This content downloaded from 132.174.251.150 on Thu, 19 Aug 2021 02:03:46 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms This content downloaded from 132.174.251.150 on Thu, 19 Aug 2021 02:03:46 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms From empire to exile This content downloaded from 132.174.251.150 on Thu, 19 Aug 2021 02:03:46 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Edited by David Hopkin and Máire Cross This series is published in collaboration with the UK Society for the Study of French History. It aims to showcase innovative short monographs relating to the history of the French, in France and in the world since c.1750. Each volume speaks to a theme in the history of France with broader resonances to other discourses about the past. Authors demonstrate how the sources and interpreta- tions of modern French history are being opened to historical investigation in new and interesting ways, and how unfamiliar subjects have the capacity to tell us more about the role of France within the European continent. The series is particularly open to interdisciplinary studies that break down the traditional boundaries and conventional disciplinary divisions. Titles already published in this series Emile and Isaac Pereire: Bankers, Socialists and Sephardic Jews in nineteenth-century France Helen Davies Catholicism and children’s literature in France: The comtesse de Ségur (1799–1874) Sophie Heywood Aristocratic families in republican France, 1870–1940 Elizabeth C. Macknight The republican line: Caricature and French republican identity, 1830–52 Laura O’Brien The routes to exile: France and the Spanish Civil War refugees, 1939–2009 Scott Soo This content downloaded from 132.174.251.150 on Thu, 19 Aug 2021 02:03:46 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms From empire to exile History and memory within the pied-noir and harki communities, 1962–2012 CLAIRE ELDRIDGE Manchester University Press This content downloaded from 132.174.251.150 on Thu, 19 Aug 2021 02:03:46 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Copyright © Claire Eldridge 2016 The right of Claire Eldridge to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Published by Manchester University Press Altrincham Street, Manchester M1 7JA www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for ISBN 978 0 7190 8723 3 hardback First published 2016 The publisher has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for any external or third-party internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Typeset by Out of House Publishing This content downloaded from 132.174.251.150 on Thu, 19 Aug 2021 02:03:46 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms To Peggy and Nora, for all the happy memories This content downloaded from 132.174.251.150 on Thu, 19 Aug 2021 02:03:46 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms This content downloaded from 132.174.251.150 on Thu, 19 Aug 2021 02:03:46 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms breaking the silence 139 Even the French public seemed to concur: a poll in 1989 revealed that 42 per cent of respondents considered the harkis a community ‘apart’ and on the margins of society, while only 34 per cent thought their integration had been a success.3 Confirming this lack of progress towards integration was the fact that the practical demands of the 1991 campaigners were essentially the same as those voiced during protests sixteen years previously. However, the activists who came to the fore in 1991 were also consciously trying to do something new in terms of strategy. Deliberately seeking to ‘set a cat among the pigeons’, this new generation of militants wanted to break with existing patterns of mobilisation to create a co-operative, federative and, crucially, independent network. They additionally wanted to reori- entate harki activism so that it extended beyond demands for material support and into historical and commemorative arenas.4 Both elements were underpinned by an insistence on the need for recognition of the community as French. For children of harkis, this revolved primarily around measures to ensure that their full socio-economic insertion was realised. For older generations, the harkis themselves and their spouses, it was framed in terms of gaining recognition for their history as a means to validate their contribution to the nation and thus revalorise their position within it. This latter combat involved a two-pronged strategy whereby the history of the harkis was to be drawn out of silence at the same time as control of the resultant narratives was to be wrested away from external commentators and placed in the hands of the community itself. To understand this drive for autonomy, both in terms of how harki activism was organised and the ends to which it was directed, it is nec- essary to examine the relationships between the community and other interested parties in the years leading up to 1991. 1975 The French public were first alerted to the plight of the harki community on a significant scale in 1975 when a spate of demonstrations captured national media attention.The months of May through to July saw mem- bers of the harki community engage in marches and strikes, block roads and occupy symbolic sites within camps, forest hamlets and local munic- ipalities, beginning in the Bias camp but quickly spreading elsewhere. In June, the director of the Saint-Maurice-l’Ardoise camp and Colonel Deluc, the secretary general of the Comité national pour les musulmans français, more commonly known as the Comité Parodi, were taken hos- tage by youths armed with guns and dynamite. These initial acts were This content downloaded from 132.174.251.150 on Thu, 19 Aug 2021 02:04:00 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 140 from empire to exile accompanied by calls for the closure of the camps, the amelioration of conditions in the forest hamlets, and concrete measures to facilitate integration. By August, events had taken a different turn as six Algerian workers were held hostage. This retaliatory act followed the detention of Borzani Kradaoui, the child of a harki who had gone to visit family in Algeria with his mother, but who had been prevented from returning to France by the Algerian authorities. The release of Borzani, along with two other harki children detained in Algeria around the same time, did not immediately calm the situation, as evidenced by the kidnapping of Djelloul Belfadel, secretary of the local branch of Amicale des Algériens en Europe (AAE) in Unieux (Loire) on 16 August. Targeting Algerians in this way was designed to highlight the issue of free circulation between France and Algeria,which was still denied to the harkis even as measures were coming into force that permitted family reunification for Algerians working in France. Viewed together, Régis Pierret argues that these two strands of the 1975 protests demonstrated the harki community reacting both to their banishment from Algeria and their rejection by France.5 For most of the 1975 protestors, however, it was their day-to-day liv- ing conditions that served as the greatest impetus to action. Conditions in the two remaining camps, Bias and Saint-Maurice-l’Ardoise, and in the various forest hamlets had deteriorated considerably as buildings, which had only ever been designed as temporary shelters, had now been in use for more than two decades. A sense of this can be gained from the 1972 annual report for Bias, which requested that showers be installed in the harkis’ homes, in place of the communal showers that residents had to pay to use; that the buildings be disinfected; that streetlights be installed; that a bus into the nearby town of Villeneuve be organised; and that a new public telephone be provided, the last one having myste- riously been blown up several months previously.6 Additionally, those born in these spaces were now reaching adulthood, bringing to the fore a range of issues that had not been apparent when these settings were first conceived.7 Chief among these was the marginalisation fostered by these environments. Describing Saint-Maurice-l’Ardoise in 1975, Le Monde referred to it as ‘a genuine ghetto’ that ‘physically and morally’ isolated the harkis from the rest of the population, reinforcing the per- ception that the harki community were unlike the rest of the French population.8 According to one former Bias resident, harkis in the camps were treated like ‘pariahs’: ‘No one dared to approach us because they’d been told things about us: that we were savages. People didn’t even dare to pass in front of the Bias camp, they were really afraid. They’d only do it in a car.’9 This content downloaded from 132.174.251.150 on Thu, 19 Aug 2021 02:04:00 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms