Richard Meissner Paradigms and Theories Influencing Policies in the South African and International Water Sectors PULSE3, A Framework for Policy Analysis fl Paradigms and Theories In uencing Policies in the South African and International Water Sectors Richard Meissner Paradigms and Theories fl In uencing Policies in the South African and International Water Sectors 3 PULSE , A Framework for Policy Analysis 123 Richard Meissner Council for ScientificandIndustrial Research(CSIR) Pretoria SouthAfrica and Centrefor Water ResourcesResearch University of KwaZulu-Natal Private Bag X01Scottsville 3209 SouthAfrica ISBN978-3-319-48546-1 ISBN978-3-319-48547-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-48547-8 LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2016955080 ©SpringerInternationalPublishingAG2017 Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsarereservedbythePublisher,whetherthewholeorpart of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission orinformationstorageandretrieval,electronicadaptation,computersoftware,orbysimilarordissimilar methodologynowknownorhereafterdeveloped. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publicationdoesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexemptfrom therelevantprotectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authorsortheeditorsgiveawarranty,expressorimplied,withrespecttothematerialcontainedhereinor foranyerrorsoromissionsthatmayhavebeenmade. Printedonacid-freepaper ThisSpringerimprintispublishedbySpringerNature TheregisteredcompanyisSpringerInternationalPublishingAG Theregisteredcompanyaddressis:Gewerbestrasse11,6330Cham,Switzerland Acknowledgements IwouldliketothankMariusClaassenforinvolvingmeintheWaterSustainability Flagship project and for encouraging me to develop PULSE3. The framework would not have been possible without a number of field trips undertaken for the project. Karen Nortje, Elliot Moyo, Nikki Funke, Winile Masangane, Cebile Ntombela,andShannaNienaberplayedvaryingrolesinorganisingthefieldtripsto the Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality. The field trips to the wastewater treatmentplantsgavevaluableinsightintotheinteractionbetweenhumansandthe environment. Karen Nortje encouraged me to tell the story of my research jour- ney (see appendix 1). I am also grateful to Inga Jacobs-Mata and Reyhana Mahomed for helping me in better communicating the PULSE3 framework for analysistodifferentaudiences.Duringsessionswherewediscussedtheframework, Irealisedjusthowdifficultitcanbetocommunicateone’sscientificknowledgeand that a critical eye can go a long way in improving matters. I would also like to acknowledge the work of our subject librarian, Engela van Heerden. Her skilled literature searches have helped the research in many ways. IwouldalsoliketothankJuanetteJohnforreadingpartsofthemanuscriptandthe critical reflections she provided. To Hennie Lötter at the University of Johannesburg’s Department of Philosophy, I own a huge debt of gratitude. He agreedtoreadthePULSE3frameworkandencouragedmetodevelopthetheoryof water research. Rudra Sil from the University of Pennsylvania also gave valuable inputs into the use of the concept ‘analytic eclecticism’. He was willing to look at the use of the concept he elaborated upon with Peter J. Katzenstein at short notice and responded with exquisite insights. Deon Geldenhuys, from the University of Johannesburg’s Department of Politics and International Relations, also gave valuable inputs after I showed him the framework over lunch in Melville. For his insight, I am very grateful. Sabine Stuart-Hill from the University of KwaZulu-Natal’sCentreforWaterResourceResearchassistedgreatlyinmytripto Germany inJuly2015whereIgaveapresentationofPULSE3attheUniversityof Osnabrück’s Institute for Environmental Systems Research. From this institute, I would like to thank Claudia Pahl-Wostl, Kathrin Knüppe, Elizabeth Ehling and v vi Acknowledgements Christian Stein, and a host of other staff researchers for their participation and comments during the presentation. I would also like to thank Chad Harris and Catherine Botha from the Department of Philosophy at the University of Johannesburg for arranging a seminar where I presented the framework and case studies to a group of philosophers and other experts in the field of water resource governanceandmanagement.Presentatthisseminar,amongstothers,were:Rafael Winkler, Hennie Lötter, Veli Mitova, Basil Fick and Jane Anderson. To these philosophers my heartfelt thanks. I would also like to express my gratitude to Fritz Schmuhl from Springer who encouraged and guided me throughout the production and publication process. Without such dedication as Fritz’s, a book like this would remain a pipe dream. Iwouldfurthermore liketoexpressmygratitudetomyfriendJeroenWarnerwho, over eisbein and beers in Osnabrück, also commented on the framework. Jeroen encouraged me to take the research further and gave some good pointers on strategies I could use to improve the text and thinking. Last but not least, I would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. Their suggestions on how to make the book more readable added immense value to the manuscript and the argumentation contained herein. Although numerous individ- uals were involved in making suggestions and reading various parts of the book, I bear full responsibility for any errors. 2016 Richard Meissner Contents 1 Water Research in South Africa .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 1 1.1 Introduction .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 1 1.2 The Myths We Rely on .... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 1 1.3 Science as Constant Critique .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 5 1.3.1 Acid Mine Drainage . .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 7 1.3.2 Integrated Water Resources Management . .... ..... .... 8 1.3.3 Transboundary River Cooperation... .... .... ..... .... 11 1.4 Rethinking Inquiry in the Water Sector .... .... .... ..... .... 13 1.5 Critical Solidarity.... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 15 1.6 How the Rest of the Book Unfolds ... .... .... .... ..... .... 19 1.7 Conclusion. .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 19 References.. .... .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 20 2 Water Governance and Management and Climate Change.... .... 25 2.1 Introduction .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 25 2.2 Climate Adaptation Strategies in Australia and South Africa . .... 25 2.2.1 Climate Change Assessment and Adaptation... ..... .... 27 2.2.2 Paradigm Assessment of Adapting South African Cities and Towns’... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 27 2.2.3 Paradigm Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability in South East Queensland. .... .... .... .... ..... .... 30 2.2.4 The South African and Australian Adaptation Plans Through the Lens of Analytic Eclecticism .... ..... .... 32 2.2.5 Theory for Practice: Social Learning and Policy Paradigms.... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 35 2.2.6 Discussion.... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 40 2.3 South Africa’s National Water Resource Strategy, Second Edition.. .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 44 2.3.1 Introduction... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 44 2.3.2 Paradigm Assessment of the NWRS2.... .... ..... .... 45 vii viii Contents 2.3.3 The NWRS2 Through the Lens of Analytic Eclecticism ... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 50 2.3.4 Theories for Practice. .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 53 2.3.5 Discussion.... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 56 2.4 The UNDP’s Water and Ocean Governance Focus Area .... .... 59 2.4.1 Introduction... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 59 2.4.2 Paradigm Assessment of the Focus Area.. .... ..... .... 60 2.4.3 The UNDP’s Webcontent Through the Lens of Analytic Eclecticism. .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 68 2.4.4 Theory for Practice: Social Constructivism.... ..... .... 75 2.4.5 Discussion.... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 76 References.. .... .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 80 3 Active Substantiation: A Theory of Water Research .... ..... .... 89 3.1 Introduction .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 89 3.2 Active Substantiation . ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 89 3.3 The Active ‘Loom’... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 91 3.4 Water on Mars.. .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 92 3.5 Air France Flight 447. ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 93 3.6 At the Behest of Active Substantiation. .... .... .... ..... .... 95 3.7 Conclusion. .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 97 References.. .... .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 97 4 PULSE3: A Framework for Analysis. .... .... .... .... ..... .... 99 4.1 Introduction .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 99 4.2 The Rationale for PULSE3.. .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 99 4.3 PULSE3’s Characteristics... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 100 4.3.1 Component #1: Research Paradigm Assessment..... .... 101 4.3.2 Component #2: The Ethos of Analytic Eclecticism... .... 113 4.3.3 Component #3: Theories for Practice .... .... ..... .... 119 4.4 Operationalising Analytic Eclecticism and the Repertoire of Theories. .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 122 4.5 Conclusion. .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 127 References.. .... .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 127 5 Paradigms and Theories: Popular Labels and Their Delimitation.... .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 131 5.1 Introduction .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 131 5.2 Paradigms and Theories .... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 131 5.3 The Importance of Paradigms and Theories . .... .... ..... .... 135 5.4 Causality... .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 139 5.5 The Unproductive Disdain for Research Paradigms and Theories.... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 142 5.6 Conclusion. .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 149 References.. .... .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 149 Contents ix 6 Advancing Different Ideas ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 155 6.1 Introduction .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 155 6.2 Constant Critique as a Travelling Companion ... .... ..... .... 155 Appendix 1: My Research Journey.... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 158 Appendix 2: Theories for Practice. .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 169 References.. .... .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 241 Index .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 249 Chapter 1 Water Research in South Africa 1.1 Introduction In this introductory chapter, I will talk about the nature of water research in the South African context. In short, research scientists study water resource manage- mentinitsvariousfacetstoameliorateproblemsthatcouldnegativelyaffecthuman populationsandthenaturalenvironment.Thisisthepopularviewofwaterresearch, itsnatureandmotivation forembarkingontheendeavour.Thereis,however,more thanmeetstheeye.Asubliminalreality existswhenweconductwaterresearch:the myths we adhere to as water researchers. In this chapter, I will explore the myth aspect and other elements characterising water research in more detail. I organise thechapterasfollows.Inthefirstsection,Iwillinvestigateandreportonmythsin International Relations theory and link the arguments contained in this rendition with thatofwater resourcegovernanceandmanagement.Iwillthen tellthereader whatthebookisabout;inotherwords,theessenceofthebookandwhyIthinkitis necessarytowrite abookreportingonmyinvestigationinresearchparadigmsand theoriesinwatergovernanceandmanagement.Iwillthen demonstrate theissuesI will address in the rest of the book with three short case studies: acid mine drai- nage, integrated water resource management and transboundary river cooperation. Inthepenultimatesectionofthechapter,IwillelaborateonhowIthinkweshould think about water research. I then elaborate on critical solidarity as a way to enact such thinking. I will then end with a conclusion. 1.2 The Myths We Rely on The natural environment is the well-spring of the water resources we need for various activities. This is in a sense a ‘myth’, or an apparent truth expressed in sloganformonwhichatheoryreliesuponinordertobetrue(Weber2014).Letme ©SpringerInternationalPublishingAG2017 1 R.Meissner,ParadigmsandTheoriesInfluencingPoliciesintheSouthAfrican andInternationalWaterSectors,DOI10.1007/978-3-319-48547-8_1