Notes for Electronic Edition. Please report any errors to Louis - Ibiblio

1507 Pages·2011·28.72 MB·English

by  Louis Lyle

i A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
PREFACE
This document has been updated as of 6/16/2010. A new abbreviated Table of Contents is
listed before the Title page and prefaces. The original table of contents has been updated
and moved to page lxxxvii. Both tables have hyperlinks to the specific text in the document.
Notes for Electronic Edition.
Please report any errors to Louis Sorenson: [email protected]. This document is
an updated version of the Word document produced by Ted Hildebrant of Gordon
Collage, Wenham MA. Changes to Dr. Hildebrant’s edition are as follows:
 Greek text changed to Cardo font and converted into Unicode and embedded.
 Hebrew text change to Ezra Sil font and converted into Unicode and embedded.
 Document changed to 8.5 x 14 inches to allow for text and font changes without
changing the pagination.
 Header with page numbers added, so printed page number matches the actual page
number. Word’s Goto page functions now work for the index Roman numeral
pages and the numbered pages.
 Numerous typographical errors were corrected.
 Many of the above changes are for the purpose of changing the document into a
web format.
 Section Breaks between Division Chapters
 Replaced the original Table of Contents with a Microsoft Word generated Table of
Contents and moved if from pp. xxi-lxii to pp. lxxxvii ff. This was done in order
to leave the page numbering of the preface the same (except for the Table of
Contents page numbering). There are a few extra headings which were in the
running text but not in Robertson’s original outline. The TOC now has links to the
various sections.
 Fixed MS Word’s Hebrew so that it can be cut and pasted into a text document
and keep the correct word order (Replaced the 202B (left-to-right) character with a
202C character after each Hebrew string of words).
 Chapter Titles added to every right-side page.
Yet to Do:
 Divide indexes into separate columns. Currently the flow is as a single column for
the whole page.
 Put footnotes in consecutive order (on separate lines)
 Remove page number and Chapter / Book Title from 1st line of every page, as they
are now part of the header
 Put all headers on a separate line.
 Create a paragraph version and remove the carriage returns and hyphenation at the
end of most lines.
 Add hyperlinked bookmarks (page numbers) at the start of every page (for html
edition)
 Convert into HTML
 Add links to the Additional notes in the main body of the text
ii A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
PREFACE
Quick-View Table of Contents
(In MS Word, Control+Click on page number to go to section.)
Notes for Electronic Edition..........................................................................................i
Quick-View Table of Contents.....................................................................................ii
PREFACE.............................................................................vii
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION......................................................................xv
PREFACE TO THIRD EDITION.........................................................................xvii
LIST OF WORKS MOST OFTEN REFERRED TO..........................................................xxii
ADDITIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR THIRD EDITION..................................xlv
Table of Contents (Detailed) ..............................................................................lxxxvii
PART I: INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................1
CHAPTER I: NEW MATERIAL.......................................................................................3
CHAPTER II: THE HISTORICAL METHOD....................................................................31
CHAPTER III: THE ΚΟΙΝΗ.........................................................................................49
CHAPTER IV: THE PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN THE KOINH.........................76
PART II
ACCIDENCE.............................................................................................................142
CHAPTER V: WORD–FORMATION...........................................................................143
CHAPTER VI: ORTHOGRAPHY AND PHONETICS......................................................177
CHAPTER VII: THE DECLENSIONS (ΚΛΙΣΕΙΣ)..........................................................246
CHAPTER VIII: CONJUGATION OF THE VERB ( ῬΗΜΑ)............................................303
PART III SYNTAX...................................................................................................378
CHAPTER IX: THE MEANING OF SYNTAX (ΣΥΝΤΑΞΙΣ).............................................379
CHAPTER X: THE SENTENCE.................................................................................390
CHAPTER XI: THE CASES (ΠΤΩΣΕΙΣ)......................................................................446
CHAPTER XII: ADVERBS ( ἘΠΙΡΡΗΜΑΤΑ)..............................................................544
CHAPTER XIII: PREPOSITIONS (ΠΡΟΘΕΣΕΙΣ)..........................................................553
CHAPTER XIV: ADJECTIVES ( ἘΠΙΘΕΤΑ)..................................................................650
CHAPTER XV: PRONOUNS ( ἈΝΤΩΝΥΜΙΑΙ).............................................................676
CHAPTER XVI: THE ARTICLE (ΤΟ ἌΡΘΡΟΝ)..........................................................754
CHAPTER XVII: VOICE (ΔΙΑΘΕΣΙΣ, Genus)..............................................................797
CHAPTER XVIII: TENSE (ΧΡΟΝΟΣ).........................................................................821
CHAPTER XIX: MODE (ἜΓΚΛΙΣΙΣ)............................................................................911
CHAPTER XX: VERBAL NOUNS (ὈΝΟΜΑΤΑ ΤΟΥ ῬΗΜΑΤΟΣ)..................................1050
CHAPTER XXI: PARTICLES (ΑΙ ΠΑΡΑΘΗΚΑΙ)........................................................1142
CHAPTER XXII: FIGURES OF SPEECH (ΓΟΡΓΙΕΙΑ ΣΧΗΜΑΤΑ)................................1194
ADDITIONAL NOTES..............................................................................................1209
INDEX OF SUBJECTS..............................................................................................1223
INDEX OF GREEK WORDS.....................................................................................1249
INDEX OF QUOTATIONS........................................................................................1291
ADDENDA TO THE SECOND EDITION....................................................................1377
ADDENDA TO THE THIRD EDITION........................................................................1385
iii A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
PREFACE
INDEX TO ADDENDA TO SECOND AND.................................................................1433
ΤHIRD EDITIONS ..................................................................................................1433
INDEX OF GREEK WORDS IN THE ADDENDA.........................................................1439
INDEX OF QUOTATIONS IN THE ADDENDA............................................................1443
iv A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
PREFACE
GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW
TESTAMENT IN THE LIGHT OF
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
BY
A. T. ROBERTSON, M.A., D.D., LL.D., LITT.D.
Professor of Interpretation of the New Testament in the
Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
Louisville, Ky.
Digitized by Ted Hildebrandt at Gordon College, Wenham, MA
March 2006
Hebrew and Greek Transformed into Unicode
and additional formatting and corrections
(Greek: Cardo; Hebrew Ezra SIL)
by Louis Sorenson, Minneapolis, MN
October 2009
Ἔχομεν δὲ τὸν θησαυρὸν τοῦτον ἐν ὁστρακίνοις σκεύσειν,
ἵνα ἡ ὑπεβολὴ τῆς δυνάμεως ᾗ του θεοῦ καὶ μὴ ἐξ ἡμῶν.
— 2 COR. 4:7
THIRD EDITION
HODDER & STOUGHTON
LONDON : : : MCMXIX (1919)
v A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
PREFACE
COPYRIGHT, 1914, BY
GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY
SECOND EDITION, REVISED AND ENLARGED
COPYRIGHT, 1915, BY
GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY
THIRD EDITION, REVISED AND ENLARGED
COPYRIGHT, 1919, BY
GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY
Composition, Electrotyping, and Presswork:
THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, CAMBRIDGE, U. S. A.
vi A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
PREFACE
TO
THE MEMORY OF
John A. Broadus
SCHOLAR TEACHER PREACHER
Preface
Preface to 2nd Edition
Preface to 3rd Edition
Table of Contents
vii A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
PREFACE

PREFACE
IT is with mingled feelings of gratitude and regret that I let
this book go to the public. I am grateful for God's sustaining
grace through so many years of intense work and am fully con-
scious of the inevitable imperfections that still remain. For a
dozen years this Grammar has been the chief task of my life. I
have given to it sedulously what time was mine outside of my
teaching. But it was twenty-six years ago that my great prede-
cessor in the chair of New Testament Interpretation proposed to
his young assistant that they together get out a revised edition
of Winer. The manifest demand for a new grammar of the New
Testament is voiced by Thayer, the translator of the American
edition of Winer's Grammar, in his article on "Language of the
New Testament" in Hastings' Dictionary of the Bible.
I actually began the work and prepared the sheets for the first
hundred pages, but I soon became convinced that it was not
possible to revise Winer's Grammar as it ought to be done without
making a new grammar on a new plan. So much progress
had been made in comparative philology and historical grammar
since Winer wrote his great book that it seemed useless to go on
with it. Then Dr. Broadus said to me that he was out of it by
reason of his age, and that it was my task. He reluctantly gave
it up and pressed me to go on. From that day it was in my
thoughts and plans and I was gathering material for the great
undertaking. If Schmiedel had pushed through his work, I
might have stopped. By the time that Dr. James Hope Moulton
announced his new grammar, I was too deep into the enterprise
to draw back. And so I have held to the titanic task somehow
till the end has come. There were many discouragements and I
was often tempted to give it up at all costs. No one who has
not done similar work can understand the amount of research,
the mass of detail and the reflection required in a book of this
nature. The mere physical effort of writing was a joy of expres-
sion in comparison with the rest. The title of Cauer's brilliant
book, Grammatica Militans (now in the third edition), aptly
describes the spirit of the grammarian who to-day attacks the
vii
viii A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
PREFACE
viii A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
problems of the language of the New Testament in the light of
historical research.
From one point of view a grammar of the Greek New Testa-
ment is an impossible task, if one has to be a specialist in the
whole Greek language, in Latin, in Sanskrit, in Hebrew and the
other Semitic tongues, in Church History, in the Talmud, in
English, in psychology, in exegesis.1 I certainly lay no claim to
omniscience. I am a linguist by profession and by love also, but
I am not a specialist in the Semitic tongues, though I have a
working knowledge of Hebrew and Aramaic, but not of Syriac
and Arabic. The Coptic and the Sanskrit I can use. The Latin
and the Greek, the French and German and Anglo-Saxon com-
plete my modest linguistic equipment. I have, besides, a smat-
tering of Assyrian, Dutch, Gothic and Italian.
I have explained how I inherited the task of this Grammar
from Broadus: He was a disciple of Gessner Harrison, of the
University of Virginia, who was the first scholar in America to
make use of Bopp's Vergleichende Grammatik. Broadus' views
of grammar were thus for long considered queer by the students
who came to him trained in the traditional grammars and unused
to the historical method; but he held to his position to the end.
This Grammar aims to keep in touch at salient points with the
results of comparative philology and historical grammar as the
true linguistic science. In theory one should be allowed to as-
sume all this in a grammar of the Greek N. T., but in fact that
cannot be done unless the book is confined in use to a few tech-
nical scholars. I have tried not to inject too much of general
grammar into the work, but one hardly knows what is best when
the demands are so varied. So many men now get no Greek
except in the theological seminary that one has to interpret for
them the language of modern philology. I have simply sought
in a modest way to keep the Greek of the N. T. out in the middle
of the linguistic stream as far as it is proper to do so. In actual
class use some teachers will skip certain chapters.
Alfred Gudemann,2 of Munich, says of American classical
scholars: "Not a single contribution marking genuine progress,
no work on an extensive scale, opening up a new perspective or
breaking entirely new ground, nothing, in fact, of the slightest
scientific value can be placed to their credit." That is a serious
charge, to be sure, but then originality is a relative matter. The
1 Cf. Dr. James Moffatt's remarks in The Expositor, Oct., 1910, p. 383 f.
2 The Cl. Rev., .June, 1909, p. 116.
ix A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
PREFACE

PREFACE ix
true scholar is only too glad to stand upon the shoulders of his
predecessors and give full credit at every turn. Who could make
any progress in human knowledge but for the ceaseless toil of
those1 who have gone before? Prof. Paul Shorey,2 of the Uni-
versity of Chicago, has a sharp answer to Prof. Gudemann. He
speaks of "the need of rescuing scholarship itself from the
German yoke." He does not mean "German pedantry and
superfluous accuracy in insignificant research — but . . . in all
seriousness from German inaccuracy." He continues about "the
disease of German scholarship" that "insists on 'sweat-boxing'
the evidence and straining after 'vigorous and rigorous' demon-
stration of things that do not admit of proof." There probably
are German scholars guilty of this grammatical vice (are Amer-
ican and British scholars wholly free?). But I wish to record my
conviction that my own work, such as it is, would have been im-
possible but for the painstaking and scientific investigation of the
Germans at every turn. The republic of letters is cosmopolitan.
In common with all modern linguists I have leaned upon Brug-
mann and Delbrtick as masters in linguistic learning.
I cannot here recite my indebtedness to all the scholars whose
books and writings have helped me. But, besides Broadus, I
must mention Gildersleeve as the American Hellenist whose wit
and wisdom have helped me over many a hard place. Gilder-
sleeve has spent much of his life in puncturing grammatical
bubbles blown by other grammarians. He exercises a sort of
grammatical censorship. "At least whole grammars have been
constructed about one emptiness."3 It is possible to be "grammar
mad," to use The Independent's phrase.4 It is easy to scout all
grammar and say: "Grammar to the Wolves."5 Browning sings
in A Grammarian's Funeral:
"He settled Hoti's business — let it be!
Properly based Oun
Gave us the doctrine of the enclitic De,
Dead from the waist down."
1 F. H. Colson, in an article entitled "The Grammatical Chapters in Quin-
tilian," I, 4–8 (The Cl. Quarterly, Jan., 1914, p. 33), says: "The five chapters
which Quintilian devotes to ‘Grammatica’ are in many ways the most valuable
discussion of the subject which we possess," though he divides "grammatica"
into "grammar" and "literature," and (p. 37) "the whole of this chapter is
largely directed to meet the objection that grammar is ‘tenuis et jejuna.’"
2 The Cl. Weekly, May 27, 1911, p. 229.
3 Gildersleeve, Am. Jour. of Philol., July, 1909, p. 229. 4 1911, 717.
5 Article by F. A. W. Henderson, Blackwood for May, 1906.
x A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
PREFACE
x A GRAMMAR OF THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT
Perhaps those who pity the grammarian do not know that he
finds joy in his task and is sustained by the conviction that his
work is necessary. Prof. C. F. Smith (The Classical Weekly,
1912, p. 150) tells of the joy of the professor of Greek at Bonn
when he received a copy of the first volume of Gildersleeve's
Syntax of Classical Greek. The professor brought it to the Semi-
nar and "clasped and hugged it as though it were a most precious
darling (Liebling)." Dr. A. M. Fairbairn1 once said: "No man
can be a theologian who is not a philologian. He who is no
grammarian is no divine." Let Alexander McLaren serve as a
good illustration of that dictum. His matchless discourses are
the fruit of the most exact scholarship and spiritual enthusiasm.
I venture to quote another defence of the study of Greek which
will, I trust, yet come back to its true place in modern education.
Prof. G. A. Williams, of Kalamazoo College, says2: "Greek yet
remains the very best means we have for plowing up and wrink-
ling the human brain and developing its gray matter, and wrinkles
and gray matter are still the most valuable assets a student can
set down on the credit side of his ledger."
Dr. J. H. Moulton has shown that it is possible to make gram-
mar interesting, as Gildersleeve had done before him. Moulton
protests3 against the notion that grammar is dull: "And yet there
is no subject which can be made more interesting than grammar,
a science which deals not with dead rocks or mindless vegetables,
but with the ever changing expression of human thought." I
wish to acknowledge here my very great indebtedness to Dr.
Moulton for his brilliant use of the Egyptian papyri in proof of
the fact that the New Testament was written in the vernacular
κοινή. Deissmann is the pioneer in this field and is still the
leader in it. It is hard to overestimate the debt of modern New
Testament scholarship to his work. Dr. D. S. Margoliouth, it is
true, is rather pessimistic as to the value of the papyri: "Not one
per cent. of those which are deciphered and edited with so much
care tell us anything worth knowing."4 Certainly that is too
1 Address before the Baptist Theological College at Glasgow, reported in
The British Weekly, April 26, 1906.
2 The Cl. Weekly, April 16, 1910.
3 London Quarterly Review, 1908, p. 214. Moulton and Deissmann also
disprove the pessimism of Hatch (Essays in Biblical Greek, p. 1): "The lan-
guage of the New Testament, on the other hand, has not yet attracted the
special attention of any considerable scholar. There is no good lexicon.
There is no good philological commentary. There is no adequate grammar."
4 The Expositor, Jan., 1912, p. 73.