Intimacy and Separateness in Psychoanalysis Clinical psychoanalysis serves as our best laboratory for exploring the riddle of what it is to be a person, and how a person is at once singularly unique while always a piece of the interpersonal fabric of humanity. In Intimacy and Separateness in Psychoanalysis, Warren Poland casts a freshly erudite eye on this paradox, resist- ing individual or intersubjective bias and avoiding the parochial allegiances common in our age of pluralism. Poland combines vivid reports from clinical analyses, literary readings, and his own life – all unfolding original observations on a person as both a part of and apart from human commonality. His consideration of how one person’s witness- ing facilitates another’s self-definition, a concept extended here in his study of outsiderness as part of human nature, has been marked a keynote contribution. Clinical illustrations of moments that matter but are usually omitted from public presentation are set alongside examples of reading powerful fiction to show how analyst and author both incite fresh openness in a person’s mind. Poland goes far- ther, exposing the personal power of union and separateness in its keenest form, facing the ultimate separation of one’s own actual death. Only with separateness can true intimacy grow, and only within the fabric of others can true individuality exist. This evocative book, ranging from the light- ness of whimsy to the dread of dying, allows every reader to taste and to learn from Poland’s thinking. Psychoanalyst or patient, writer or reader, each one living one’s own life – all can find new understandings in this work. Warren S. Poland, M.D., has practiced clinical psychoanalysis for over half a century. His observations and reflections, including in his early book Melting the Darkness: The Dyad and Principles of Clinical Technique, were honored by his receipt of the Sigourney Award in 2009. In personal essays, in considerations of literary works, and centrally in his clinical psychoanalytic studies, he explores the paradoxical simultaneity of intersubjectivity and individuality. He is also the former editor of the JAPA Review of Books. “This is no ordinary psychoanalytic book. It has no peer in the way it struggles to come to terms with the paradox of the essential otherness of people to one another despite all we hold in common. This book is also like no other psychoanalytic book in the way it draws on language as the custodian of our accrued experience as a civilization. What a pleasure it is when once in a great while we come across a book such as this one where we find ourselves pausing after reading a sentence, reading it several times before going on, or simply taking time to sit with its rever- berations and echoes.” – Thomas H. Ogden, author most recently of Reclaiming Unlived Life: Experiences in Psychoanalysis “I was moved to tears a number of times by this book, as Warren Poland cut through the psychoanalytic jargon and took the reader to the heart of what it is to be human – messy, vulnerable, mortal and incapable of living up to what we would like to be. Yet a form of hope emerges from his writing that I find downright inspiring. I will return to this book again and again.” – Glen O. Gabbard, M.D., author of Love and Hate in the Analytic Setting “Wisdom is a quality rarely encountered in life or literature, still more rarely in writings on psychoanalysis. Warren Poland has given us that rarest of gifts; a book rich in the wisdom that only a clinician of long experience, striking originality, and unique sensitivity to the paradoxes of our human condition could produce. This is a truly wonderful book, the culmination of Warren Poland’s invaluable contributions to psychoanalysis.” – Ted Jacobs, Clinical Professor, Emeritus, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Training and Supervising Analyst, The New York and IPE Psychoanalytic Institutes “Warren Poland writes of analysis as contact between separate people, a contact that leads to change in both. In his writing he achieves a similar contact. He describes the psychoanalytic experience with such clarity and emotional depth that his words touch the reader as words in an analysis touch the other. This book is for all analysts, to be returned to again and again, both for the knowledge it contains and for the pleasure provided by his beautiful and accurate description of what actually takes place during psychoanalysis.” – Judith Fingert Chused, M.D., Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Clinical Professor of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine, Emeritus Training and Supervising Analyst, Washington Center for Psychoanalysis Intimacy and Separateness in Psychoanalysis Warren S. Poland Edited and introduced by William F. Cornell With a preface by Nancy Chodorow First published 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business 2018 Warren S. Poland The right of Warren S. Poland to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested ISBN: 978-1-138-09775-9 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-138-09776-6 (pbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-10472-0 (ebk) Typeset in Times New Roman by Swales & Willis Ltd, Exeter, Devon, UK Psychoanalysis is ... ... a celebration of the emergence of the self, a unique, unprec- edented event in the history of the universe, an awareness of the continuity of experience in a unique entity, one that never existed before and will never exist again. This miracle is confirmed by the others, the witnesses to one’s uniqueness, just as the self gives meaning to the uniqueness and individuality of others ... This is the dramatic element in psychoanalysis, a continuous, mutual reaffirmation of two independent but related selves, something that makes the long hours and the tremendous cost of psychoanalysis a very special and worthwhile experience. Psy- choanalysis defines and celebrates both the changing uniqueness and the continuity of the self over time and experience. The self thus stands as a commentary on the essential nature of time, and vice versa. We are witnesses of and witnessed by the others and by the universe. They will always be there, no matter how brief a sojourn we have in time and life. It reminded me of the lines of Lamartine’s “Le Lac”: L’homme n’a point de port, le temps n’a point de rive ; Il coule, et nous passons ! Jacob Arlow Personal correspondence Contents Preface: Warren Poland – humanist, ethicist, friend ix NANCY CHODOROW Acknowledgments xv Editor’s introduction: a freedom of mind – Warren Poland in word and deed xviii WILLIAM F. CORNELL PART I Opening conclusions 1 1 Regarding the other 3 2 Rather my own shortcomings 9 PART II The psychoanalytic situation 13 3 The analyst’s witnessing and otherness 15 4 Outsiderness in human nature 30 5 The interpretive attitude 46 6 The analyst’s approach and the patient’s psychic growth 60 7 The analyst’s fears 73 viii Contents PART III Challenges within the psychoanalytic process 85 8 Problems in pluralism: narcissism and curiosity 87 9 On immediacy: “vivid contrast between past and present” 100 10 The limits of empathy 102 11 Beyond bedrock: the trap of abandoning psychology 108 12 Oedipal complexes, oedipal schema 113 PART IV Beyond the clinical setting 117 13 Reading fiction and the psychoanalytic experience: Proust on reading and on reading Proust 119 14 Psychoanalysis and culture 134 15 The mind beyond conflict: whimsy 137 16 Pathologizing mental processes: whimsy 142 17 Polymorphously normal sexuality 146 PART V Endings in poetry, psychoanalysis, and life 151 18 What play did Shakespeare write when he wrote Twelfth Night? 153 19 Ephemera: unfinished thoughts on endings and death 156 20 Slouching towards mortality: thoughts on time and death 163 Index 170 Preface Warren Poland: humanist, ethicist, friend Nancy Chodorow As analysts, we meet our patients in the consulting room, but we often meet our colleagues and forebears, beginning with Freud, through their writings. I first met Warren Poland, I do not remember when, through his writings – highly theoreti- cal, deeply clinical, straightforwardly personal, pervasively ethical, and flat out gorgeous – writings that I return to again and again. He is one of psychoanalysis’s great writers. As we read him, we are bathed in the language of the patient, in his empathy for his patients, and in what he says to them and feels about and for them, so eloquently and to the point. We are bathed in his always-pertinent self- reflection and self-observation but never inundated by the analyst’s subjectivity. And we find references to Shakespeare, Proust, Vuillard, the Nabis, Yiddish tales, Japanese Noh mask carving. Analyst and author, author and analyst, seem to go seamlessly together, both underpinned by an ethical humanity. Warren Poland is among our most elegant, sophisticated, and as right as you can be contemporary writers about the simple and straightforward, yet complex and amazing, work that is psychoanalysis. He gives us clear concepts and rich case descriptions that seem to provide in themselves guidance to how we want to work. His clinical sensitivity, the cases he describes, Warren’s own feelings as he works – these all come alive as he creates narratives about the deepest feelings, meanings, and histories of his patients, about their work together, about change and the internal and external impediments to change. “Vignette” does not do jus- tice to Warren’s case writing, and “theory” does not do justice to his seamless, grounded accounts of the clinical consulting room and the goals of analytic work. We wonder, as we also wonder about our other great writers, beginning with Freud – and for each of us, a select additional few – are they separable, being an analyst and being a writer? For Warren, they seem to be inextricably intertwined. In Melting the Darkness, Warren writes, It is misleading to speak glibly of one-person psychology versus two- person psychology. No single person exists outside a human, object-con- nected field; the analytic space colors how such a single person comes to understanding by the other and to insight. At the same time, the mind of any individual can be engaged by another yet is always crucially apart, a private universe of inner experience.