PalaeobioPalaeoenv(2016)96:1–12 DOI10.1007/s12549-015-0229-5 EDITORIAL B Introduction to the special issue Contributions in honour ě č ^ of Zbyn k Ro ek JamesD.Gardner1&TomášPřikryl2,3 Received:9December2015/Accepted:16December2015/Publishedonline:5February2016 #SenckenbergGesellschaftfürNaturforschungandSpringer-VerlagBerlinHeidelberg2016 Preface Biographicalsketchandcommentaryontheacademic contributionsofZbyněkRoček Overthe course ofhisnearlyfive decadeslong career, the Czech herpetologist and palaeontologist Zbyněk Roček Zbyněk Roček was born on 16 August 1945, a few weeks (Fig. 1) has become well known for his research on lower after the end of the WWII and two years before the be- vertebrates, especially on the origins, anatomy, functional ginning of Soviet domination of Czechoslovakia, in morphology, development, ecology, systematics and fossil thesmalltownofLitomyšlineasternBohemia,nowwith- recordoffrogs.Zbyněkhasalsobeenateacherandsuper- in the Czech Republic. His childhood and youth were visor,agenerousmentorandavaluedcolleagueforseveral spent in the region, initially in the town of Vysoké Mýto generations of students and researchers. In recognition of and later in the town of Pardubice, where his father Zbyněk Roček’s many academic contributions and on the worked as a public notary. Zbyněk completed the manda- twin occasions in 2015 of his being appointed Emeritus tory eight years of primary school and, because he was Professor at the Czech Academy of Sciences and his 70th destinedforuniversity,anadditionalthreeyearsofmiddle birthday, here, we (1) provide a biographical sketch and school. During his middle school years, Zbyněk and sev- commentaryonhisacademiccontributionsand(2)present eral friends served as field assistants for an ornithologist acollectionofpapersbysomeofZbyněk’scolleaguesthat friend of his father’s—that experience lead to a lifelong echo many of the themes and topics of his research interest in natural history and drove home the importance programme. of regarding organisms, even fossil ones, as living entities within their environment. Upon graduation in June 1962 and a few months shy of his 17th birthday, Zbyněk ap- plied for entrance into Charles University in Prague, ThisarticleisacontributiontothespecialissueBContributionsinHonour where he planned to study geography and biology, with ofZbyněkRoček^. a particular emphasis on ornithology, in hopes of becom- ingamiddle schoollecturer.Thecommitteeofschooland * JamesD.Gardner communist party officials who reviewed university appli- [email protected] cations in those post-war years instead decreed that * TomášPřikryl Zbyněk spend one year working in a variety of non- [email protected] academic positions. During that year, Zbyněk established his proletarian credibility by delivering milk from a dairy 1 RoyalTyrrellMuseumofPalaeontology,Box7500, factory, labouring as a bricklayer’s assistant, unloading Drumheller,AlbertaT0J0Y0,Canada cargo from trains and working in a book store for a state 2 InstituteofGeologyoftheCzechAcademyofSciences,v.v.i., publishing house. Rozvojová269,16500Praha6,CzechRepublic In August 1963, Zbyněk passed the entrance interviews 3 InstituteofGeologyandPalaeontology,CharlesUniversityin and was admitted into the Faculty of Science at Charles Prague,Albertov6,12843Praha2,CzechRepublic University, and then promptly spent much of the next few 2 PalaeobioPalaeoenv(2016)96:1–12 thatwastodefinethecourseofhisacademiccareer.AsZbyněk recalls, a young research assistant in the Department of Zoologytoldhim,BDon’tbefoolish,everyonewantstobean ornithologist.Thinkaboutyourfuture:therearetoomanyor- nithologistswhocannotgetjobs.Trytodosomethingelse,like amphibians and their distribution. Nearly nothing is known about that.^ Zbyněk took that advice to heart and, for his Master’sthesis,studiedthedistributionofAlpinenewtsinthe CzechRepublic;theresultsofthatworkappearedinatrioof papers(Roček1968,1970,1972).Zbyněk’sfinalhalf-yearof universitywasenlivenedbyeventsduringthePragueSpringof 1968, when Czechoslovakia cautiously flirted with political reform,beforeSovietandotherWarsawPacttroopsoccupied the country in August and Moscow’s will was re-imposed. Zbyněk participated in some of the street rallies that summer andthen,whenorderwasrestored,hereturnedtohisstudies. HegraduatedwithaPromovanýBiolog(Prom.Biol.:‘gradu- ated biologist’) degree later in the fall of that year. Although manyofhisfellowgraduatesleftthecountrysoonaftergradu- ation,Zbyněkelectedtoremain. In1969,Zbyněkbeganjugglinghistimebetweenstarting employmentasazoologistatasmallregionalmuseuminthe town of Rychnov nad Kněžnou in eastern Bohemia and ful- Fig. 1 Emeritus Professor Zbyněk Roček, in his laboratory at the fillinghisfinalyearofcompulsorymilitaryservice.Notwish- Institute of Geology in March 2015. Photograph courtesy of Zbyněk ingtocontinueservingasatankcommander,aroleforwhich RočekandPavelLisý(InstituteofGeologyoftheCzechAcademyof he had trained part-time during university, he was able to Sciences,v.v.i.,Prague) exploithisgeographytrainingtogetre-assignedtoacartog- raphyunit.Duringthesummerof1970,hisunitsurveyedand corrected the positions of rock cairns used to demarcate the monthsinanundergraduateworkpartythathelpedbringinthe year’sharvestofhops(akeyingredientinbrewingtastyCzech bordersbetweenCzechoslovakiaandneighbouringcountries. Thosecairnshadamysterioushabitofshiftingwhich,atleast beer) and potatoes. After enduring the usual dull first year of mandatory classes, over the next four years, Zbyněk enjoyed temporarily,allowedfarmersononesideofthebordertoplant crops in a bigger field. Zbyněk recalls the work as being thediversityofcourseshetookandtheinstructionhereceived pleasantandnotespeciallyregimented.Duringthegrapehar- within the departments of Physical Geography and Zoology. vestingseason,heandhiscolleaguesusedtheirmilitarytruck Many of his classes had a field-based component, which Zbyněkfondlyrecallsasbeinginvaluableforcomplementing to haul grapes for local farmers in exchange for bottles of delicious, locally made wine. One week in early July, andexpandeduponwhatwastaughtintheclassroom.Healso Zbyněk slipped away for a week to get married in Bohemia gainedvaluableexperienceasateachingassistantinbothde- and,uponreturningfromhishoneymoon,wasnotsurprised, partments, participated in collecting expeditions with the butstillrelieved,tofindthathisabsencehadnotbeenofficial- Department of Zoology, was a member of the Faculty of Science’s rock-climbing club and taught skiing.1 During his lynoticed. secondyearatuniversity,Zbyněkreceivedsomepivotaladvice After completing his military service and while still at the museum in Rychnov nad Kněžnou, Zbyněk continued 1Onememorable,non-academicexperienceforZbyněkduringthattime his research on newts. In 1972, he was awarded a Rerum wasabriefforayintothemoviebusiness.InJune1968,hewascastasan NaturaliumDoctor(RNDr.:‘Doctorofnaturalthings’)de- extraintheWWIImovie‘TheBridgeatRemagen’(releasedin1969),for gree from Charles University for his dissertation on the scenes being filmed along the Vltava River, south of Prague. Zbyněk biometrics of central European populations of Alpine recallsbeingpaidthethen-princelysumof100Czechcrownsperday, newts. During his time at the museum, he generated over andsubsequentlylearningthatthegoatbelongingtoafellowextrawas alsoearningthesamedailyrateasthehumanextras.AlthoughZbyněk two dozen natural history publications, including two haswatchedthefilmseveraltimes,hewasneverabletopickhimselfout about Alpine newts derived from his Rerum Naturalium of the crowd scenes. In 2014, while touring fossil froglocalities near research (Roček 1974a, b), his first frog papers, which Bonn, Germany, Zbyněk was finally able to visit the stretch of the reported on developmental variation in body proportions RhineValleywheretheoriginalRemagenBridgestood,butwasnever rebuiltafterbeingdestroyedneartheendofthewar. and polydactyly in extant populations of green frogs PalaeobioPalaeoenv(2016)96:1–12 3 Zbyněk began working as Prof. Špinar’s assistant in November1975(Fig.2).AtŠpinar’ssuggestion,Zbyněkim- mediately began his Candidatus Scientiarum (CSc.; equiva- lenttoaPhD)dissertationonthecranialanatomyanddevel- opment of Pelobates. That study was Zbyněk’s first serious foray into frogs, and many of its themes (e.g. the interplay between development, ontogeny and evolution in tetrapods; theosteology,origins,fossilrecordandsystematicsoffrogs) were further explored and expanded upon during the rest of hisresearchcareer.Thelatterhalfofthe1970swasabusyand eventful time for Zbyněk. In 1976, he re-opened the Bechlejovice Oligocene frog quarry in northern Bohemia, but quickly realisedthere was littlechanceofcollectingany significantnewfossilsfromthatalreadyexhaustivelysampled quarry.3Despitehislimitedtimeworkingatthatquarry,many previously collected specimens from Bechlejovice would be featuredmuch laterinhis paperson development and meta- morphosisinfossilpipoidfrogs(e.g.Roček2003a;Ročekand Fig.2 ZbyněkRoček(left)andProfessorZdeněkV.Špinar(right),dur- VanDijk2006).Thenextyear,Zbyněkledacrewthatscreen ingoneoftheirregularSundayafternoonwalksinMay1986inPrague. washed the lower Miocene Dolnice locality in western Atthattime,Špinarwas70yearsoldandZbyněkhadbeenworkingas Bohemia; the abundant, isolated bones from that locality Špinar’s assistant for the past decade. Photograph courtesyofZbyněk RočekandMarieŠpinarová(Třebíč) formedthebasisforaseriesofdescriptiveandfaunalpapers by Zbyněk and colleagues through the 1980s (Moody and Roček 1980; Rage and Roček 1983; Roček 1984a; (Roček1974c,d),andhisonlysolo-authoredmammalpa- Młynarski and Roček 1985; Fejfar and Roček 1988). Also, per(Roček1974e).Hispapersonnewtsandfrogsbrought in1977, the Czechoslovakian company Geoindustria, which himtotheattentionofZdeněkŠpinar,whowasaprofessor wascarryingoutgeologicalmappingfortheLibyangovern- of palaeontology at Charles University. Zbyněk had never ment,invitedProf.ŠpinarandZbyněktocollectatthethen- met Prof. Špinar, although he was familiar with his work, recently discovered lower Oligocene locality of Jabal al especially Špinar’s pair of classic palaeontology books Hasawinah, in the Sahara Desert. Their Libyan expedition published just a few years earlier.2 Špinar invited Zbyněk resultedinthe discovery ofnumerousvertebratefossils(e.g. to meet him at Charles University, where they examined ŠpinarandRoček1978;Roček1979),includingseveraldoz- the university’s collection of articulated frog fossils from en frog skeletons belonging to a new species of Xenopus,4 the Oligocene locality of Bechlejovice in northern Bohe- plusthememorableexperienceofbeingbrieflydetainedand mia and had a short discussion. At the end of that questionedassuspectedspiesbyLibyansecurityofficialsfor meeting, Špinar offered Zbyněk a position at Charles havingsnappedphotographsinaTripolimarketontheirfirst University as his assistant. This tempting offer was com- dayinthecountry.In1979,Zbyněkspentthreemonthswork- plicated by the fact that Zbyněk’s wife Jana had only re- inginProf.ErikJarvik’slaboratoryattheSwedishMuseumof cently secured a high school lecturer position in Rychnov, Natural History in Stockholm, where he was able to study where they lived. Moving to Prague would mean Jana Jarvik’sextensivecollectionofDevoniansarcopterygianand would have to wait for a similar teaching vacancy to open tetrapodfossils,includingsectioned skulls thatrevealedoth- in one of Prague’s high schools. In a compromise familiar erwisehiddendetailsofinternalcranialanatomy.Insightsthat to many academic couples, they decided on a short-term ZbyněkgleanedfromthatshortbutintensivetimeinSweden solution: he would move to Prague to begin working at wereincorporatedintomanyofhissubsequentpapersdealing Charles University, while she continued to live and work withtheoriginsanddevelopmentofamphibians(e.g.Roček in Rychnov until a teaching position opened in Prague. 1981,1988a,1990,1993a,2003b).Also,in1979,Zbyněkand JanabecameparentswhentheirdaughterHanawasborn. 2Špinar,Z.V.(1972).TertiaryfrogsfromCentralEurope.TheHague: 3Bechlejovice has yielded nearly 1600 fossil tadpoles and metamor- Dr.W.JunkN.V. phosedfrogs(Z.Roček,personalcommunication,2015). Špinar,Z.V.(1972).Lifebeforeman.London:ThamesandHudsonLtd. 4Špinar, Z. V. (1980). The discovery of a new species of pipid frog [This book was translated into many other languages, although the (Anura,Pipidae)intheOligoceneofCentralLibya.InM.J.Salem& Czechversiondidnotappearuntil16yearslater:Špinar,Z.V.(1988) M. T. Busrewil (Eds.), The geology of Libya. Vol. 1 (pp. 327–348). Knihaopravěku.Prague:Albatros.] London:AcademicPress. 4 PalaeobioPalaeoenv(2016)96:1–12 Zbyněk completed his dissertation and was awarded his 1980s also saw the publication of BEvoluce Obratlovců^ (= Candidatus Scientiarum degree in 1980 from Charles BEvolution of Vertebrates^: Roček 1985a), the first of his University. The following year, the monograph version of threesolo-authoredbooks. his dissertationwas published in English(Roček 1981),and Through the latter part of the 1980s and into the early itquicklybecameaclassicreferenceworkonthedevelopment 1990s, Zbyněk tackled his final graduate degree. In andosteologyoftheanuranskull.5Followingthecompletion December 1991, he was awarded a Doctor of Sciences ofthatdegree,ZbyněkremainedatCharlesUniversity,where (DrSc) degree from Charles University for his study on the he continued his academic research and duties in the originandevolutionofanurans,whichwasbasedonaseries Department of Paleontology and later in the Department of of 14 solo- and co-authored papers, some of which had not Zoology. From 1992 onwards, he was cross-appointed as a beenpublishedbythetimehisdegreewasawarded(Böhmeet Senior Researcher at the Institute of Geology of the Czech al. 1982; Jarošová and Roček 1982; Roček 1984b, 1985b, AcademyofSciences,alsoconvenientlylocatedinPrague. 1986a, 1987, 1988a, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1993b; Rage and The next 35 years were devoted to teaching, supervising Roček 1989; Roček and Veselý 1989; Roček and Nessov students, research, study trips abroad, and attending and 1993).Zbyněk’snextmajorundertakingthatdecadewasbe- organising conferences. In 1980, Prof. Lehman hosted what ing the lead organiser for the 3rd World Congress of wasintendedtobeasix-monthstudyvisitbyZbyněktothe Herpetology,whichmetduringAugust1997inPrague,6and Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris. When wasattendedbyoverathousandinternationaldelegates.For Lehman unexpectedlydied soon after Zbyněk arrived, Jean- Zbyněk,oneofthe highlightsofthateventwasbeingpleas- ClaudeRage(thenaCNRSresearcheratUniversitéParisVI) antlysurprisedathowmuchtheattendeesenjoyedanevening andhiswifeAgnesbefriendedZbyněkandhelpedsalvagethe concert of classical Czech music presented as part of the remainder of his Parisian visit. Jean-Claude and Zbyněk re- Congress programme. During the 1990s and into the next mainclose friends and havecollaboratedona variety ofpa- millennium, Zbyněk continued his academiccareerand rose pers, mostnotably onfrogorigins and re-descriptions ofthe through the ranks at Charles University, where he became a stem frog Triadobatrachus (Rage and Roček 1986, 1989; FullProfessorin2007andthenanEmeritusProfessoratthe RočekandRage2000a,b),theevolutionoffrogassemblages CzechAcademyofSciencesin2015. in Europe during the Cenozoic (Rage and Roček 2003), a In recent correspondence to us, Zbyněk summed up his reviewofTertiary anurans (Ročekand Rage2000c) and de- researchcareerbystatingthathewasprimarilyfocusedon scriptionsofMiocene snakesand anEocene frog(Rage and theoriginsandstructuralevolutionofanurans,andthathe Roček 1983, 2007). They also re-interpreted a supposed was especially interested in questions like: (1) what were Devoniantetrapodprintasthesomewhatlessexcitingresting the principal anatomical transformations leading to the or- trace of a starfish (Roček and Rage 1994). Another pivotal igin of the anuran body plan and subsequently during the event during the 1980s that was to have long-term benefits group’s evolution, (2) how are these transformations doc- for Zbyněk occurred in 1985, when he hosted the 3rd umented in the fossil record and ontogeny of extant frogs Ordinary General Meeting of the European Herpetological and(3)towhatextentcananatomicalfeaturesthatarosein Society in Prague. That meeting was attended by about 400 various froglineagesbeusedtoreconstructtheirphyloge- delegates,andwasremarkableforbeingoneofthefirstocca- netic histories? Those themes and questions are especially sionswhenherpetologistsandpalaeontologistsfromWarsaw prominentinhispapersandconferencepresentations,hav- Pact countries and the rest of the world were able to freely ingtitlessuchasBTheincrassatiofrontoparietalisinfrogs, meetandlearnabouteachother’swork.Asaresultofpersonal its origin and phylogenetic significance^ (Jarošová and contactsmadeatthatconference,thenextyear, Zbyněkwas Roček 1982), BAnatomical transformations in the transi- invited to work with several prominent Canadian and tion from temnospondyl to proanuran stages^ (Roček and American colleagues at their home institutions. Since then, Rage 2000a), BOntogeny in Tertiary frogs^ (Roček 2004), international collaborative research, especially on palaeonto- BTransformation of the pectoral girdle in the evolutionary logical topics, has been an important component of origin of frogs: insights from the primitive anuran Disco- Zbyněk’s career (e.g. Roček and Nessov 1993; Roček and Lamaud 1995; Kordikova et al. 2001; Bernor et al. 2004; Roček and Van Dijk 2006; Delfino et al. 2009; Gardner et 6Zbyněkrecallsthatthisconferencewasheldunderquitedifferentcir- cumstancesthantheEuropeanHerpetologicalSocietymeetings12years al.2010;Ročeketal.2010,2011,2012a,b,2015).Themid- early.Intheinterveningyears,thecollapseofcommunismacrossEastern EuropeandtheCzechoslovakianVelvetRevolutionpavedthewayini- 5Althoughlongoutofprint,digitalcopiesofthismonographarenow tiallyfortheinstallmentofademocraticgovernmentinthecountyand accessible through several web sites (e.g. ResearchGate.net and thenitspeacefulpartitioningintotheCzechRepublicandSlovakia.As Academia.edu) and from the ‘Scientific papers by Zbyněk Roček’ thoseofuswhoattendedthe1997meetingscanattest,bythattime,the websitemaintainedbytheInstituteofGeologyoftheCzechAcademy Czech Republic was enthusiastically embracing capitalism and, once ofSciencesat:http://rocek.gli.cas.cz/Bibliography.htm. again,PraguewasbecomingafashionableEuropeancity. PalaeobioPalaeoenv(2016)96:1–12 5 glossus^ (Havelková and Roček 2006) and BPost- Outside of his research, teaching and supervisory roles, metamorphic development of Early Cretaceous frogs as a Zbyněk has provided decades’ worth of service to the tool for taxonomic comparisons^ (Roček et al. 2012a). scientific community in a variety of ways. Especially no- Thosesamethemesandquestionsarealsoevidenttovary- table in this regard have been his constructive and sup- ing degrees in most of his other papers, including those portive reviews of manuscripts and grant applications, his focused primarily on anatomy and development (e.g. mentoring of younger researchers (both of us have cer- Kolesová et al. 2007; Královec et al. 2010; Roček et al. tainly benefited from Zbyněk’s advice and help over the 2015), functional morphology (e.g. Delfino et al. 2009; years) and his participation in organising numerous scien- Přikryl et al. 2009; Robovská-Havelková et al. 2014) and tific conferences and symposia. As part of his ongoing classical descriptive and systematic palaeontology (e.g. efforts to promote an appreciation for evolution and nat- Roček 2008; Wuttke et al. 2012; Dong et al. 2013; Roček ural history within his country, Zbyněk also translated et al. 2014). Other notable contributions by Zbyněk and into Czech four popular science books for adults7 and a colleagues included summaries and reviews of the anuran larger number of books for children about dinosaurs and fossil record (e.g. Sanchiz and Roček 1996; Roček and other animals. Presenting this tribute to Zbyněk in the Rage2000c;Roček2000a,2013a)andfaunal-stylepapers journal Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments is es- reporting on assemblages of frogs, other amphibians and pecially fitting, because he is a member of the editorial reptiles from the Mesozoic and Cenozoic of Europe, Asia board and he supports the journal by providing thorough and North America (e.g. Roček and Nessov 1993; Roček reviews and high-quality papers. Given his sense of hu- 1994a, b, 2005; Roček and Wuttke 2010; Roček et al. mour, Zbyněk undoubtedly appreciates the irony that, al- 2010). Although Zbyněk is justifiably best known for his thoughhisworkhaslargelyfocusedonfrogs,thusfar,the work on frogs, he has also published a modest number of only taxon to be named in his honour has been the fossil papers dealing with reptiles (e.g. Moody and Roček 1980; lizard Mediolacerta roceki.8 Roček 1980a, b, 1984a; Rage and Roček 1983; Młynarski AlthoughretirementhasfreedZbyněkofhisteachingand andRoček1985).EchoinghisearlyworkonAlpinenewts, administrativeresponsibilities,hecontinuestoactivelypursue Zbyněkhasmaintainedanongoingsidelineinterestinfos- researchand related projects, albeitata moreleisurely pace. silandextantsalamanders(e.g. Roček 1994c,1996a, b,c, Forexample,inthepastyear,heco-authoredapaperonthe 1997a,b,c,1999;VaterandRoček2004)andalsocontrib- structure and taxonomic value of the frontoparietal bone in uted Alpine newt accounts (Roček 1992a; Roček et al. palaeobatrachid frogs (Roček et al. 2015) and spent several 2003) for two natural history books. In keeping with his weeksworkingwithcolleaguesattheInstituteforVertebrate modestnature,Zbyněktendstodownplayhisworkbyarguing Paleontology and Paleoanthropology inBeijing onnewfrog thatnoneofhisprojectshasbeenespeciallyflashy.However, fossils. Currently, Zbyněk is editing a Festschrift for Prof. evenacursoryglanceatthenumberandbreadthofhispubli- Špinarscheduledforpublicationin2016.9Retirementalso cations (see ‘Selected scientific publications of Zbyněk means that Zbyněk and Jana are now able to devote more Roček’atendofthisarticle)convincinglydemonstratesthat time to travelling and, closer to home, enjoying their hisresearchprogrammehasmadesubstantialcontributionsto mountain cottage nestled in a forested landscape dotted thefieldsofherpetologyandpalaeontology. with numerous small ponds inhabited, fittingly, by frogs In addition to maintaining an active and productive re- and newts. We wish Zbyněk all the best for his well- search programme, Zbyněk was a long-time teacher at Charles University and supervised several dozen student re- 7FromEnglish: search projects. Regarding his supervisory philosophy, Gould,S.J.(2005).Dinosaurinahaystack.NewYork:HarmonyBooks. Zbyněkstated,BIalwaysconsidereditimportantthatmystu- [In Czech: Gould, S. J. (2005). Dinosauři v kupce sena. Praha: dentsworkonscientificproblemsthattheyliked,notonprob- Academia.] Palmer,D.(1999).Theatlasoftheprehistoricworld.London:Marshal lems imposed on them. A good scientist should be able to Edition. [In Czech: Palmer, D. (2001). Prehistorický atlas. Vývoj recogniseproblemsthatdeserve tobeclarified.^ Heencour- planetyZemě.Praha:Knižníklub.] aged his students to work independently and with minimal Shubin,N.(2008).Yourinnerfish.Ajourneyintothe3.5billionyear supervision,butwasalwaysavailabletoprovidegeneralad- historyofthehumanbody.NewYork:PantheonBooks.[InCzech: Shubin,N.(2009).Rybavnás.PrahaaLitomyšl:Paseka.] viceasneeded.Althoughmanyofhisstudentsworkedonfrog FromGerman: projects, others worked on topics as disparate as revising a Beurlen,K.,&Lichter,G.(1986).Versteinerungen.München:Mosaik fossilcoelacanthspeciesandreconstructingthespeechcapa- Verlag.[InCzech:Beurlen,K.,&Lichter,G.(1997).Zkameněliny. bilitiesofNeanderthals.Manyofhisstudentswentontoca- Praha:IkaraKnižníklub.] 8Augé,M. L. (2005). Évolution des lézardsduPaléogèneenEurope. reersinconservationandashighschoollecturers,withami- MémoiresduMuséumnationald’Histoirenaturelle,192,1–369. nority (including one of us, namely TP) having gone into 9AsaspecialissueofActaMuseiNationalisPragae,SeriesB—Historia academia. Naturalis. 6 PalaeobioPalaeoenv(2016)96:1–12 deservedretirementandlookforwardtoboththeresultsof YuanWang,LipingDongandSusanE.Evans:BPolydactyly his ongoing research and the possibilities for future andotherlimbabnormalitiesintheJurassicsalamander collaborations. CChhuunneerrppeettoonnfromChina^ Inoneofhisearlynaturalhistoryreports,Zbyněkdocumented instances of additional digits among extant green frogs in Summaryofpapersincludedwithinthisspecialissue Bohemia(Roček1974d).Anomalousoccurrencesofadditional phalanges,digitsandevenlimbsnowarewell-known,butpuz- TomášPřikryl,RostislavBrzobohatýandRůženaGregorová: zling,phenomenainsomeextantpopulationsoffrogsandsal- BDiversityanddistributionoffossilcodlets(Teleostei, amanders. Yuan Wang and colleagues document the first in- Gadiformes,Bregmacerotidae):reviewandcomments^ stances of these anomalies in the salamander fossil record, on the basis of a mono-specific sample of exquisitely preserved InthefirstcontributiontothisSpecialIssue,Zbyněk’sformer skeletonswith body outlinesfrom the Jurassic ofnortheastern student,TomášPřikryl,andhispalaeoichthyologicalco-authors China.Theoccurrenceofsuchmalformationsintheseca.160 bringmuchneededclaritytothefossilrecordofcodlets.These million year old Chinese fossils suggests that developmental are a family of small-sized, pelagic fish that currently have a processesresponsibleforthegrowthandregenerationofdigits near-global distribution in warm marine waters and a modest andlimbs—regardlessofwhetherthosestructuresarenormalor fossil record extending back into the Eocene. The authors re- malformed—have remained consistent throughout the evolu- viewthefossilrecordandhistoryofworkoncodletsand,ina tionary history of salamanders. As further noted by Wang et mannerreminiscentofmanyofZbyněk’sstudiesonfossilam- al.,recentpalaeontologicalanddevelopmentalstudiesbyother phibians,theycombineevidencefromfossilspecimensaswell researchershaveraisedthepossibilitythattheabilitytoregen- astheosteologyanddevelopmentoflivingcodletstorevisethe erate digits and appendages may be a primitive attribute for taxonomyoffossilmembers.Přikryletal.acceptthe12nom- salamandersand,potentially,forTetrapodomorphaasawhole. inalfossilspeciesknownonlybyotoliths,butforthefivefossil (Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 96(1). doi:10. speciespreviouslynamedonthebasisofbodyfossils,theylimit 1007/s12549-015-0219-7) thenumberofdiagnosablespeciestojusttwo,bothwithinthe genus Bregmaceros, and question whether a poorly known MártonVenczel,JamesD.Gardner,VladA.Codrea,Zoltán monotypic species, Bregmacerina antiqua, can be retained Csiki-Sava,ŞtefanVasileandAlexandruA.Solomon:BNew within the family. (Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeo- insightsintoEurope’smostdiverseLateCretaceousanuran environments,96(1).doi:10.1007/s12549-015-0222-z) assemblagefromtheMaastrichtianofwesternRomania^ WhenZbyněkpublishedhiscomprehensivereviewoftheglob- PavelP.Skutschas:BAnewcrown-groupsalamander alMesozoicanuranrecord(Roček2000a),whatwasknownfor fromtheMiddleJurassicofWesternSiberia,Russia^ the Upper Cretaceous portion of that record in Europe was largely confined to western portions of the continent. ThetwodecadessinceZbyněk’sreviewoftheEuropeanfossil Beginning with discoveries in the mid-1980s, Maastrichtian salamander record (Roček 1994c) have seen substantial im- sedimentarybasinsinwesternRomaniahavesteadilyyielded provements in our understanding of the fossil record of that a growing number of isolated frog bones. On the basis of all group,bothwithinEuropeandglobally.Aspartofhisongoing, previously published and newly available specimens, Márton field- and laboratory-based research programme on the fossil Venczel and colleagues provide an up-to-date account of the recordofsalamandersandothertetrapodsfromEurasia,Pavel latestCretaceousfrogassemblagefromRomania.Incontaining Skutschasdescribesanewspeciesofcrown-cladesalamander three alytids, the oldest known bombinatorid, a possible from a richly fossiliferous, Middle Jurassic quarry in Siberia. pelobatid and at least two indeterminate taxa, this is proving Thisnewspeciesisoneoftheoldestknownsalamandersandit to be the most taxonomically diverse Late Cretaceous frog extendsthefossilrecordofthegenusKiyatritonbacksome40 assemblagecurrentlyknownfromEurope.TheRomanianfrog millionyearsfromitsonlypreviouslyknownoccurrenceinthe assemblage contains a mix of endemic and more widespread Aptian–Albian of Siberia. The new Siberian salamander con- groups,andwhencomparedtootherLateCretaceousEuropean tributestothemountingevidencethatstemandcrownsalaman- frog assemblages, it shows both similarities (e.g. preponder- derswerecontemporaneousduringtheinitialportionsoftheir ance of alytids) and differences (e.g. lacks both the knownrecordsandthatpresent-daySiberiaservedasarefuge palaeobatrachids from the Campanian–Maastrichtian of west- forasuiteofJurassicaspectvertebratetaxawellintotheEarly ernEuropeandtheputativeneobatrachianfromtheSantonian Cretaceous. (Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, of Hungary). (Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 96(1).doi:10.1007/s12549-015-0216-x) 96(1).doi:10.1007/s12549-015-0228-6) PalaeobioPalaeoenv(2016)96:1–12 7 AmyC.Henrici:BDiggingthroughthepast:theevolutionary early 21st century, when advances in computing power, the historyofburrowingandundergroundfeeding adventofGISmappingandamoresophisticatedunderstand- inrhinophrynidanurans^ ing ofthe factorsinfluencing species distributions havenow madethose ‘ecologicalsuitability analyses’ feasibleand,ac- Crediting Roček and Rage’s (2000c) review of the Tertiary cording to their proponents, a powerful tool for explaining frog record as the inspiration for her contribution, Amy species distributions in the present, past and future. In their Henrici details the palaeontologicalevidencefor the skeletal contribution,JorgeLoboandcolleaguesassesshowwellac- novelties,specialisedlifestyleanddistributionoftheendemic tualdistributionaldataforQuaternary(bothextantandfossil) North American Rhinophrynidae. Today, rhinophrynids are speciesoffrogsandsalamandersacrosstheIberianPeninsula represented by a single species that is highly specialised for match predictions for their maximum potential distributions, asubterraneanexistenceandisconfinedtotheextremesouth- asgeneratedfromasuiteofclimaticvariables.Theyfindthat ernmost USA southwards into Central America. The family theactualandpredicteddistributionsaresimilarenoughthat, hasamoreextensivefossilrecordinwesternNorthAmerica, with some caveats, fossil occurrences of at least Quaternary where its geographic distribution extends northwards into amphibiantaxacanbeusedtoinferpastclimaticconditions. southernmostCanadaanditstemporalrangeextendsbackto (Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 96(1). doi:10. the Palaeocene and, perhaps, even to the Late Jurassic. 1007/s12549-015-0224-x) Utilising previously published and newly identified fossils, combined with recent palaeoclimatic studies, Henrici traces StevenC.Sweetman:BAcomparisonofBarremian–early the timing and appearance of osteological features linked to AptianvertebrateassemblagesfromtheJeholGroup, the evolution of underground feeding and head-first north-eastChinaandtheWealdenGroup,southernBritain: burrowinginthesebizarrefrogs,andsheproposesthatclimat- thevalueofmicrovertebratestudiesinadversepreservational ic and environmental changes initiated during the late settings^ Palaeogene in western North America forced rhinophrynids southwards. (Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, In terms of the number of fossils recovered, the diversity of 96(1).doi:10.1007/s12549-015-0215-y) taxonomic groupsknown andthe range ofbodysizesrepre- sented,theWealdenGroupofsouthernBritainandtheJehol Hugues-AlexandreBlain,MassimoDelfino,ClaudioBerto GroupofnortheasternChinaaretherichestdepositsforEarly andMartaArzarello:BFirstrecordofPPeelloobbaatteessssyyrriiaaccuuss Cretaceous non-marine vertebrates in the world. Much of (Anura,Amphibia)intheearlyPleistoceneofItaly^ whatweknowaboutthevertebraterecordforbothunits,es- pecially for smaller sized taxa such as lissamphibians, has OneofZbyněk’sfavouritefroggenera,Pelobates,isthesub- cometolightoverthepastfewdecadesthankstotheefforts ject of the contribution by Hugues-Alexandre Blain and col- of a few, mostly English, palaeontologists working in the leagues. These authors document a palaeobiogeographically Wealden and larger numbers of Chinese palaeontologists unexpected record for P. syriacus, on the basis of isolated and their colleagues (including Zbyněk) working on Jehol bonesrecoveredfromalowerPleistocenefissurefillinsouth- fossils.Drawingonhisextensive,first-handexperiencewith easternItaly.Thatspeciesiscurrentlyrestrictedtotheeastern the Wealden and his contacts within the Chinese palae- MediterraneanregionandtheMiddleEast.Blainetal.propose ontological community, Steve Sweetman is well posi- thattheextralimitalpresenceofP.syriacusinItalyduringthe tioned to provide a review and comparison of the Wealden early Pleistocene was the result of it having dispersed east- and Jehol vertebrate assemblages. The two assemblages are wards during cooler intervals, when sea levels dropped and broadly similar in terms of which major groups are present, suitable overland routes emerged across the Aegean Sea. whereasdifferencesarelikelyattributabletoacombinationof (Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 96(1). doi:10. geographicseparation,palaeoenvironmentalandtaphonomic 1007/s12549-015-0220-1) factors, and the more limited outcrop available for the Wealden Group and lesser amount of research having been JorgeM.Lobo,IñigoMartínez-SolanoandBorjaSanchiz:BA devoted to that unit. (Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeo- reviewofthepalaeoclimaticinferencepotentialofIberian environments,96(1).doi:10.1007/s12549-015-0217-9) Quaternaryfossilbatrachians^ JamesD.GardnerandJean-ClaudeRage:BThefossilrecord One of the initial goals for Zbyněk’s Master’s project in the oflissamphibiansfromAfrica,Madagascar,andtheArabian late 1960s was to assess whether the distribution maps he Plate^ generated for populations of the Alpine newt in the CzechRepubliccouldbeexplainedintermsofgeographical, FossilfrogsofAfricaanditsadjacentregionshavelongbeen climaticandotherenvironmentalfactors.Fastforwardtothe ofinteresttoZbyněk, beginning with the memorable trip he 8 PalaeobioPalaeoenv(2016)96:1–12 made in 1977 with Prof. Špinar to collect Oligocene frog SelectedscientificpublicationsofZbyněkRoček fossilsinLibya,andsubsequentlywithhiscollaborativerede- scriptions of the Triassic stem frog Triadobatrachus from Thisabbreviatedlistincludesscientificpapers,importantpublishedconfer- Madagascar (Rage and Roček 1986, 1989), his participation enceproceedings,books,bookchaptersandeditedvolumes.Exceptwhere citedinthetext,otherpublications(conferenceabstracts,bookreviews, inapairofconferencesheldin2002and2005inSouthAfrica translations,andpopularandsemi-popularpublications)arenotincluded. and,mostrecently,hiscollaborativestudyofdevelopmentin Foramoreextensivepublicationlist,seethe‘ScientificpapersbyZbyněk pipoidfrogsthatutilisedCretaceousfossilsfromSouthAfrica Roček’ website maintained by the Institute of Geology of the Czech andIsrael(RočekandVanDijk2006).Because of its com- AcademyofSciencesat:http://rocek.gli.cas.cz/Bibliography.htm. plex palaeogeographic history, any consideration of Africa’s lissamphibian record must include its associated islands and the adjacent Arabian Plate portion of the 1968: Roček, Z. (1968). Příspěvek k faunistice čolka horského (Triturus Middle East. In the final contribution of this volume, alpestris)vČechách.Živa,15,224.[Acontributiontothefaunistics Jim Gardner and Zbyněk’s long-time friend and collab- oftheAlpinenewt(Triturusalpestris)inBohemia] orator, Jean-Claude Rage, present a comprehensive re- view and commentary on the lissamphibian fossil record 1970: from Africa, Madagascar and the Arabian Plate. Asdoc- Roček, Z. (1970). Rozšíření čolka horského, Triturus alpestris umented in their review, the region’s lissamphibian record is (Laurentius, 1768) v severovýchodních Čechách (with German betterthangenerallyappreciated:fossilsareknownfromover summary). Acta Musei Reginaehradecensis Series A: Scientiae Naturales, 11, 63–70. [The distribution of the Alpine newt, 90 sets of localities ranging in age from basal Triassic to Triturusalpestris(Laurentius,1768)innorth-eastBohemia] Holocene age, 20 named taxa are currently recognised and Africa is one of only two continents (the other being North 1972: America)havingrecordsforallfourlissamphibianclades(i.e. Roček,Z.(1972).Rozšířeníčolkahorského(TriturusalpestrisLaur.)v frogs, salamanders, caecilians and albanerpetontids). severních Čechách (with German summary). Sborník (Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 96(1). doi: 10. SeveročeskéhoMusea,ScientiaeNaturales,4,45–52.[Distribution 1007/s12549-015-0221-0) oftheAlpineNewt(TriturusalpestrisLaur.)inthenorthBohemia] 1973: Roček,Z.(1973).ObratlovciseverovýchodníchČech.Soupisliteratury doroku1970.HradecKrálové:StátnívědeckáknihovnavHradci Králové&KrajskémuzeumvHradciKrálové.[Vertebratesofthe Acknowledgements The genesis of this article began with us north-eastBohemia.Bibliographyuntil1970] recountingthemanyanecdotesthatZbyněkRočekhadsharedwithus overtheyearsabouthislifeandcareer.Wethenproceededtoimpose heavily on Zbyněk’s generosity and patience by asking for extensive 1974: autobiographicaldetailsandclarification,acompletelistofhispublica- Peška, R., Procházka, F., Režný, K., & Roček, Z. (1974). Průvodce tionsandthetwophotographsincludedinthispaper—allofwhichhe naučnou stezkou okolím Deštného. Rychnov nad Kněžnou: provided in his usual prompt and conscientious manner. Jean-Claude MuzeumOrlickýchhor.[Guidetotheeducationaltrailinthesur- Rage (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France) critiqued roundingsofDeštné] anearlierversionofthispaperandhelpedensureitsaccuracy.Weare Roček, Z. (1974a). Beitrag zur Erkennung der Neotenie des Alpen- gratefultoMrs.MarieŠpinarová(Třebíč)forallowingustopublishthe molches Triturus alpestris (Laurenti, 1768). Věstník Česko- photographinwhichherdeceasedhusband,Prof.Špinar,appearswith slovenskéspolečnostizoologické,38,285–294. Zbyněk,andalsotoPavelLisý(InstituteofGeology,CAS,v.v.i.,Prague) Roček,Z.(1974b).BiometricalinvestigationsofcentralEuropeanpopu- forhavingtakenthephotographofZbyněkinhislaboratory. lations of the Alpine newt, Triturus alpestris alpestris (Laurenti, AssemblinganeditedcollectionofpaperslikethisSpecialIssue 1768) (Amphibia: Urodela). Acta Universitatis Carolinae— relies on the efforts, goodwill and professionalism of many people. Biologica,1972,295–373. Wethanktheauthorsoftheninepapersincludedinthisvolumefor Roček,Z.(1974c).Veränderungen derKörperproportionalitätwährend their diverse contributions and the reviewers who provided con- des Wachstums im Populationsmuster des Wasserfrosches Rana structive and prompt reviews of the submitted manuscripts. In the esculenta (Linnaeus, 1758) (Amphibia: Ranidae). Věstník editorial office for Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, the Československéspolečnostizoologické,38,215–227. Managing Editor Sinje Weber and the Editor-in-Chief Peter Roček, Z. (1974d). Polydaktylie u skokanů zelených. Akvárium a Königshof enthusiastically endorsed our proposal, and then helped terrarium,17,28.[Polydactylyingreenfrogs] us navigate through the many steps needed to produce the final Roček,Z.(1974e).NetopýřiOrlickýchhoraPodorlicka.Orlickéhory— volume. We also appreciate the efforts of the production team at Podorlicko,6,53–67.[BatsoftheOrlickéMountainsandtheirfoothills] Springer,whohelpedturnthetenmanuscriptsconstitutingthisFest- schriftintoapolishedvolume.JDG’swife,JoanMarklund,endured thefamiliarlonelinessofbeingan‘editorialwidow’duringthelatter 1976: stages of this project. Smirina,E.,&Roček,Z.(1976).Onthepossibilityofusingannualbone We offer this Special Issue of Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeo- layersofAlpinenewts,Triturusalpestris(Amphibia:Urodela),for environmentsasatributetoourcolleague,mentorandfriend,Emeritus their age determination. Věstník Československé společnosti ProfessorZbyněkRoček. zoologické,40,232–237. PalaeobioPalaeoenv(2016)96:1–12 9 1977: 1984: Roček, Z. (1977a). Obojživelníci a plazi. In Z. Roček (Ed.), Příroda Roček,Z.(1984a).Lizards(Reptilia:Sauria)fromtheLowerMiocene Orlických hor a Podorlicka (pp. 607–614). Praha: Státní locality Dolnice (Bohemia, Czechoslovakia). Rozpravy zemědělskénakladatelství.[Amphibiansandreptiles.In:Natureof Československé akademievěd. Řada matematických a přírodních theOrlickéMountainsandtheirfoothills] vědA,94,1–69. Roček,Z.(1977b).OntheformTriturusalpestrislacusnigri(Seliškarand Roček,Z.(1984b).MacropelobatesosborniNoble,1924—redescription Pehani,1935).BritishJournalofHerpetology,5,679–683. andreassignment.ActaUniversitatisCarolinae—Geologica,1982, Roček, Z. (Ed.) (1977c). Příroda Orlických hor a Podorlicka. Praha: 421–438. Státnízemědělskénakladatelství.[NatureoftheOrlickéMountains Špinar,Z.V.,&Roček,Z.(1984).Thediscoveryoftheimpressionofthe andtheirfoothills] ventral side of Eopelobates anthracinus Parker, 1929 holotype. Sklenář, J., & Roček, Z. (1977). Savci. In Z. Roček (Ed.), Příroda Amphibia-Reptilia,5,87–95. Orlických hor a Podorlicka (pp. 635–647). Praha: Státní zemědělské nakladatelství. [Mammals. In: Nature of the Orlické 1985: Mountainsandtheirfoothills] Młynarski, M.,& Roček, Z. (1985). Chelonians(Reptilia:Testudines) from the Lower Miocene locality Dolnice (Bohemia, 1978: Czechoslovakia).Časopispromineralogiiageologii,30,397–407. Špinar,Z.V.,&Roček,Z.(1978).NewfindingsofTertiaryfaunainJabal Roček,Z.(1985a).Evoluceobratlovců.Praha:Academia.[Evolutionof Hasáwnah(centralLibya).Second SymposiumontheGeology of vertebrates] Libya,1978,59–60. Roček, Z. (1985b). Tooth replacement in Eusthenopteron and Ichthyostega. In H.-R. Duncker & G. Fleischer (Eds.), 1979: Functional morphology in vertebrates. Fortschritte der Roček,Z.(1979)ZazkamenělýmižábaminaSaharu.LidéaZemě,28, Zoologie, 30, 249–252. 356–360.[OnthesearchforfossilfrogsintheSaharaDesert] Sklenář, J., & Roček, Z. (1979). Zoogeografie obojživelníků a plazů 1986: východních Čech. Hradec Králové: Krajskémuzeum východních Rage,J.-C.,&Roček,Z.(1986).Triadobatrachusrevisited.InZ.Roček Čech. [Zoogeography of amphibians and reptiles of eastern (Ed.), Studies in herpetology. Proceedings of the European Bohemia] HerpetologicalMeetings,Prague1985(pp.255–258).Karolinum: Praha. 1980: Roček, Z. (1986a). An ‘intracranial joint’ in frogs. In Z. Roček (Ed.), Moody,S.,&Roček,Z.(1980).Chamaeleocaroliquarti(Chamaeleonidae, Studiesinherpetology.ProceedingsoftheEuropeanHerpetological Meetings,Prague1985(pp.49–54).Karolinum:Praha. Sauria):anewspeciesfromtheLowerMioceneofcentralEurope. VěstníkÚstředníhoústavugeologického,55,85–92. Roček,Z.(editor)(1986b).Studies in herpetology. Proceedings ofthe Roček,Z.(1980a).Intraspecificandontogeneticvariationofthedentition European Herpetological Meetings, Prague 1985. Praha: in the Green Lizard Lacerta viridis (Reptilia, Squamata). Věstník Karolinum. Československéspolečnostizoologické,44,272–277. Roček, Z. (1980b). The dentition of the European Glass Lizard 1987: Ophisaurus apodus (Pallas, 1775) (Reptilia, Sauria: Angui- Buchar,J.,Drobník,J.,Hadač,E.,Janko,J.,Květ,J.,Lellák,J.,&Roček, dae), with notes on the pattern of tooth replacement. Z.(1987).Život.Praha:Mladáfronta.[Storyoflife] Amphibia-Reptilia,1,19–27. Roček, Z. (1987). Some features of the skull ontogeny in frogs Roček,Z.(1980c).AcontributiontothesystematicsofEuropeanranidfrogs (Amphibia,Anura)andtheirimportanceforrecognizingtheevolu- (Amphibia,Ranidae)onthebasisoftheincrassatiofrontoparietalis. tion of this group. In V. Pokorný (Ed.), Contribution of VěstníkČeskoslovenskéspolečnostizoologické,44,219–229. Czechoslovak palaeontology to evolutionary science 1945–1985 (pp.89–96).Praha:Karolinum. 1981: Roček, Z. (1981). Cranial anatomy offrogs of the family Pelobatidae 1988: Stannius,1856,withoutlinesoftheirphylogenyandsystematics. ActaUniversitatisCarolinae—Biologica,1980(1–2),1–164. Fejfar,O.,&Roček,Z.(1988).TheLowerMiocenevertebratefaunaof Dolnice, Cheb basin (Western Bohemia, Czechoslovakia). Acta UniversitatisCarolinae—Geologica,1986,233–249. 1982: Roček,Z.(1988a).Originandevolutionofthefrontoparietalcomplexin Böhme,W.,Roček,Z.,&Špinar,Z.V.(1982).OnPelobatesdecheni anurans.Amphibia-Reptilia,9,385–403. Troschel, 1861, and Zaphrissa eurypelis Cope, 1866 (Amphibia: Roček, Z. (1988b).List offossil amphibians of Czechoslovakia. Acta Salientia:Pelobatidae)fromtheearlyMioceneofRottnearBonn, ZoologicaCracoviensia,31,513–540. WestGermany.JournalofVertebratePaleontology,2,1–7. Jarošová,J.,&Roček,Z.(1982).Theincrassatiofrontoparietalisin 1989: frogs, its origin and phylogenetic significance. Amphibia- Reptilia,3,111–124. Rage, J.-C., & Roček, Z. (1989). Redescription of Triadobatrachus massinoti (Piveteau, 1936) an anuran amphibian from the early Triassic.PalaeontographicaAbteilungA,206,1–16. 1983: Roček, Z. (1989). Developmental patterns of the ethmoidal region Rage, J.-C., & Roček, Z. (1983). Dolniceophis lehmani (Serpentes, of the anuran skull. In H. Splechtna & H. Hilgers (Eds.), Colubridae), a new fossil snake from the Lower Miocene of Trends in vertebrate morphology. Fortschritte der Zoologie, Czechoslovakia.Časopispromineralogiiageologii,28,17–21. 35, 412–415. 10 PalaeobioPalaeoenv(2016)96:1–12 Roček,Z.,&Veselý,M.(1989).Developmentoftheethmoidalstructures Roček,Z.(1996b).ThesalamanderBrachycormusnoachicusfromthe oftheendocraniumintheanuranPipapipa.JournalofMorphology, OligoceneofEurope, andtherole ofneotenyintheevolutionof 200,301–319. salamanders.Palaeontology,39,477–495. Roček,Z.(1996c).Evoluceneotenií(zhistorienašichčolků).Vesmír,75, 72–75.[Evolutionbymeansofneoteny(fromhistoryofnewts)] 1990: Roček, Z. (1996d). Heterochrony: response of Amphibia to cooling Roček, Z. (1990). Ethmoidal endocranial structures in primitive tetra- events.Geolines,3,55–58. pods:Theirbearingonthesearchforanuranancestry.Zoological Sanchiz,B.,&Roček,Z.(1996).Anoverviewoftheanuranfossilrecord. JournaloftheLinneanSociety,99,389–407. InR.C.Tinsley&H.R.Kobel(Eds.),ThebiologyofXenopus.The symposium of the Zoological Society of London (pp. 317–328). 1991: London:ZoologicalSocietyofLondon. Roček,Z.(1991).EthmoidalendocraniuminprimitiveTriassicamphib- ians.PaläontologischeZeitschrift,65,351–361. 1997: Roček,Z.(1997a).Neotenyandpaedomorphosisasevolutionaryfactors 1992: inTertiaryAmphibia.JournalofMorphology,232,315. Roček, Z. (1992a). Triturus alpestris. In V. Baruš & O. Oliva (Eds.), Roček, Z. (1997b). Origin of species: An example, the European Fauna Československa—Amphibia (pp. 127–132). Praha: salamandrid Triturus. InZ. Roček& S.Hart (Eds.), Herpetology Academia. ’97.AbstractsoftheThirdWorldCongressofHerpetology,Prague Roček, Z. (1992b). Pelobates fuscus. In V. Baruš & O. Oliva (Eds.), 1997(p.175).Praha:WorldCongressofHerpetology,1997. Fauna Československa—Amphibia (pp. 152–157). Praha: Roček,Z.(1997c).ThesalamandridamphibianChelotriton(Amphibia: Academia. Salamandridae)andrelatedformsfromtheTertiaryofEurope.InZ. Roček & S. Hart(Eds.), Herpetology ’97. Abstracts ofthe Third World Congress of Herpetology, Prague 1997 (p. 175). Praha: 1993: WorldCongressofHerpetology,1997. Roček,Z.(1993a).PalatoquadrateinaDevonianfishEusthenopteron. Roček,Z.(1997d).FossilamphibiansandreptilesoftheCzechRepublic. Evidence of its dual fish origin. Zeitschrift für zoologische InP.Nečas,D.Modrý&V.Zavadil(Eds.)Czechrecentandfossil SystematikundEvolutionsforschung,31,38–46. amphibians and reptiles. An atlas and field guide (pp. 15–19). Roček,Z.(1993b).Originandevolutionoftheanuranpostnasalwalland Frankfurta.M.:EditionChimaira. adjacentpartsofthepalatoquadrate.EthologyEcology&Evolution, Roček,Z.,&Hart,S.(Eds.)(1997).Herpetology’97.Abstractsofthe 5,247–265. ThirdWorldCongressofHerpetology,Prague1997.Praha:World Roček, Z., & Nessov, L. A. (1993). Cretaceous anurans from Central CongressofHerpetology,1997. Asia.PalaeontographicaAbteilungA,226,1–54. 1998: 1994: Roček,Z.(1998a).DerMesselerSalamander.InW.vonKoenigswald& Roček,Z.(1994a).HoloceneanuransfromCaucasus.AsiaticHerpeto- G.Storch(Eds.),Messel,EinPompejiderPaläontologie(pp.58– logicalResearch,5,31–44. 59).Sigmaringen:JanThorbeckeVerlag. Roček,Z.(1994b).TaxonomyanddistributionofTertiarydiscoglossids Roček,Z.(1998b).StammesgeschichteundEvolution.InR.Hofrichter (Anura)ofthegenusLatoniav.Meyer,1843.Geobios,27,717– (Ed.),Amphibien.Evolution,Anatomie,Physiologie,Ökologieund 751. Verbreitung,Verhalten,BedrohungundSchutz(pp.20–31).Natur Roček,Z.(1994c).ReviewoffossilCaudataofEurope.Abhandlungen BuchVerlag:Augsburg. und Berichte des Museums für Naturkunde und Vorgeschichte, Roček, Z. (1998). Developmental story of the anuran skull: Magdeburg,17,51–56. does it provide any phylogenetic information? In C. Roček,Z.(1994d).Wolterstorff’scontributiontostudyoffossilanurans. Miaud & R. Guyetant (Eds.), Current studies in herpe- Abhandlungen und Berichte des Museums für Naturkunde und tology (pp. 35–50). Le Bourget du Lac: Societas Euro- Vorgeschichte,Magdeburg,17,39–43. paea Herpetologica. Roček, Z., & Rage, J.-C. (1994). The presumed amphibian footprint NotopuspetrifromtheDevonian:aprobablestarfishtracefossil. 1999: Lethaia,27,241–244. Roček,Z.(1999).UnesalamandredeMessel.InW.vonKoenigswald& G.Storch (Eds.), Messel. LaMémoire de la Nature (pp. 58–59). 1995: Paris:Seuil. Roček,Z.(1995).AnewspecimenofEopelobates(Anura:Pelobatidae) from the Tertiary near Bonn (Germany) and the problem of E. 2000: anthracinus–E. bayeri relations. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 69, 283–287. Roček, Z. (2000a). Mesozoic Anurans. In H. Heatwole & R. Roček,Z.,&Lamaud,P.(1995).FurtherdataonThaumastosaurusbottii L. Carroll (Eds.), Amphibian biology, vol. 4, palaeon- tology (pp. 1297–1333). Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty DeStefano,1903,ananuran(Leptodactylidae)fromtheEoceneof Europe.JournalofVertebratePaleontology,15,506–515. & Sons. Roček, Z. (2000b). Phylogeny and evolution. In R. Hofrichter (Ed.), Amphibians(pp.20–31).FireflyBooks(U.S.)Inc.andKanPorter 1996: Books,Canada. Roček, Z. (1996a). Skull of the neotenous salamandrid amphibian Roček,Z.,&Rage,J.-C.(2000a).Anatomicaltransformationsinthe Triturus alpestris and abbreviated developments in the Tertiary transition from temnospondyl to proanuran stages. In H. Salamandridae.JournalofMorphology,230,187–197. Heatwole & R. L. Carroll (Eds.), Amphibian biology, vol. 4,
Description: