ebook img

Health Policy Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Approach PDF

322 Pages·2018·10.617 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Health Policy Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Approach

An Interdisciplinary Approach THIRD EDITION Curtis P. McLaughlin, DBA Professor Emeritus Kenan-Flagler Business School and School of Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Craig D. McLaughlin, MJ Health Policy Speaker and Consultant Berkeley, California World Headquarters Jones & Bartlett Learning 5 Wall Street Burlington, MA 01803 978-443-5000 [email protected] www.jblearning.com Jones & Bartlett Learning books and products are available through most bookstores and online booksellers. To contact Jones & Bartlett Learning directly, call 800-832-0034, fax 978-443-8000, or visit our website, www.jblearning.com. Substantial discounts on bulk quantities of Jones & Bartlett Learning publications are available to corporations, professional associations, and other qualified organizations. For details and specific discount information, contact the special sales department at Jones & Bartlett Learning via the above contact information or send an email to [email protected]. Copyright © 2019 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright may be reproduced or utilized in any form, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner. The content, statements, views, and opinions herein are the sole expression of the respective authors and not that of Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement or recommendation by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC and such reference shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. All trademarks displayed are the trademarks of the parties noted herein. Health Policy Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Third Edition is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by the owners of the trademarks or service marks referenced in this product. There may be images in this book that feature models; these models do not necessarily endorse, represent, or participate in the activities represented in the images. Any screenshots in this product are for educational and instructive purposes only. Any individuals and scenarios featured in the case studies throughout this product may be real or fictitious, but are used for instructional purposes only. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the Subject Matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the service of a competent professional person should be sought. Production Credits VP, Product Management: David D. Cella Composition: codeMantra U.S. LLC Director of Product Management: Michael Brown Project Management: codeMantra U.S. LLC Product Specialist: Danielle Bessette Cover Design: Kristin E. Parker Production Manager: Carolyn Rogers Pershouse Rights & Media Specialist: Merideth Tumasz Vendor Manager: Molly Hogue Media Development Editor: Shannon Sheehan Senior Marketing Manager: Cover Image (Title Page, Part Opener, Chapter Sophie Fleck Teague Opener): © uschools/Getty Images Manufacturing and Inventory Printing and Binding: Edwards Brothers Malloy Control Supervisor: Amy Bacus Cover Printing: Edwards Brothers Malloy Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: McLaughlin, Curtis P., author. | McLaughlin, Craig, author. Title: Health policy analysis: an interdisciplinary approach / Curtis P. McLaughlin, Craig D. McLaughlin. Description: Third edition. | Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning, [2019] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018000271 | ISBN 9781284120240 (pbk.: alk. paper) Subjects: | MESH: Health Policy | Health Planning | United States Classification: LCC RA395.A3 | NLM WA 540 AA1 | DDC 362.1—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018000271 6048 Printed in the United States of America 22 21 20 19 18 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 In memory of Barbara Nettles-Carlson, RN, FNP, MPH—wife, mother, stepmother, trailblazer, educator, and dedicated health professional. © uschools/Getty Images Contents Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ix Chapter 3 American Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .xi Exceptionalism— Historical and About the Authors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .xii Political . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 A Chronology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 PART I The Context 1 The Current “Era” Emerges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36 Employers Want Out: Backing Chapter 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . 3 Consumer-Driven Health Care . . . . . . . . .39 The Many Actors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 The Law of the Land: The ACA (Temporarily?) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 Health Care: What Is It? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43 Health Policy: What Is It? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Case 3: International Comparisons: The Policy Analysis Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Where Else Might We Go? . . . . . . . . . . . . .44 Professionals and the Policy Discussion Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51 Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 National Systems Differ but Chapter 4 Where Do We Want Parallels Exist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 to Be? . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Key Policy Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 Where Are We? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53 Overarching Medico-Social Issues . . . . . . . .11 Alignment with the Rest of Society . . . . . .56 Impact of Societal Values on Policy Decisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 What Do Governments Want? . . . . . . . . . . .60 Politicization of Science and Limiting Where in the World? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64 Role of Expertise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 Case 4: National Standards on Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Chapter 2 American Health Care (CLAS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65 Exceptionalism— Discussion Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66 Structural and Chapter 5 Representative Conceptual . . . . . . . . . 16 Policy Options . . . . . . 68 Key Structural Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 Key Conceptual Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 Access to Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68 Industrialization and Quality of Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79 Corporate Lite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 Enhance Patient Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . .80 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 Costs of Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .82 v vi Contents Relationships with the External Chapter 8 The Policy Analysis Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92 Process: Evidence- Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .93 Based Medicine . . . .132 Case 5: Global Medical Coverage . . . . . . . . .94 Reducing Variation and Saving Discussion Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96 Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .133 Crosscurrents Involved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .134 PART II The Policy The Process of Evidence-Based Analysis Process 99 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .134 Constraints on Variables Used in Chapter 6 The Policy Analysis of Evidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .140 Analysis Process: The Example of NICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .140 Identification and Decision Aids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .141 Definition . . . . . . . . .101 Determining Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .143 Where in the World? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .146 Early Sources of Misunderstanding . . . . . .102 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .146 Getting the Scenario Right . . . . . . . . . . . . . .102 Case 8: Comparative Effectiveness: Hidden Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107 Avastin Versus Lucentis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .146 Where in the World? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .110 Discussion Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .150 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111 Case 6: Small Area Variations . . . . . . . . . . . .111 Chapter 9 The Policy Analysis Discussion Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .112 Process: Evaluation Chapter 7 The Policy Analysis of Political Process: Health Feasibility . . . . . . . . .151 Technology Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .152 Assessment . . . . . . .113 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .153 Authorizing Environments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .153 Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114 Key Government Actors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155 Technological Forecasting . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114 Political Inputs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .161 Levels of Technological Forecasting . . . . .115 Nongovernmental Actors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .164 Forecasting Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .119 Methods for Analyzing Political Organizations Devoted to Feasibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .167 Healthcare Technology Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .123 Critiques of Political Feasibility Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .174 Where in the World? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .124 Where in the World? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .175 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .125 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .175 Case 7: Oregon’s Health Evidence Review Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .125 Case 9: Green Mountain Care . . . . . . . . . . .176 Discussion Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .131 Discussion Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .179 Contents vii Chapter 10 The Policy Analysis Influence on Society: A Broader Question . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .222 Process— Double Checking for Interacting Evaluation of Policies and Contextual Change . . . . . .223 Economic Viability . .180 Trade-Offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .225 Defining the Healthcare Process Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .226 Involved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .180 Working Out Your Own Scenarios . . . . . .226 Selecting the Analytical Approach . . . . . .183 Where in the World? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .229 Basic Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .184 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .229 Agreeing on the Resources Case 11: The Folic Acid Fortification Required . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .189 Decision: Before and After . . . . . . . . . . . .231 Determining Relevant Costs . . . . . . . . . . . .190 Discussion Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .240 Valuing the Outcomes Produced . . . . . . . .192 Chapter 12 Implementation Dealing with Important Uncertainties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .199 Strategy and Financial Feasibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .201 Planning . . . . . . . . .241 Identifying Financing Methods . . . . . . . . . .202 Levels of Implementation Failure . . . . . . . .241 Considering Distributional Effects . . . . . . .202 Implementation Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .242 Where in the World? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .204 Setting Up to Succeed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .247 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .204 That All-Important Start . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .250 Case 10: Increasing the Federal Providing for Periodic Reviews . . . . . . . . . .250 Cigarette Excise Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .205 Implementing Policies That Affect Discussion Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .210 Clinical Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .251 The Postmortem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .251 Chapter 11 The Policy Analysis Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .252 Process: Analysis Case 12 : The Troubled Launch of of Values and HealthCare .gov . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .253 Social Context . . . .211 Discussion Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .259 Equitable Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .212 Efficiency and Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .212 PART III The Professional Patient Privacy and Confidentiality . . . . . .213 as Participant 261 Informed Consent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .213 Personal Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .215 Chapter 13 Health Professional Professional Ethics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .215 Leadership . . . . . . . . . 263 Consumer Sovereignty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .216 Social Welfare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .217 Disinterestedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .263 Rationing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .218 Informational Credibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .263 Process Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .222 To Influence Globally, Start Locally . . . . . .264 viii Contents Process Innovation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .265 Chapter 14 Conclusion: All Health Policy Analysis: A Relevant Those Levers and School for Leadership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .265 Still No Fulcrum . . .276 Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .266 Where to Stand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .276 Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .266 The Physician’s Dilemma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .278 Enhancing the Professional’s Role . . . . . . .266 The ERISA Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .279 Where in the World? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .268 Many ACA Provisions Stay in Place, But Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .268 Uncertainty Continues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .279 Case 13: The Data Sharing Proposal . . . . .269 Why Not an Unraveling? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .280 Discussion Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .275 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .280 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299 © uschools/Getty Images Preface ▸ The Policy Analysis Process and Health Professionals This text is about the process of developing health policy relevant to the United States. We have included the perspectives of a number of disciplines and pro- fessions. Because our country has many actors but no coherent, integrated, systematic health policy at the federal level, even after the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), we have drawn heavily on our personal experiences and backgrounds, which include economics, political science, manage- ment, communications, and public health. We have also drawn on the experiences of other countries. Although the federal government has taken on a greater role with the passage of the ACA, states and even smaller jurisdictions will continue to play a major role in health planning. Values, economics, and health risks may vary among them, which suggests a need for independence in planning and execution. Canada’s experience with a broad policy and specific health systems for each province has seemed to work as well, or better than, a centralized bureaucracy might have. Even the health services of a number of European countries have tended toward more decentralization as time has passed. This text is organized into three parts: “The Context,” “The Policy Analysis Process,” and “The Professional as a Participant.” We have anticipated that this text will be used to review health system issues and policy planning for health in a variety of graduate professional programs. We have not assumed zero knowledge of the U.S. health system, but we have not anticipated that the reader will have a great deal of background about how and why the U.S. health system developed as it did, nor about the efforts that took place in the past to reform it. Therefore, Part I, “The Context,” explores current issues with the system (Chapters 1 and 2) and the history of how that system has evolved (Chapter 3). Chapter 4 challenges readers to ask about where we want to be, and Chapter 5 reviews policy alternatives that seem to have strong support for getting from where we are to where we might want to be. Some of these are reflected in the ACA, while others are not. These chapters do not purport to be “value free,” but this text is different from most books on health policy because it does not attempt to push a single solution set. Studying the present is important for research and understanding, but the educational purpose of this text, and presumably of any course in which it is assigned, is to prepare students to meet whatever new, and perhaps unforeseen, challenges that develop in the future. Part II, “The Policy Analysis Process,” develops a set of tools for future use. Chapter 6 deals with identification and definition of the issues to be studied. Chapter 7 introduces some of the concepts of technology assessment applicable ix

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.