ebook img

Implications of Open Access Repositories Quality Criteria and Features for Teachers’ TPACK Development PDF

71 Pages·2017·1.125 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Implications of Open Access Repositories Quality Criteria and Features for Teachers’ TPACK Development

SPRINGER BRIEFS IN EDUCATION Rita Tavares António Moreira Implications of Open Access Repositories Quality Criteria and Features for Teachers’ TPACK Development 123 SpringerBriefs in Education More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/8914 Rita Tavares • António Moreira Implications of Open Access Repositories Quality Criteria and Features for Teachers’ TPACK Development Rita Tavares António Moreira University of Aveiro University of Aveiro Aveiro, Baixo Vouga, Portugal Aveiro, Baixo Vouga, Portugal ISSN 2211-1921 ISSN 2211-193X (electronic) SpringerBriefs in Education ISBN 978-3-319-57915-3 ISBN 978-3-319-57916-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57916-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017940636 © The Author(s) 2017 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Printed on acid-free paper This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Foreword Being asked to write a foreword to a publication is almost always considered a double-edged task. In one of those edges you should have the impartiality of the review, the objectivity of the text and its overall scientific or literature contribution to a given field. On the other edge, you have the authors, your personal connection (and admiration for, in this particular instance) with them and with their work. Weighing in these often-conflicting forces is often a heavy load. However, in this case, this foreword came easy and pleasant. Putting it simply, what you will find in this brief is a thorough review of European science education main open access repositories, its features and contributions and, finally, an interesting connection to an important question: how can these environ- ments contribute to improve teachers’ knowledge in the pedagogical, scientific and technological combinations of their practices. More into it you will also find very interesting insights regarding e-Research, a qualitative research methodology for dealing with Internet-driven data and instruments. And this is definitely the kind of work that is interesting both to academics and practitioners, teachers and research- ers, students and parents. When talking about the integration of technology in everyday practices one seems to forget that, in educational contexts, this largely depends on the utility that the teachers can envision in doing it. Overall, teachers are not lazy professionals, nor are stuck in ancient methods and strategies because it is easier. Teachers are pragmatic. Teachers change their practices when they believe they are doing it for better preparing their students. They do not do it just because it is fancy or because they mind what others are going to think of them if they do not join the bandwagon. One of the strategies to show them that these open resources are valuable is to invite them to look at them, to discuss them with their peers, to give teachers the opportunity to appropriate them, to change them taking into account their contexts, their students and their communities. And that is what this brief is all about: appro- priation, collaboration, sharing. In one word, it is about networks. In the hype of social media, many times one forgets that social networks existed before technology. Being, in the beginning, a sociological concept, nowadays it is v vi Foreword almost impossible to mention it without mentioning technology. But these (profes- sional) social networks existed back in the day when teachers met to jointly plan their classes, their resources, their strategies and to openly share their ideas and their pedagogical uptakes on the scientific contents. This is not the place to discuss how our lives evolved to a point where, profes- sionally, we seldom can find the time or place to do it face-to-face and we now prefer (or should we say, have) to technologically mediate these contacts and these collaborations. However, with this brief, we will understand some of the ways teachers are coping with open technology and resources and also adapting their professional practices to this era. Mostly, you will find that they are still open to the innovation that matters to our schools though there is still much to do and a long way to go. To talk about the authors of this brief is the other part of this task. And, by the way, also simple to do. Both António and Rita are brilliant scholars, although they have different ages, experiences and professional paths. António has dedicated much of his life to teaching and research in the Educational Technology field. He is a revered and celebrated teacher in the Department of Education and Psychology of the University of Aveiro and a brilliant supervisor and researcher. Moreover, he is a dear friend, to whom I will always find the time to meet, discuss new and old ideas or merely talk about soccer matches, our beloved Sporting or the weather. Rita is a committed and talented Ph.D. student in the Multimedia in Education Doctoral Programme where she is completing a thesis about a model of development of digi- tal educational resources using educational data mining. She is a dedicated and intelligent student that makes the task of co-supervising her a simple one. Rita has also the experience of working in companies as an Educational Coordinator, and that is a major advantage she brings to the table when discussing the practicalities of much of the issues that are discussed in this brief. Most of all, they are brilliant people to get along with and to discuss what they have to share resulting from their studies, hard work and diverse experiences. This is why this is a must-read book and this is why I am so privileged to write this foreword. Aveiro, Portugal Luís Pedro June 2016 Preface This book was motivated by the will of the authors to understand how open access repositories are being developed and maintained and to provide, disseminate and promote the development of digital educational resources. It is also our will to understand how these technological environments can enhance the development of teachers’ new skills and new pedagogical and didactic approaches. Thus, the main objective of this brief is to analyse open access repositories quality criteria and fea- tures, and how these can improve teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) development. This book is organized in six major sections. Section one, Open Access Repositories and Digital Educational Resources, addresses an historical overview of open access repositories, presenting some recommendations for their develop- ment and maintenance, namely regarding digital educational resources (re) use. Given that this brief is research driven, in section two the authors present the objec- tives and the methodology used in the present study. Sections three, four and five analyse namely (1) the prevalence of European Science Education open access repositories and teachers’ perceptions of those same repositories, (2) the most com- mon European Science Education open access repositories features and their impli- cations, and (3) the impact of open access repositories usage on teachers’ TPACK development. The last section, Results and discussion, focuses on the analyses of a selected open access repository [House of Sciences (originally Casa das Ciências)], addressing its characteristics and features, the impact of social media features in digital educational resources (re) use, and the relationship between repository qual- ity criteria and teachers’ TPACK development. For this study, the authors collected, crossed and analysed data from different sources, namely the relevant literature in the field, information available in open access repository and their social networks, and information provided by repository stakeholders, adopting mostly a qualitative e-Research methodology. This study allowed to stress that Science Education open access repositories development and availability represent an important tool to increase digital educa- tional resources (re) use and the adoption of new pedagogical and didactic approaches. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the selected open access vii viii Preface repository and attempting to underline availability, maintenance and updating, and enhancement requirements for the importance of digital educational resources usage, the authors present a set of proposals to be taken into consideration in (future) Science Education open access repositories, having in mind a set of keywords that underlie the whole text: Digital Educational Resources, Open Access Repositories, Science Education, Social Media, TPACK and e-Research. Aveiro, Portugal Rita Tavares June 2016 António Moreira Acknowledgements The brief Implications of Open Access Repositories Quality Criteria and Features for Teachers’ TPACK Development would not exist without the effort of many peo- ple, the reason why we would like to express our gratitude to those who, either institutionally or personally, helped shape this book. Firstly, the authors of this book sincerely thank Springer for having accepted to publish this brief. Furthermore, the existence of this book and the study conducted was only pos- sible thanks to the Foundation for Science and Technology. The authors wish to express their deep appreciation to this institution for the financial support to the study, under the form of two Research Fellowships: the first one within the Technology Enhanced Learning and Societal Challenges Doctoral Program (with reference PD/BI/113557/2015), and the second one within the Human Capital Operational Program, supported by the European Social Fund and national funds of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education (with reference SFRH/ BD/107808/2015). The study was also only possible thanks to the broad cooperation of open access repositories stakeholders, in particular House of Sciences (originally Casa das Ciências). The authors would like to express their many thanks to the staff of House of Sciences for their support throughout this study, especially to Guilherme Monteiro, House of Sciences Webmaster, for his invaluable availability and inputs for this research. Finally, we would also like to leave a warm word of thanks to Dr. Luís Pedro for the foreword he so thoughtfully prepared for the book. ix

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.