General Mental Ability and Two Types of Adaptation to Unforeseen Change Von der Philosophischen Fakult¨at der Rheinisch-Westf¨alischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Dipl.-Psych. Jonas W. B. Lang aus Aachen Berichter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Lutz F. Hornke Paul D. Bliese, PhD. Tag der mu¨ndlichen Pru¨fung: 16. Juni 2007 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Hochschulbibliothek online verfu¨gbar. Promotionskommission: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Klaus Willmes-von Hinckeldey (Vorsitz) Univ.-Prof. Dr. Lutz F. Hornke Paul D. Bliese, PhD. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Iring Koch To Jessica and Julian Acknowledgements I thank Lutz F. Hornke for his ongoing support, mentoring, and teaching over the threeyearsofmydoctoralstudiesandhisroleasscientificadvisorofthisdissertation. I thank Paul D. Bliese for answering questions, teaching, and providing deeper insights on mixed-effects modeling and other data-analytic issues over the last two years of my doctoral studies. I thank Verena Buddrus, Tieu Duyen (Soujen) Chung, Johannes Kleikamp, Immo K¨oster, Jessica Lang, Simon T. K. Lang, Ricarda Schmitz, and Anne Vieten for their help in collecting and entering data. Finally, I thank Jessica Lang and Rachel Prayner for helping me to improve the language of this dissertation. Aachen, April 2007 Jonas W. B. Lang I thank Klaus Willmes-von Hinckeldey, Lutz F. Hornke, Paul D. Bliese, and Iring Koch for serving on my dissertation committee and providing valuable discussions and comments. Aachen, June 2007 Jonas W. B. Lang v vi General Mental Ability and Two Types of Adaptation Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Adaptation to Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2. Aims of the Present Dissertation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2. Conceptual and Methodological Section: Defining and Operationalizing Adaptability to Change 9 2.1. Definitions of Adaptation to Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2. The Task-Change Paradigm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.3. Conceptual and Methodological Problems in Research on Adaptation to Change and Recent Methodological Approaches to Deal with Them 16 2.3.1. Issue 1: Separating Adaptive and Non-Adaptive Performance . 16 2.3.2. Issue 2: Considering the Process Nature of Adaptive Perfor- mance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.4. Multilevel Mixed-Effects Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.5. Application of Discontinuous Growth Modeling Techniques to Adapt- ability Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.5.1. Basal Task Performance and Skill Acquisition . . . . . . . . . 24 vii viii General Mental Ability and Two Types of Adaptation 2.5.2. Transition Adaptation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2.5.3. Reacquisition Adaptation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 2.5.4. Illustration and Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.6. Brief Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3. Empirical Section: General Mental Ability and the Two Types of Adap- tation 35 3.1. Theoretical Background: General Mental Ability . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2. The Relationship Between General Mental Ability and Adaptation: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.3. Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.3.1. Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.3.2. Task . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.3.3. General Mental Ability Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.3.4. Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 3.3.5. Statistical Analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3.4. Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3.4.1. Descriptive Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3.4.2. Model Building and Model Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 3.4.3. Hypothesis and Research Question . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 4. Discussion 83 4.1. Transition Adaptation, Reacquisition Adaptation, Skill Acquisition, and Basal Task Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 4.1.1. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 Contents ix 4.1.2. Implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 4.2. General Mental Ability and Adaptation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 4.2.1. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 4.2.2. Current Findings and Previous Research . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 4.2.3. Proposed Framework and Current Findings . . . . . . . . . . 88 4.2.4. Implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 4.3. Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 4.3.1. Generalizability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 4.3.2. Quadratic Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 4.4. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5. Summary 99 6. Zusammenfassung 103 References 107 A. Study Variables: Histograms, Normal Probability Plots, and Scatterplot Matrix 129 B. Discontinuous Mixed-Effects Model: Checks of Model Assumptions 137 C. Expanded Discontinuous Mixed-Effects Model Accounting for Quadratic Change: Coding of Change Variables, Checks of Model Assumptions, and Results 155 D. Lebenslauf des Autors 169 x General Mental Ability and Two Types of Adaptation
Description: