Governments and Geographic Information Professor Ian Masser, Department of Urban Planning and Management, International Institute for Aerospace, Survey and the Earth Sciences (ITC), 7500 AA Enschede, The Netherlands, and University of Sheffield, Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN. Governments and Geographic Information IAN MASSER ITC, Enschede and University of Sheffield UK Taylor & Francis Ltd, One Gunpowder Square, London EC4A 3DE USA Taylor & Francis Inc., 1900 Frost Road, Suite 101, Bristol, PA 19007 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Ltd 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0-203-21287-8 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-27006-1 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 07484 0789 8 (cased) ISBN 07484 0706 5 (paperback) Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data are available Cover design by Hybert Design & Type, Waltham St Lawrence, Berkshire. Contents List of figures and tables vii Preface ix 1 The Emergence of National Geographic Information Strategies 1 Introduction 1 Some definitions 4 The choice of case studies 5 Analytical framework 6 Conclusion 7 2 What is Geographic Information and why is it so important? 9 Introduction 9 The significance of information and geographic information 9 Geographic information as a resource 11 Geographic information as a commodity 14 Geographic information as an asset 16 Geographic information as an infrastructure 18 Conclusions 19 3 Britain 21 The Creation of a National Digital Topographic Database Introduction 21 Main providers of geographic information 23 The institutional context 26 Elements of national geographic information strategy 30 Evaluation 35 4 The Netherlands 39 The Emergence of a National Geographic Information Strategy Introduction 39 Main providers of geographic information 39 v vi CONTENTS Institutional context 43 Elements of national geographic information strategy 45 Evaluation 52 5 Australia 55 The Commonwealth Dimension of State Geographic Information Strategies Introduction 55 Main providers of geographic information 55 Institutional context 62 Elements of national geographic information strategy 64 Evaluation 69 6 The United States 73 The National Spatial Data Infrastructure in Perspective Introduction 73 Main providers of geographic information 74 Institutional context 79 Elements of national geographic information strategy 83 Evaluation 88 7 What Lessons Can Be Learnt From These Experiences? 91 Introduction 91 Main providers of geographic information 92 Institutional context 95 Elements of national geographic information strategy 99 Some lessons for other countries 105 References 109 Index 117 List of figures and tables FIGURES 3.1 Britain 22 4.1 The Netherlands 40 4.2 Information flows between providers and suppliers in the Netherlands 46 4.3 Example of Top 10 vector database output for Naarden near Amsterdam 50 5.1 Australia 56 5.2 Structure of the South Australia land information system 59 5.3 Example of State of Victoria cadastral database for Sovereign Hill, Ballarat 68 6.1 The United States 74 6.2 Digital Orthophoto image of the Capitol Building in Washington DC 78 6.3 Federal Geographic Data Committee structure 84 COLOUR PLATES Six examples of Ordnance Survey maps TABLES 1.1 Analytical framework used for the case studies 6 3.1 National products introduced by Ordnance Survey since 1992 25 3.2 Government information providers’ expenditure, revenue, net cash costs and cost recovery 28 3.3 Membership of IGGI on 1 January 1996 32 4.1 Progress of the GBKN project at 1 January 1996 49 5.1 Key features of the states’ and territories’ digital cadastral databases 57 5.2 Comparison of data charges for non-government users in different states and territories 62 6.1 Open access and revenue generation: some survey findings 81 7.1 Case-study countries: land area and population 92 7.2 Case-study countries: distribution of responsibilities among different levels of government 95 vii Preface This book is the product of my continuing interest in the processes and consequences of the diffusion of geographic information technologies which was originally triggered off by the publication of the Chorley Report a decade ago. It began with a series of studies evaluating the impact of geographic information systems on British local government, culminating in the publication of a co-authored book with Heather Campbell on GIS and organisations in 1995. The findings of these studies highlighted the rapid rate at which diffusion was taking place throughout the local government sector. At the same time they also demonstrated that the adoption of a new technology and its effective utilisation were two very different things. As a result there is a considerable gap between the expectations expressed in much of the literature and the realities of GIS implementation in a complex organisational environment. These studies aroused a great deal of interest not only in Britain but also in other European countries and in North America. This stimulated a more ambitious project on the diffusion of geographic information systems in local government in Europe which was undertaken under the auspices of the European Science Foundation’s GISDATA scientific programme. This project involved a series of case studies of GIS diffusion in nine European countries as well as an exploration of the broader organisational theoretical perspectives underlying this research and their potential impacts on society. The findings of this project were published in a co-edited book with Heather Campbell and Max Craglia entitled GIS Diffusion: The Adoption and Use of Geographic Information Systems in Local Government in Europe in 1996. They showed that, while there were many common features between the experiences of these countries with respect to the recent history of diffusion, there were also some important differences between them. One of the most striking differences concerned the links between digital data availability and the level of GIS diffusion. The findings of the case studies suggested that the question of digital data availability was not simply a matter of the information rich verses the information poor. It was much more a question of central and local government attitudes towards the management of information. Countries with relatively low levels of digital data availability and GIS diffusion also tended to be countries where there had been a fragmentation of data sources in the absence of central or local government coordination. Conversely, countries where government had created a framework in terms of responsibilities, resources and standards for the collection and management of geographic information also tended to be those with relatively high levels of digital data availability and GIS diffusion. ix