Man dies as ¢ result of sex with horse ‘Yop. You red that comely. Not only that, he rtate is investigacing a farm tat i apparently well ‘known arcong those wo exoy Setialty. Now Wechington states Icoking into crizinalizing Descalpy eis one of oy twelve states ther donot alrecdy da sz, Reed more her, Ieewike: me thatthe travesty of decision that nas Laereneev, Texas should render avs probibiting bectilty unesnstinutioal, precisely a Justie Saliz said. So, slope a=gument) Where's the ACLU when you ed them: Do they not ee the injstice of diserimatingaguine:peozle boeauee of wha/what they want > have seswith? sect sid. ‘Toe eal lames Una yu xl aol o aller poole aud acl Ue a in Toss ble Tasumemer) fi to recogni ans difference nerrer ten carsenting rs and some sick abusing ars ania Ti -vlly su hard Wo wake Ue aller illegal wie allow he Foray? Where's the Mig prohinn Fare? Bias Hagen sede 2 Thave argucd betor Ido not thin: the Tess lw es prudomt My point hare fs nota oral axe, but a lege argument. there is no vay to istingcish Eetwees these vo, at east ‘ot in oar Constinutio:, Certainly leis‘ atures ean dictingush betwcen zhose (az I would =r reasons of enforceability and effectinecess), bt the izea hat homcsesual bekavisrs iforent than beeialiy a ¢ Conctir-tonal attr ic unjustifiable. There ie no sigit in ou Constitution to have sex with whoever or whatever you vant inthe oivaey 0! our home (oz FED. That may or may not bo gcod pcliy, bur hatis a éizieront question,