ebook img

Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology Essentials. Part 2 PDF

355 Pages·2016·176.38 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology Essentials. Part 2

& Grainger Allison's DDiiaaggnnoossttiicc RRaaddiioollooggyy Essentials Lee Alexander Grant BA (Oxon) FRCR Consultant Radiologist The Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust London, UK Nyree Griffin MD FRCR Consultant Radiologist Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust London, UK Edinburgh London New York Oxford Philadelphia St Louis Sydney Toronto 2013 Upload by : Chy Yong CHURCHILLLIVINGSTONE animprintofElsevierLimited #2013,ElsevierLimited.Allrightsreserved. Theright ofLeeAlexanderGrantandNyreeGriffintobeidentified asauthorsofthisworkhasbeenassertedbythem in accordancewiththe Copyright,DesignsandPatents Act1988. Nopart ofthispublication maybereproduced ortransmitted inanyform orbyanymeans,electronicor mechanical,including photocopying, recording,oranyinformationstorage andretrievalsystem,without permissioninwritingfromthe publisher. Detailson howtoseekpermission,furtherinformation aboutthePublisher’spermissionspoliciesandourarrangements with organizations suchastheCopyrightClearance CenterandtheCopyrightLicensing Agency,can befoundat ourwebsite: www. elsevier.com/permissions. Thisbookandtheindividual contributions containedinitareprotectedunder copyright bythePublisher(otherthanasmaybe notedherein). Notices Knowledgeandbestpracticeinthisfieldareconstantlychanging.Asnewresearch andexperiencebroadenourunderstanding, changesinresearch methods,professional practices,ormedical treatmentmaybecomenecessary. Practitionersandresearchersmustalwaysrelyontheirownexperienceandknowledgeinevaluatingandusinganyinformation, methods,compounds,orexperimentsdescribedherein.Inusingsuchinformationormethodstheyshouldbemindfuloftheirown safetyandthesafetyofothers, includingpartiesforwhomtheyhave aprofessionalresponsibility. Withrespect toanydrugor pharmaceuticalproductsidentified,readersareadvisedtocheckthemost current information provided(i)onproceduresfeaturedor(ii)bythemanufacturerofeachproducttobe administered,toverifythe recommended doseorformula,themethodanddurationofadministration,andcontraindications.Itistheresponsibilityofpractitioners,relying ontheirownexperienceandknowledgeoftheirpatients,tomakediagnoses,todeterminedosagesandthebesttreatmentforeach individual patient,andtotakeallappropriatesafetyprecautions. Tothefullestextentofthelaw,neitherthePublishernortheauthors,contributors, or editors,assumeanyliabilityforanyinjury and/ordamagetopersonsorpropertyasamatterofproductsliability,negligence orotherwise,orfromanyuseoroperationof anymethods, products,instructions, orideascontainedinthematerialherein. ISBN:978-0-7020-3448-0 E-ISBN:978-0-7020-4894-4 Acatalog recordfor thisbookisavailablefrom theLibraryofCongress PrintedinChina Lastdigitistheprintnumber: 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Foreword I am delighted to be able to write the foreword to this which are needed for day-to-day radiological practice. book prepared by two outstanding young radiologists Thus,inonesimpletextbook,mostoftheessentialinfor- who worked with me here in Cambridge. While they mation required for practising radiology becomes wereatmysidereporting,theypolitelypointedoutthat available. a list-like textbook was what candidates for examina- Justtotakeoneexample,thesectiononlobarcollapse tions required, even if there is still a need for the defini- is extremely well presented. For old-stagers like me it is tive‘authorizedbible’.Thustheysetaboutreviewingthe excellent to see the plain CXR findings so well matched fifth edition of Grainger & Allison’s Diagnostic Radiology, with their CT equivalents. But more importantly the one of the largest multi-author textbooks of radiology commonest causes are listed, rather like a bookmaker’s in the world, with a view to presenting the data in a list: but not with the odds attached! Then come the all more examination-orientated format. To this end they important teaching pearls. Even in the legends to the have used much of the text and several of the illustra- images there are additional teaching points, such as is tionswithinthebook butembellishingthecrucial teach- seen in a patient with left upper lobe collapse: ‘the jux- ing points with the minimum amount of text. Thus the taphrenic peak sign: A small triangular density (arrow) organization of this new shortened version still adopts is seen; the sign is due to reorientation of an inferior the same form of organization as the main textbook but accessory fissure.’ with a more graphic and more modern feel. They Theeditorsofthemaintextbookverymuchhopethat acknowledge the help that Michael Houston and all this new single textbook will be seen as an essential those from Elsevier have given them and they acknowl- add-on to its big brother. As Doctors Griffin and Grant edge the work that the four editors of the fifth edition suggest,itisverymuchanticipatedthatthesmallertext- (Professors Ronald G. Grainger, David J. Allison, Andy book will be a bench book which becomes dog-eared Adam and myself) have put into this book. Of course close to the reporting station, whilst the definitive bible we, in turn, all owe an enormous debt to Professors is in a more sacrosanct place within the department or Grainger and Allison for having had the vision of start- on the bookshelf of the radiologist’s office. They should ing the whole process all those years ago. be congratulated on their enormous energy to harness In any event, the presentation of this single-volume such a huge amount of data on top of their very busy textbook is much more suitably aimed at the young lives while they metamorphosed from Senior Registrar radiologist/examination candidate. It has an attractive to Consultant status. I wish both them and this remark- layout, easy referencing, excellent images and the mini- able book every success. mum of text. It also includes appendices with the latest TNM staging, new RECIST criteria for following Adrian K Dixon response to chemotherapy and other ‘pearls’, all of Cambridge, 2013 xi Preface We are extremely grateful to Michael Houston for the However, our greater vision was for it to become an opportunity to write our ‘dream’ book and the support invaluable tool for practising consultants as well. With given to us by all four editors of the Grainger & Allison’s this in mind, we have added a new Appendices section Diagnostic Radiology series (Profsessors Andy Adam, incorporatingthelatestTNMstaging,RECIST1.1criteria AdrianK.Dixon,RonaldG.GraingerandDavidJ.Allison). and other important pearls in anatomy and imaging, We would also like to single out Joannah Duncan for that we felt would be of immense value in day-to-day special praise, as without her hard work and tireless radiological practice. These will hopefully provide dedication this book would never have been completed. essential aide memoirs for those things that somehow Theoverridingvisionwastosatisfyaneedthatisnot always seem impossible to commit to memory! currentlyaddressedbyanyradiologytextbookpresently Inevitably due to the limitations of space, not every onthemarket.Wewantedtocreateasinglevolumetext- detailorasmanyfigurescouldbeincludedaswewould book based on the 5th edition of Grainger & Allison that have liked. However, we hope that we have achieved, has all its information presented in a standardized within the space limitations, what we set out to do. At way. We wished to avoid long descriptive sentence con- present there is no single volume, comprehensive gen- structions that would make information retrieval ineffi- eral radiology textbook that has attempted to do this. cient. Furthermore, images within this book have been Wehopethatthisbookiswellthumbedbyatrainee- directlylinkedtotherelevanttextandplacedonthefac- to be then promoted to the workstation as a consultant ing page. The use of colour was essential in making this radiologist - rather than gathering dust on a bookshelf book more accessible to the reader and to facilitate at home! quicker referencing. As relatively recent trainees that have sat the FRCR Lee Grant BA FRCR examinations, we wanted this book to provide as close Nyree Griffin MD FRCR as is possible a ‘one-stop reference guide’ for trainees. 2013 xiii Dedication To Malcolm and Hilary, from both of us. You know why. Acknowledgements Listed below are the sources for borrowed and adapted #32 Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New material. Due to space limitations within the book sym- response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised bols have been used instead of full citations after figure RECIST guideline (version 1.1). European Journal of and table legends. Below is a list of the symbols and Cancer 2009;45(2);228–247 their corresponding citations. #33 Royal College of Radiologists; Standards for intra- #1 Edey AJ, Hansell DM. Incidentally detected small vascular contrast agent administration to adult patients, pulmonary nodules on CT. Clinical Radiology 2009;64: 2nd edn. The Royal College of Radiologists, April 2010 872–884 #34 El-Khoury GY, Bennett DL, Stanley MD. Essentials #2 Hansell DM, Lynch D, McAdams HP, Bankier AA. of MSK imaging, 1st edn. Churchill Livingstone, 2002 Imaging of diseases of the chest. Mosby, 2009 #35 Pope T, Morrison WB, Bloem HL, et al. Imaging of #10 O’Connor JH, Cohen J. Dating fractures. In: the musculoskeletal system. Saunders, 2008 Kleinman PK (ed). Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. *AdamA,DixonAK,GraingerRG,AllisonDJ.Grainger Williams & Wilkins, 1987, p.112 & Allison’s diagnostic radiology, 5th edn. Churchill #11 Kleinman PK (ed). Diagnostic imaging of child Livingstone, 2007 abuse. Williams & Wilkins, 1998, p.179 † Sutton D. Textbook of radiology and imaging, 7th edn. #12ChapmanS,NakielnyR.Aidstoradiologicaldiffer- Churchill Livingstone, 1998 ential diagnosis, 4th edn. Saunders, 2003 ‡ McLoud T. Thoracic radiology: The requisites. Mosby, #13 Abrams HL, Sprio R, Goldstein N. Metstases in 1998 carcinoma. Analysis of 1000 autopsied cases. Cancer ¶ Middleton WD, Kurtz AB, Hertzberg BS. Ultrasound: 1950;3:74–85 The requisites. Mosby, 2004 #20 Gore RM, Levine MS. Textbook of gastrointestinal ¶¶ Kaufman J, Lee M. Vascular and interventional radi- radiology. Saunders/Elsevier, 2007 ology: The requisites. Mosby, 2003 #21 Lim JS, Yun MJ, Kim MJ, et al. CT and PET in § BlickmanJ,ParkerB,BarnesP.Pediatricradiology:The stomach cancer: preoperative staging and monitoring requisites. Mosby, 2009 of response therapy. RadioGraphics 2006;26(1): §§ Ziessman HA, O’Malley JP, Thrall JH. Nuclear medi- 143–156 cine: The requisites. Mosby, 2006 #24 Slovis TL. Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging, (cid:1) Zagoria R. Genitourinary radiology: The requisites. 11th edn. Elsevier, 2008 Mosby, 2004 #27 De Bruyn R. Paediatric ultrasound: how, why (cid:1)(cid:1) Weissleder R, Wittenberg J, Harisinghani M, Chen J. andwhen,2ndedn.Elsevier/ChurchillLivingstone,2010 Primer of diagnostic imaging, 4th edn. Mosby, 2007 #28 Bates J. Abdominal ultrasound: how, why and (cid:129) Miller S. Cardiac imaging: The requisites. Mosby, 2004 when. Churchill Livingstone, 2011 (cid:129)(cid:129) Halpert R. Gastrointestinal imaging: The requisites, #30TurgutAT,AltinL,TopcuS,etal.Unusualimaging 3rd edn. Mosby, 2006 characteristicsofcomplicatedhydatiddisease.European 1 Journal of Radiology 2007;63(1):84–93 Grossman R, Yousem D. Neuroradiology: The requi- sites. Mosby, 2003 #31 Parizel PM, Makkat S, Van Miert E, et al. Intracra- 11 SotoJ,LuceyB.Emergencyradiology:Therequisites. nial hemorrhage: principles of CT and MRI interpreta- Mosby, 2009 tion. European Radiology 2001;11:1770–1783 xv Dedication To Malcolm and Hilary, from both of us. You know why. Acknowledgements Listed below are the sources for borrowed and adapted #32 Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New material. Due to space limitations within the book sym- response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised bols have been used instead of full citations after figure RECIST guideline (version 1.1). European Journal of and table legends. Below is a list of the symbols and Cancer 2009;45(2);228–247 their corresponding citations. #33 Royal College of Radiologists; Standards for intra- #1 Edey AJ, Hansell DM. Incidentally detected small vascular contrast agent administration to adult patients, pulmonary nodules on CT. Clinical Radiology 2009;64: 2nd edn. The Royal College of Radiologists, April 2010 872–884 #34 El-Khoury GY, Bennett DL, Stanley MD. Essentials #2 Hansell DM, Lynch D, McAdams HP, Bankier AA. of MSK imaging, 1st edn. Churchill Livingstone, 2002 Imaging of diseases of the chest. Mosby, 2009 #35 Pope T, Morrison WB, Bloem HL, et al. Imaging of #10 O’Connor JH, Cohen J. Dating fractures. In: the musculoskeletal system. Saunders, 2008 Kleinman PK (ed). Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. *AdamA,DixonAK,GraingerRG,AllisonDJ.Grainger Williams & Wilkins, 1987, p.112 & Allison’s diagnostic radiology, 5th edn. Churchill #11 Kleinman PK (ed). Diagnostic imaging of child Livingstone, 2007 abuse. Williams & Wilkins, 1998, p.179 † Sutton D. Textbook of radiology and imaging, 7th edn. #12ChapmanS,NakielnyR.Aidstoradiologicaldiffer- Churchill Livingstone, 1998 ential diagnosis, 4th edn. Saunders, 2003 ‡ McLoud T. Thoracic radiology: The requisites. Mosby, #13 Abrams HL, Sprio R, Goldstein N. Metstases in 1998 carcinoma. Analysis of 1000 autopsied cases. Cancer ¶ Middleton WD, Kurtz AB, Hertzberg BS. Ultrasound: 1950;3:74–85 The requisites. Mosby, 2004 #20 Gore RM, Levine MS. Textbook of gastrointestinal ¶¶ Kaufman J, Lee M. Vascular and interventional radi- radiology. Saunders/Elsevier, 2007 ology: The requisites. Mosby, 2003 #21 Lim JS, Yun MJ, Kim MJ, et al. CT and PET in § BlickmanJ,ParkerB,BarnesP.Pediatricradiology:The stomach cancer: preoperative staging and monitoring requisites. Mosby, 2009 of response therapy. RadioGraphics 2006;26(1): §§ Ziessman HA, O’Malley JP, Thrall JH. Nuclear medi- 143–156 cine: The requisites. Mosby, 2006 #24 Slovis TL. Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging, (cid:1) Zagoria R. Genitourinary radiology: The requisites. 11th edn. Elsevier, 2008 Mosby, 2004 #27 De Bruyn R. Paediatric ultrasound: how, why (cid:1)(cid:1) Weissleder R, Wittenberg J, Harisinghani M, Chen J. andwhen,2ndedn.Elsevier/ChurchillLivingstone,2010 Primer of diagnostic imaging, 4th edn. Mosby, 2007 #28 Bates J. Abdominal ultrasound: how, why and (cid:129) Miller S. Cardiac imaging: The requisites. Mosby, 2004 when. Churchill Livingstone, 2011 (cid:129)(cid:129) Halpert R. Gastrointestinal imaging: The requisites, #30TurgutAT,AltinL,TopcuS,etal.Unusualimaging 3rd edn. Mosby, 2006 characteristicsofcomplicatedhydatiddisease.European 1 Journal of Radiology 2007;63(1):84–93 Grossman R, Yousem D. Neuroradiology: The requi- sites. Mosby, 2003 #31 Parizel PM, Makkat S, Van Miert E, et al. Intracra- 11 SotoJ,LuceyB.Emergencyradiology:Therequisites. nial hemorrhage: principles of CT and MRI interpreta- Mosby, 2009 tion. European Radiology 2001;11:1770–1783 xv 3.1 OESOPHAGUS HIATUS HERNIA DEFINITION RADIOLOGICAL FEATURES (cid:129) Protrusion of part of the stomach through the Bariumswallow diaphragmatic oesophageal opening (cid:129) Sliding hiatus hernia: the Schatski or B ring is § Sliding hernia (the commonest type): the gastro- demonstrated above the diaphragmatic hiatus oesophageal junction (GOJ) slides proximally (cid:129) Rolling hiatus hernia: a part of the stomach (usually through the diaphragmatic hiatus to assume an thegastricfundus)isprolapsedintothechestanterior intrathoracicposition▶itisaccompaniedbyreflux or lateral to the oesophagus and oesophagitis – The squamocolumnar junction is seen at (cid:1)38cm PEARLS (the normal is 40cm) from the incisors at (cid:129) Schatski or B ring: a ring of mucosal tissue at the endoscopy § lower border of the phrenic ampulla marking the Rolling hernia: the GOJ is in a normal junction between the squamous and columnar position below the diaphragm – the proximal epithelium (the ‘Z line’) stomach (usually the fundus) herniates through (cid:129) The ‘A’ ring or inferior oesophageal sphincter: the hiatus ▶ this is more prone to incarceration about 2-4cm proximal to the B ring is a thicker ring and obstruction, and it may undergo torsion, produced by active muscular contraction resulting in strangulation, infarction or perforation (cid:129) The Schatski ring is always associated with a small – The squamocolumnar junction maintains its sliding hiatus hernia ▶ it can be congenital or normal position § secondary to gastro-oesophageal reflux (with Combined hernia: features of both are present associated inflammation and fibrosis) (cid:129) The Schatski ring is usually no more than 2–3mm CLINICAL PRESENTATION in thickness ▶ despite being mucosal it can be symptomatic (requiring dilatation) (cid:129) Asymptomatic or gastro-oesophageal reflux ((cid:3) reflux (cid:129) If the B ring is incomplete, part of it can sometimes be oesophagitis) ▶ symptoms are more commonly seen demonstratedastheincisuralnotch(whichisinevitably with a sliding hernia seen on the greater curve aspect of the stomach) GASTRO-OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) gastro-oesophageal polyp (seen as a single linear DEFINITION polyp straddling the GOJ) (cid:129) Refluxoesophagitis:thiscandemonstratemucosaloedema, (cid:129) GORD follows lower oesophageal sphincter erosivediseaseorfrankulceration▶initiallythe dysfunction▶thisinitiallyleadstoreflux(withminor collapsedoesophagusshowsthickenedlongitudinal irritation and inflammation) but can then proceed to folds(>3mm)▶multiplefineulcersgivethemucosaa ulceration, fibrosis and stricture formation ▶ it may punctateorgranularappearance▶largerdiscrete also be associated with a hiatus hernia punched-outulcerscandevelop▶ulcerationismost CLINICAL PRESENTATION pronouncedimmediatelyabovetheGOJandlocal circularmusclespasmmayproducetransversefolds▶ (cid:129) Heartburn or dysphagia ▶ the major long-term scarringproducespermanentfoldsthatradiatefromthe complications are peptic oesophagitis ((cid:3) stricture ulcermargins formation or Barrett’s oesophagus) (cid:129) Long-term sequelae: stricture formation (typically a short stricture above a hiatus hernia with smooth RADIOLOGICAL FEATURES tapered margins) ▶ the development of Barrett’s oesophagus (in 10% of cases) Bariumswallow Radionuclide study Reflux of 99mTc-sulphur colloid (cid:129) Reflux: this may be demonstrated but alone is of labelled scrambled egg can demonstrate gastro- questionable significance – minor amounts can occur oesophageal reflux in the normal population ▶ gross reflux (up to the PEARLS leveloftheaorticknuckleoraboveandnotclearedby a stripping wave passing down the oesophagus) is (cid:129) 24-hourpHmeasurementisthe‘goldstandard’inthe likely to be symptomatic assessment of reflux § Associated features: a wide gastro-oesophageal (cid:129) Thereisnodirectrelationshipbetweenahiatusherniaand junction (> ˚/(cid:2) of the maximally distended 238 GORD:manypatientshaveahiatusherniabutnoGORD thoracic oesophagus) ▶ an inflammatory (butmostpatientswithGORDwillhaveahiatushernia) HIATUS HERNIA AND REFLUX Rolling(paraoesophageal)hiatushernia.The Contrast studydemonstrating acombined-type Inflammatorypolyp (arrows)lyingat gastricfundus (H)liesalongsidethelower hiatushernia.Note therollingcomponent witha endofgastricfold (asterisk).{ oesophagus (O).{ largeportionofstomachabovethediaphragm,but inadditionthegastro-oesophagealjunctionhasalso migratedcranially.* Body of oesophagus Ring A Vestibule Ring B Stomach Gastro- oesophageal junction A B A B Diaphragmatic hiatus Slidinghiatushernia.(A)Bariumswallowshowsahiatushernia(H), Thelower endoftheoesophagus. (A)TheBringmaynormally morethan3cmwidewithatleast3gastricfoldsseenextending bewithin2cm above(asshownhere)orbelowthehiatus. acrossit▶S¼stomachformingthehernia▶B¼Bring,the Thustheoesophageal vestibulemaynormally beabove,orstraddle gastro-oesophagealjunction▶V¼vestibule.TheAringisnot thediaphragmatichiatus.(B)Smallslidinghiatusherniawithnormal visible.(B)CTscanshowingthecruraofthediaphragm Bring(betweenarrows).{ (arrows)separatedby28mm(normalis<15mm).Thefundus ofthestomachisseenherniatingthroughthediaphragmatichiatus.{ 239 3.1 ¡ OESOPHAGUS OESOPHAGITIS AND BENIGN STRICTURES DEFINITION (cid:129) Crohn’s disease: this can present with aphthoid ulcers or frank ulceration (cid:129) Oesophageal inflammation ((cid:3) subsequent smooth (cid:129) Nasogastric tube: this renders the lower oesophageal benign stricture formation) can be caused by the sphincter incompetent, resulting in a reflux following: oesophagitis and a long tapered stricture within the § GORD (see separate section) lower oesophagus ▶ this may occur only 48 h post § Infection: especially in the immunocompromised placement ▶ the strictures are often long and patient Candida albicans ▶ herpes simplex virus extensive (HSV) ▶ cytomegalovirus (CMV) ▶ human (cid:129) Caustic ingestion: this can lead to mucosal necrosis immunodeficiency virus (HIV) ▶ tuberculosis with ulceration and mucosal sloughing ▶ the § Drugs: potassium chloride tablets ▶ tetracycline ▶ oesophagus may perforate within the 1st 2 weeks or clindamycin ▶ doxycycline ▶ NSAIDs result in fistulation to the pleural cavity or § Radiation: this is often self-limiting pericaridium ▶ it heals with fibrosis and stricture § Crohn’s disease: this is very rare and usually formation ▶ strictures occur at the normal sites of accompanied by extensive GI disease elsewhere oesophagealcompression(e.g.attheleveloftheaorta, § Iatrogenic: following prolonged placement of a left main bronchus or diaphragmatic hiatus) nasogastric tube (NGT) § Caustic ingestion of strong acids or alkalis PEARLS CLINICAL PRESENTATION Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica (cid:129) Odynophagia ▶ dysphagia ▶ haematemesis (cid:129) A hereditary skin disease affecting children where minor trauma produces bullae formation ▶ the RADIOLOGICAL FEATURES oesophagus may be involved (leading to stricture formation) Barium swallow (cid:129) Candidiasis:initiallythereisdysmotilityandatonyof Pemphigoid theoesophagus▶eventuallyclassicplaque-likefilling (cid:129) A benign mucous membrane disease of middle age, defects with ulceration and pseudomembrane involving the conjunctiva and mucosa of the oral formation are seen (there are also irregular and cavityandskin▶theupperoesophagealmucosamay thickened mucosal folds) ▶ occasionally pseudo- be involved with ulcers, webs and stricture formation ulcerations may appear as aphthous ulcers (cid:129) HSV: vesicles in the upper and mid-oesophagus appear as sessile filling defects ▶ when they burst Intramural pseudodiverticulosis they leave punched-out superficial ulcers on a (cid:129) The excretory ducts of the oesophageal deep mucous background of normal mucosa ▶ in advanceddisease glands dilate and fill with barium ▶ they are seen on there can be diffuse ulceration barium studies as multiple, flask-shaped mucosal (cid:129) CMV/HIV: presents with giant oesophageal ulcers outpouchings ▶ this disease is usually diffuse, but (cid:129) Drugs: potassium chloride causes deep ulceration may be localized if it is associated with peptic leading to stricture formation ▶ NSAIDs can cause stricture formation or an oesophageal carcinoma contact oesophagitis (cid:129) Fistulation may occur between these (cid:129) Radiation: > 20Gy results in a transient oesophagitis pseudodiverticula ▶ intramural abscesses may with aperistalsis or tertiary contractions ▶ >45Gy develop which can rarely perforate through the results in obliterative endarteritis after 6 months with oesophageal wall ▶ long tapered strictures may arise severe oesophagitis and smooth strictures – deep (cid:129) It is associated with oesophagitis (usually due to ulcers can also form (which may fistulate to the reflux)▶otherunderlyingdisordersincludediabetes, trachea) candidiasis and alcoholism 240

Description:
Elsevier, 2013. — 237p.OesophagusStomachDuodenum, small bowel, colonLiver, biliary, pancreas, spleenPeritoneum, mesentery and omentumPlain abdominal radiographPaediatric gastrointestinal disordersSkeletal traumaPaediatric fracturesSoft tissue imagingGeneral characteristics of bone tumoursBenign bo
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.