology 25 3 Christ as the picture of essential humanity: one of many 46 4 Tillich on Boehme: a restrained embrace 58 5 The Goddess, mother of the Trinity: Tillich’s late suggestion 75 6 The problem of the three and the four in Paul Tillich and Carl Jung 92 7 Bringing up Father: Jung on Job and the education of God in history 111 8 Memory and emergence: Jung and the mystical anamnesis of the nothing 127 9 Tillich’s theonomous naturalism and its relation to religious and medical healing 143 10 Jung, Tillich and their challenge to religious education 161 vi Contents 11 Tillich, Jung and the wisdom and morality of doing science and technology 178 Afterword 192 References 194 Index 201 Preface What follows is the substance of my sustained reflection on the work of Paul Tillich and Carl Jung. The thought of the former led me to write a doctoral thesis on his work (defended in 1971). The power of the latter led me to train as an analyst in Zurich and to practice since 1980. What is most intriguing in the thought of both individuals is their identification of the origins of religious experience and so of the religions in the depth of the human being. Both hoped that their delineation of the origin of religion within the human would lead to the restoration of religious credibility both within and beyond the religious institutions of their society. Both embraced a radical immanence as the basis of a now emerging religious universalism which would appreciate the particularity of each religion while making each a relative concretion of an underlying generative power undermining all claims to a cumulative and final possession of an absolute truth. In appreciating while making relative the specific concretions of the religious instinct in the world’s current religions, Tillich and Jung may well provide a sketch of a now emerging religiosity which will in fact make the future possible. This implies that the greatest current threat to the species is religious conviction, faith, in religious or politi- cal form. The reader is invited to at least consider the following presentation of their views and their importance to an inescapably religious humanity if religion is to enhance the present and enable the future. Chapter 1 Toward a salvageable Tillich The implications of his late confession of provincialism* The texts and the context Late in Paul Tillich’s life a series of events conspired to effect a perceptible broadening of his theological perspective. This expanded consciousness was most evident in late confessions of an earlier and, by implication, somewhat sustained provincialism running throughout much of his theological endeavor to that point. Such confessions of provincialism led him, in his more occa- sional late statements, to positions in considerable tension if not contradic- tion with his earlier Systematic Theology. Some of these provincialisms are to be found even in the third volume of his Systematic Theology written at the same time, in the early 1960s, when he was deploring such provincialism in statements made elsewhere. Tillich’s battle against his and others’ provincialism had a history. In an address as early as 1952 Tillich (1886–1965) identifies a number of provin- cialisms in the mindset he brought with him from Germany in 1933. (Tillich 1959a) The provincialisms indicted here are basically an amalgam of German theological, philosophical and cultural provincialisms, provincialisms he claims to have shed prior to 1952 in the face of various forms of American pragmatism and pluralism. (Thomas 1995: 19) In a reminiscent mood, in this address, Tillich is generous in praising the American theological and cultural environment he entered from Germany for its role in making him aware of his continental German provincialisms while, in turn, making no demand that he accept a new American provincialism, sensitive though he remained to the possibility that such a set-back could occur on American soil. (Tillich 1959a: 176) However, this earlier admission of provincialism pales in comparison to his later confessions of a further series of provincialisms only then to be fully exorcised. These later confessions force the question whether or not the defeat * This chapter derives from a presentation to the North American Paul Tillich Society, meeting in Toronto, November 2002. A preliminary version of the chapter appeared in The North American Paul Tillich Society Newsletter, 29, 2, 2003, 10–14, amplified as “Toward a Salvageable Tillich: The Implications of his Late Confession of Provincialism”, Studies in Religion, 33, 1, 2004, 3–26.
Description: