ebook img

Modern Intellectual History (Volume 08, Issue 01, April 2011) PDF

268 Pages·2011·2.72 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Modern Intellectual History (Volume 08, Issue 01, April 2011)

14792443_8-1.qxd:1479–2443_8-1 2/28/11 7:32 PM Page 1 vol. 8 | no. 1 | april 2011 | issn 1479–2443 Modern Intellectual History M o d e r n modern 1–2 A Note from the Editors I n Articles t 3–29 “Almost a Separate Race”: Racial Thought and the Idea of Europe in British e Encyclopedias and Histories, 1771–1830 ll intellectual e PAUL STOCK c t 31–59 Madame Guizot and Monsieur Guizot: Domestic Pedagogy and the Post-Revolutionary u Order in France, 1807–1830 a ROBIN BATES l history H 61–90 Transcending Babel in the Cultural Translation of Friedrich Rückert (1788–1866) i TUSKA BENES s t o 91–125 Canonizing Dewey: Columbia Naturalism, Logical Empiricism, and the Idea of r American Philosophy y ANDREW JEWETT Essay 127–146 Beyond “Academicization”: The Postwar American University v o and Intellectual History l RICHARD F. TEICHGRAEBER III . 8 Forum: The Idea of Sustainability | MH 147–151 Introduction n EMMA ROTHSCHILD o . 153–170 The Invention of Sustainability 1 PAUL WARDE | a I 171–191 Environmental, Economic, and Moral Dimensions of Sustainability p in the Petroleum Industry in Austrian Galicia r i ALISON FRANK l 2 193–212 Maintaining (Environmental) Capital Intact 0 EMMA ROTHSCHILD 11 Review Essays 213–225 The Subject and the Work of Difference: Gender, Sexuality, and Intellectual History SANDRINE SANOS 227–236 German Post-Darwinian Biology Reassessed FREDERICK GREGORY 237–251 Historicizing American Travel, at Home and Abroad LESLIE BUTLER 253–263 Ayn Rand and American Conservatism in the Cold War Era PATRICK ALLITT Cambridge Journals Online For further information about this journal please go to the journal website at: journals.cambridge.org/mih 14792443_8-1.qxd:1479–2443_8-1 2/28/11 7:32 PM Page 2 modern intellectual history Instructions for contributors 4. offprints MIHserves as a focal point and forum for scholar- No paper offprints are provided, but the correspon- ship in intellectual history and related fields. Though ding author will be sent the pdf of the published its primary focus is on Europe and the United article. Print offprints may be purchased at extra States, it also devotes attention to intellectualand cost at proof stage. Editors cultural exchanges between the West, the non-West, and the Americas. It encompasses the period from Orders, which must be accompanied by Charles Capper, Boston University, USA 1650 to the present. MIHis concerned with this payment, may be sent to a bookseller, subscription Email [email protected] era’s intellectual discourses - with understanding agent or direct to the publisher: Cambridge Anthony J. La Vopa, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA the contextual origins and reception of texts, and University Press, The Edinburgh Building, Email [email protected] with recovering their historical meaning. The term Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge cb2 2ru; or in the “texts” encompass various forms of intellectual and usa, Canada and Mexico: Cambridge University Samuel Moyn, Columbia University, USA cultural expression, including political thought, Press, Journals Fulfillment Department, 100Brook Email [email protected] philosophy, religion, literature, the social sciences, Hill Drive, West Nyack, New York 10994-2133. Duncan Kelly, University of Cambridge, UK the natural sciences, and the visual arts. Periodicals postage paid at New York, nyand at Email [email protected] additional mailing offices. 1. submissions Assistant Editor Andrew J. Ballou, Boston University, USA Articles submitted for consideration should be sent Copying to Modern Intellectual History, Boston University, This journal is registered with the Copyright Email [email protected] Department of History, 226 Bay State Road, Boston, Clearance Center, 222Rosewood Drive, Danvers, ma Editorial Board Modern Intellectual Historypublishes scholarship ma02215, usa. [email protected] 01923, usa. Organizations in the USA who are also David Armitage, Harvard University, usa in intellectual and cultural history from 1650 Submission of a paper will be taken to imply that registered with the C.C.C. may, therefore, copy C. A. Bayly, University of Cambridge, uk onwards, with primary attention to Europe it is unpublished (even in a language other than material (beyond the limits permitted by sections Thomas Bender, New York University, usa and the United States but also to trans-nation- English) and is not being considered for publication 107and 108of U.S. Copyright law) subject to pay- RJRuuilcithahna Br Bdlo oBcuohru,g Ur, kBCeu,L cUAkn,n iuevlsela rUsintyiv oerf sLitoyn, duosna, uk aWl edsetv.elopments that encompass the non- ewtilosilenlw sb)he t eaors eCk. eUadmp tobonr ai dassgcicege nUp tncaoinvpecyerrs ioigtfyh atP p(roeasnps e.cre, rtthaein a ucothnodri- mTfohrei nsp trc otoomn tsohetnei otC nd.aCole .Cos r n ocofo ttm hexemt epenerrdc i catool p pmyu urfeplteoi psoelfes $ . c1Co2op.0dy0ien.g LPHaaowuwlur aBesrnaodcy eeB rBr, iuUckenl,l i,Uv Henraisvirtevyra soridtfy WU onifs icMvoeinrcsshiitniyg,, a Muns,a audsisaon, pSMuuobbdsleicsrrhnie pIdtn ittoehnlrlseecet utiaml eHsi sat oyreyar(,I iSnS NAp 1r4i7l,9 A-2u4g4u3s)t iasnd mnoitsC shiooonnltd rt iocbo urpetyoprrrisog dahrute cf eore ras nwpyoo nmrlsdiabwteleird ifaeo lp ri nuo bbwltiahciaincthiino tgnh peinye r ad-lol 1Ss4utr7pe9pe-lt2y, 4 Ps4ih3ni/gl1a1led. IecSlopIp hTiieeasa, rop aSf hs1ee9pe1ta0 r4Sa,e truev saiacre,t i,i cs3l 5ea0su 1tfhoMro arprirzkieevdta tteo Stefan Collini, University of Cambridge, uk November. Three parts form a volume. The sub- forms and media, including electronic publication, use only. Organizations authorized by the Jeffrey Collins, Queen’s University, Ontario, scription price, which includes delivery by air and for ensuring that the appropriate acknowledge- Copyright Licensing Agency may also copy material canada where appropriate (but excluding VAT), of volume ments are included in their manuscript. subject to the usual conditions. For all other use, Faisal Devji, University of Oxford, uk 8, 2011, which includes print and electronic access, permission should be sought from Cambridge or Prasenjit Duara, National University of Singapore is £165.00(US $268.00in USA, Canada and 2. manuscript preparation from the American branch of Cambridge University Peter Gordon, Harvard University, usa Mexico) for institutions; £26.00(US $39.00in Contributors must follow the layout and stylistic Press. Malachi Haim Hacohen, Duke University, usa USA, Canada and Mexico) for individuals, which conventions of MIH. Detailed Instructions for con- David D. Hall, Harvard Divinity School, usa includes print only. Students ordering direct from tributors can be obtained from the Web at Modern Intellectual Historyis included in the Thomas A. Haskell, Rice University, usa Cambridge Journals Online service which can be the publishers and certifying that the journal is http://journals.cambridge.org/journal_ David A. Hollinger, University of California, found at http://journals.cambridge.org. For further Berkeley, usa for their personal use can subscribe to the print ModernIntellectualHistory. information on other Press journals access Daniel Walker Howe, UCLA, usa version at £19.00(US $29.00in USA, Canada and The recommended length of articles is http://cambridge.org/journals. Gerald N. Izenberg, Washington University, Mexico). The electronic-only price available to 10,000–12,000words including footnotes. The St Louis, usa institutions is £141.00(US $232.00). Single parts recommended length of review essays is 5,000 cambridge university press Martin Jay, University of California, Berkeley, usa are £55.00(US $90.00in USA, Canada and words including footnotes. The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Mary Kelley, University of Michigan, usa Mexico) plus postage. EU subscribers (outside Articles should normally be written in English. Cambridge cb2 8ru, uk Aileen Kelly, University of Cambridge, uk the UK) who are not registered for VAT should Spelling may follow either British or American con- 32Avenue of the Americas, New York, ny10013-2473, James T. Kloppenberg, Harvard University, usa add VAT at their country’s rate. VAT registered vention but must be consistent. usa László Kontler, Central European University, members should provide their VAT registration Contributors should submit an electronic copy 477Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, vic3207, Hungary number. Japanese prices for institutions (includ- in Word as an email attachment. Australia Bruce Kuklick, University of Pennsylvania, usa ing ASP delivery) are available from Kinokuniya Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014Madrid, Spain PJaevteeLdr o MMndaanojednel,d eu,r ,kQ Uuneievne rMsitayr yo,f U Cnaimvebrsriitdyg oe,f uk CJaopmanp.any Ltd, P.O. Box 55, Chitose, Tokyo 156, 3Tch.y appnorggoerodap fahst ipcarol oofr sftaacgtue.a Tl ehrer oprusb olinshlye rm raeys ebreves the DoScok uHtho uAsfer,i cTahe Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, Suzanne Marchand, Louisiana State University, usa Articles appearing in this journal are abstracted right to charge authors for correction of non-typo- Printed in the United Kingdom by the University Tracie M. Matysik, University of Texas at Austin, usa and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: graphical errors. Press, Cambridge Michael O’Brien, University of Cambridge, uk History and Life. Lewis Perry, St Louis University, usa Daniel T. Rodgers, Princeton University, usa This journal issue has been printed on Helena Rosenblatt, City University of New York, usa FSC-certified paper and cover board. FSC is an Dorothy Ross, The Johns Hopkins University, usa independent, non-governmental, not-for-profit Emma Rothschild, Harvard University, usa/King’s organization established to promote the College, Cambridge uk responsible management of the world’s forests. Joan Shelley Rubin, University of Rochester, usa Please see www.fsc.org for information. Andrew Sartori, New York University, usa Jerrold Seigel, New York University, usa James Turner, Notre Dame University, usa © Cambridge University Press 2011 Caroline Winterer, Stanford University, usa ISSN 1479-2443 modern intellectual history contents pp1–2 ANotefromtheEditors Articles pp3–29 “AlmostaSeparateRace”:RacialThoughtandtheIdea ofEuropeinBritishEncyclopediasandHistories, 1771–1830 paulstock pp31–59 MadameGuizotandMonsieurGuizot:DomesticPedagogy andthePost-RevolutionaryOrderinFrance,1807–1830 robinbates pp61–90 TranscendingBabelintheCulturalTranslationofFriedrich Ru¨ckert(1788–1866) tuskabenes pp91–125 CanonizingDewey:ColumbiaNaturalism,LogicalEmpiricism, andtheIdeaofAmericanPhilosophy andrewjewett Essay pp127–146 Beyond“Academicization”:ThePostwarAmericanUniversity andIntellectualHistory richardf.teichgraeberiii Forum:TheIdeaofSustainability pp147–151 Introduction emmarothschild pp153–170 TheInventionofSustainability paulwarde pp171–191 Environmental,Economic,andMoralDimensionsof SustainabilityinthePetroleumIndustryinAustrian Galicia alisonfrank pp193–212 Maintaining(Environmental)CapitalIntact emmarothschild ReviewEssays pp213–225 TheSubjectandtheWorkofDifference:Gender,Sexuality,and IntellectualHistory sandrinesanos pp227–236 GermanPost-DarwinianBiologyReassessed frederickgregory pp237–251 HistoricizingAmericanTravel,atHomeandAbroad lesliebutler pp253–263 AynRandandAmericanConservatismintheColdWarEra patrickallitt ModernIntellectualHistory,8,1(2011),pp.1–2 (cid:2)C CambridgeUniversityPress2011 doi:10.1017/S1479244311000023 a note from the editors RoughlyeightyearsagowemetinManhattanwithNickPhillipsontoplana newjournaltobelaunchedbyCambridgeUniversityPress.TwoAmericanswho knew each and had worked together well, and who were largely in agreement aboutwhatMIHshouldaccomplish.WewerewellawareofthequalityofNick’s scholarship, of course, and had heard through the transatlantic grapevine that hewasagreatcolleague.Still,weweremorethanalittleapprehensive.Whatif Nickhadatotallydifferentideaofthejournal?Whatifthepersonalchemistry didn’t work? Within an hour of our discussion we knew that we had “lucked out”onbothcounts.ReadersfamiliarwithNick’sworkwillsurelyagreethathe hasoneofthesharpestandmostimaginativemindsinthediscipline,andthat hehadbeencombiningintellectualhistorywithsocialandculturalhistorywell beforehistoriansstartedmakingsuchafussaboutit.Manhattanwastheright place to meet. An urban gentleman (in the best of senses), Nick is a gourmet ofawesomerange(everythingfromhautecuisinetodelifood)andasparkling conversationalistandraconteur.Lunchordinnerwithhimisanevent.Noone takesmorecare,orpleasure,inorderingagoodbottleofwine.Thesubjectof conversation need not be history; he is a lover of art and music, and has been veryactiveintheculturalandciviclifeofEdinburgh,wherehewasacelebrated teacherattheuniversityfrom1965to2004. Nick is now retiring from his editorial responsibilities. The timing is extraordinary.Heisnotleavinginawakeofpastglories;he’sattheverypeakofhis career.Roughlythirtyyearsago,Nickburstonthescene—hehasawayofbursting onthescene—asoneoftheleadingscholarsoftheScottishEnlightenment.His firsttwobooksleftnodoubtofhisversatility:anowindispensablemonographon theScottishlegalprofessioninthelateeighteenthandearlynineteenthcenturies, andanelegantintellectualbiographyofDavidHumeasahistorian.Atthesame time,Nickplayedakeyroleinexplainingwhat“politesociability”meant,both inpracticeandintheory;whytheuniversitiesandtheircitieswerethecenters of the Enlightenment in Scotland; and how they shaped and were shaped by it.Hemusthaveknownfromthebeginningthatallthiswouldculminateina denselycontextualizedbiographyofAdamSmith(whosepaperswereburnedat hisdeath).Itwillbe,hewouldtellus,“abiographywithoutsources.”ButNickisa 1 2 anotefromtheeditors virtuosoatgettingsparesourcestoyieldeverylastbitoftheirhistoricalmeaning. Thebook—AdamSmith:AnEnlightenedLife—appearedwithPenguininAugust of 2010, and there is now an American edition by Yale University Press. It is a mastercontributionbothtoEnlightenmentstudiesandtobiography. OneofthechallengesinlaunchingMIHwastomakeitatrulytransatlantic enterprise,andthatmeantgettingsubmissionsandbuildingareadershipinthe UK.WithoutNickthejournalsimplywouldnothavebeenabletodothat.Itwas notonlythatNickknewsomanypeople;hiswit,amiabilityandsheerkindness madeitveryhardtoturnhimdown.ReaderswhohavebeeneditedbyNickknow howgoodheisatediting.Hehasthepatience—andthegoodjudgment—towait forapieceto“ripen”(oneofhisfavoritewords);hecoaxespeopleintomaking theirprosemorelucidandmorereadable(jargonwasbanned);andheisquick tospotakinkoravoidintheargumentorinthepresentation.Welearnedagreat dealfromhim. WewishNickallthebestinthecomingyears. CharlesCapperandAnthonyLaVopa ModernIntellectualHistory,8,1(2011),pp.3–29 (cid:2)C CambridgeUniversityPress2011 doi:10.1017/S1479244311000035 “almost a separate race”: racial thought and the idea of europe in british encyclopedias and histories, 1771–1830 paulstock DepartmentofInternationalHistory,LondonSchoolofEconomics E-mail:[email protected] ThisarticleexplorestheassociationbetweenracialthoughtandtheideaofEurope in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century Britain. It begins by noting the complexitiessurroundingtheword“race”inthisperiod,beforeconsideringwhether— and on what grounds—contemporary race thinkers identify a “European race” or “races”. This reveals important ambiguities and correlations between anatomical, genealogicalandculturalunderstandingsofhumandifference.Theessaythendiscusses how some of these ideas find expression in British encyclopedias, histories and geographicalbooks.Inthisway,itshowshowracialideasaredisseminated,notjust in dedicated volumes on anatomy and biological classification, but also in general workswhichpurporttosummarizeandtransmitcontemporaryreceivedknowledge. Thearticledrawsuponentrieson“Europe”ineveryBritishencyclopediacompleted between1771and1830,aswellasnamedsourcetextsforthosearticles,tracinghowthe word“Europe”wasusedandwhatracialconnotationsitcarried.Someentriesimply that“European”iseitheraseparateraceentirely,orasubcategoryofasinglehuman race. Others, however, reject the idea of a distinctive European people to identify competing racial groups in Europe. These complexities reveal increasing interest in thedelineationofEuropeanidentities,aninterestwhichemergespartlyfromlong- standingeighteenth-centurydebatesaboutthecategorizationandcomprehensionof humandifference.Inaddition,theyshowthediffusionof(contending)racialideasin non-specialistmedia,foreshadowingthegrowingprominenceofracialthoughtinthe laternineteenthcentury. introduction This essay explores the association between racial thought and the idea of Europe in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century Britain. It begins by noting the complexities surrounding the word “race” in this period, before considering whether—and on what grounds—contemporary race thinkers identify a “European race” or “races”. This reveals important ambiguities and 3 4 paulstock correlations between anatomical, genealogical and cultural understandings of human difference. The essay then discusses how some of these ideas find expression in British encyclopedias, histories and geographical books. In this way,itshowshowracialideasaredisseminated,notjustindedicatedvolumeson anatomyandbiologicalclassification,butalsoingeneralworkswhichpurportto summarizeandtransmitcontemporaryreceivedknowledge.1 Thearticledraws uponentrieson“Europe”ineveryBritishencyclopediacompletedbetween1771 and1830,aswellasnamedsourcetextsforthosearticles,tracinghowtheword “Europe”wasusedandwhatracialconnotationsitcarried.Someentriesimply that “European” is either a separate race entirely, or a subcategory of a single human race. Others, however, reject the idea of a distinctive European people in order to identify competing racial groups in Europe. These complexities reveal increasing interest in the delineation of European identities, an interest whichemergespartlyfromlong-standingeighteenth-centurydebatesaboutthe categorizationandcomprehensionofhumandifference.Inaddition,theyshow thediffusionof(contending)racialideasinnon-specialistmedia,foreshadowing thegrowingprominenceofracialthoughtinthelaternineteenthcentury. theconceptof“race” Totalkof“race”inthisperiodisitselfcomplexandcontroversial,principally becausethetermhadanumberofcomplexmeaningsintheeighteenthandearly nineteenthcenturies.AccordingtoNicholasHudson,itmostcommonlyreferred to“familylines,lineage,extraction...orbreedsofanimal”,andthushadboth dynastic and classificatory connotations.2 “Races”—that is, lines of descent or groupsofpeoples—couldbe“identifiedandsignifiedthroughreligion,custom, language, climate aesthetics and historical time, as much as physiognomy and skincolour”.Forthisreason,conceptionsof“race”wereintertwinedwithideas about politics and nation: they “occupied overlapping if not identical cultural andpoliticalterrains...usedtodistinguishgroupsbylineage,commondescent ororiginandtoidentifypolitical,socialandterritorialparticularity”.3 Inother words,discussionabout“race”encompassedvariousinterrelatedunderstandings 1 ForanthologiesofsuchspecialistworksfromthisperiodseeH.F.Augstein,ed.,Race:The OriginsofanIdea(Bristol,1996);EmanuelChudwukiEze,ed.,RaceandEnlightenment: A Reader (Oxford, 1997); Peter Kitson and Debbie Lee, eds., Slavery, Abolition and Emancipation:WritingsintheBritishRomanticPeriod,vol.8,TheoriesofRace,ed.Peter Kitson(London,1999) 2 Nicholas Hudson, “From ‘Nation’ to ‘Race’: The Origin of Racial Classification in Eighteenth-CenturyThought”,Eighteenth-CenturyStudies29/3(1996),247. 3 KathleenWilson,TheIslandRace:Englishness,EmpireandGenderintheEighteenthCentury (LondonandNewYork,2003),11–12,55. “almostaseparaterace” 5 ofhumandifference:physicalappearance,disposition,environmentalinfluences, descentororigins,religion,culturalmannerisms,andpoliticalsystems.Forthis reason,RoxannWheelerspeaksofthe“fluidarticulationofhumanvariety”and the“elasticityofrace”intheeighteenthcentury.Inparticular,shewarnsagainst anachronisticandessentialistunderstandingsof“race”asasetoffixedphysical characteristics.4 The word “ethnic”, for instance, originally meant “heathen, ungodly, irreligious”, which emphasizes the importance of religious belief and socialpracticeindistinguishingandcategorizingdifferentpeoples.5 Eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century thinkers were thus preoccupied by “the tenuous ... opposition between nature and society, the innate and the acquired”, especially the related problems of how supposedly “natural” characteristicscouldchange,andhowacquiredbehavioursandqualitiescould come to seem innate. In this sense, the “poles of an essentialised Nature and a capricious Environment” competed and overlapped with one another: ideas about manners and society were ambiguously interconnected with “absolutist notions” of inheritance and non-acquired “essence”.6 Eighteenth- centuryinvestigationsofhumandifference“indicatethatideasabout“culture” and “biology” do not occupy separate domains, and that they develop in relationtooneanother.7 Enquiriesintoskincolour,forinstance,hingedonthe relationshipbetweeninhabitants’temperament,dispositionandbodilyhumours, and external factors such as climate, commerce and societal development. In thisway,environment,mentalfacultiesandbodilyappearancewerecoupledin a “symbiotic relationship”.8 Indeed, given its close relationship with notions of “lineage” and “bloodline”, the language of “race” could simultaneously connote class, dynasty and societal organization, as well as biological 4 RoxannWheeler,TheComplexionofRace:CategoriesofDifferenceinEighteenth-Century BritishCulture(Philadelphia,2000),7,9–10.GeorgeStockingarguesthatracedidnot commonlydesignate“physicalentitiesunchangedsincethebeginningofrecordedtime” untilafterthepublicationofRobertKnox’sTheRacesofMen(1850).SeehisVictorian Anthropology(NewYork,1987),65. 5 ColinKidd,BritishIdentitiesbeforeNationalism:EthnicityandNationhoodintheAtlantic World,1600–1800(Cambridge,1999),34,287.Kidddrawsuponthedefinitionsof“ethnick” in the Glossographia (1656) and Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary (1755), though the word meant “pagan” as early as the 1470s. See Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edn (Oxford, 1989),“ethnic”,sense1. 6 Wilson,TheIslandRace,6–8. 7 AniaLoombaandJonathanBurton,Introduction,inidem,eds.,RaceinEarlyModern England:ADocumentaryCompanion(NewYork,2007),8,22–3. 8 Wheeler,TheComplexionofRace,2–5,22–4 6 paulstock “blood ties” and “common substance” or essence inherited through physical relations.9 Oftenthesevariableunderstandingsofhumandifferencecoexistinthesame text.InTheSpiritoftheLaws,forinstance,Montesquieuusestheword“race”to maketechnicaldistinctionsbetweensocialsystemsacrossdifferentperiods.The “firstrace”referstothoseFrankswhofollowedSalicandRomanlaw: Lepaysqu’onappelleaujourd’huilaFrance,futgouverne´danslapremie`reraceparlaloi Romaine,oulecodeThe´odosien,&parlesdiversesloixdesbarbaresquiyhabitoient... laloiSaliquee´toite´tabliepourlesFrancs,&lecodeThe´odosienpourlesRomains. thecountrythattodayonecallsFrancewasgovernedunderthefirstracebyRomanlaw, ortheTheodosiancode,andbythevariouslawsofthebarbarianswholivedthere...the SalicLawwasestablishedfortheFranksandtheTheodosiancodefortheRomans. The “second race” allowed these semi-centralized legal structures to decline amidst the rise of fiefdoms: “Les loix Saliques, Bouguignonnes & Wisigothes furent donc extreˆmement ne´glige´es a` la fin de la seconde race” (The Salic, Burgundian and Visigothic laws were therefore extremely neglected at the end of the second race).10 Montesquieu thus uses “race” in an administrative and legal sense, though the term also carries dynastic connotations and hence the implicationsof“lineage”and“(royal)blood”:themostrecentEnglishtranslators render“firstrace”as“Merovingian”and“secondrace”as“Carolingian”inorder toforegroundtheseundertones.11 Indeed,indistinguishingbetweenpeoples— forexample,FranksandRomans—whoaresubjecttodifferentlawsaccordingto apparentprovenance,Montesquieuidentifieshumangroupsbaseduponreputed “descent”.ElsewhereinTheSpiritoftheLaws,heclassifiespeoplesaccordingto physicalcharacteristics,whichinturnindicatestheirinnate“nature”: Ceuxdontils’agitsontnoirsdepuislespiedsjusqu’a`lateˆte&ilsontlenezsie´crase´qu’il estpresqu’impossibledelesplaindre...Ilestsinatureldepenser,quec’estlacouleurqui constituel’essencedel’humanite´...Ilestimpossiblequenoussupposionquecesgensla` soientdeshommes. 9 ElizabethColwill,“Sex,SavageryandSlaveryintheShapingoftheFrenchBodyPolitic”, in Sara E. Melzer and Kathryn Norberg, eds., From the Royal to the Republican Body: IncorporatingthePoliticalinSeventeenth-andEighteenth-CenturyFrance(Berkeley,1998), 204. 10 Charles-LouisdeSecondat,BarondeMontesquieu,Del’espritdesloix,nouvelleedition, aveclesdernierescorrections&illustrationsdel’auteur,2vols.(Edinburgh,1750),2:245, 254.Thetranslationsaremine.Forsimilarusesoftheword“race”seeibid.,1:421;2:400, 433,452,454,466.ForfurtheranalysisseeIvanHannaford,Race:TheHistoryofanIdeain theWest(Washington,DC,1996),187–90,200–2. 11 SeeCharles-LouisdeSecondat,BarondeMontesquieu,TheSpiritoftheLaws,trans.Anne M.Cohler,BasiaC.MillerandHaroldStone(Cambridge,1987),537.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.