Hold Up: Machine Delay in Architectural Design by Zachary Cohen Bachelor of Architecture Carnegie Mellon University, 2012 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2018 ©2018 Zachary Cohen. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: ______________________________________________________________________________ Department of Architecture May 24, 2018 Certified by: ______________________________________________________________________________ Mark Jarzombek Professor of the History and Theory of Architecture Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: ______________________________________________________________________________ Sheila Kennedy Professor of Architecture Chairman, Committee for Graduate Students Hold Up: Machine Delay in Architectural Design Zachary Cohen Master of Science in Architecture Studies SMArchS Architectural Design Supervisor Mark Jarzombek Professor of the History and Theory of Architecture Readers Sheila Kennedy Professor of Architecture Mark Goulthorpe Associate Professor of Design Hold Up: Machine Delay in Architectural Design by Zachary Cohen Submitted to the Department of Architecture on May 24, 2018 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies ABSTRACT This thesis introduces an architectural design approach that is founded on working with digital fabrication machines, materials, and time: Machine Delay Fabrication (MDFab). MDFab is characterized by the materialization and manipulation of the time taken by digital fabrication machines to do work. MDFab contrasts with other approaches to digital fabrication that architectural design has appropriated from adjacent fields (for example, human-computer interaction and automated manufacturing). In particular, MDFab is a response to “real-time” digital fabrication techniques, which use embedded sensing to immediately interact with the designer, material, and/or environment. Real-time techniques have negatively distanced architectural designers from material, temporal, and instrumental understanding. Further, the current dependence on real-time points to a future of anti-anticipation: a time in which architectural designers—and human beings, in general— will not have to anticipate what happens next. MDFab is an alternative to this future: it offers a way to interact with digital fabrication machines that enables architectural designers to advance the material thinking, improvisation, and speculation that are—and should always be—fundamental to the architectural design process. The first part of the paper is concerned with the historical, theoretical, and practical contextualization of MDFab. MDFab is situated within work in both the arts and sciences that has explored the productive potential of delay. These experiments in delay set up critiques of three contemporary architectural design approaches to digital fabrication. These critiques are supplemented by an examination of digital fabrication projects that have opened alternative contexts for architectural design research. The first part concludes with a discussion of the science and practice of curing in concrete fabrication. The second part of this paper is dedicated to the introduction of Machine Delay Fabrication. The foundational concept of MDFab, machine delay, is introduced. The conceptual design implications of MDFab are discussed. The method of 3D printing concrete that was invented to explore MDFab is presented through a detailed account of its design. The findings of the concrete 3D printing exploration are used to speculate on the aesthetic, constructive, and ethical possibilities of MDFab in architectural design. Finally, the work is recontextualized in terms of the not-so-distant future that awaits architectural design practice. Thesis Supervisor: Mark Jarzombek Title: Professor of the History and Theory of Architecture Acknowledgements Thank you: to my committee members, Mark Jarzombek, Sheila Kennedy, and Mark Goulthorpe; to my independent study advisor, Justin Lavallee; to my informal advisors, Mark West, Caitlin Mueller, and Joel Lamere; to the MIT Architecture Shop managers, Chris Dewart and Jen O’Brien; to the Marvin E. Goody Award Committee; to the MIT School of Architecture community; to Robyn and Josh, for holding me up.
Description: