Table Of Content

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO FACULTY OF LAW Legal Process (Section CC) - First Year Professor: Kenneth E. Juli Volume 2 of 2 University of Toronto Faculty of Law 2007-08 • ^ BORA WSKIN LAW LlBfllW: AUG 3 0 2007 • FACULTY OF LAW *' 'NiVERS^TY OF tO?^NTC) UNIVEISITY OF FACnlTYOflAW Legal Process (Section CC) - First Year Professor: Kenneth E. Jull Volume 2 of 2 University of Toronto Faculty of Law 2007-08 UNIVlRSIfT OF TORONTO FACimFyOFLAW Legal Process (Section CC) - First Year Professor: Kenneth E. Jull Volume 2 of 2 University of Toronto Faculty of Law 2007-08 Legal Process (Section CC) - First Year Volume 2 of 2 INDEX 3.3 WHERE TO Litigate; Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens • Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, as amended. Rule 17. 424 • Bangoura v. Washington Post et al, [2005] Court of Appeal for Ontario C41379 (Armstrong JA, Lang JA, McMurty CJO, released on September 16, 2005), http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/2005/september/C41379.htm. 428 • Watson & McGowan, Ontario Civil Practice (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2006) Annual Survey of Recent Developments in Civil Procedure, at pp. 22-26. 439 3.4 Class Actions • Class Proceedings Act, 1992^ S.O. 1992, c. 6. 442 • Sandra Rubin, “A new haven for class acts” The Globe and Mail, June 13, 2007, BIO. 456 • Legal Notice, “Notice of Certificate of Approval of Class Action Settlement”. 457 • Hollickv. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158. 459 • Cloud et al v., Canada (A.G.) (2005), 73 O.R. (3d) 401 (C.A.). 487 • Inco Ltd. V. Pearson, [20061 S.C.C.A. No. 1. 507 PART 4: MAJOR STEPS IN AN ACTION 4.1 MAP OF THE System • Major Steps in an Action 519 • Map of Basic Civil Process 522 4.2 Discovery of documents and claims of privilege • Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, as amended, Rules 30 and 30.1. 523 • Grossman v. Toronto General Hospital (1983), 146 D.L.R. (3d) 280. (Ont. Gen. Div.) 529 • Blank v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 319, 2006 SCC 39. 532 Legal Process (Section CC) - First Year Volume 2 of 2 • Ontario (Ministry of Environment) v. McCarthy Titrault (1992), 9 C.E.L.R. (N.S.) 12. (Ont. Prov. Div.) 560 • Gavin MacKenzie, “Is Keeping Secrets in Client’s Best Interest?” Law Times (28 February 2000) at 8. 563 • Kirsten McMahon, “In-House Opinion Protected By Privilege” Law Times (7 June 2004), at 3. 565 • M(A) Ffyan (SCC 1997). 567 V. Oral discovery and Inspection of Property • Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, as amended. Rules 31,32. 572 • Rainbow Lndustrial Caterers Limited v. CNR (1986), 6 B.C.L.R. (2d) 268 (S.C.) 31. 580 • Burke v. Gauthier [1987] O.J. No. 1086. 581 4.4 Motions (a) Interlocutorv’ • Bettencourt v. Ontario (2005), 2005 CarswellOnt 106, 74 O.R. (3d) 550. 586 (b) Summary' Judgment • Watson & McGowan, Ontario Civil Practice (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2006) at pp. 514-517. (Rule 20 - 20.01 -20.04) 596 • Romano v. D’Onofrio (2006), 77 O.R. (3d) 583. 598 (c) Costs • Kirk .Makin, “Judge Rejects $243,314 claim for half day” The Globe and Mail, June 28, 2007. 601 PARTS; SETTLEMENT 5.1 Mediation • Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O (1990), Reg. 194, as amended. Rule 24.1. (Mandatory' Mediation) 602 • Watson & McGowan, Ontario Civil Practice (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2006) at pp. 594-595. (Rule 24.1) 608 Legal Process (Section CC) - First Year Voluine 2 of 2 • Watson & McGowan, Ontario Civil Practice (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2006) at pp. 602-603. (Rules 24.1.10,24.1.11 - Procedure) 609 • Owen M. Fiss, “Against Settlement” (1984) 98 Yale Law Journal 1073. (excerpt) 610 5.2 Offers to settle • Watson & McGowan, Ontario Civil Practice 2007 (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2006) at pp. 946-950. (Rule 49) 613 • Walker v. Ritchie, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 428, 2006 SCC. 616 PART 6: TRIAL 6.1 IMPARTIAEITY OF TRIAL JUDGES • Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259, 2003 SCC 45. 638 6.2 Background • Bertha Wilson (Hon.), “Will Women Judges Really Make A Difference?” (1990) 28 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 507. 665 6.3 USE OF Discovery at trial • Archibald and Morton, Discovery: Principles and Practice: Chapter 12, “Use of Discovery at Trial”. 681 • T. Archibald, K. Jull, "An Empirical Approach Towards a New Methodology of Impeachment" (Annual Review of Civil Litigation -- 2004. 686 PART?; CIVIL JUSTICE REFORM • Steve Penney, “Mass Torts, Mass Culture; Canadian Mass Tort Law and Hollywood Narrative Film” (2004) 30 Queen’s Law Journal 205. 699 • M. Moffit, “Customized Litigation: The Case for Making Civil Procedure Negotiable”, (2007) The George Washington Law Review 461. 752