Table Of Content

INDEX Volume 15 (1994) Advancing Program Evaluation, Huey- Chen, Huey-Tsyh, Epilogue, 93-94. Tsyh Chen, 229-237. Chen, Huey-Tsyh, Theory-driven Eva- American Evaluation Association luations: Need, Difficulties, and Annual Awards (1993), Presentation Options, 79-82. by Debra J. Rog, 111-114. Clarifying and Expanding the Applica- tions of Program Theory-driven Berk, Richard A., Three Trends in Evaluations, Nick L. Smith, 83-88. Evaluation Research, 261-264. Conducting Simultaneous Large Multi- Bickel, William E., Evaluation Use in Site Evaluations on Parallel Topics, Private Foundations: A Case Study, Frances M. Weaver, 37-44. 169-178. Bickman, Leonard, An Optimistic View Developmental Evaluation, Michael of Evaluation, 255-259. Quinn Patton, 311-319. Bland, Lori, See Tomlinson, Carol. Discovering the Future of the Case Boruch, Robert F., The Future of Study Method in Evaluation Controlled Randomized Experi- Research, Robert K. Yin, 283-290. ments: A Briefing, 265-279. Diverse Voices in Evaluation Practice: Feminists, Minorities, and Persons Callahan, Carolyn, see Tomlinson, With Disabilities, Donna M. Mertens, Carol. Joanne Farley, Anna-Marie Madison Campbell, Donald T., Retrospective and and Patti Singleton, 123-130. Prospective on Program Impact Assessment, 291-298. Eichelberger, R. Tony, see Bickel, Caracelli, Valerie J., Mixed-Method William E. Evaluation: Developing Quality Empowerment Evaluation, David M. Criteria through Concept Mapping, Fetterman, 1-15. 139-152. Empowerment Evaluation: A Case Carter, Janet, Review of Evaluation Study of an Adolescent Substance Thesaurus, 109-110. Abuse Prevention Program in New Case Studies of Evaluation Utilization in Mexico, Nina Wallerstein and Louis Gifted Education, Carol Tomlinson, Martinez, 131-138. Lori Bland, Tonya Moon and Empowerment Evaluation, Objectivist Carolyn Callahan, 153-168. Evaluation, and Evaluation Standards: Chelimsky, Eleanor, Evaluation: Where Where the Future of Evaluation We Are, 339-345. Should Not Go and Where It Needs To Chen, Huey-Tsyh, Advancing Program Go, Daniel L. Stufflebeam, 321-338. Evaluation, 229-237. Engle, Molly, Introduction, 121-122. Chen, Huey-Tsyh, A Panel on Theory- Engle, Molly, Review of Program driven Evaluation and Evaluation Evaluation: Forms and Approaches, Theories, 73-74. 201-204. 386 EVALUATION PRACTICE, 15(3), 1994 Epilogue, Huey-Tsyh Chen, 93-94. Introduction, Molly Engle and Naomi E. Evaluation: Review of the Past, Preview Penney, 121-122. of the Future, M.F. Smith, 215-227. Issue of Methodology in Qualitative Evaluation: Where We Are, Eleanor Inquiry, Review by John D. Richards, Chelimsky, 339-345. 107-108. Evaluation Thesaurus, Review by Janet Carter, 109-110. Jorgensen, Margaret, Review of Manag- Evaluation Use in Private Foundations: ing Change in Schools, 103-106. A Case Study, William E. Bickel, R. Tony Eichelberger and Rosemary A. Leviton, Laura C., Program Theory and Hattrup, 169-178. Evaluation Theory in Community- based Programs, 89-92. Farley, Joanne, see Mertens, Donna M. Light, Richard J., The Future for Evaluation, 249-253. Fetterman, David M., Empowerment Lincoln, Yvonna S., RSVP: We are Evaluation, 1-15. Pleased to Accept your Invitation, Final Synthesis, Michael Scriven, 367- 179-192. 382. Lincoln, Yvonna S., Tracks Toward A Fine Line between Evaluation and Postmodern Politics of Evaluation, Explanation, Michael Scriven, 75-78. 299-309. Franklin-Alley, Rasjidah, Review of Linerode, Philp M., Review of Gifted or Understanding Teaching, 95-98. Able, Realizing Children’s Potential, Future for Evaluation, Richard J. Light, 205-206. 249-253. Future of Controlled Randomized Madison, Anna-Marie, see Mertens, Experiments: A Briefing, Robert F. Donna M. Boruch, 265-274. Managing Change in Schools, Review by Future Perfect of Evaluation, Ernest R. Margaret Jorgensen, 103-106. House, 239-247. Martinez, Louis, see Wallerstein, Nina. Mertens, Donna M., Diverse Voices in Gifted or Able, Realizing Children’s Evaluation Practice: Feminists, Potential, Review by Philip M. Minorities, and Persons With Dis- Linerode, 205-206. abilities, 123-130. Guba, Egon G., see Lincoln, Yvonna S. Methods of Educational and Social Science Research: An Integrated Hattrup, Rosemary A., see Bickel, Approach, Review by Mark Hawkes, William E. 99-102. Hawkes, Mark, Review of Methods of Mixed-Method Evaluation: Developing Educational and Social Science Quality Criteria through Concept Research: An Integrated Approach, Mapping, Valerie J. Caracelli and 99-102. Leslie J.C. Riggin, 139-152. House, Ernest R., The Future Perfect of Molnar, Jack, Using Clients to Monitor Evaluation, 239-247. Performance, 29-36. Moon, Tonya, see Tomlinson, Carol. Impact of President’s Reinvention Plan on Evaluation, Michael J. Wargo, 63- Need-Based Evaluation Theory: What 72. Do You Need To Know To Do Good Index 387 Evaluation? William R. Shadish, 347- RSVP: We are Pleased to Accept your 358. Invitation, Yvonna S. Lincoln and Needs Assessment Since 1981: State of Egon C. Guba, 179-192. Practice, Belle Ruth Witkin, 17-28. Scriven, Michael, Product Evaluation— Optimistic View of Evaluation, Leonard The State of the Art, 45-62. Bickman, 255-259. Scriven, Michael, The Final Synthesis, 367-382. Panel on Theory-driven Evaluation and Scriven, Michael, The Fine Line between Evaluation Theories, Huey-Tsyh Evaluation and Explanation, 75-78. Chen, 73-74. Sechrest, Lee, Program Evaluation: Oh Patton, Michael Quinn, Developmental What It Seemed To Be! 359-365. Evaluation, 311-319. Shadish, William R., Need-Based Eva- Patton, Michael Quinn, Review of The luation Theory: What Do You Need Program Evaluation Standards: How To Know To Do Good Evaluation? to Access Evaluations of Educational 347-358. Programs, 193-200. Singleton, Patti, see Mertens, Donna M. Penney, Naomi E., see Engle, Molly. Smith, M.F., Evaluation: Review of the Product Evaluation—The State of the Past, Preview of the Future, 215-227. Art, Michael Scriven, 45-62. Smith, Nick L., Clarifying and Expand- Program Evaluation: Forms and ing the Application of Program Approaches, Review by Molly Engle, Theory-driven Evaluations, 83-88. 201-204. Stufflebeam, Daniel L., Empowerment Program Evaluation: Oh What It Seemed Evaluation, Objectivist Evaluation, To Be! Lee Sechrest, 359-365. and Evaluation Standards: Where the Program Evaluation Standards: How to Future of Evaluation Should Not Go Assess Evaluations of Educational and Where It Needs To Go, 321-338. Programs, Review by Michael Quinn Stup, Brenda, see Molnar, Jack. Patton, 193-200. Summative Evaluation, Formative Eva- Program Theory and Evaluation Theory luation, and Tactical Research, Community-based Programs, Laura Charles S. Reichardt, 275-281. C. Leviton, 89-92. Reichardt, Charles S., Summative Theory-driven Evaluations: Need, Diffi- Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, culties, and Options, Huey-Tsyh and Tactical Research, 275-281. Chen, 79-82. Retrospective and Prospective on Pro- Three Trends in Evaluation Research, gram Impact Assessment, Donald T. Richard A. Berk, 261-264. Campbell, 291-298. Tomlinson, Carol, Case Studies of Richards, John D., Review of Issues of Evaluation Utilization in Gifted Methodology in Qualitative Inquiry, Education, 153-168. 107-108. Tracks Toward A Postmodern Politics Riggin, Leslie J.C., see Caracelli, Valerie of Evaluation, Yvonna S. Lincoln, J. 179-192. Rog, Debra J., Presentation of 1993 American Evaluation Association Understanding Teaching, Review by Annual Awards, 111-114. Rasjidah Franklin-Alley, 95-98. 388 EVALUATION PRACTICE, 15(3), 1994 Using Clients to Monitor Performance, Weaver, Frances M., Conducting Simul- Jack Molnar and Brenda Stup, 29-36. taneous Large Multi-Site Evaluations on Parallel Topics, 37-44. Wallerstein, Nina, Empowerment Eva- Witkin, Belle Ruth, Needs Assessment luation: A Case Study of an Adoles- Since 1981: The State of the Practice, cent Substance Abuse Prevention 17-28. Program in New Mexico, 131-138. Wargo, Michael J., The Impact of the Yin, Robert K., Discovering the Future President’s Reinvention Plan on of the Case Study Method in Evalua- Evaluation, 63-72. tion Research, 283-290.