1969024052 TRW ' _,SYSTEMSGROUP PIARK " REEE)NDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA 1969024052-002 I 06,114.6008- TO00 1 1 _UNAMRODULE/ABGOURITDANCE ;',_:. -_! _ SYSTE(MLM/AGS) _' NASA/ERC ;. DesigCnriteriParogram, \ " GuidanacendControl _, '.'\4, ' '_it .b _" " 1968 September -f- ',* Prepared for: ._., i:i ,... • :1# AEelreocntarount;lccss aRnedseSarpcahceCeAndtmerinistrat;on , .,_. __ Cambridge, Massachusetts , ' '_ .... Contract NAS 12-110 ...:.K.i," _" ...... ., -'_.41l _ SYSTEMS GROUP LC_ PA_K • ,_[ DONDO 13_A(:_t, (.AI IF(_f.'i_,HA '1 L ..... ,,,._ ----- ,, ,,, ., . ,,| I III • IIIIII i 1969024052-003 LUNAR MODULE/ABORT GUIDANCE SYSTEM (LM/AGS) DESIGN SURVEY NASA_RC DESIGN CRITERIAPROGRAM GUPDANCE AND CONTROL Preparedfor National AeronauticsandSpaceAdministration Electronlcs ResearchCenter Cambridge, Massachusetts Contract NAS 12-110 1968Sep;._mber Approved: N. W. Trembath LM/AGS ProgramManager "" Approved: "_ T. W Layton ,V;': StudyManager ':"_ Contract NAS 12-110 _." _., ]969024052-004 | I I I FOREWORD ! i I produ_cheids rbeyporitnduisstrioanle ocfonatrascetroiress ofasdepsaigrnt osfurtvheeysNASbAeing Design Criteria Program. The objective of the Program is provide approaches I to a unification of design for the devel- opment of space vehicles and their major components. The i sfruormveysspecaifriec inNteAndSeAd prtoojedcotscumeanntd wdilelsigbne uesxepderieanscean aigdainined , identifying suitable topics for design criteria monographs. I This report summarizes TRW' s design experience to date in developing the Lunar Module Abort Guidance System _ I for the Apollo Program, and relates this experience to the | NASA/ERC Design Critera Program for Guidance and Control. | I The preparation of this report was supervised and coor- dinated by Dr. T. W. Layton and J. A. Vanderlaan. Major I sections were prepared by: J, A. Vanderlaan, H. D. Blow, i G. M. Petrov, F. A. Evans, W. M. Ashley, P. B. Aubol, l' Mt,_chLn.icOablrciognhtte,ntanwderDe.JS.arSg.enHti.ll,AHd.diAt.ionIarlwicno,ntLr.ibNu.toJresnokfs, D. Wede_ ,nd, T. A. Fuhrman, W. W. Benjamin, R. E. Morse, and H. A. Pudewa. I l V "'" III 1969024052-005 i PRECEDING PAGE BLANK NOT FILMED. t I CONTENTS ! SUMMARY I i. l Z. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Z J Z. i CZ.OIN.FIIGURAAbToIrOtNSensor Assembly 2Z Z. i. 2 Abort Electronics Assembly Z Z. 3 and I I. Data Entry Display Assembly Z Z.Z OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS 5 Z2..ZZ.. iZ LMuanjoarr MLMod/AulGeS MFisusinocntions 55 Z.3 PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS 7 8 Z.4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Z. 4. i Thermal Environment 8 _. 3. HISTORICZA.4L.2 SUMVMibrAaRtioYn OEFnvAirGonSmeDntESIGN DEVELOPMENT i,80o I; ,O 3. i. 2 Sensor Assembly Concept iO •_ 3.Z M3..AZJ.OiR DMESoIdGifNicatioCnHsANGECSaused by Changes in Functional ii Requirements i i I_. 3. Z. Z MReoqduifiirceamtieonntss Caused by Changes in Mission iZ 3.3 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF DESIGN DEVELOPMENT " OF THE ABORT SENSOR ASSEMBLY i3 3.3.'. Early History i3 3.3.2 Design Concepts at Program Start i3 Ii 3.3.3 Outline of Design Evaluation i4 3.3.4 Chronological Outline of Design Changes, I Problems, and Solutions i4 I v | 1969024052-006 CONTENTS (Continued) 3.4 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPUTER SUBSYSTEMS (AEA AND DEDA) 24 3.4.I Early Design Decisions Z4 3.4. Z Design Development History of A_A Subsections 26 3.5 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF SOFTWARE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 29 3.5.i Early History 29 3.5. Z Program Modifications Subsequent to DMCP 30 4. MAJOR DESIGN PROBLEMS _ 33 4.i DISCUSSION OF MAJOR DESIGN PROBLEMS OF THE ASA '33 4.i.i Sensors 33 4. I. Z Sensor/Electronics Loops 36 4. i. 3 Electronics and Interface 40 4. i. 4 Thermal and Mechanical 41 4.. 5 Testing 4Z 4.Z DISCUSSION OF MAJOR DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COMPUTER SUBSYSTEMS (AEA AND DEDA) 47 : 4.2. i Major Design Changes 47 ' 4.2. Z Mechanical Design Problems 49 i 4.2.3 Residual Problem Areas 50 4.3 DISCUSSION OF MAJOR DESIGN PROBLEMS OF SOFTWARE 5i 4.3,i Softwired Program 51 4.3.Z Hardwired Program 54 : ' 4.4 DISCUSSION OF MAJOR PROBLEMS IN SYSTEMS LEVEL TESTING 54 i 4.4. i Integration Test Problems 54 4.4.2 System Performance Test Problems 55 APPENDIX: DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR SUB- ASSEMBLIES, SOFTWARE, AND SYSTEM LEVEL TESTING 57 vi '<I 1969024052-007 _| !i- _r tF /,i" I ILLUSTRATIONS I " i Z-1 Abort Guidance System Assemblies 3 Z-2 AGS Functional Block Diagram 4 • _ Z-3 Co-Elliptic Rendezvous Flight Profile 5 Z-4 ASA Linear Vibration Requirement 9 _i,.| ii!_' Z-5 ASA Rotational Vibration Requirement 9 _: I Z-6 AGS Design Limit Sinusoidal Vibration 9 _:_, Z-7 AGS Design Limit Random Vibration 9 I 4-! Capacitor C4 Adjust in Accelerometer 35 ! • ! ! I I vii I 1969024052-008 ABBREVIATIONS "I ACE Automatic checkout equipment AEA Abort electronics assembly AGS Abort guidance system -_ ASA Abort sensor assembly BTME Bench test maintenance equipment l ,J CDH Constant delta h CDU Coupling data unit CLR Clear C]O Checkout CSD Cross spectral density CSI Coelliptic sequence initiate CSM Command and service module T D/A Digital/analog DEDA Data entry and display assembly DMCP Design mission computer program ,-_ DRB Design Review Board % DTL Diode transistor logic ,L. EMI Electromagnetic interference .. ENT R Enter -;_! EPC Earth prelaunch calibration _ / ERC Electronic Research Center FDAI Flight Director Attitude Indicator *-!; FEB Functional electronic block (thin-film hybrid circuit) FP Flight program "_ FS Flight simulation a -: g Acceleration due to gravity '_' vill I ] 969024052-009 :&, - i:_.':- GAEC Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation "_i::'-|_ GMT Greenwich Mean Time _';_;_ GSE Ground Support Equipment '_"" I HVSIR H-vector spin input rectification J Hz Hertz l ICS Interpretive computer simulation ID Identification t IMU Inertial measurement unit _,_':' I/0 Input/output _--_..: _- LM Lunar Module :]I__,/%,'. LOS Line of sight _"_'_ I _' LSB Least significant bits _ MIT/11, Massachusett_ Institute of Technology Instrumentation _..., Laboratory _.:_, MSB Most significant bits _ii MSC Manned Spacecraft Center :_i I MSFN Manned space flight network :i_':_. i MTBF Mean time between failure "_;_! i PGNCS Primary Guidance, Navigation, and Control System per _i:' PPS Pulses second _!:' I PSD Power spectral density :_._ PTSA Pulse torque servoamplifier " RCS Reactor control system _i' I RFP Request for proposal -;_,:- SCP Software change proposal _ I SMRD Spin motor rotation detector ._:, T LM Telemetry _" TPi Transfer phase initiate _, iI ._._ UACSC United Aircraft Corporation System Center )"i"_, WSMR White Sands Missile Range ,¢,..._' _"i__ |X ] 969024052-0] 0 \ ! ! 1' 1 SUMMARY ! This report presents a survey of the system also provides a means of moni- design a_.d development of the Abort toting the perform.-.mce of the PGNCS Guidance System for the Apollo Lunar for fault detection. ,_ Module. Section 3 documents the evolution o_ The Lunar Module Abort Guidance the Abort Guidance System (AGS)design • System, which is described in Section and summarizes the historical design 2, is a-strapdown, all-attitude, inertial development of subassemblies and soft- guidance system being developed and ware. Section 4 presents the major produced by TRW Systems Group for design problems that have developed to _=. NASA's Manned Spacecraft C _nter un- date. Since the system is in the late . der subcontract to Grumman Aircraft /stages of development, but has not yet : _ Engineering Corporation. This system been flight-tested, it is po,ssible that provides the capability for safely re- additional problem areas _vill appear, _ tMurondiunlge tihne thaestruonnaliuktesly teoventhte oCfomamParni-d aanndy deevseingtn, ci_hamngaeys, bewidllesirbaeblerequirteod.writeIn mary Guidance, Navigation, and Con- an addendum to this report at the end of trol System (PGNCS) failure either the development cycle after the system t! disurionng thdeescluennta,r suwrhfailcee, the orLundaurringModule hAasdetbaeileend sudbejescctreidption to opoferatthieonalmajor usaAgGe.S ,_ ascent from the lunar surface to the subassemblies, software, and °,-stern Command Module. The abort guidance leveltesting is contained in the Appendix. [- { N 1
Description: