LIBERTY UNIVERSITY MERE CHRISTIAN THEISM AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL: TOWARD A TRINITARIAN PERICHORETIC THEODICY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF LIBERTY UIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DIVINITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY RONNIE PAUL CAMPBELL JR. LYNCHBURG, VA JUNE 2015 Copyright © 2015 Ronnie P. Campbell Jr. All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL SHEET MERE CHRISTIAN THEISM AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL: TOWARD A TRINITARIAN PERICHORETIC THEODICY Ronnie Paul Campbell Jr. Read and approved by: Chairpersons: David J. Baggett Reader: C. Anthony Thornhill Reader: Leo R. Percer Date: 6/29/2015 iii To my dad, Paul Campbell Thank you for first introducing me to Jesus so many years ago. I owe you much gratitude for setting an example of Christ-like service. To my wife, Debbie, and children, Abby, Caedmon, and Caleb It was your kindness, encouragement, and love that gave me great joy and kept me going. You deserve much more than my words could ever express. To my father-in-law, Bob Bragg Though you’ve had your bout with suffering, I will see you again one day, my friend, in the renewed heavens and earth, where we shall experience no more sickness, pain, or sorrow. We will dwell together in that country—Sweet Beulah Land! iv CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... viii ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. ix CHAPTER 1: WHY GOD AND EVIL MATTER?................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose and Method ................................................................................................................... 4 Key Terms and Concepts .......................................................................................................... 13 Evil, Kinds of Evil, and the Good ......................................................................................... 13 Pain and Suffering................................................................................................................. 25 Summary of Chapters ............................................................................................................... 31 CHAPTER 2: METAPHYSICAL SYSTEMS AND EVIL PART 1 ...................................... 34 Evaluating Metaphysical Systems ............................................................................................ 35 The Classification of Evil ......................................................................................................... 42 Naturalism and Evil .................................................................................................................. 44 Naturalism and Life .............................................................................................................. 47 Naturalism and Consciousness ............................................................................................. 51 Naturalism, Good, Evil, and Responsibility ......................................................................... 55 CHAPTER 3: METAPHYSICAL SYSTEMS AND EVIL PART 2 ...................................... 64 Pantheism and Life ................................................................................................................... 70 Pantheism and Consciousness................................................................................................... 84 Pantheism, Good, Evil, and Responsibility .............................................................................. 86 Concluding Matters ................................................................................................................... 96 CHAPTER 4: METAPHYSICAL SYSTEMS AND EVIL PART 3 ...................................... 97 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 97 Defining Panentheism ............................................................................................................... 97 Alfred North Whitehead ......................................................................................................... 103 Primary Categories.............................................................................................................. 103 God and the World .............................................................................................................. 107 Charles Hartshorne.................................................................................................................. 109 Critique of Classical Theism ............................................................................................... 110 The Concept of God ............................................................................................................ 111 Process Panentheism and Evil ................................................................................................ 114 Process Panentheism and Life ............................................................................................ 114 Process Panentheism and Consciousness............................................................................ 119 v Process Panentheism, Good, Evil, and Responsibility ....................................................... 130 CHAPTER 5: METAPHYSICAL SYSTEMS AND EVIL PART 4 .................................... 144 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 144 Theism and Evil ...................................................................................................................... 150 Theism and Life .................................................................................................................. 150 Theism and Consciousness ................................................................................................. 157 Theism, Good, Evil, and Responsibility ............................................................................. 169 CHAPTER 6: METAPHYSICAL SYSTEMS AND EVIL PART 5 .................................... 189 Factual Adequacy.................................................................................................................... 189 Logical Consistency ................................................................................................................ 192 Explanatory Power and Scope ................................................................................................ 195 Ad Hoc-ness ............................................................................................................................ 199 Plausibility .............................................................................................................................. 201 Livability ................................................................................................................................. 204 Concluding Thoughts .............................................................................................................. 207 CHAPTER 7: THE TRINITY AND THE KINGDOM OF GOD ........................................ 210 Light, Love, and Fellowship ................................................................................................... 211 Trinity, Human Freedom, and Sin .......................................................................................... 220 The Kingdom, Creation, Gospel, and Church......................................................................... 226 Theosis and the Kingdom of God ........................................................................................... 238 Concluding Thoughts .............................................................................................................. 246 CHAPTER 8: TOWARD A FULLER THEODICY ............................................................. 247 Theodical Suggestions ............................................................................................................ 248 Freewill Theodicy ............................................................................................................... 248 Soul-Making Theodicy ....................................................................................................... 253 ‘O Felix Culpa’ Theodicy ................................................................................................... 265 Concluding Thoughts .......................................................................................................... 270 Trinitarian Perichoretic Theodicy ........................................................................................... 270 TPT and The Existential Problem ........................................................................................... 276 Evil and Divine Suffering ................................................................................................... 276 Evil and Divine Action ....................................................................................................... 283 Evil and the Church ............................................................................................................ 286 CHAPTER 9: CONCLUDING MATTERS ........................................................................... 289 Objections Considered ............................................................................................................ 291 vi The Problem of Monotheism .............................................................................................. 291 The Problem of Identity ...................................................................................................... 299 Where to Go From Here? ........................................................................................................ 307 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................... 309 vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are too many people to thank for the accomplishment of this project, but space will only permit a few. First, I would like to thank the faculty at Liberty University, and especially those within the School of Divinity, who have shaped my thinking throughout the years. I am grateful to Dr. Ed Martin who introduced me to many of the concepts in this work, particularly those related to the problem of evil and metaphysics. I am also indebted to Dr. John Morrison for his acute theological insight, as it relates to modern Christian thought. He is theologian par excellence. Dr. Gary Habermas was instrumental in helping me see the centrality of Jesus’s resurrection and how it touches every doctrine of the Christian faith, especially soteriology and eschatology. It was in Dr. Kevin King’s classes where many of the key insights for this project came together as we hashed out issues pertaining to theological method, human anthropology, and ecclesiology. I am also indebted to my dissertation committee. It is because of their encouragement, willingness, and dedication that this project was able to move forward. Dr. Leo Percer was my first contact in the Ph.D. program, and he has always been willing to answer my questions and make himself available when needed. Dr. Chad Thornhill provided wisdom, particularly to those areas related to the interpretation of key passages, as well as in helping me see the need for greater clarity on certain parts. Dr. David Baggett has been a constant source of encouragement. He has provided keen insight and direction throughout, which has made this dissertation all the better. I am humbled by his dedication and commitment to his students. He is an exemplar of what it means to be a mentor as he chaired this dissertation. Lastly, I would like to thank my wife, Debbie, for her love, patience, and kindness. She was a source of strength from the Lord. I could not have asked for a better friend and companion. viii ABSTRACT There is perhaps no problem confronting Christian theism more than that of the problem from evil. Evil in the world is not merely a problem for the Christian worldview, however, but also for various other metaphysical systems. This project takes up a comparative analysis of four major worldviews—naturalism, pantheism, process panentheism, and theism—and argues that of the four, theism provides not only the best explanation for the phenomena of evil in the world but it also gives an overall thicker worldview response to the challenges that evil presents. But theism in-and-of-itself is not enough. A specific form of theism is needed—a form of theism that is grounded in the perichoretic relationship of the divine Trinity—that accounts for both God’s aseity and His being essentially loving. Having compared each of the four worldviews and having argued for the need of a Trinitarian concept of God, this project then takes up the challenge of providing a uniquely Christian theodicy, which I have dubbed the Trinitarian Perichoretic Theodicy (TPT). TPT offers a way forward in answering not only the theological/philosophical issues related to the problem from evil but it also provides a framework for responding to those sufferers who have been affected by the presence of evil in the world. ix CHAPTER 1: WHY GOD AND EVIL MATTER? Introduction There is, perhaps, no problem confronting Christian theism more than the so-called problem of evil. As William Lane Craig acknowledges, “The problem of evil is certainly the greatest obstacle to belief in the existence of God.”1 For, after all, if God were all-powerful and all-good, why would He allow evil to exist in the world? If He were good, surely He would want to stop any evil that He could. If He were all-powerful there should be nothing keeping Him from eliminating evil in the world. It would seem, then, that God is, if He exists, either unloving or incapable of stopping the evil that we see and experience. This famous objection by David Hume2 is by no means the only problem facing the question of God’s existence and evil in the world. Why is there evil at all? Why is God not doing more about evil in the world? Questions like these stir at our hearts and beg for answers—answers not only to our intellectual inquiries, but also to the existential realities that come along with the existence of evil in the world. In the midst of their existential plight, people find themselves asking, “Why did God allow this to happen to me or to this group of people?” When looking back to such events as September 11, 2001, when many Americans died because of the attacks of terrorists, or natural disasters that devastate whole people groups, as in the events of the tsunami of 2004 off the coast of the Indian Ocean, hurricane Katrina in 2005, the earthquake of Pakistan and Kashmir in 2005, and, most recently, the typhoon that hit the Philippines in 2013, people are left asking “Where 1 Craig, “Problem of Evil.” http://www.reasonablefaith.org/the-problem-of-evil [accessed November 2, 2013]. 2 David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1998), pt X, 63. 1
Description: