ENTERING TO TRAPPING TO GRAPPLING BY LARRY HARTSELL JEET KUNE DO Entering to Trapping to Grappling by Larry Hartsell Acknowledgements | wish 0 thank the following ‘or their assistance with the photograchy: Hal Faulkner Caris Kent, Alphonso Tamez, Magda, Burt Poe, Steve Connoley, Paul Yunas, Ernie Franko, Tim Tackett, Jr. and Tim lackett, Sr. DISCLAIMER Please note thal the aublisrer of ths inst-uetional hank 4SIBLE in any ol owing Ihe rarmer whats ace" for any injury who itis essenie “nat nafore tallow ng any of the activities. 2 slesoribed, the readin’ nr waco’ hauld fre: consult hi s where’ or net ine veatter of easers should erhars on the p'ysical act describe verein Since Ire pyeleal acty ies Gescnbed herein may be tor. =0 ial tat 2 ohysicran be constited. netrastion IgB\. 0 86868 0515, Lipraty ef Cortrsox Catalog Number, 8451053 984 by Urigu: ished 1964 visten P the Led Stamos of America seats Front Cove Ilustration: Walter ton Book Dasigr: Mathenna Leurg & Ran wong WP Poticarions 420" Vanawon Pl: Piinerk, cclfomic 31505 : Contents Acknowledgements Dedication Foreword Linda Lee What is Jest Kune Do? Dan inosanto . Ranges of Combat I. Stance and Footwork Ill, Trapping Hands IV. Entering to Trapping to Grappling V. Grappling as a De‘ense VI. Grappling ‘rom the Tie-Up Position ‘About the Author To the memory of Bruce Lee, who was my sifu and my rspiration. To Linda Lee for ner support and introduction. To Adrian Marsnall for Fis guidance and friendship To Dan inosanto, my sifu, mentor, ard above all my ‘rend To Richard Bustillo, Jerry Patest, and the rest of the old Chinatown group with whom | was fortunate enough to train. To my mother and father wio have susperted me through good times and bad To Tim Tackett, my ‘riend end JKD brother. (peices Peteac, AY wire Foreword During the ea‘ly years of Bruce's stay in the United States, there were just a nandiul of ded cated martial artists with whom Bruce associated, warked out, and exchanged ideas, This wes indeed a quality group, individuals who to tris day practice and live the highest Seals sf the martial arts and exhibil an aware- ness of the very simple—yet highly effactive—princ ples of ject kune do Larry Hartsell has been a member of this group, as well as a family friend, to this day, His cook, nighly rega-ded by his pears, is @ straightforward example of the direcl application of jeet kune do <6 grappling techniques. Larry's book also disclays 2 recog- nition of the basic concept of jeet kune do, that s, the ability to — discriminate between those techniques that ara useful to the in divicual and those that are personally unsu table. Bruce would have been proud of Larry's czntinued growth in the arts and of his constant striving to reac nis fullest potential Writing this book is one step along the way lo Larry's greater gell- actualizaticn and ors | feel, that Bruce would heartly endorse Mende) Kee ee Dan Inosanto WHAT IS JEET KUNE DO? Jeel kune do—tive | tera! translation is “way of the intercepting fist'was conceived by Bruce Lee in 1967. Unlike many other martial arts, there are neither a series of ru es nor a classification af techniques which constitute a distinct jaet kine co (KD) method cf fightirg. JKD is unbound: JKD is freedom, It possesses everylning, yet in itsell is possessed by nothing Those w70 understand JKD ara primarily interested in its powers of liberation wher JKD 's used a3 @ mirror for self-examination. Inthe pasl, many have tried to define JKD in terms of a distinct style: Bruce Lee's kung-fu; Bruce Lee's karate; Bruce Lee's kickboxing, Bruce Lee's system of strect figating. To label JKD ae Bruce Lee's martial an” is 19 completely mistake Bruce Lee's —and JKD's—meening, JKD's concepts sinaly carnot be con- fined within 2 single system To understand this, 2 martial artist must transcend the duality of "for" end "against," reaching tor that point of unity which is beyond mere distinction. “ne under- standing =f JKD is cha direct intuition of this oo’nt of unity. According ts Bruce Lee, knowiedge in the ‘nevtiel arts ultimately means self-knowledge Jeet kune do is not a new style of kung-fu or karate, Bruse Lee did not invent e new or compasile ety 0 set it apart from any existing method. His concept was to free nis followers trom clinging to any style, pattern, or mold, It must be emphasized that jea: kuna do is merely a name, @ mirror reflecting ourselves. There is a sort of progressive ap- proach to JKD training, but es Lee observed. “To create a vnethad of fignting is like putting a pound of water into wrapping paper and shapi'y il,’ Structura ly, many oeople mistake JKD as a composite s:yle of martial art hecause of i's aificiency. At any given time jeet kune do can resemble Thai boxing or wing chun or wrestling or karate, Its weaponty resembles Filipino escrima anc kali; in long-range application it can resemble Northen Chinese kung-fu 5° savate. Accord ng to Les. the efficiency af any style depends upon cir- cumstances and tne fighting range of distance: the soldier employs a hend grenade a* 50 yards, but he chooses a dagger for close-quarters combat, 4 s:aff, to take another example, '3 the wrong weapon te take to a fight in a telephone booth; a knife would again ba the most aporopriate weapon. Jee! kure co is neither opposed or unoppases to the concept of style. We can say that it is autsicle as wall as inside of al par- ticular structures. Because JKD maxes no claim to existing as a ee style, some irdiviuals conclude that it is neutral or indifferent to the question. Again, this is not the case, for JKD is at once “this” and “nol this." A good JAD practitioner resis his actions on direct intuition. According to Lea, a style should never be like the Bible in which the principles and laws can never be violated. There will always be differences between individuals in regard to the qualily of training, ohysical make-up, level of understanding, environmen- tal concitioning, and likes arc dislikes, According to Bruce, truth is a‘ pathless road’; thus JKD is rot an arganization or an institu- tion of which one can be a member. "“E thar you unders:and or you don't—and that is that,” he said, Wher Bruce taught a Cninese system of kiing-fu (it was shortly after his arr val in the Uritec States), he dd operate an institute of learning; but after that early period he abarcsned his belief in any particular sysiem or s-yle, Ch nese or otverwise. Lee did say that to reach the masses one should probably form some type of organ zat on; for his own part, ne dismissed te notion as un- necessary to his own teaching. Still, lo reach che ever grow ng numbers sf students, some sort =# preconceived sels had lo be established. And as a result of such 2 move by martial ars organizations. many of their members woul be corcitionec to a prescribed system; many of thei: members would end us as prisoners of systerratic oril ing. This is why Lee celieves in teaching only a faw students at any time. Such a methos ot ins:ructicn required tne teacher to main- tain an alert observation of each student in order to establish the Necessary stuce tt leacher relat orship. As Lee so atten abse-ved “A good instructor functions as a pointer of the :ruth, exposing the student's vulnerability, forcing him :o explore himself bath in- tarnally ard externally, and finally integrating himsef with his being.’ Martial arts—like life itself—is in flux, in constant arhythmic movements, in constant change, = owing with this change is very importenl Ard finally, any .KD man wao says tat JKD is ex- slusively JKD is simply not with il, He s slill hung up an his own sell-enc osing “esistance, still anchored to react onary patterns still trapped wishin limbetion, Such a person has not digested the simple fact that truth exists outside of all molds or patterns Awareness is never exclusive. To quote Bruce: “Jeet kun do is just a name, a boat used tc get ore across ther ver. Once across tis discarded ang not to be carried on one's back.” In 1981, the JXD concept was luughil in only Inree places: the Filipino Kali Acaclemy in Torrance, California, 1» Charlotte, North Carolina (where ~arry Hartsell taught a few select students); and 1 Seattle, Washington (under the directior of Taki Kimura). The Sulk of che JKD concept is taught in Torrance, where the school is vii under the direction of nyse f and Richard Bustilic. Itis organizes in accordance with the premise that a JKM man must undergo different experiences. For example, in Phase 1 and Phase 2 classes al Ihe Filigino Kali Academy, students ave taugtt Western boxing and Bruce Lea's mathod of kick Soxing—un fan, | deeply fee thal students should be taught experiences as opposed to tochniques. Ir other words, a karate practitioner who has never boxed before needs to excerience sparring with a boxer. What ne learns from that experience is up to him. Accord- ing ta Bruce, a teacher is not a giver of truth; ne is merely a guide to the truth each student must fins. The tota picture Lee wanted to aresent to hs pupils was that above everything else, tte pucls musi find their ow7 way to truth, He never hesilaled co Sey. "Your truth is not my truth; my truth is not yours.” Bruce dic rot nave a blueprint, cut ratner a series of guide- lines to ead one to proficicney. In using training equipment, tnere was @ systematic approach in which one could develop speed, distance, power. timing, coordination, endurance and footwork < But jeet Kune do was not an end in itself for Bruce—nor was ita mere by-product of his martial studies, it was a mans to selt discavery. JKD was a prescription for personal growth; twas an investigation of freedom—treedom not only to act naturally and effectively in combat, but in lifa. in Ite, we abscrb what is useful and reject what is useless, ard add lc experienc what is specifically our own, Bruce Lee always wanted his students to experience judo, jujutsu, akido, Western coxing; he wanted his students to exp o’e Chinese systems of sersitivity like wing chun, to exalore the elements of kali, eserima, amis; to explore the elements of pentjek silat, Thai boxing, savate. He wanted his students to come to ar understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each method. No all is sugerior or inferior to any other Thats the objec: lesson of jest <une do, to be unbound, to be ‘ree! in comba! to use no sty'e a slyle, to use ne way as the way, to rave no limita- tion as the only limitation, Neitha’ be for or against a carticular styl. In other words, jeet kune So ' just is." (Or to use the words of a Zen maxim to cescrine jeet Kure co, “In the landscape of spring there is neither better nor worse, Tne flowering branches grow, some short, some ong Ai) K Lane Spataete AEE EEE EEE I. RANGES OF COMBAT As we can see from Dan |nosanto’s introduction, jeet xune do s hard to define. The important thing to remember is that uKD is 2 oF system, There is ro specal list of jeet kune do techniques. While there is a structure, JAD students are not cound by il, What Bruce Lee was trying to achieve was his students" ultimate liberation from style. Bruce was always wor ‘ied that if he were no longer around, his students would freaze set kune do — which should always be growing, changing, and = adapting into a ‘iqid styla. In.a phone call <0 Der iol Loc a few montns belore his death, Bruce said that an organ zed jeet kune do school was a poor idea because “students tend to take the agende. for the way and the program for the truth.” ltis extremely cifficult to write a book about jeet kune do, since the reader may |cok at tne book and say, ‘This is jeet kune do; or he may turn the idzas ir this bock into "igid laws: or he may look at soma of the techniques through the eyes of his own par- ticular sy 2. In writing this book, | simply want to share some of the things that Bruce taught his sluden's. Take whet ig use‘Ll, re- ject what is sseless, add whatis specifically your own. In the {nal analysis, JKD musi be felt, not written about. Bruce would have agreed wita Chuang Tzu, the fourh century B,C, Taoist phileso- pher, who said, “If it could be selkad about. everyone would nave told his brother."