Genealogical Research, Ancestry.com, and Archives by Christine Garrett A thesis submitted to the ...

158 Pages·2009·0.41 MB·English

Genealogical Research, Ancestry.com, and Archives

by

Christine Garrett

A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of
Auburn University
in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the Degree of
Masters of Arts in History

Auburn, Alabama
May 14, 2010

Copyright 2010 by Christine Garrett

Approved by

Robert J. Jakeman, Chair, Associate Professor of History
Reagan Grimsley, Assistant Professor of History
Kenneth W. Noe, Professor of History
Abstract
Genealogy is one of the most popular leisure activities in the world. Until the 1990s,
genealogical research was conducted either by visiting at or corresponding with physical
repositories. The rise of the Internet, particularly the growing popularity of Ancestry.com,
challenges archival institutions’ role as a main research location. To discover how much
Ancestry.com has affected genealogical research and archives, this study includes a survey of
genealogical researchers at the Alabama Department of Archives and History. Although the
survey yielded useful information, the results cannot be considered as representative of
genealogists as a group because of the limited number of participants (thirty) and the
administration of the survey at only one location. Instead, the survey serves as a pilot project
to promote further study of Ancestry.com. The survey showed that most of the participants
use Ancestry.com, yet relatively few have subscriptions to the Web site. Instead they use the
free access available at the archives. Participants like Ancestry.com’s ease of use, speed, and
access to numerous records. They consider the site another tool to help them in their
genealogical research, a tool that will not replace their need to research at physical
repositories. Survey participants continue to visit archival repositories to receive help from
staff and to access original records and records not available online. Thus, while
Ancestry.com has made genealogical research easier, it has not replaced the need to visit
archives for the participants in the survey.

ii
Table of Contents

Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... ii
List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... iv
List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. viii
Chapter 1: History of Genealogical Research ............................................................................ 1
Chapter 2: Ancestry.com ........................................................................................................... 19
Chapter 3: Literature Review ................................................................................................... 36
Chapter 4: Survey Methodology .............................................................................................. 61
Chapter 5: Survey Results and Analysis .................................................................................. 78
Chapter 6: Conclusion.............................................................................................................. 136
References Cited ....................................................................................................................... 142
References Consulted ................................................................................................................ 149

iii
List of Tables
Table 1: Number of Years of Experience ................................................................................. 79
Table 2: For Whom Participants Research ............................................................................... 81
Table 3a: Other Research Locations by Years of Experience .................................................. 82
Table 3b: Other Research Locations by Professional/NonProfessional Status ......................... 84
Table 4a: How Learned about Genealogical Research at ADAH by Years of Experience ...... 85
Table 4b: How Learned about Genealogical Research at ADAH by
Professional/NonProfessional Status .......................................................................................... 87
Table 5a: Records Used at Archives by Years of Experience .................................................. 88
Table 5b: Records Used at Archives by Professional/NonProfessional Status ......................... 90
Table 6a: Genealogy Web Sites Used by Years of Experience ................................................ 91
Table 6b: Genealogy Web Sites Used by Professional/NonProfessional Status ....................... 92
Table 7a: Use of Ancestry.com by Years of Experience ......................................................... 93
Table 7b: Use of Ancestry.com by Professional/NonProfessional Status ................................. 94
Table 8a: Parts of Ancestry.com Used by Years of Experience ............................................... 95
Table 8b: Parts of Ancestry.com Used by Professional/NonProfessional Status ...................... 96
Table 9a: Personal Subscriptions to Ancestry.com by Years of Experience ............................ 97
Table 9b: Personal Subscriptions to Ancestry.com by Professional/NonProfessional Status ... 98
Table 10a: Use of Archival Institutions’ Free Access to Ancestry.com by Years of
Experience .................................................................................................................................. 99

iv
Table 10b: Use of Archival Institutions’ Free Access to Ancestry.com by
Professional/NonProfessional Status ........................................................................................ 100
Table 11a: How Participants Learned about Ancestry.com by Years of Experience ............. 101
Table 11b: How Participants Learned about Ancestry.com by Professional/NonProfessional
Status ......................................................................................................................................... 102
Table 12a: Checking Ownership of Records on Ancestry.com by Years of Experience ....... 103
Table 12b: Checking Ownership of Records on Ancestry.com by
Professional/NonProfessional Status ........................................................................................ 104
Table 13a: Visiting Repositories to See Original Documents by Years of Experience .......... 104
Table 13b: Visiting Repositories to See Original Documents by
Professional/NonProfessional Status ........................................................................................ 105
Table 14a: Reasons for Participants to See Documents by Years of Experience ................... 106
Table 14b: Reasons for Participants to See Documents by Professional/NonProfessional
Status ......................................................................................................................................... 107
Table 15a: Ability to See Original or Copy by Years of Experience ..................................... 108
Table 15b: Ability to See Original or Copy by Professional/NonProfessional Status ............ 108
Table 16a: Participants’ Trust of Archival Copies by Years of Experience ........................... 109
Table 16b: Participants’ Trust of Archival Copies by Professional/NonProfessional Status .. 110
Table 17a: Visiting Repositories to See Other Records Held by Years of Experience .......... 111
Table 17b: Visiting Repositories to See Other Records Held by
Professional/NonProfessional Status ........................................................................................ 111
Table 18a: Ancestry.com’s Effects on Participants’ Research by Years of Experience ........ 112

v
Table 18b Ancestry.com’s Effects on Participants’ Research by
Professional/NonProfessional Status ........................................................................................ 113
Table 19a: Success in Finding Information on Hard-to Locate Ancestors by Years of
Experience ................................................................................................................................ 114
Table 19b: Success in Finding Information on Hard-to Locate Ancestors by
Professional/NonProfessional Status ........................................................................................ 115
Table 20-1a: Ancestry.com’s Effect on Use of Archives by Years of Experience ................. 115
Table 20-1b: Ancestry.com’s Effect on Use of Archives by Professional/NonProfessional
Status ......................................................................................................................................... 116
Table 20-2a: Increase or Decrease in Use of Physical Repositories by Years of Experience 116
Table 20-2b: Increase or Decrease in Use of Physical Repositories by
Professional/NonProfessional Status ........................................................................................ 118
Table 21a: Records Participants Would Like on Ancestry.com by Years of Experience ...... 119
Table 21b: Records Participants Would Like on Ancestry.com by
Professional/NonProfessional Status ........................................................................................ 120
Table 22a: Participants’ Views on Placement of Public Records on a Subscription-Based
Web Site by Years of Experience ............................................................................................ 121
Table 22b: Participants’ Views on Placement of Public Records on a Subscription-Based
Web Site by Professional/NonProfessional Status ................................................................... 122
Table 23a: Top Reasons for Researching Genealogy on Ancestry.com by Years of
Experience ................................................................................................................................ 123

vi
Table 23b: Top Reasons for Researching Genealogy on Ancestry.com by
Professional/NonProfessional Status ........................................................................................ 125
Table 24a: Top Reasons for Researching Genealogy at Physical Locations by Years of
Experience ................................................................................................................................ 126
Table 24b: Top Reasons for Researching Genealogy at Physical Locations by
Professional/NonProfessional Status ........................................................................................ 128
Table 25a: Genealogical Research Location Preference by Years of Experience .................. 129
Table 25b: Genealogical Research Location Preference by Professional/NonProfessional
Status ......................................................................................................................................... 130
Table 26a: Explanation of Preference for Researching at Physical Locations or Online by
Years of Experience ................................................................................................................. 131
Table 26b: Explanation of Preference for Researching at Physical Locations or Online by
Professional/NonProfessional Status ........................................................................................ 133

vii
List of Abbreviations

ADAH Alabama Department of Archives and History
GEDCOM Genealogical Data Communication (see note seven for a definition)
LDS The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (also known as Mormons)
NARA National Archives and Records Administration
SSDI Social Security Death Index
SAA Society of American Archivists
SARC Southeastern Archives and Records Conference
TGN The Generations Network (former name of Ancestry.com)

viii
Chapter 1: History of Genealogical Research
Genealogical research in the United States, like numerous American pastimes, has its
origins in Western Europe. The tracing of genealogical lineages in Western Europe dates
back, at least, to St. Matthew’s gospel which was first written in Greek.1 From the time of
St. Matthew in the first century until the sixteenth century, genealogy was primarily a tool of
the aristocracy, used to prove one’s membership in noble or royal families and, thus, to
affirm their entitlement to power and wealth. The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
witnessed the beginnings of “modern scientific genealogy,” which required genealogies to be
supported by documentary evidence and written down, not just repeated orally. The impetus
on written proof resulted from economic and social factors of the times. The two centuries
were rife with “economic instabilities and demographic crises” including the rise of new
families to the nobility who sought to connect themselves to established families and the
disappearance of many well-established lines. Coincidental with this instability was
increased interest in literacy and history, which also contributed to the rise in genealogy’s
popularity.2

1 Matthew 1: 1—17 NIV (New International Version). Although genealogies can be found throughout the Old
Testament, genealogists, such as William Roskey, trace genealogy’s beginning to the New Testament. The
reason for this apparent discrepancy is “[t]he word [genealogy] itself comes from two Greek words meaning
birth and study, and . . . [in the New Testament] it appears in the original Greek. See William Roskey,
“History for Genealogists.” In How to Trace Your Family Tree: A Complete and Easy to Understand Guide for
the Beginner. Ed. American Genealogical Research Institute Staff, 7—14. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and
Company, 1975 for more on this topic.
2 American Genealogical Research Institute Staff. How to Trace Your Family Tree: A Complete and Easy to
Understand Guide for the Beginner (Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company, 1975), 2-3 and Hannah
Little, “Archive Fever as Genealogical Fever: Coming Home to Scottish Archives,” Archivaria 64 (2007), 91.

1
The rise in literacy rates also contributed to the shift from oral to written genealogies.
Until the twelfth century, genealogical information was transmitted orally, with the
genealogy recorded in the Bible being an exception. As the population—beginning with
royalty and the upper classes that were genealogy’s main practitioners—became more
literate, reliance on oral transmission of information gave way to recordkeeping. The change
from oral to written records, including genealogies, was a gradual development that was not
firmly established until four centuries later and its progress varied geographically and by
record type.3
Unlike their European relations, early settlers in the thirteen colonies did not spend
much time, if any, tracing their ancestors. Given that they were trying to settle the New
World they likely lacked the time and resources to pursue genealogical research. It was not
until the 1700s that a few published genealogies appeared in the colonies. These early works
included 1731’s Memoirs of Roger Clap, a 1763 Bollinger broadside, and Luke Stebbins’s
The Genealogy of Mr. Samuel Stebbins and Hannah, his wife published in 1771. Stebbins’s
work is considered by some to the first major American genealogical work. Like most early
genealogists, Stebbins was interested in solely the lines of direct descent—brothers, sisters,
aunts, uncles were not included.4
Despite these early examples of American genealogical activity, genealogy was not a
popular pursuit of the new nation’s citizens or, at least, not one pursued in public. The
American Revolution and the resulting independence of the United States had a significant

3 M. T. Clanchy. From Memory to Written Record: England 1066—1307, 2nd ed. (Padstow, Cornwall: T. J.
Press Ltd., 1993), 68 provides just one example of the transition from orality to literacy. Little, “Archive
Fever,” 91.
4 Elizabeth Shown Mills, “Genealogy in the ‘Information Age:’ History’s New Frontier,” National
Genealogical Society Quarterly Centennial Issue 91 (2003), 262.

2