ebook img

Executive Functioning in Men with Schizophrenia and Substance Use Disorders. Influence of ... PDF

16 Pages·2016·0.95 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Executive Functioning in Men with Schizophrenia and Substance Use Disorders. Influence of ...

RESEARCHARTICLE Executive Functioning in Men with Schizophrenia and Substance Use Disorders. Influence of Lifetime Suicide Attempts AnaAdan1,2*,MariadelMarCapella1,GemmaPrat1,DiegoA.Forero3,SilviaLo´pez-Vera1, Jose´FranciscoNavarro4 1 DepartmentofClinicalPsychologyandPsychobiology,FacultyofPsychology,UniversityofBarcelona, Barcelona,Spain,2 InstituteofNeurosciences,UniversityofBarcelona,Barcelona,Spain,3 Laboratoryof NeuroPsychiatricGenetics,BiomedicalSciencesResearchGroup,SchoolofMedicine,UniversidadAntonio a1111111111 Nariño.Bogota´,Colombia,4 DepartmentofPsychobiology,SchoolofPsychology,UniversityofMa´laga, a1111111111 Ma´laga,Spain a1111111111 a1111111111 *[email protected] a1111111111 Abstract OPENACCESS Background Citation:AdanA,CapellaMdM,PratG,ForeroDA, Lo´pez-VeraS,NavarroJF(2017)Executive LifetimesuicideattemptsinpatientswithcomorbiditybetweenpsychoticdisordersandSub- FunctioninginMenwithSchizophreniaand stanceUseDisorder(SUD),knownasdualdiagnosis,wasassociatedwithaworseclinical SubstanceUseDisorders.InfluenceofLifetime andcognitivestate,poorprognosisandprematuredeath.However,todatenoprevious SuicideAttempts.PLoSONE12(1):e0169943. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943 studyhasexaminedthecognitiveperformanceofthesepatientsconsideringasindepen- dentthepresenceorabsenceoflifetimesuicideattempts. Editor:AntonioVerdejo-Garc´ıa,Universityof Granada,SPAIN Received:May4,2016 Methods Accepted:December21,2016 Weexploreexecutivefunctioningdifferencesbetweensuicideattemptersandnon-attemp- Published:January18,2017 tersindualschizophrenia(DS)patientsandthepossiblerelatedfactorsforbothexecutive performanceandcurrentsuiciderisk.FiftyDSmalepatientsinremissionofSUDandclini- Copyright:©2017Adanetal.Thisisanopen accessarticledistributedunderthetermsofthe callystables,24withand26withoutlifetimesuicideattempts,wereevaluated.Weconsid- CreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,which eredZscoresforallneuropsychologicaltestsandacompositesummaryscoreforboth permitsunrestricteduse,distribution,and premorbidIQandexecutivefunctioning. reproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginal authorandsourcearecredited. DataAvailabilityStatement:Allrelevantdataare Results withinthepaper. DSpatientsshowedlowperformanceinset-shifting,planningandproblemsolvingtasks. Funding:Thisresearchwassupportedbygrants Thosewithsuicideattemptspresentedlowercompositesummaryscores,togetherwith fromtheSpanishMinistryofEconomyand worseproblemsolvingskillsanddecision-making,comparedwithnon-attempters.How- Competitiveness,PSI2012-32669andPSI2015- 65026(MINECO/FEDER/UE),andbytheUniversity ever,aftercontrollingforalcoholdependence,onlydifferencesindecision-makingre- ofBarcelona(APIF-2011;ResearcherTraining mained.Executivefunctioningwasrelatedtothepremorbidintelligencequotient,and ProgramgranttoSLV).Theseinstitutionshadno severalclinicalvariables(duration,severity,monthsofabstinenceandrelapsesofSUD, roleinstudydesign,datacollectionandanalysis, globalfunctioningandnegativesymptoms).Arelationshipbetweencurrentsuiciderisk,and decisiontopublishorpreparationofthe manuscript. first-degreerelativeswithSUD,insightandpositivesymptomswasalsofound. PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943 January18,2017 1/16 SuicideAttemptsandExecutiveFunctioninginDualSchizophrenia CompetingInterests:Theauthorshavedeclared Conclusions thatnocompetinginterestsexist. Ourresultssuggestthatproblemsolvingand,especially,decision-makingtasksmightbe sensitivetocognitiveimpairmentofDSpatientsrelatedtopresenceoflifetimesuicide attempts.Theassessmentoftheseexecutivefunctionsandcognitiveremediationtherapy whennecessarycouldbebeneficialfortheeffectivenessoftreatmentinpatientswithDS. However,furtherresearchisneededtoexpandourfindingsandovercomesomelimitations ofthisstudy. Introduction SubstanceUseDisorder(SUD)isbecomingmoreprevalentovertheyearsanditishighlycom- moninSchizophrenia(SZ),acomorbidityknownasDualSchizophrenia(DS).Thisdualdiagno- sishasrelevantclinicalimplications,giventhatsubstanceusecouldexacerbatetheSZsymptoms [1]aswellasthecognitiveimpairment[2,3],italsoworsenstheprognosisofthedisorder[4,5], andincreasestheriskofsuicide[6].Thus,itisnecessarytostudynewwaystoimprovethe health-relatedqualityoflifeandreducingmortalityofDSpatients.Giventhatsuicideisoneof themaincausesofprematuredeathinSZ[7,8],preventingsuicideanddiminishingitsriskfac- torsdeservegreatconsiderationasmaintargetsofcare,especiallyintheDSpopulation. Around20–50%ofSZpatientswillattemptsuicideintheirlifetime[9,10].Thesuiciderisk isgreaterinfirstoracutepsychoticepisodes,duringthefirstsixmonthsafterhospitalization [11,12]andinSUDcomorbidconditions[6,8,11,13–16].Alcoholisoneofthemoststudied substancessinceithasbeenshowntohaveasignificantimpactonsuicide[17–19]andcogni- tion[20,21].Furthermore,DSpatients,comparedtoSUDpatients,arelessmotivatedto changetheirconsumptionpattern,aremoredifficulttoinvolveintreatment,exhibitslower progress,tendtogiveuplong-termprograms[22]andremainatriskofrelapseevenyears afteraperiodoffullremission[23]. InadditiontotheSUD,otherriskfactorsforsuicidedescribedinSZpatientsare:malegen- der,singlemaritalstatus,livingaloneandsocialisolation,familyorpersonalhistoryoflifetime suicideattempts,aggressivebehavior,depressionandhopelessness,lowstressresistance, higherinsightandmetacognitionability.Moreover,otherfactorsarealsolinkedtosuiciderisk inSZpatients:lowadherencetonon-pharmacologicaltreatment,moretypicalantipsychotic prescriptions,long-termillnesswithseveralexacerbations,lossoffaithintreatment,fearof deterioration,higherinsightoftheillness,increasedpositiveandfewernegativesymptoms, highernicotineconsumptionandgreaterdurationofuntreatedpsychosis[17,24,25]. Ontheotherhand,thestudyoftheclinicalcharacteristicsoftheDSpatientshighlightsthe importantroleplayedbycognition.Comparedwiththesinglecondition,intheDSithasbeen observedaworseglobalcognitivestate[26]withamarkeddeteriorationwithage,especiallyin executiveperformance[2,3,27],anditisconsideredtobeapowerfulpredictorofmaladaptive functioning[26].Interestingly,higherpremorbidintelligencequotient[17,28],betterexecu- tive[29,30]andsocialpremorbidfunctioning[18],anddysfunctionalimpulsivity[9,19,28] havebeenhypothesizedtopredisposeforsuicidalbehaviorandcouldfacilitatetheillegalsub- stanceacquisition.Inthiscontext,theprimarydrugofdependenceseemsdecisivegiventhat alcoholisthesubstancethathasshowngreaterneurodegenerativebraineffectsandcognitive impairment[31]. Takingallthefactorsstatedaboveintoconsideration,DSindividualsareavulnerablepopu- lationtocommitsuicide,giventhattheymeetmanyofthepreconditionsfortheemergenceof suicidality.However,fewstudieshaveevaluatedtheexecutivefunctioningoftheDSpatients PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943 January18,2017 2/16 SuicideAttemptsandExecutiveFunctioninginDualSchizophrenia andnonehasaddresseditspossibleinfluenceontheexistenceoflifetimesuicideattemptsand clinicalvariablesthatmaybemodulatingresults,sonewresearchisneededtoclarifythese questions. Theaimofthisstudywastoexplore,firstly,theexecutivefunctioningdifferencesbetween suicideattemptersandnon-attemptersinDSpatientsandthepossiblepremorbidandclinical relatedfactors.Todoitanexhaustiveclinicalevaluationandacompleteneuropsychological batterywasapplied,beingallpatientsinremissionofSUDandclinicallystables. MaterialsandMethods Participants Theparticipantswere50DSmalepatients(36.06±7.79years)fromsevenmedicalcentersin Barcelona.Theywereassignedtotwogroupsaccordingtotheself-reportedprevioussuicide attempts:DSattempters(DS+;n=24)andDSnon-attempters(DS-;n=26).Oursamplesize wasaimedtohaveabalanceddesignintwogroups.Bothgroupswereabstinentforatleast threemonths,controlledbyurinalysis. PatientswerederivedbymedicalcentersfromtheirdiagnosesaccordingtotheDSM-IV- TR(2000)[32]andinclusion/exclusioncriteriarequired.However,eachdiagnosiswascon- firmedinafirstevaluationsessionbyaresearcherresponsibleforclinicalassessment(Master inClinicalPsychology)usingtheSCID-Iandastructuredinterviewofsociodemographic andclinicaldata.Occasionally,somepatientswereruledoutfornotcomplyingwiththedual diagnosisrequired.Theinclusioncriteriawere:(1)currentdiagnosisofpsychoticspectrum disorder(schizophreniaandschizoaffective)andcurrentSUDinremissionforatleastthree months;(2)undertreatment;(3)malegender,consistentwiththesexprevalenceofthe disorder;(4)agebetween18–55years;(5)clinicallystablepsychiatricsymptomatology.The exclusioncriteriawere:(1)DSM-IV-TRcriteriaforacurrentsubstanceinduced-psychiatric disorderorpsychiatricdisorderduetoamedicalcondition;(2)otherseveremedicalillness; (3)mentalretardation,historyoftraumaticbraininjuryorneurologicalinjury;(4)receiving electroconvulsivetherapywithin12monthspriortotheirstudyparticipation.Frominitially derivedsample(n=56)sixpatientswerediscardedforfailingtomeetthediagnosticandclini- calcriteria.Noneofthepatientsincludedinthestudydroppedoutandtheyallcompleteddata recordingsessions. Allpatientswereintreatmentfortheirclinicalconditions(SUDandpsychoticdisorder) withanintegratedinterventioninwhichaddictionandmentalhealthinterventionareoffered atthesametimeandbythesameteam[5].Integratedinterventionincludesacombinationof motivationalinterviewing,contingenceandcasemanagement,cognitivebehavioraltherapy, socialskillstrainingandrelapseprevention. TheethiccommitteeoftheUniversityofBarcelonaapprovedthisstudy,whichcomplies withtheethicalstandardsonhumanexperimentationandwiththeHelsinkideclarationof 1975,asrevisedin2008.Allparticipantsprovidedwritteninformedconsentandwerenot compensatedfortheirparticipation.Datacollectionwascarriedoutbetween2013and2015. ClinicalMeasures InformationwascollectedusingtheStructuralClinicalInterviewforDSM-IV-TRAxisI Disorders(SCID-I)[33]alongwithastructuredinterviewofsociodemographicandclinical data.Weconfirmedtheself-reporteddatawiththemedicalhistoryofthemedicalcenters, withespecialemphasisinourclassificatorycriteriaoflifetimesuicideattempts.Thesuicide attemptsinDS+grouprangefrom1to5,withthefollowingdistribution:8patientswith oneattempt,8withtwoattempts,5withthreeattempts,1withfourattemptsand2withfive. PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943 January18,2017 3/16 SuicideAttemptsandExecutiveFunctioninginDualSchizophrenia Chlorpromazineequivalentdoses(CPZ)werecalculatedforantipsychoticmedication[34]. Wealsorecordeddailyconsumptionofcigarettesandcaffeine(milligramsofcoffee,teaor cola),andtheFagerstro¨mtest[35]wasadministeredtosmokersfornicotinedependence. Additionally,theClinicalGlobalImpression-Severityscale(CGI-S)[36]wasappliedasa subjectivemeasureoftheclinicalseverity.Thegenerallevelofsymptomsandfunctioningwas assessedthroughtheGlobalAssessmentofFunctioning(GAF)[37].ThePositiveandNegative SyndromeScale(PANSS)[38]wasadministeredasameasureofpsychoticsymptomseverity, anditem12wasusedforInsightevaluation.SocialadaptationwasmeasuredbytheSocial AdaptationSelf-EvaluationScale(SASS)[39].Depressivesymptomswereassessedwiththe BeckDepressionInventory(BDI)[40]andthePlutchikRiskofSuicideScale(RS)[41]was appliedtoassessthecurrentsuiciderisk,establishingthecut-offof6points[42].Finally,the severityoftheSUDwasmeasuredwiththeDrugAbuseScreeningTest(DAST-20)[43]. NeuropsychologicalAssessment WeusedtheVocabularyandBlockDesignsubtests(WAIS-III)asareliableestimateofverbal andnon-verbalpremorbidIQ[44].Toobtainmeasuresofdorsolateralprefrontalfunctionwe selectedtheBackwardDigitssubtest(WAIS-III),theTrailMakingTest-trailB-(TMT-B),the TowerofHanoi(ToH)andthestandardcomputerizedversionoftheWisconsinCardSorting Test(WCST)asmeasuresofworkingmemory,set-shifting,planningabilitiesandproblem solving,respectively.TheIowaGamblingTask(IGT)wasadministeredtomeasuredecision- makingcapacity,asameasureofdysfunctionalimpulsivityrelatedtoorbitofrontalcortex functioning[45].RawscoresweretransformedtoZscores(mean=0±SD=1)foralltests (globalscores)anditssubcomponents,basedontheSpanishnormativedatafortheWAIS-III subtests[46],TMT-B[47,48],WCST[49],onMexicannormativedataforToH[50],andon AmericannormativedataforIGT[51].AnaverageofZscores(compositesummaryscores) wereconductedtoyieldageneralmeasureforbothpremorbidIQandexecutivefunctioning. DataAnalysis GroupdifferencesindemographicandclinicalvariableswereexploredwiththeMann-Whit- neyUtest(U)orwiththeChi-Squaretestforcategoricalvariables.Ifthequantitativedataful- filledthenecessaryconditions,theStudent’st-test(t)wasused;whentheconditionswerenot met,thenonparametricMann-WhitneyUtestwasusedinstead.DifferencesinZscoresof neuropsychologicalperformancebetweengroupswereanalyzedwithone-wayanalysisof covariance(ANCOVA)forVocabulary,BlockDesign,BackwardDigitssubtests,TMT-Band compositesummaryscoresforbothpremorbidIQandexecutivefunctioning.Multivariate analysisofcovariance(MANCOVA)wasconductedinthecaseoftheToH,WCSTandIGT. Repeatedmeasuresmultivariateanalysisofvariance(RMMANCOVA)wasalsousedforthe fiveblocksoftheIGTdirectscores.Inallcases,weconsideredageascovariatetocontrolfor possibleeffectsincognitiveperformancebecause,althoughgroupsdidnotshowdifferences, areknowntheage-relatedeffectsbothingeneralpopulation[50]andDSpatients[2,3].We repeatedallsignificantanalysesincludingalcoholdependencealsoascovariate.Thepartial squaredEta(η 2)statisticwasusedtomeasuretheeffectsize,inconjunctionwiththeobserved p powerthroughtheoptionavailableintheanalysisofvariance,andthepost-hoccomparisons wereBonferronicorrected.Finally,weconductedstepwiselinearregressionsconsideringonly thesignificantvariables(p<0.05)foundinapreviousbivariatecorrelationanalysisforexecu- tivefunctioningandcurrentsuiciderisk.Inallcasestheconditionsofapplicationandnon- existenceofcollinearityandmulticollinearitywereverified.DatawereanalyzedusingtheSta- tisticalPackagefortheSocialSciences(SPSS;version21.0). PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943 January18,2017 4/16 SuicideAttemptsandExecutiveFunctioninginDualSchizophrenia Results DemographicandClinicalData Groupsdidnotdifferinsociodemographicdata,medicalcomorbidity,CPZ,CGI,GAF,depressive symptoms,socialadaptation,dailycaffeineintakeandcurrentsuicideriskscores(seeTable1). Althoughnosignificantdifferencewerefoundbetweengroupsinthesuiciderisk,consideredas presentorabsent(χ2 =1.82;p=0.18),wehaveobservedatendencyofhigherproportionsof (1) patientswithsuicideriskintheDS+(84.6%)comparedtotheDS-group(58.3%).Dailymedica- tionwasequivalentbetweengroups,exceptforuseofinterdictors,withhigherconsumptioninthe DS+group.Moreover,DS+showedahighernumberoffirst-degreerelativesbothwithSUDand psychiatricdisorders,dailycigaretteconsumptionandnicotinedependencecomparedtoDS-.No significantdifferenceswerefoundbetweengroupsinpsychoticsymptoms(PANSSscores). RegardingSUDcharacteristics,polyconsumptionwasthemorefrequentpatterninthe totalsample(72%)andalsoinbothgroups(DS+:83%andDS-:61%).DS+patientsshowed greateralcoholconsumptionthanDS-,althoughthepercentageofpatientswiththealcoholas primarydrugofdependencewasnotdifferentbetweengroups.Moreover,thetwogroupsdid notshowdifferencesinlengthofabstinence,numberofrelapses,durationofSUDandseverity ofSUD(DAST-20). ExecutiveFunctioning ThetotalsampleshowedalowperformancecomparedtothenormativedataintheTMT-B, reactiontimeintheToH,andtrialstofirstcategoryinWCST(zscoreslowerto-1SD).Inthe othertasks,bothintheindividualcomponentsandglobalscores,aswellasinthecomposite summaryscoreofexecutivefunctioning,performancetendedtobeworsethanaveragebutin nocaseexceeds-1SD(Table2). ThegroupsshowedsimilarpremorbidIQ,consideringboththeverbalcomponentasthe manipulative,andonlyprovideddifferencesintheperformanceofWCSTandIGT.The WCSTanalysesshowedsignificantworsescoresfortheDS+patientsincategoriescompleted, trialstofirstcategoryandintheglobalmeasureofWCSTperformance.However,thesediffer- encesdisappearedwhenthealcoholdependencewasconsideredasacovariateintheanalyses (F <2.229;p>0.143;η 2<0.049). (1,46) p ConsideringtheIGT,weobtainedsignificantdifferencesinthethird,fourthandlastblock trialsaswellasinthetotalscore(100trials),withtheDS+groupshowingtheworstperfor- mance.AlthoughtheZscoresforbothgroupsintheIGTwerewithinthemean,whenthetotal directscoreswereconsideredregardingthetypeofdecision-makingchosen,theDS+group showedadisadvantageouspatternincomparisontotheDS-(F =11.274;p=0.002;η 2= (1,47) p 0.193;power=0.907)(seeFig1A).Similarly,theRMMANCOVAforthedirectscoresshowed asignificantlyworseperformanceoftheDS+group(F =5.203;p=0.027;η 2=0.100; (1,47) p power=0.636),withanegativelearningcomparedtotheDS-(seeFig1B).Allsignificantdiffer- encesbetweengroupsintheIGTremainedwhenalcoholdependencewasconsideredasa covariateintheanalyses(F >4.64;p<0.037;η 2>0.092;power>0.562). (1,46) p Finally,thecompositesummaryscoreofexecutivefunctioningwasworseinDS+groupas comparedtoDS-anditcontinuedprovidingsignificantdifferenceswhenintheanalysisthealco- holdependencewasincludedascovariate(F =4.982;p=0.032;η 2=0.096;power=0.603). (1,46) p FactorsRelatedtoExecutiveFunctioningandCurrentRiskofSuicide Inthetotalsample,theregressionanalysisindicatedthatthemodelwassignificantforallcog- nitivetasksexcepttheIGT,andalsoforthecompositesummaryscoreofexecutivefunctioning PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943 January18,2017 5/16 SuicideAttemptsandExecutiveFunctioninginDualSchizophrenia Table1. SociodemographicandclinicaldataofDualSchizophrenia(DS)patients,andconsideringthepresence(DS+)orabsence(DS-)ofsuicide attempts. Mean,standarddeviation,frequencywithpercentage,andstatisticalcontrast(Student’st,Mann-WhitneyUorChi-Squaretest). DS(N=50) DS-(N=26) DS+(N=24) Statisticalcontrast Sociodemographicdata Age(yr) 36.06(7.79) 35.92(8.63) 36.21(6.95) t =0.12 (1,48) Maritalstatus Χ2 =2.48 (2) Single 41(82.0%) 22(84.6%) 19(79.2%) Stablepartner 3(6.0%) 2(7.7%) 1(4.2%) Separated/Divorced 6(12.0%) 2(7.7%) 4(16.6%) Yearsofeducation 9.84(2.06) 9.38(1.94) 10.33(2.12) t =1.65 (1,48) Economicsituation χ2 =2.68 (4) Active 5(10.0%) 2(7.7%) 3(12.5%) Disabilitypension 35(70.0%) 17(65.4%) 18(75.0%) Unemployed 5(10.0%) 3(11.5%) 2(8.3%) Noincome 3(6.0%) 2(7.7%) 1(4.2%) Offwork(onsickleave) 2(4.0%) 2(7.7%) 0(0%) Clinicaldata Numberofmedicalcomorbidities 0.60(0.81) 0.42(0.58) 0.79(0.96) t =1.64 (1,48) Respiratory-typea 4(8.0%) 3(11.5%) 1(4.2%) χ2 =0.92 (1) Metabolic-typea 7(14.0%) 3(11.5%) 4(16.7%) χ2 =0.27 (1) Infectious-typea 6(12.0%) 2(7.7%) 4(16.7%) χ2 =0.95 (1) Othera 9(18.0%) 4(15.4%) 5(20.8%) χ2 =1.43 (1) Dailynumberofmedications 3.20(1.78) 2.96(1.93) 3.46(1.61) t =0.98 (1,48) Typicalantipsychoticsa 13(26.0%) 7(26.9%) 6(25.0%) χ2 =0.02 (1) Atypicalantipsychoticsa 45(90.0%) 22(84.6%) 23(95.8%) χ2 =1.00 (1) Antidepressantsa 15(30.0%) 6(23.1%) 9(37.5%) χ2 =2.33 (1) Moodstabilizersa 12(24.0%) 6(23.1%) 6(25.0%) χ2 =0.07 (1) Anxiolyticsa 21(42.0%) 9(34.6%) 12(50.0%) χ2 =0.98 (1) Anticholinergicsa 13(26.0%) 8(30.8%) 5(20.8%) χ2 =0.78 (1) Interdictora 15(30.0%) 4(15.4%) 11(45.8%) χ2 =5.13* (1) Othermedicationa 14(28.0%) 8(30.8%) 6(25.0%) χ2 =0.64 (1) CPZequivalentdosage(mg) 41.34(90.36) 35.32(97.20) 45.37(83.53) t =1.02 (1,48) ClinicalGlobalImpression 3.84(1.48) 3.96(1.40) 3.71(1.57) t =0.60 (1,48) GlobalAssessmentFunctioning 65.78(10.82) 64.46(10.17) 67.21(11.52) t =0.89 (1,48) Currentsuiciderisk(Plutchikscale) 6.80(2.41) 5.92(1.93) 7.62(2.60) t =1.18 (1,48) Depressivesymptoms(BDI) 4.53(4.08) 3.80(6.34) 4.83(3.04) t =0.46 (1,48) Socialadaptation(SASS) 36.55(9.06) 35.33(9.92) 38.38(7.87) t =0.76 (1,48) Relativeswithpsychiatricdisorder 0.75(0.88) 0.48(0.71) 1.04(0.98) t =2.27* (1,48) Ageofpsychoticdisorderonset 24.21(6.70) 23.75(7.36) 24.67(6.10) t =0.47 (1,48) Durationofillness(yr) 11.88(7.71) 12.20(8.95) 11.54(6.43) t =0.30 (1,48) Psychiatricdiagnosis χ2 =0.02 (1) Schizophrenia 42(84.2%) 22(85.0%) 20(83.3%) Schizoaffective 8(15.8%) 4(15.0%) 4(16.7%) PANSS-Positivesymptoms 11.37(5.79) 10.79(4.15) 11.83(6.89) t =0.53 (1,48) PANSS-Negativesymptoms 14.00(7.19) 12.57(6.66) 15.11(7.57) t =0.99 (1,48) PANSS-Generalpsychopathology 30.09(12.46) 27.43(11.77) 32.16(12.91) t =1.08 (1,48) Insight 2.10(1.37) 1.62(1.04) 2.44(1.50) t =1.81 (1,48) FisrtdegreerelativeswithSUD U=180.00** None 30 23 7 (Continued) PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943 January18,2017 6/16 SuicideAttemptsandExecutiveFunctioninginDualSchizophrenia Table1. (Continued) DS(N=50) DS-(N=26) DS+(N=24) Statisticalcontrast One 6 3 3 Twoormore 14 0 14 Ageofintakeonset(yr) 17.22(5.20) 17.64(5.88) 16.79(4.47) t =0.57 (1,48) DurationofSUD(yr) 18.39(8.13) 17.97(9.01) 18.83(7.28) t =0.37 (1,48) Primarydrugofdependence χ2 =1.14 (3) Alcohol 24(48.0%) 11(42.3%) 13(54.2%) Cocaine 13(26.0%) 8(30.8%) 5(20.8%) Cannabis 10(20.0%) 5(19.2%) 5(20.8%) Other 3(6.0%) 2(7.7%) 1(4.2%) Numberofsubstancesused 3.80(1.78) 3.31(1.57) 4.26(1.85) t =1.99 (1,48) Cocainea 47(94.0%) 24(92.3%) 23(95.8%) χ2 =0.27 (1) Cannabisa 39(78.0%) 20(76.9%) 19(79.2%) χ2 =0.37 (1) Alcohola 41(82.0%) 17(65.4%) 24(100%) χ2 =10.13** (1) Psychodyslepticsa 22(44.0%) 10(38.5%) 12(50.0%) χ2 =0.67 (1) Opioidsa 12(24.0%) 4(15.4%) 8(33.3%) χ2 =2.20 (1) Sedativesa 10(20.0%) 4(15.4%) 6(25.0%) χ2 =0.72 (1) Monthsofabstinence 6.64(4.15) 6.50(4.81) 6.79(3.40) t =0.24 (1,48) Numberofrelapses U=211.50 None 18 11 7 One 10 7 3 Twoormore 22 8 14 SeverityofSUD(DAST-20) 12.00(2.62) 12.67(2.96) 11.43(2.24) t =1.21 (1,48) Intermediate 26.9 25.0 28.6 Substantial 69.2 66.7 71.4 Severe 3.8 8.3 0 Dailynumberofcigarettes 20.50(13.49) 16.08(11.52) 25.29(14.04) t =2.54* (1,48) Nicotinedependence(Fagerstro¨mtest) 5.82(2.77) 5.00(2.73) 6.71(2.57) t =2.28* (1,48) Dailycaffeineintake(mg) 255.51(203.67) 217.69(179.58) 300.00(219.41) t =1.45 (1,48) CPZ=Chlorpromazine;BDI=BeckDepressionInventory;SASS=SocialAdaptationSelf-EvaluationScale;PANSS=PositiveandNegativeSyndrome Scale;SUD=SubstanceUseDisorder;DAST-20=DrugAbuseScreeningTest. aPercentageswillnotequal100aseachparticipantmaytakemorethanonesubstanceormedicationandmayhavemorethanonemedicalcomorbidity. *p<0.05 **p<0.01. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943.t001 (seeTable3).Thesignificantindependentvariablesrelatedtothedifferenttaskwerepremor- bidIQ,GAF,negativesymptoms(PANSS),severity(DAST-20)anddurationofSUD.Premor- bidIQexplained39%ofthevarianceofworkingmemorytaskand,togetherwithdurationof SUD,57%ofthevarianceofWCST.ExecutionisbetterashigherOQandshorterdurationof SUD.Furthermore,GAFexplained13%ofthevarianceintheBackwardDigitssubtest,being theexecutionhigherasbetterglobalfunctioning.NegativesymptomswithDAST-20described 24%ofthevarianceofToHtest,patientswithlessnegativesymptomsandhigherseverityof addictionperformedbetter.Consideringtheexecutivefunctioning(compositescore),premor- bidIQ,DAST-20anddurationofSUDaccountedfor52%oftheirvariance.Thebestcom- positescoresofexecutivefunctioningarerelatedtohigherIQandseverityofaddictionand shorterdurationofSUD. PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943 January18,2017 7/16 SuicideAttemptsandExecutiveFunctioninginDualSchizophrenia Table2. NeuropsychologicaltestsdatainZscoresofDualSchizophrenia(DS)patients,andconsideringthepresence(DS+)orabsence(DS-)of suicideattempts. Mean,standarderrorandstatisticalcontrastcarriedout(ANCOVAorMANCOVAwithageascovariate). NeuropsychologicalTests DS(N=50) DS-(N=26) DS+(N=24) F Effectsize Power (1,47) PREMORBIDIQ Vocabulary(WAIS-III) -0.14(0.11) -0.02(0.15) -0.27(0.16) 1.272 BlockDesign(WAIS-III) -0.17(0.15) -0.21(0.20) -0.13(0.22) 0.071 CompositeSummaryScore -0.16(0.12) -0.12(0.16) -0.20(0.17) 0.130 EXECUTIVEFUNCTIONING WorkingMemory(Backwarddigits,WAIS-III) 0.03(0.19) 0.10(0.26) -0.10(0.28) 0.634 Set-shifting/CognitiveFlexibility(TMT-B) -1.03(0.12) -1.00(0.18) -1.07(0.18) 0.060 Planningabilities(TowerofHanoi) Numberofmovements 0.32(0.14) 0.36(0.19) 0.28(0.20) 0.092 Reactiontime -1.24(0.20) -1.21(0.28) -1.28(0.30) 0.031 Globalscore -0.46(0.15) -0.42(0.20) -0.50(0.21) 0.065 Abstractreasoning/Problemsolving(WCST) Trials -0.69(0.16) -0.37(0.22) -1.01(0.24) 3.755 Totalcorrect 0.59(0.16) 0.52(0.22) 0.66(0.23) 0.184 Totalerrors -0.34(0.14) -0.08(0.19) -0.61(0.20) 3.767 Perseverativeerrors 0.41(0.18) 0.66(0.26) 0.16(0.27) 1.777 Non-perseverativeerrors -0.76(0.12) -0.53(0.16) -1.00(0.17) 3.898 Conceptuallevelresponses -0.49(0.15) -0.22(0.21) -0.77(0.21) 3.459 Categoriescompleted -0.74(0.24) -0.05(0.34) -1.42(0.35) 8.013** 0.146 0.792 Trialstofirstcategory -1.12(0.34) -0.36(0.47) -1.88(0.49) 4.969* 0.096 0.598 Failuretomaintainset -0.69(0.20) -0.43(0.28) -0.96(0.29) 1.678 Learntolearn -0.24(0.21) 0.15(0.28) -0.63(0.30) 3.631 Globalscore -0.43(0.13) -0.06(0.18) -0.80(0.19) 7.940** 0.145 0.788 Decision-making(IowaGamblingTask) Block1(trials1–20) 0.40(0.10) 0.55(0.13) 0.25(0.14) 2.744 Block2(21–40) -0.28(0.08) -0.26(0.11) -0.31(0.12) 0.098 Block3(41–60) -0.59(0.10) -0.32(0.14) -0.87(0.15) 7.790** 0.142 0.781 Block4(61–80) -0.66(0.12) -0.37(0.17) -0.95(0.17) 5.636* 0.103 0.651 Block5(81–100) -0.57(0.11) -0.21(0.15) -0.93(0.16) 10.457** 0.182 0.886 Totalscore(100trials) -0.47(0.09) -0.18(0.12) -0.76(0.13) 11.249** 0.193 0.907 CompositeSummaryScore -0.48(0.07) -0.31(0.10) -0.65(0.10) 5.699* 0.105 0.685 IQ=intelligencequotient;WAIS-III=WechslerAdultIntelligenceScale-RevisedThirdEdition;TMT-B=TrailMakingTest,trailB;WCST=WisconsinCard SortingTest *p<0.05 **p<0.01. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943.t002 IntheDS-group,similarlytothetotalsample,premorbidIQwassignificantforBackward Digitssubtest,explaining47%ofthevarianceand,togetherwithdurationofSUDdescribed 52%ofthevarianceofWCST.InbothcaseshigherIQwasrelatedtobetterperformance,and inthesecondcasewiththeshorterdurationofSUD.Ontheotherhand,DAST-20described 48%ofthevarianceofToHtestandmonthsofabstinenceandSUDrelapsesaccountedfor 31%ofthevarianceinTMT-B.Theplanningabilityisbetterashigherseverityofaddiction andthesuperiorcognitiveflexibilityasmoremonthsofabstinenceandlowerrelapses.Consid- eringtheDS+group,alsopremorbidIQexplainedthevarianceinBackwardDigitssubtest, inthiscase26%.AshigherIQ,thebettertheperformanceinworkingmemory.Additionally, IQtogetherwithdurationofSUDexplained47%ofthevarianceinTMT-Band36%ofthe PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943 January18,2017 8/16 SuicideAttemptsandExecutiveFunctioninginDualSchizophrenia Fig1. Totalscore(100trials)(a)andlearning(b)inIowaGamblingtask(IGT)forDualSchizophrenia patientswith(DS+)andwithout(DS-)suicideattempts.B1:trials1–20;B2:trials21–40;B3:trials41–60; B4:trials61–80;B5:trials81–100. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943.g001 varianceinWCST.Inbothcases,ashigheristheIQbetteristheexecutionandasshorter durationofSUDbettercognitiveflexibility.Finally,negativesymptomsdescribed38%ofthe varianceinToHtask,ashigherpresenceofsymptomsworsetheperformance.Fortheexecu- tivefunctioning(compositescore),intheDS-grouppremorbidIQ,DAST-20anddurationof SUDexplainedthe87%ofitsvariance,whileintheDS+groupIQtogetherwithdurationof SUDaccountedforthe52%(seeTable3).Inallcasesthesenseoftherelationshipisestablished asdescribedinthetotalsample. Wefoundsignificantcorrelationsbetweencurrentsuicideriskandnumberoffirst-degree relativeswithSUDandinsight,whichaccountedfor64%ofthevarianceforthetotalsample. PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943 January18,2017 9/16 SuicideAttemptsandExecutiveFunctioninginDualSchizophrenia Table3. Stepwiselinearregressionanalysisofeachindependentvariable,explainingexecutivefunctioningofDualSchizophrenia(DS)patients, andconsideringthepresence(DS+)orabsence(DS-)ofsuicideattempts. Executivefunctioning AdjustedR2 F Independentvariablesa βStandardized pvalues Conditionindexb DS(N=50) WorkingMemory(Backwarddigits,WAIS-III) 0.393 30.464 PremorbidIQ 0.627 0.001 1.205 Set-shifting/CognitiveFlexibility(TMT-B) 0.127 7.952 GAF 0.380 0.007 12.281 PlanningAbilities(ToH) 0.241 4.813 Negativesymptoms(PANSS) -0.474 0.015 10.800 SeverityofSUD(DAST-20) 0.397 0.049 AbstractReasoning/ProblemSolving(WCST) 0.574 9.092 PremorbidIQ 0.499 0.001 4.880 DurationofSUD(yr) -0.606 0.002 Compositesummaryscore 0.522 6.014 PremorbidIQ 0.592 0.006 10.804 SeverityofSUD(DAST-20) 0.581 0.008 DurationofSUD(yr) -0.505 0.028 DS-(N=26) WorkingMemory(Backwarddigits,WAIS-III) 0.465 22.758 PremorbidIQ 0.698 0.001 1.550 Set-shifting/CognitiveFlexibility(TMT-B) 0.305 6.274 Monthsofabstinence 0.515 0.006 4.008 SUDrelapses 0.378 0.041 PlanningAbilities(ToH) 0.483 5.532 SeverityofSUD(DAST-20) 0.875 0.008 7.570 AbstractReasoning/ProblemSolving(WCST) 0.522 6.996 PremorbidIQ 0.447 0.014 4.390 DurationofSUD(yr) -0.751 0.006 Compositesummaryscore 0.872 12.311 PremorbidIQ 0.781 0.019 10.168 SeverityofSUD(DAST-20) 0.957 0.005 DurationofSUD(yr) -0.499 0.041 DS+(N=24) WorkingMemory(Backwarddigits,WAIS-III) 0,260 8.713 PremorbidIQ 0,542 0.008 1.267 Set-Shifting/CognitiveFlexibility(TMT-B) 0.466 10.583 DurationofSUD(yr) -0.741 0.001 6.398 PremorbidIQ 0.682 0.001 PlanningAbilities(ToH) 0.380 4.676 Negativesymptoms(PANSS) -0.760 0.012 4.245 AbstractReasoning/ProblemSolving(WCST) 0.356 7.968 PremorbidIQ 0.524 0.010 6.305 DurationofSUD(yr) -0.436 0.016 Compositesummaryscore 0.517 4.209 PremorbidIQ 0.726 0.014 6.195 DurationofSUD(yr) -0.465 0.029 WAIS-III=WechslerAdultIntelligenceScale-RevisedThirdEdition;IQ=IntelligenceQuotient;TMT-B=TrailMakingTest,trailB;GAF=Global AssessmentofFunctioning;ToH=TowerofHanoi;PANSS=PositiveandNegativeSyndromeScale;SUD=SubstanceUseDisorder;DAST-20=Drug AbuseScreeningTest;WCST=WisconsinCardSortingTest;IGT=IowaGamblingTask. aOnlysignificantvariablesarepresentedthatcompriseeachexplicativemodel. b.Inmodelswithmorethanonevariableisincludedthesuperior. Inallcases,theTolerancevalueswerehigherthan0.815andtheVarianceInflationFactorvalueslowerthan1.209. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943.t003 WhenconsideringthegroupsthisresultcorrespondtotheDS+patients,withfirst-degreerela- tiveswithSUDandinsighttogetherexplainingthe87%oftheirvarianceforcurrentsuicide risk.Incontrast,inDS-groupthe47%ofthevarianceofcurrentsuicideriskwasexplainedfor thepositivesymptoms(PANSS)(Table4). Discussion Toourknowledge,thisisthefirststudyaimingtoexploretheexecutivefunctioning,current suicideriskandclinicalstateinDSpatients,consideringthepresenceorabsenceoflifetime suicideattemptsandrelatedfactors. PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169943 January18,2017 10/16

Description:
higher insight and metacognition ability. Moreover . WCST analyses showed significant worse scores for the DS+ patients in categories completed,.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.