Frameworks: Comparison and Correspondence for Three Archetypes

48 Pages·2002·1.15 MB·English

by  Richard Martin

Frameworks:
Comparison and Correspondence
for Three Archetypes
Richard Martin
Tinwisle Corporation
Bloomington, Indiana
Edward Robertson
Computer Science Department
Indiana University
Copyright © 2002 R. Martin & E. Robertson
Outline - Frameworks: Comparison
and Correspondence for
Three Archetypes
• Sampler
• Foundation
• ISO/DIS 19439
• C4ISR Version 2.0
• Compare Features
• Correspondence
Frameworks: Comparison and Correspondence for Three Archetypes 1
Copyright © 2002 R. Martin & E. Robertson
Sampler
Foundation
ISO/DIS 19439
C4ISR V2.0
Architectural Representations
Compare Features
Correspondence
• FRAT pyramid
• ARC CMM sphere
• Rockwell-Collins cube
• PERA wind chime
• GERA tower
(ISO 15704:2000 Annex A)
• ISO/DIS 19439:2002 tower
• Zachman grid
• C4ISR Version 2.0 triad
Presentation focus is on latter three
with reference to fifth.
Frameworks: Comparison and Correspondence for Three Archetypes 2
Copyright © 2002 R. Martin & E. Robertson
Sampler
Foundation
ISO/DIS 19439
C4ISR V2.0
FRAT
Compare Features
Correspondence
Function, Requirements, Answers, Test
S ystems thinking -
each of the FRAT views can be described
with
Upper Level FRAT Data Provides
Scope For Next Level
Lower Level Must Roll - Up
and Map to Upper Level
Each Level of FRAT Establishes
a BASELINE
Simulation Models Provide Dynamic
Views of FRAT
Source: B. W. Mar, B. G. Morais, FRAT – A Basic
Framework for Systems Engineering, INCOSE 2002
Detail elaboration adds both depth and
breadth to the system description
Frameworks: Comparison and Correspondence for Three Archetypes 3
Copyright © 2002 R. Martin & E. Robertson
Sampler
Foundation
ISO/DIS 19439
C4ISR V2.0
ARC CMM
Compare Features
Correspondence
Source: ISO/TC 184/SC5 N913, E. delaHostria, Chairman, and
ARC Advisory Group (used with permission)
Aligning functional applications along axis to identify
dimensions of the global manufacturing enterprise
Frameworks: Comparison and Correspondence for Three Archetypes 4
Copyright © 2002 R. Martin & E. Robertson
Sampler
Foundation
ISO/DIS 19439
C4ISR V2.0
Rockwell Collins
Compare Features
Correspondence
System Architectural Representation
Architectural Perspectives
Support
n
o
cti
a
str Service
b
A
m
Perspective Filters: Function Syste Hie
r
•Development & a
r
Verification c
h
•Manufacturing & m y
n n e
P•TrSraotnodsruapcgotierot &nat ion ntation entatio entatio Subsyst
•Installation & e s s
s e e
D•Sepimlouylmateionnt & Training epre Repr Repr ponent
••OMpaienrtaetnioannacle & Support al R cal ural Co m
•Disposal gic ysi ct
o h u
•Project L P tr
S
•Safety
•Functional
•Physical
•Information/ Data Flow ©Copyright 2001 RoRckweella Clolilzinsa, Intcion
6 Dec 2001 ©Copyright 2001 Rockwell Collins, Inc 37
Ver 2.5
Source: R. W. Jorgensen, Architectural Abstractions, INCOSE 2002.
Copyright © 2001 Rockwell Collins, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Permission is hereby granted to anyone to use this copyrighted
material for any lawful purpose.
Frameworks: Comparison and Correspondence for Three Archetypes 5
Copyright © 2002 R. Martin & E. Robertson
Sampler
Foundation
ISO/DIS 19439
Purdue Enterprise Reference
C4ISR V2.0
Architecture Compare Features
Correspondence
Source: T. J. Williams, A Handbook on Master Planning and
Implementation for Enterprise Integration Programs, Institute
for Interdisiplinary Engineering Studies, Purdue University.
Frameworks: Comparison and Correspondence for Three Archetypes 6
Copyright © 2002 R. Martin & E. Robertson
Sampler
Foundation
ISO/DIS 19439
C4ISR V2.0
GERAM V 1.6.3
Compare Features
Correspondence
Generalised Enterprise Reference
Architecture and Methodology
Generic
}Subdivision
Views Partial according
togenericity
Particular
{ { {
Instantiation
Identification
Customer service
}Subdivision
Concept Management according to
and control purpose of activity
Requirements Software }Subdivision
according to physical
Hardware
Preliminary design manifestation
Design
Resource
Detailed design Organisation }Subdivision
according to
Information
Implementation model content
Function
Operation
Decommission Machine }Subdivision according
to means of
Human implementation
Life-cycle
phases
Reference Architecture Particular Architecture
Source: ISO 15704:2000 Annex A and Figure 10, The GERA
modelling Framework of GERAM [GERAM V1.6.3
http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~bernus ](used with permission)
Frameworks: Comparison and Correspondence for Three Archetypes 7
Copyright © 2002 R. Martin & E. Robertson
Sampler
Foundation
ISO/DIS 19439
C4ISR V2.0
ISO/DIS 19439
Compare Features
Correspondence
CIM Systems Integration: Framework for
Enterprise Modelling
genericity
Overview:
el
e n e ric le v elartial level ticular lev Pleavretlicular
g p r
a w
p
e
i
v

w n Reference
o
se domain identification w vie ati Catalog
e e z
a
i c i
h concept definition v r n
a
n u
p g
w o o
r
l e ti es o
e i a
requirements definition v r
d m
n r w
o io o e
m t f i
design specification c n v
e un i g
f n
s i
l
i implementation description l
r e
p d
o
r
m
e domain operation
not defined at

t e
n s the domain
e ri
decommission definition p operation phase
r
e
t
n
e
Source: International Standards Organization ISO/CEN parallel
enquiry draft prEN ISO 19439 of 4/22/2002
Frameworks: Comparison and Correspondence for Three Archetypes 8
Copyright © 2002 R. Martin & E. Robertson
Sampler
Foundation
ISO/DIS 19439
Zachman framework C4ISR V2.0
Compare Features
(of excruciating detail)
Correspondence
ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE - A FRAMEWORKTM
DATA What FUNCTION How NETWORK Where PEOPLE Who TIME When MOTIVATION Why
S(CCOONPTEEXTUAL) Ltois tth oef BTuhsiningess Ismportant BLuissti noef sPsr oPceersfosrems sthe Lthiset Bouf sLionceastsio Onsp einra wtehsich ImLipsot rotfa Ontr gtoa nthizea Btiounssiness Ltois tth oef BEuvseinntess Ssignificant List of Business Goals/Strat (CONTEXSTCUOAPLE)
Planner EBuNsTinITeYss = T Chliansgs of BFuusnicnteiosns =P rColcaessss of NLoocdaet i=on Major Business People = Major Organizations Time = Major Business Event CEnridtisc/aMl eSauncsc=eMssa jFoar cBtours. Goal/ Planner
ENTERPRISE e.g. Semantic Model e.g. Business Process Model e.g. Logistics Network e.g. Work Flow Model e.g. Master Schedule e.g. Business Plan ENTERPRISE
MODEL MODEL
(CONCEPTUAL) (CONCEPTUAL)
Owner Ent = Business Entity Proc. = Business Process Node = Business Location People = Organization Unit Time = Business Event End = Business Objective Owner
Reln = Business Relationship I/O = Business Resources Link = Business Linkage Work = Work Product Cycle = Business Cycle Means = Business Strategy
e.g. Logical Data Model e.g. "Application Architecture" e.g. "Distributed System e.g. Human Interface e.g. Processing Structure e.g., Business Rule Model SYSTEM
SYSTEM Architecture" Architecture MODEL
MODEL (LOGICAL)
(LOGICAL)
Node = I/S Function
Designer ERnetl n= = D Dataat aE Rnteitlyationship IP/Oro c= .U= sAepr pVliiceawtison Function (LPinrok c=e sLsinoer, CShtoarraagcete, reistcti)cs PWeoorpkle = = D Reolivleerable TCimyec le= =S yPsrtoecme sEsvinegn tC y c le MEneda n=s S =trAuccttiuorna lA Asssseertritoionn Designer
TECHNOLOGY e.g. Physical Data Model e.g. "System Design" e.g. "System Architecture" e.g. Presentation Architecture e.g. Control Structure e.g. Rule Design TECHNOLOGY
MODEL CONSTRAINED
(PHYSICAL) MODEL
(PHYSICAL)
Builder Ent = Segment/Table/etc. Proc.= Computer Function Node = HSaorfdtwwaarree/System People = User Time = Execute End = Condition Builder
Reln = Pointer/Key/etc. I/O = Screen/Device Formats Link = Line Specifications Work = Screen Format Cycle = Component Cycle Means = Action
DETAILED e.g. Data Definition e.g. "Program" e.g. "Network Architecture" e.g. Security Architecture e.g. Timing Definition e.g. Rule Specification DETAILED
REPRESEN- REPRESEN-
TATIONS TATIONS
(OUT-OF- (OUT-OF
CONTEXT) CONTEXT)
Sub- Sub-
Contractor ERnetl n= = F Aiedlddress IP/Oro =c .C= oLnatnroglu Balgoec kStmt NLiondke = = P Arodtdorceoslsses WPeoorkp l=e J=o Ibdentity TiCmyec l=e I=n tMerarcuhpitne Cycle MEenadn =s =S uSbte-cpondition Contractor
EFUNNTECRTPIORNISINEG e.g. DATA e.g. FUNCTION e.g. NETWORK e.g. ORGANIZATION e.g. SCHEDULE e.g. STRATEGY FEUNNTCETRIOPNRIINSGE
Zachman Institute for Framework Advancement - [phone] Copyright - John A. Zachman, Zachman International
Role by Interrogative grid of cells containing models of the enterprise
A proto-typical Framework!
Frameworks: Comparison and Correspondence for Three Archetypes 9
Copyright © 2002 R. Martin & E. Robertson