Motor Learning Abilities in Adults who Stutter by Kimberly Rose Bauerly A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Speech- Language Pathology Department of Speech- Language Pathology University of Toronto © Copyright by Kimberly Rose Bauerly (2012) ii Motor Learning Abilities in Adults who Stutter Doctor of Philosophy, 2012 Kimberly Rose Bauerly Department of Speech-Language Pathology University of Toronto Abstract This dissertation is comprised of three studies investigating the hypothesis that people who stutter (PWS) differ from people who do not stutter (PNS) in their motor skill learning abilities. The first study in this dissertation examined the ability to learn a novel sequential speech task following a 24-h retention period. Despite slower sequence durations compared to the PNS, PWS showed the ability to retain what they had learned for all measured variables on day one and following a 24-h consolidation period. The second study in this dissertation examined the ability to learn a sequential finger tapping task by observing the ability to produce the sequence under both tests of retention and interference. For tests of retention, PWS showed the ability to retain improvements in performance for all measured variables, albeit at slower speeds compared to PNS. For tests of interference, a significant interaction for reaction time and sequence duration revealed that PNS’ performance reached a relative plateau while PWS’ performance continued to show improvement. The third study in this dissertation investigated the extent to which individual differences in motor learning are associated with differences in stuttering treatment outcome. PWS participating in an intensive fluency treatment program were assessed for their working memory ability and their motor iii learning performance on a syllable reading and finger tapping task. Treatment success was measured at pre-treatment, post-treatment and six months follow-up using percent syllables stuttered, introspective clinical characteristics (OASES; Yaruss, 2010) and fluency effort. The relationship between motor learning and treatment outcome was examined using multiple regression analyses. Results did not support the hypothesis that the ability to learn a simple speech and nonspeech motor task is predictive of treatment outcome. Although treatment proved successful as evidenced by percent syllables stuttered and OASES scores, scores of fluency effort indicated that participants had not automated their newly learned fluency skills when speaking in everyday conversations. Together, these studies do not support the hypothesis of a motor learning deficit in PWS but rather support the assumption of limited motor abilities. Limited motor abilities are discussed as having implications to stuttering treatment outcome. iv Acknowledgments It has been a great pleasure working with the faculty, staff and students at the University of Toronto. I could not have succeeded without the invaluable support of a several. Without these supporters, especially the select few I’m about to mention, I may not have gotten to where I am today. I’d like to give a heartfelt, special thanks to my supervisor and mentor, Dr. Luc De Nil. He has been motivating, encouraging, and enlightening. His patience, flexibility, genuine caring and concern, and relaxed demeanor have been appreciated. I am very grateful to the remaining members of my dissertation committee, Dr. Elizabeth Rochon and Dr. Pascal van Lieshout. I appreciate their insightful comments and constructive criticism regarding both theoretical and methodological issues surrounding my research. They often posed questions to me that were very challenging, which allowed me to reach my maximum potential in learning and I am thankful for that. I have also been very fortunate to have had the opportunity to learn from Dr. Robert Kroll. His academic support and input in helping me develop my third study has been greatly appreciated. My deepest gratitude goes to Sophie Lafaille who has known the answer to every question I’ve ever asked her regarding lab equipment and computer problems. I couldn’t have completed all the required paperwork and delivered it to the correct place without her. Thank you Sophie, you shall always be remembered as a smiling face and a warm and friendly heart. I am also very thankful to Sara Smits- Bandstra, Deryl Beal and Aravind Namasivayam who were always there for me to proofread a paper, answer statistical problems or hash out an idea with me. Most of all, they provided the encouragement I needed to continue on. My gratitude is also extended to Marni Grotell for her help with data collection as well as Neil Mathews, Anna Arulampalam, and Emily Dixon for their help in performing the reliability measures. I wish to thank all of the considerate individuals who devoted their time to participate in my studies. I am also grateful to the friends I have met on this journey, especially to Stacey Skoretz, who has v become a good friend to me and has helped me stay sane through these years. It has been a privilege getting to know her. Most importantly, none of this would be possible without the love and support from my family. My parents have taught me about hard work and self-respect, and about persistence. Mom, especially, was a great role model of resilience, strength and character. Both have always expressed how proud they are of me and how much they love me. I’d also like to extend deep appreciation to my parents- in – law who provided me with the financial support needed to embark on this endeavor. Finally, this dissertation is dedicated to my husband, Brad Bauerly, and two beautiful daughters. I must acknowledge with tremendous and deep thanks my husband, who through love, support and belief in me, I’ve been able to complete this dissertation. I am also indebted to my beautiful daughter Addison, for the very special person she is. She has provided me with so many happy and beautiful memories throughout this journey. And last but not least, Lauren, my little love bug, who has blessed our lives during the final stages of this journey. These studies were funded by a grant by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN 105626-04) granted to Dr. Luc De Nil. I am grateful for the financial support I received by the University of Toronto Open Fellowship Award. vi CONTENTS Abstract..........................................................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................iv List of Tables ...............................................................................................................................................xi Table of Figures .........................................................................................................................................xiii List of Appendices ………………………………………………………………………………………xvii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW ...............................................................1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 Incidence and Prevalence .................................................................................................................1 Developmental Stuttering ................................................................................................................1 Motor Abilities and Developmental Stuttering ................................................................................2 Neurophysiology and Developmental Stuttering .............................................................................5 Neuroanatomy and Developmental Stuttering .................................................................................8 Genetics and Developmental Stuttering ..........................................................................................9 Environment and Developmental Stuttering ..................................................................................11 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................13 CHAPTER II MOTOR PRACTICE AND LEARNING ............................................................................14 vii Introduction ....................................................................................................................................14 Motor Skill Learning ......................................................................................................................15 Attention and Automaticity ............................................................................................................16 Working Memory and Motor Learning .........................................................................................17 Stages of Motor Learning ..............................................................................................................18 Measuring Motor Skill Learning ...................................................................................................21 Schema Theory ..............................................................................................................................25 Schema Theory and Sequence Skill Learning ...............................................................................26 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................28 CHAPTER III MOTOR PRACTICE AND LEARNING IN PWS.............................................................29 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................29 Motor Practice and Developmental Stuttering ...............................................................................29 Motor Learning and Developmental Stuttering .............................................................................31 Treatment Effects ...........................................................................................................................36 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................37 Research Questions ........................................................................................................................38 CHAPTER IV SPEECH SEQUENCE SKILL LEARNING IN ADULTS WHO STUTTER ...................39 Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................39 viii Introduction ....................................................................................................................................40 Present Investigation and Objectives..............................................................................................43 Methods ..........................................................................................................................................47 Statistical Analysis .........................................................................................................................48 Results ............................................................................................................................................49 Discussion ......................................................................................................................................60 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................64 CHAPTER V NONSPEECH SEQUENCE SKILL LEARNING IN ADULTS WHO STUTTER ...........................................................................................................65 Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................65 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................66 Present Investigation and Research Questions ..............................................................................73 Methods ..........................................................................................................................................73 Statistical Analysis......................................................................................................................... 74 Results ............................................................................................................................................81 Discussion ......................................................................................................................................92 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................100 CHAPTER VI MOTOR LEARNING ABILITIES IN ADULTS WHO STUTTER: ix PREDICTIVE FACTORS TO LONG TERM TREATMENT OUTCOME ...............................102 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................102 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................102 Present Investigation and Research Questions ............................................................................111 Methods ........................................................................................................................................111 Statistical Analysis........................................................................................................................122 Results ..........................................................................................................................................123 Discussion ....................................................................................................................................136 Conclusions...................................................................................................................................144 CHAPTER VII DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................145 A Review of the Speech and Nonspeech Sequence Skill Learning Studies: Evidence of Limitations in Motor Ability....................................................................................................145 A Review of Chapter 6: Motor learning abilities in adults who stutter: Predictive Factors to Long Term Treatment Outcome ..................................................................................151 Motor Skill Limitations in PWS ..................................................................................................152 Implications for Treatment ..........................................................................................................160 Limitations and Future Directions ...............................................................................................163 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................167 x Appendices …………………………….…………………………………………….………….169 References ....................................................................................................................................175
Description: