University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Theses and Dissertations 2015 Oral corrective feedback and the acquisition of Chinese rule-based verb constructions Zhengwei Qiao University of Iowa Copyright 2015 Zhengwei Qiao This dissertation is available at Iowa Research Online: http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1730 Recommended Citation Qiao, Zhengwei. "Oral corrective feedback and the acquisition of Chinese rule-based verb constructions." PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, University of Iowa, 2015. http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1730. Follow this and additional works at:http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd Part of theFirst and Second Language Acquisition Commons ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND THE ACQUISITION OF CHINESE RULE-BASED VERB CONSTRUCTIONS by Zhengwei Qiao A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in Second Language Acquisition in the Graduate College of The University of Iowa May 2015 Thesis Supervisor: Professor Chuanren Ke Copyrights by ZHENGWEI QIAO 2015 All Rights Reserved Graduate College The University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL ___________________________ PH.D. THESIS ___________ This is to certify that the Ph.D. thesis of Zhengwei Qiao has been approved by the Examining Committee for the thesis requirement for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in Second Language Acquisition at the May 2015 graduation. Thesis Committee: ________________________________ Chuanren Ke, Thesis Supervisor ________________________________ Helen Shen _________________________________ Judith Liskin-Gasparro _________________________________ Michael Everson _________________________________ Weldon Coblin I dedicated this dissertation to my dear husband, Lingjian Meng, who provided love, support, and inspiration. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I once heard that it took a village to make a Ph. D. My journey of writing this dissertation confirmed these words. I could not finish my dissertation without my Ph. D. “village.” I want to first express my heartfelt gratitude to my advisor Professor Chuanren Ke. I thank him for his encouragement and support throughout my graduate studies. His knowledge of pedagogy and second language acquisition has been a true inspiration. His constructive advice kept pushing the boundaries of my thinking and made my dissertation writing oriented and focused. I am grateful to Professor Judith Liskin-Gasparro for being my role model. Her SLA-Speaking class has introduced me to the field of error correction on students’ speech, which became my primary research interests. Special thanks go to Professor Helen Shen. I am indebted to her for introducing me to many instructional skills in Chinese teaching and generously supporting me in my data collection. I am also grateful to her for giving me the opportunities of teaching Chinese in the Chinese program. I would also like to express my sincere gratitude to Professor Michael Everson and Professor Weldon Coblin for kindly serving on my dissertation committee. I thank them for their insightful comments and suggestions throughout the course of this project. My Ph.D. “village” also includes the students at the University of Iowa who participated in this study. The experiment lasted over seven weeks. Without the students’ engagement and support, this project would not have been possible. ii Last but not least, I want to thank my family: my husband, my parents, my sister, and my brother. I thank my husband, Lingjian Meng, for his caring, love, and support. I would not have come this far without him. I thank my parents for their love, and my brother and sister for always taking care of my parents while I am far away from home. iii ABSTRACT Research has focused on how the effects of different types of feedback vary as a function of the complexity of the linguistic targets and on the learning of inflectional features. However, few studies have investigated the learning of rule-based verb constructions. Grounded in the interactionist approach and usage-based theory, this study investigated the effects of corrective feedback on the acquisition of rule-based and rote- learning verb constructions among English-speaking learners of Chinese. Specifically, this study examined the effects of input-providing feedback and output-prompting feedback on the learning of two verb constructions. Data were drawn from 18 learners of Chinese from second-year Chinese classes in an American university. The participants were divided into two groups and took a pretest, treatment, and two posttests. Learners also filled out a questionnaire about their perception and preference of feedback types. Contrary to previous research, results indicated that both recasts and metalinguistic clues had positive effects on learners’ learning of the target constructions. Moreover, learners of different proficiency in the target constructions preferred different types of feedback. The study results provided a categorization of rule-based verb constructions based on the rules that govern their formations and identified stages learners moved through when learning verb constructions. The researcher proposed an instructional model of rule-based verb constructions. The model will help instructors recognize the stage the learners’ are in and provide insight into how to help learners move to a higher stage by providing appropriate instruction, corrective feedback, and practice activities. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................1 1.1 The aim of this study .....................................................................................1 1.2 Research design ............................................................................................3 1.2.1 Subject population .............................................................................3 1.2.2 Study procedures ...............................................................................4 1.3 Significance of the study ...............................................................................5 1.4 Organization of the dissertation .....................................................................7 CHAPTER 2 LEARNING OF DIRECTIONAL VERB COMPOUNDS.......................8 2.1 Theories of motion events .............................................................................8 2.1.1 How languages differ in motion events encoding ............................. 10 2.1.2 Revised typological categorization of motion events ........................ 11 2.2 Chinese directional verb complements ........................................................ 12 2.2.1 Compositional properties of DVCs................................................... 13 2.2.2 DVCs constraints ............................................................................. 16 2.3 Acquisition of directional verb complements ............................................... 19 2.3.1 L1 influence in acquiring L2 motion events ..................................... 20 2.3.2 Usage-based theory .......................................................................... 23 2.3.3 L1 and L2 acquisition studies of DVCs ............................................ 26 2.4 Summary..................................................................................................... 28 CHAPTER 3 RECASTS AND METALINGUISTIC CLUES .................................... 30 3.1 Interactionist theories of language learning ................................................. 30 3.2 Skill Theory ................................................................................................ 33 3.3 Oral corrective feedback ............................................................................. 35 3.3.1 Types of corrective feedback ........................................................... 35 3.4 Recasts and metalinguistic clues .................................................................. 37 3.4.1 Noticing of recasts ........................................................................... 40 v 3.4.2 Implicit knowledge and output-prompting feedback ......................... 43 3.5 Studies comparing recasts and prompts ....................................................... 44 3.5.1 Learner-internal factors .................................................................... 48 3.6 Summary..................................................................................................... 51 CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................... 53 4.1 Research questions ...................................................................................... 53 4.1.1 Linguistic issues .............................................................................. 53 4.1.2 Pedagogical issues ........................................................................... 54 4.2 Research design .......................................................................................... 56 4.2.1 Participants ...................................................................................... 57 4.2.2 Target constructions ......................................................................... 58 4.2.3 Data collection procedure................................................................. 61 4.2.4 Treatment ........................................................................................ 62 4.2.5 Operations of recasts and metalinguistic clues .................................. 65 4.3 Assessment ................................................................................................. 67 4.3.1 Oral production test ......................................................................... 67 4.3.2 Questionnaire ................................................................................... 71 4.4 Data analysis ............................................................................................... 72 4.4.1 Data analysis for research questions ................................................. 72 4.4.2 Raters and rating reliability .............................................................. 73 4.5 Pilot study ................................................................................................... 74 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS............................................................................................. 75 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 75 5.2 Findings for research question 1 .................................................................. 75 5.2.1 Activity verb production tests .......................................................... 76 5.2.2 DVC production tests ....................................................................... 78 5.2.3 Summary of findings for research question 1 ................................... 83 5.3 Findings for research question 2 .................................................................. 86 5.3.1 Pretest error types ............................................................................ 87 5.3.2 Posttest error types ........................................................................... 89 5.3.3 Challenging items on the DVC production tests ............................... 93 vi
Description: