IMPROVINGTHEACCURACYANDPRECISIONOF LASERABLATIONINDUCTIVELYCOUPLEDPLASMAMASSSPECTROMETRY ANALYSISOFHETEROGENEOUSMATERIALS By JANINAR.GUTIERREZ ADISSERTATIONPRESENTEDTOTHEGRADUATESCHOOL OFTHEUNIVERSITYOFFLORIDAINPARTIALFULFILLMENT OFTHEREQUIREMENTSFORTHEDEGREEOF DOCTOROFPHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITYOFFLORIDA 2003 Thisdocumentisdedicatedtomyparents,GirmeandCarmencita;andtoRod. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IthascertainlybeenaprivilegetoworkundertheguidanceofDr.JamesD. Winefordner. Ithankhimnotonlyforsharinghiswisdomandknowledgeinscience withme,andmoreforbeingakindandunderstandingadviser. IespeciallythankDr. BenjaminSmithforgivingmeguidanceanddirectioninmyresearchandmorefor alwaysbeingreadytolisten. IthankDr.NicoloOmenettoforhisencouragementand supportinallmyscientificendeavorsbutmore forhiscontagiouspositiveoutlookin life. Heneverfailedtoletmeseethepositivesideineverything. IthankDr.WilliamW.Harrisonfortheencouragementandmanyhelpful discussionsingroupmeetings.IalsothankDr.IgorGorunshkinforthemanyhelpful discussionsonresearchandlife. IthankDr.PaulMuellerforthemanyin-depth discussionsaboutthefieldofLaserAblationICPMS. Ithankmycommitteemembers, Dr.DavePowellandDr.JohnEylerfortheirsupport. IalsothankDr.DavidHahnfor thecountlesshelpfuldiscussionsonlightscattering,andfortheuseoftheparticle measuringsystems. IthanktheERC,especiallyDr.KevinPowersandGilBrubaker,for generouslylettingmeusetheAerosizer. IthankthePacificNorthwestNational Laboratory,particularlyDr.MichaelAlexander,forfundingtheresearchandforloaning metheArgon-ionlaserandthewastesimulantsamples. IthanktheentireWinefordnergroupfortheirsupport.IthankespeciallyXihong Wufortakingthetimetohelpmewithotherpeople’ssamplessothatIcouldconcentrate onmywork. iii IespeciallythankJamshidTemirovforalwaysbeingreadytohelpwithanythingin thelaboratory;withlasers,plumbing,lifting,andevenwithcoffee.He,alongwithFiruza andDiyora,hasbeen,morethananything,myfamilyinGainesville;andnowordscan fullyexpressmyloveandgratitudeforthem. Ideeplyexpressmygratitudetomy friends,IsaBenitez,IvanaBoridarivic,andTamaraBlagojevic,whohavestoodwithme fromthefirstdayofgraduateschooltothelast. Iwouldnothavesurvivedlifein graduateschoolwithoutthem. IwouldalsoliketothankRovelynTapec,CelesteRegino, CamillaYandocandGinoAbiesforwelcomingmeintoGainesville. Theyhelpedmake Gainesvilleasecondhomeforme. Ithankmyfamilyfortheirsupportandencouragement;especiallymyparents GirmeandCarmencita. Ifeeltrulyblessedtobelovedbysomanypeople.Lastly,I wouldliketothankmyfiance,Rod,whohasalwaysstoodbymenomatterwhat.Ithank himforhislove,support,andespeciallyhispatience.Hehasgivenmesomethingtolook forwardtoeveryday. Iconsidermyselfaveryblessedperson. iv TABLEOFCONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii ABSTRACT viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 BACKGROUND 5 FundamentalsofLasers 5 PropertiesofLaserRadiation 5 PrinciplesofLaser 6 TemporalModes 9 Nd:YAGLasers 10 PrinciplesofLaserAblation 10 LaserAblationProcess 10 Laser-solidInteraction 12 InductivelyCoupledPlasmaMassSpectrometry 13 InductivelyCoupledPlasmas 14 TheIonizationProcess 18 InterfacingICPandMassSpectrometer 20 QuadrupoleMassSpectrometer 25 MassDetectors 27 SampleIntroduction 30 LaserAblationInductivelyCoupledPlasmaMassSpectrometry 30 AnalyticalEfficiency 34 AblationEfficiency 34 TransportEfficiency 34 IonizationEfficiency 35 QuantitationStrategies 35 NuclearWasteSamples 36 3 SOURCESOFNOISEINTHELA-ICPMS 41 Background 41 ExperimentalMethods 42 Results 44 Conclusion 50 v 1111 4 PARTICLESIZEDISTRIBUTIONSTUDIESOFLASERABLATEDMATERIAL5 Background 51 ExperimentalMethods 53 Results 55 EffectofLaserWavelength 55 EffectofLaserIrradiance 62 EffectofSampleMatrixProperties 65 Conclusion 70 5 USINGANINERTIALIMPACTORTOIMPROVEPARTICLESIZE DISTRIBUTIONOFLASER-ABLATEDMATERIAL 71 Background 71 ExperimentalMethods 77 Results 79 EffectivenessoftheInertialImpactorasaParticleFilter 79 EffectonSignalIntensityandPrecision 83 EffectonFractionation 88 Conclusion 88 6 NORMALIZATIONOFLA-ICPMSSIGNALTOLIGHTSCATTERED BYLASER-ABLATEDMATERIAL 91 Background 91 PrinciplesofParticleScatter 92 TheoreticalConsiderationstoNormalizationofICPMSSignalwithLight Scatter 94 ExperimentalMethods 104 Results 11 FundamentalStudies 11 Lightscatterasafunctionofparticlediameter 11 Lightscatterasafunctionofparticlenumberdensity 118 ScatterofAblatedMaterial 121 Normalization 124 Conclusion 132 7 NORMALIZATIONWITHSPECTRALEMISSIONINTENSITY FROMTHELASERINDUCEDPLASMA 134 Background 134 ExperimentalMethods 135 Results 136 Conclusion 147 8 LA-ICPMSANALYSISOFWASTESIMULANTS 148 ExperimentalMethods 148 Results 149 Dryvs.WetAblation 149 vi LA-ICPMSAnalysisofWasteSimulant 153 StudiesPerformedwiththePNNLSystem 164 Effectofvaryinglaserirradiance 164 Rastervs.noraster 171 Impactorstudies 171 Scanningelectronimages 175 Conclusion 181 9 CONCLUSIONANDFUTUREWORK 182 Conclusion 182 FutureWork 184 LISTOFREFERENCES 186 BIOGRAPHICALSKETCH 189 vii AbstractofDissertationPresentedtotheGraduateSchooloftheUniversityofFloridain PartialFulfillmentoftheRequirementsfortheDegreeof DoctorofPhilosophy IMPROVINGTHEACCURACYANDPRECISIONOFLASERABLATION INDUCTIVELYCOUPLEDPLASMAMASSSPECTROMETRYANALYSISOF HETEROGENEOUSSAMPLES By JaninaR.Gutierrez August2003 Chair:JamesD.Winefordner MajorDepartment:Chemistry Laserablationinductivelycoupledplasmamassspectrometry(LA-ICPMS)has developedintoanimportantandindispensabletoolforsolidsamplinganalysis.Theuse ofLA-ICPMSallowsrapidinsituanalysisrequiringminimalsamplepreparationwhile usingaminimal amount(micrograms)ofsample. Lowdetectionlimitsofpartsper billionarealsoeasilyachievedformostelementsusingtheLA-ICPMS. However,the useofLA-ICPMShasyettobefullydevelopedasarapidandroutinemethodofanalysis forheterogeneousmaterials. Matrix-matchedstandards arerequiredforquantitative analyses. Variations in the laser ablation process, and elemental and isotopic fractionationsmayoccurduringanalysisaffectingbothprecisionandaccuracy. ThegoalofthisresearchistoimprovetheprecisionandaccuracyofLA-ICPMS analysisofheterogeneousmaterials. viii Initialstagesofthestudyinvolvedfundamentalstudiestodeterminethecausesof poorprecisionandaccuracyinLA-ICPMS. Resultsshowedthatthelimitingsourceof noiseinLA-ICPMSisflickerorexcesslowfrequencynoiseoriginatingfromvariations inthesampleaerosolastheyarecreated,transportedandintroducedintotheICP.Particle sizedistributionstudiesoflaser-ablatedmaterialwerethenperformedtodeterminethe ablation parameters that produced sample aerosol with the optimum particle size distributionyieldingthebestICPsignalintermsofsignalintensityandstability. Aninertialimpactorwasusedtoimprovetheparticlesizedistributionofthe ablatedmaterialpriortoitsintroductionintotheICPMS.Resultsshowedthatremoving thelargerparticlesfromablatedmaterialimprovedICPMSsignalprecision. ICP-induced elemental and isotopic fractionation effects were also reduced by removing larger particlesfromtheablatedmaterial. Lightscatteredbyablatedmaterialwasalsocollected andusedfornormalizationoftheICPMSsignal. Resultsshowthatnormalizationtolight scatteredbytheablatedmaterialcompensatedforvariationsinthemassablated,orthe numberofparticlesablatedduringananalysis. Theuseofthespectralemissionintensity ofananalytecollectedfromthelaser-inducedplasmatonormalizeitscorrespondingLA- ICPMSsignalwasalsoinvestigated. Finally,theproposedapproachestoimprovingtheprecisionandaccuracyofLA- ICPMSwereappliedtoheterogeneousnuclearwastesimulants. IX CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION LaserAblationInductivelyCoupledPlasmaMassSpectrometry(LA-ICPMS)has developedintoanimportantanalyticaltoolinavarietyofapplicationsinvolvingawide rangeofsolidmaterialssuchasglasses,ceramics,soils,andplastics’. TheuseofLA- ICPMSallowssolidsamplingofdiversematerialsrangingfromconductingtonon- conducting,andfromorganictoinorganicmaterials.Solidsintheformofsheets, powders,pastesandevensludgescaneasilybesampled. TheuseofLA-ICPMSallows rapidinsituanalysisrequiringminimalsamplepreparationwhileusingaminimal amount(micrograms)ofsample. Lowdetectionlimitsofpartsperbillionarealsoeasily achievedformostelementsusingtheLA-ICPMS. However,theuseofLA-ICPMShas yettobefullydevelopedasarapidandroutinemethodofanalysis.Matrix-matched standardsarerequiredforquantitativeanalyses. Variationsinthelaserablationprocess andelementalandisotopicfractionationsmayoccurduringanalysisaffectingboth precisionandaccuracy.TheuseofLA-ICPMSlacksbothprecisionandaccuracy. Current%RSDsrangefrom5to20%dependingonthesamplebeinganalyzed.13 Theseproblemsareescalatedintheanalysisofheterogeneoussamples. Heterogeneityisdefinedinthisresearchastheexistenceofnon-uniformityofaphysical orchemicalpropertyinthesample. Theheterogeneoussampleswerefertopossessnon- uniformityinsamplesurfacemorphologyandconsistency;andnon-uniformityinsample composition,specificallynuclearwastes. Nuclearwastesconsideredinthisstudyarein theformofsludge,andpaste,seeminglyhighlyviscousliquidswithsolidgranules 1