NIH Scientific Workforce Diversity Progress Report and Recommendations PDF
Preview NIH Scientific Workforce Diversity Progress Report and Recommendations
NIH Scientific Workforce Diversity Progress Report and Recommendations ACD Diversity Working Group Hannah A. Valantine, MD NIH Chief Officer for Scientific Workforce Diversity th 114 NIH ACD Meeting | June 8, 2017 NIH Advisory Committee to the Director Working Group on Diversity Roy Wilson, MD Elba Serrano, PhD, Hannah Valantine, Renee Navarro, PharmD, MD Joan Reede, MD, MPH, MBA Co-Chair-Elect Co-Chair MD, Co-Chair Nanibaa’ Garrison, PhD Abigail Stewart, PhD Michael Summers, PhD Dana Takagi, PhD, MA Clyde Yancy, MD Richard Nakamura, PhD Alison Gammie, PhD Gordon Moskowitz, PhD David Asai, PhD John Dovidio, PhD Scout, PhD Irene Avila, PhD, Brad Newsome, PhD, Exec. Sec. Past Exec. Sec. NIH Scientific Workforce Diversity: Progress Report and New Recommendations Presentation Outline • Review of progress on 2012 ACD recommendations • Three clustered areas – NIH Institutional Oversight and Support – Mentoring, Career Development, Recruitment, Retention – Research and Interventions • Where are we now? Demographic data • Proposed new 2017 ACD recommendations 13 Recommendations from the 2012 Report of the ACD WGDBRW NIH Institutional Support and Oversight Recommendations Chief Officer for Scientific Workforce Diversity ACD Working Group on Diversity Tracking and Evaluation Mentoring, Career Research and Intervention Development, Recruitment, Recommendations Retention Review Feedback for All Support for Underserved Institutions Applications Mentoring Networks Racial Funding Disparity Undergraduate Scholarships Peer Review Working Group IRP Diversity Bias Education K-12 Support Anonymous Bias Study NIH Institutional Oversight and Support • Chief Officer for Scientific Workforce Diversity (COSWD) – Mission: NIH leads and catalyzes scientific workforce diversity through data-driven innovations to recruit and retain the most talented scientists – Strategic goals – Extramural and intramural implementation plans – Communication plan: Newsletter; blogs; website – diversity.nih.gov • ACD WG on Diversity – Progress to date and new recommendations • NIH Steering Committee Diversity Working Group – Evaluation, tracking NIH Institutional Oversight and Support Tracking and Evaluation • Evaluation – retrospective – Diversity administrative supplements – IC-specific diversity programs • NIGMS - RISE, MARC, IMSD • NCI - CURES • NIAID - INRO • Evaluation – prospective – Center for Evaluation and Coordination (CEC) as a model: – BUILD; NRMN • Tracking – Electronic submission (Diversity supplements; Progress Reports) – Monitoring through eRA Commons ID – ORCID ID Mentoring, Career Development, Recruitment, Retention: Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) Awards made October 2014 BUILD: 10 sites/experiments NRMN CEC Total: $250 million (5 years) BUILD • California State University Long Beach • California State University National Research Mentoring Hispanic- Historically Northridge Serving Black Network (NRMN) Institutions Colleges • Morgan State University and • Boston College; Morehouse Universities • Portland State University Total of 10 • San Francisco State University SM; U. Min.; U. North Texas; Sites/Experiments • University of Alaska Fairbanks U. Wisconsin State Public • University of Detroit Mercy Colleges Universities • University of Maryland Baltimore Coordination and Evaluation County • University of Texas El Paso Center (CEC) • Xavier University of Louisiana University of California Los Angeles Scientific Approach to Enhancing the Diversity of the Biomedical Research Workforce • BUILD:10 experiments each with: - Hypothesis - Intervention and control groups - BUILD vs Non-BUILD institutions • Three levels of impact: student, faculty, and institution • Integration of social science research and psychosocial interventions into the process of training and mentoring • Rigorous assessment and evaluation of the training and mentoring interventions implemented across the program - Hallmarks and metrics of success BUILD: “Clinical Trial” Model of Investigation Short to Medium-Term Medium to Long-Term Independent Variables Outcomes Outcomes Gender Completion of Undergraduate Race/Ethnicity Engagement in Research Degree in Biomedical Science Disability Status Socio-economic Status Enhanced Institutional Factors Self-Efficacy & Science Identity Evidence of Biomedical Career Test Scores Preparedness Major Pursuit & Persistence in GPA Biomedical Science Disciplines Application & Acceptance to Scientific Presentations and Graduate Programs Activities or Interventions Authorship of Manuscripts Financial Support Research Fellowships & Academic Advising & Support Social Integration Scholarships Research Training & Support Novel Curricula Satisfaction with Faculty Mentoring Mentorship Diversity Training Career Development Intent to Pursue Biomedical Research Career Consortium-Wide Evaluation Design: *BUILD; BUILD vs non-BUILD Institutions Prior to BUILD (HERI) Time 1 Times 2, 3, … Grantee institution Grantee institution Grantee institution BUILD BUILD non- BUILD non- non- BUILD BUILD non- non- non- BUILD BUILD BUILD Comparison institution Comparison institution Comparison institution HERI: *Intervention vs control groups within BUILD institutions HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE
The list of books you might like
