Kerala Gazette, 2021-01-26, Part PART - I Notification and Orders issued by the Government

0.21 MB·English

by  Government of Kerala

© Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073
dated 5-9-2012 with RNI
കേരള സര്‍ക്കാര്‍
ന്ത ന്തു Reg. No. KL/TV(N)/634/2021-2023
2021
കേരള ഗസററ
KERALA GAZETTE
ആധികാരികമായി പ്രസിദ്ധപ്പെടുത്തുന്നത്‌
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
2021 ജനുവരി 26
O1OAIMADABNo , 26th January 2021
വാല്യം 10 ചൊവ്വ
1196 മകരം 13 4
13th Makaram 1196
Vol. X Thiruvananthapuram,
1942 മാഘം 6
Tuesday
6th Magha 1942
PART I
Notifications and Orders issued by the Government
Labour and Skills Department for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour
Court will pass the award within a period of three
Labour and Skills (A)
months.
ORDERS
ANNEXURE
(1)
“Whether the termination of employment to
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1296/2020/LBR.
Thiruvananthapuram, 3rd December 2020. Sri Prasannakumar, Worker, Hotel Thilak, M.C.
Road, Thiruvalla, by the proprietor, Hotel Thilak,
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
M.C. Road, Thiruvalla is justifiable or not?
industrial dispute exists between Sri Mathew Mappila,
Proprietor, Hotel Thilak, M. C. Road, Thiruvalla-689 101 If not, what reliefs he is entitled to get?”
and the workman of the above reffered establishment
(2)
Sri Prasannakumar, Kalaril Veedu, Near Deepa Tower,
Thiruvalla in respect of matters mentioned in the G.O. (Rt.) No. 1299/2020/LBR.
annexure to this order;
Thiruvananthapuram, 3rd December 2020.
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
industrial dispute exists between Sri Robert Antony,
adjudication;
Managing Partner, Kunnuthura Enterprises, Panackal Lane,
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Cherthala-688 530 and the Workman of the above the
by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act refferd establishment Sri Sureshkumar, Valiya Kallunkal
of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government Veedu, Kothala P. O., Pampadi-686 502 in respect of
hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
Gaz. No. 4/2021/DTP (Part I).
26th JAN. 2021] KERALA GAZETTE 36
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is (4)
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1301/2020/LBR.
adjudication;
Thiruvananthapuram, 3rd December 2020.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act
industrial dispute exists between Sri K. J. Dennis,
of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government
Managing Director, Detilish Rugs, Valavanadu, Kalavur P. O.,
hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred
Alappuzha (Cocodale, M. O. Ward, Post box No. 169,
for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The
Pin- 688 011) and the workman of the above referred
Labour Court will pass the award within a period of
establishment Sri Arun, P. A., Poojaveli, Thuravur P. O.,
three months.
Cherthala, Alappuzha-688 532 in respect of matters
ANNEXURE mentioned in the annexure to this order;
“Whether the denail of employment 10
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
Sri Suresh Kumar, Worker at Kunnuthara
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
Enterprises, Panackal Lane, Cherthala-688 530
adjudication;
by its management is justifiable ? If not what
relief he is entitled to get ?” Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of
(3)
1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1300/2020/LBR.
direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for
Thiruvananthapuram, 3rd December 2020.
adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha. The
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of
industrial dispute exists between The Managing Director, three months.
Trivandrum Motors (P) Ltd., Neeranjanam Tower,
ANNEXURE
T. C. 83/19(16-18), Thakaraparambu, Fort P. O.,
Thiruvananthapuram-23 and the workman of the above “Whether the discharge from duty’ of
referred establishment Sri Vinesh Kumar, R., Sri Arun, P. A., Mechanic & Machine Operator
Krishnalayam, T. C. 51/1341(1), Sathyan Nagar, Staff of Detilish Rugs, Valavanad by the
Pappanamcode Estate P. O., Thiruvananthapuram in management of Detilish Rugs, Valavanad is
respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this
justifiable ? If not what relief he is entitled to
order;
get ?”
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is (3)
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1322/2020/LBR.
adjudication;
Thiruvananthapuram, 10th December 2020.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act
industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri Satheesh Naik,
of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government
Managing director, Canvas Trading Pvt. Ltd.,
hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred
Najiya Building, Puthiyapalam, Mooriyad Road,
for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam.
Chalappuram P. O., Kozhikode-673 002
The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of
(2) Sri Muraleedhar Kammath, Director, Canvas Trading
three months.
Pvt. Ltd., Najiya Building, Puthiyapalam, Mooriyad Road,
ANNEXURE
Chalappuram P. O., Kozhikode-673 002 and the
workman of the above referred establishment
“Whether the denial of employment to Sn Vinesh Kumar, R.,
Sri Saleesh, N., Nelloli House, Ummalathur,
Customer Relation driver, Trivandrum Motors
Medical College P. O., Kozhikode-8 in respect of
(P) Ltd., Thakaraparambu, Fort P. O.,
Thiruvananthapuram by the management of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
Trivandrum Motors (P) Ltd., Thakaraparambu,
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
Fort P. O., Thiruvananthapuram is justifiable? If
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
not what reliefs he is entitled to?”
adjudication;
26th JAN. 2021] KERALA GAZETTE 37
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred (7)
by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of G.O. (Rt.) No. 1324/2020/LBR.
1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby Thiruvananthapuram, 10th December 2020.
direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an
adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The
industrial dispute exists between Sri N. Premkumar,
Labour Court will pass the award within a period of Propritor, Surya Textiles, Court road, Vadakara, Kozhikode
three months. and the workman of the above referred establishment
Sri T. Venugopal, Thorayintavida, P.O. Mayyannur in
ANNEXURE
respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this
“Whether the denail of employment to Sri Saleesh, N., order;
Salesman, by the management of Canvass
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
Trading Pvt. Ltd., Najiya Bulding, Chalappuram, necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
Kozhikode is justifiable ? If not, what relief adjudication;
he is entitled to ?”
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
(6) by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of
1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby
G.O. (Rt.) No. 1323/2020/LBR.
direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for
Thiruvananthapuram, 10th December 2020.
adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The
Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Labour Court will pass the award within a period of
industrial dispute exists between Sri T. K. Chandran, three months.
propritor, Darsana Textiles, Near New stand, Edodi road, ANNEXURE
Vatakara and the worker of the above referred
“Whether the denail of employment 10
establishment represented by The Secretary, Kozhikode
Sri T. Venugopalan, Salesman, Soorya Textiles
Jilla Commercial Employees Union, C.I.T.U., Vatakara
by the Management of Soorya textiles, Court
Area Committee, Dwaraka Building, Old Bus stand,
Road, Vatakara, Kozhikode is justifiable or not ?
Vatakara (1) Sheeba W/o Aneesh, Kunnothu Meethal, If not, what are the reliefs he is entitled to ?”
Mottantharammel, Thodannur P. O.(2) Usha W/o Balan,
Alakkari Thazhe Kuniyil, Edacheri P. O. in respect of By order of the Governor,
matters mentioned in the annexure to this order;
SHIBU, R..,
Under Secretary.
And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is
necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for
adjudication; നിയമ വകുപ്പ്‌
നിയമ (എച്ച്‌)
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of വിജ്ഞാപനം
1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby (1)
direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for
നമ്പര്‍ 27236 എച്ച്‌ദ/2019/ നിയമം.
adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The തിരുവനന്തപുരം, 2020 ഡിസംബര്‍ 10.
Labour Court will pass the award within a period of
കേരള സര്‍ക്കാര്‍, 1952-ലെ നോട്ടറീസ്‌ ആക്ടിന്റെ
three months.
(1952-ലെ ദാം ക്രേന്ദ ആക്ട്‌) 3-൦ 5-൦ വകുപ്പുകളും
199-േലെ നോട്ടറീസ്‌ ചട്ടങ്ങളിലെ ചട്ടം 8 ബി-യും കൂട്ടിവായിച്ച
ANNEXURE
(പകാരം നല്‍കപ്പെട്ട അധികാരങ്ങള്‍ വിനിയോഗിച്ച്‌,
“Whether the denail of employment to Smt. Sheeba and ശ്രീ. കുര്യന്‍ ചെമ്പോള, agjo., അഡ്വക്കേറ്റ്‌,
Smt. Usha, Saleswomen, by the proprietor of 6/0 മത്തായി, ചെമ്പോള, ഏറ്റുമാനൂര്‍, കോട്ടയം -686 631
Darsana textiles, Near New stand, Edodi എന്നയാളെ കോട്ടയം റവന്യു ജില്ല ഉള്‍പ്പെടുന്ന പപദേശം
അധികാരപരിധിയായി നിശ്ചയിച്ച്‌ 25-ട-2020-ഠാം തീയതി
Road,Vatakara is justifiable or not ? If not,
മുതല്‍ വീണ്ടും അഞ്ചുവര്‍ഷ കാലയളവിലേക്ക്‌ നോട്ടറിയായി
what are the reliefs they are entitled to ?”
(രജിസ്റ്റര്‍ നമ്പര്‍ 34/97 /1%110)ഇതിനാല്‍ പുനര്‍ നിയമിക്കുന്നു.