ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: ASSESSMENT OF FOODBORNE PATHOGEN SURVIVAL DURING PRODUCTION AND PRE-HARVEST APPLICATION OF COMPOST AND COMPOST TEA David T. Ingram, Ph.D. 2009 Directed By: Sam W. Joseph, Professor (Emeritus), CBMG and Director, Maryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health Jianghong Meng, Professor, NFSC, and Interim Director of the Joint Institute for Food Safety and Nutrition The use of compost in crop production systems as a soil amendment is recognized by both conventional and organic plant production practitioners as a means to increase yields and reduce the incidence of foliar diseases. Compost tea (CT), an aqueous extract of the biological components of compost, is also recognized as a means to broadcast the phytopathogen- reducing components of compost directly to the surfaces of plants where many foliar diseases become established. CT has been shown to control the proliferation of a variety of foliar diseases in many turf, crop and horticulture production systems when applied directly to the foliar surfaces of plants. This dissertation research was designed to address several pre-harvest food safety issues concerning compost and compost teas. Three objectives were pursued to establish whether the use of compost and compost teas as pre-harvest practices may introduce foodborne pathogens into the food supply and, therefore, contribute to the incidence of foodborne illness. The first objective involved a microbiological survey of commercially available compost in the U.S. to determine the prevalence of fecal coliforms, Escherichia coli, Salmonella and enterococci that might be reaching consumers through contaminated fruit and vegetables. The second objective was to investigate the ability of these foodborne pathogens to propagate during the production of CT. The third objective involved a field study examining the potential of CT to disseminate E. coli into organic and conventional strawberry production systems. The effects of CT on the fruit yield, phytopathogen suppression, as well as the potential for foodborne pathogen survival on the fruit surfaces were examined. This project provided important information and recommendations for the safe production and pre-harvest application of compost and compost teas. It was contended that, with proper attention to the manufacture and storage of compost and with simple modification of current trends in CT production systems, the current threshold of pre-harvest introduction of foodborne pathogens could be significantly reduced. ASSESSMENT OF FOODBORNE PATHOGEN SURVIVAL DURING PRODUCTION AND PRE-HARVEST APPLICATION OF COMPOST AND COMPOST TEA By David Thomas Ingram Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2009 Advisory Committee: Professor Sam W. Joseph, Co-Chair Professor Jianghong Meng, Co-Chair Professor Thomas W. Castonguay Dr. Mark A. Kantor Dr. Patricia D. Millner © Copyright by David T. Ingram 2009 DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated first and foremost to my family who, through the years have provided the strength, security and unconditional love every professional graduate student needs to nurture his dreams, cultivate his ideas, wrestle with his demons, and find his own path in life and career (with gentle prodding). I know that no one will be more pleased than my father when he places a copy of this dissertation on his bookshelf next to his own, also earned at the University of Maryland. Dad, you will never know how much I have relied on your always sound advice, guidance and much needed camaraderie to provide me with direction -- sometimes with a kick in the gluteus maximus. Your pursuit of excellence is second to none, and our entire family is all the stronger for your leadership. Mom, you have no idea how often I have tapped into your unbounded energy and amazing ability to remember the important things in life. Just thinking about you always puts a smile on my face. Kirsten, my sister, thank you for your patience and positive encouragement that has kept me focused over the years. You have no idea how much I have enjoyed watching you become a wonderful mother for my niece, Ella and nephew, Thomas. If not for my fabulous wife, Shannon Leigh Kondrad, I could not have accomplished this piece of work because of her selflessness and support. Words cannot describe my gratitude for her love. You are truly the woman of my dreams. Finally, the individual who probably most inspired me to complete this dissertation is my daughter who will arrive this spring. I eagerly await your arrival so ii that I can share with you all that I have learned about life, love and the pursuit of dreams. This dissertation is dedicated to you all. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS “It may be poop to you, but it’s my bread and butter” Sam W. Joseph, Ph.D. I would first like to acknowledge Sam W. Joseph, Ph.D., my long-time mentor, counselor, professor, and friend who recognized the potential microbiologist in me back in the days when E. coli O157:H7 and other foodborne pathogens were mostly implicated in red meat and poultry. I cherished our time together and mentally processed every bit of advice that you gave me over the many research projects, “coffee house” discussions, golf outings, manuscript drafting, the completion of my M.S. Thesis, and the ups and downs associated with completing, finally, this dissertation. I would not be where I am today in my career without your guidance on coping with the many pitfalls and entrapments associated with putting pen-to-paper. My father repeatedly said, “David, you owe Sam Joseph much more than you realize right now.” He was right. Your efforts to help me to earn the Ph.D. enable me to continue tinkering in the laboratory and exploring a science that I have learned to love. Thank you for your patience and all you have done for me. Dr. Jianghong Meng, your interest in me as one of your first lab-technicians in the NFSC Department and later your support as I embarked on this Ph.D. journey will never be forgotten. Thank you. I hope that this dissertation will mark the beginning of more opportunities to collaborate with you. Before I met Patricia Millner, Ph.D., I thought compost was simply a pile of poop, and that there was only one type of strawberry. Bless you for introducing me to the incredibly diverse and wonderful world of agriculture. Giving me the iv opportunity, freedom and financial support to pursue my experiments, (even some you surely knew would fail), strengthened my instincts and methods and enabled me to find my scientific legs. Engaging me in your diverse and fruitful research programs in the USDA-ARS family has helped me to understand the interactions of medical, food and environmental microbiology. Thank you for all your support, guidance and friendship that enabled a seed, planted in a cooperative research agreement with the University, to grow through the medium of a Student-Career Experience Program into a full-bloom government career. In my book, you are a renaissance leader. v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................... IX LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................... XI CHAPTER 1 : LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................................................... 1 Overview ................................................................................................................... 1 Compost : evolution from historical reference to state-of-the-art ............................ 5 Modern compost production methods .................................................................. 8 Physico-chemical factors affecting the composting process .................................. 13 Carbon:Nitron ratio ............................................................................................. 13 Moisture .............................................................................................................. 14 pH ........................................................................................................................ 15 Temperature ........................................................................................................ 15 Uses and benefits .................................................................................................... 16 Soil conditioner ................................................................................................... 17 Plant disease suppression .................................................................................... 19 Compost as an energy source .............................................................................. 21 Human pathogens in compost ................................................................................. 23 United States composting standards ................................................................... 23 Pathogen reduction in compost ........................................................................... 26 Pathogen indicators ............................................................................................. 28 Gaps in Part 503 Regulations .............................................................................. 28 Compost Tea ........................................................................................................... 31 Definitions and development .............................................................................. 31 Uses and benefits ................................................................................................ 34 Evolution of U.S. compost tea production methods ........................................... 44 Food safety concerns........................................................................................... 46 Human pathogens in compost tea ....................................................................... 49 Compost Tea Task Force recommendations ....................................................... 54 Scope of dissertation ............................................................................................... 56 CHAPTER 2 : FECAL BACTERIAL PATHOGENS AND INDICATORS IN COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE COMPOST ........................................................ 58 Abstract ................................................................................................................... 58 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 61 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................ 64 Compost sampling and processing ...................................................................... 64 Dry weight determination ................................................................................... 68 Microbiological analyses .................................................................................... 69 MIDI protocol ..................................................................................................... 79 Real-time PCR detection of virulence genes in E. coli isolates .......................... 83 vi Statistical analysis ............................................................................................... 84 Results ..................................................................................................................... 86 Composting facilities .......................................................................................... 86 Physical and chemical parameters of compost samples ..................................... 87 Coliform and Salmonella concentrations in compost samples ........................... 94 Heterotrophic, gram negative and enterococci populations in compost samples. ............................................................................................................................. 98 Monthly analysis for fecal coliform, E. coli and Salmonella content ............... 101 Analysis of compost samples based on biosolids content ................................ 106 Characterization of E. coli and Salmonella isolates .......................................... 107 Summary for fecal coliform, E. coli and Salmonella content ........................... 114 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 115 CHAPTER 3 : POTENTIAL MULTIPLIER FACTORS EFFECTING COMPOST TEA AS A SOURCE OF ESCHERICHIA COLI AND SALMONELLA .................. 128 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 128 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 129 Materials and Methods .......................................................................................... 133 Bacteria and culture conditions. ........................................................................ 133 Compost source and nutrient supplements. ...................................................... 134 Compost tea method (ACT, NCT) comparison ................................................ 135 Component bioassays........................................................................................ 138 Analysis of four compost tea brewing systems. ................................................ 138 Competition study ............................................................................................. 139 Microbiological characterization of compost teas. ........................................... 140 Physical and chemical characterization of compost ......................................... 141 Statistical analyses ............................................................................................ 141 Results ................................................................................................................... 142 ACT/NCT compost tea comparison study ........................................................ 142 Component bioassays........................................................................................ 144 Brewer comparison ........................................................................................... 144 Competition study ............................................................................................. 145 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 159 CHAPTER 4 : EFFECT OF COMPOST AND COMPOST TEA ON THE MICROBIOLOGICAL SAFETY AND HARVEST QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS ..................................................................................................................... 166 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 166 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 168 Materials and Methods .......................................................................................... 173 Strawberry plot design and statistical analysis ................................................. 173 Strawberry field preparation ............................................................................. 174 Preparation and application of compost tea (foliage treatments) ...................... 176 Microbiological and chemical analysis of compost tea .................................... 178 vii
Description: