2b. Open Systems (10) Open Systems OpenSystemsTopics •Definition •Barriers Outlook and •VendorStatus Opportunity •Outlook OpenSystenfis: Definition What An Is TechnologyBased "Open System"? or FundionBased mm KM OpenSystems OpenSystems UserAgreement UserAgreement Definition Ranking Productstmedmind^^eiident 3.9 3J standards archltectw« Vendor-independentoperatingsystem 3.8 3.8 Single-vendoroperatingsystem 3.5 supportedbymultiplevendors INPUT K1M=Low,5=High m4m 1 OpenSystemsAreNot UserDIsa^rediTieiit Definition Ranking •Technologybased CodegenmtmftimullJii^ptai^emw 3.2 -MVS UNIX 3.2 -UNIX OperatingSystemacceptsguestOSs 2.9 OperatingSystemwitlivarietyof 2.8 -Codagenerators •Accesstoapplica^onssoiiMare NlPUT I&7 Op^SystemsAre ImpactofCompeting Standardson OpenSystems •SypDOftiilfeyctetaeiosfeifidards Adds -MS^SorWindows benefits/ •F-u3n8c6tipornocoreiseKnJtred 33,2/^2%\\45%//]mRemmovbees«M^ -Portable,interoperable •Vendorindependent mm somebeiM^ KM lO-tO OpenSystems — Ponability-^D^f^cin Interoperability Definition Databasesandapplicationscan Relatedtoportability-applicitfiofm bemovedfromoneoperating anddatathatcanbemovedfrom environmenttoanotherwithlittle oneenvironmenttoanothercan ornomodification. alsointeractwitheachother INPUT INPUT s/mm 2 OpenSystems InteroperabilityBenefits BenefitsofIr^erc^abiiity SwiVtecnhdHorWs 201 80 from MLuo/lwtt3i%pla^t"fN.orMmedDiBuImVIS ^30/ 80BImportant 31%\ RunApps. m Very onMult.0/S In^piortant V 56% PoeaMefRMpondantt INPUT INPUT to-u OpenSystems ProblemswithInteroperability Problem Ranking Barriers to Open bU^slelrarteisopnonsibletornuittivendor 3.6 Systems Acceptance PriMoomp«tWoii•psorertwrviee 3.3 Low-costhardwa»¥iildOIBsurvive 3.1 HardwaremaimMianOBimre 2.8 complex INPUT INPUT le-i* OpenSystems OpenSystems SignificantBarriers LessSignificantBarriers Barrier Ranking Barrier Ranking Conflictingstandards 4.2 Lackofpackageapplications 3.3 L^ckofstandards 3.7 UNIXa(fiK(»Monf 3.2 Non-standardimplementations 3.6 Lacdt<4d^^elopaieiitto<^ 2J 3J Lackofconsultants 2.7 Lackofsystemssoftware 2.7 IsLow,5=1-1jgh INPUT INPUT IO.tT 3 OpenSystems OpAnSy^ems BendiitsOutweighProblems? No(5%) Interoperability Implications *Mu^vdfidorimiaMcins •MaifitsnanceopporttinWds INPUT MPUT QpiHiSystanis ExpiatedOpenSyslery^ Vendor Benefits Portabilityandinteroperabilityis •Fewertechnology-^Aised acrossmultivenciorenvironments modifications — •Reducedtraining useranddeveloper •Reducedtechnologyrisksdueto portability openSystems Systems UserDelinitiQn VendorPositions •IBM at •DigitalEquipment LowerCost •NCR •Othersystemsmanufacturers WPUT INPUT