ERIC ED482190: Key Performance Indicators Accountability Report Card, 2000-2003.

23 Pages·2003·0.29 MB·English

by  ERIC

DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 482 190
JC 030 629
Key Performance Indicators Accountability Report Card, 2000-
TITLE
2003.
Dalton State Coll., GA. Office of Institutional Research and
INSTITUTION
Planning.
2003-00-00
PUB DATE
NOTE
22p.
Numerical/Quantitative Data (110)
PUB TYPE
EDRS Price MF01/PC01 Plus Postage.
EDRS PRICE
Academic Achievement; *Community Colleges; *Educational
DESCRIPTORS
Assessment; *Educational Indicators; Educational Needs;
Educational Objectives; School Effectiveness; Two Year
Colleges
*Dalton State College GA
IDENTIFIERS
ABSTRACT
This document is the annual Accountability Report Card that
was created by the Dalton State College Office of Institutional Research and
Planning for the academic year 2002-2003. The document addresses improvements
made according to indicators in a variety of areas that have also been used
in previous years. The results for the 2001-2002 are compared to the
improvement targets that had been set for 2002-2003 in the previous year. The
document also provides the improvement targets and actual results for the
2000-2001 academic years. The indicators that are tracked in the study are
(1) incoming/new freshmen cohort achievement;
the following:
(2) learning
(5) degree progress and student
(3) enrollment;
support;
(4) efficiency;
achievement;
(7) licensure examination program;
(6) general education;
(8)
retention rate;
(10) graduate employment;
(9) graduation rate; (11) student
(12) employer satisfaction;
satisfaction;
(14) faculty profile;
(13) fiscal;
(15) faculty satisfaction;
(16) staff satisfaction; and (17) academic support
and administrative efficiency/ satisfaction (this category is divided up into
27 different areas and each are addressed individually) .
The actual results
for the 2002-2003 academic years is not yet available, but by looking at this
document one gain a good sense of what is expected of the Dalton State
College in 2002-2003.
(MZ)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made
from the ori inal document.
DSIN
DALTON STATE
COLLEGE
PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND
EDUCATION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL. HAS
Improvement
Mice ol Educational Research and
BEEN GRANTED BY
INFORMATION
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
CENTER (ERIC)
reproduced as
lir This document has been
organization
received from the person or
originating it.
made to
Minor changes have been
improve reproduction quality.
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
stated in this
Points of view or opinions
represent
document do not necessarily
official OERI position or policy.
KEY PERFORNIANCE INDICATORS
ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT CARD
2000-2003
LABLE
BEST COPY AVM
4
DSC Accountability Report Card, 2000-2003
Produced by the Office of Institutional Research and Planning
For more information, contact:
Directory, Institutional Research and Planning
205-206 Memorial Hall
213 North College Drive, Dalton, GA 30702-3797
Phone: [phone]
706.272.2556
Fax:
E- mail: hcodjoe@em. daltonstate. edu
Webpage : http://www.daltonstate.edu/irp
University System of Georgia
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action System Institution
3
DSC Accountability Report Card, 2000-2003
Table of Contents
Incoming/New Freshmen Cohort Achievement Indicators
I.
1
Learning Sipport
2
Enrollment Indicators
3
Efficiency Indicators
3
IV.
Degree Progress and Student Achievement Indicators
4
V.
General Education Indicators
4
VI.
Licensure Examination Indicators
VII.
7
Retention Rate Indicators
VIII.
8
Graduation Rate Indicators
IX.
8
Graduate Employment Indicators
X.
10
Student Satisfaction Indicators
XI.
10
Employer Satisfaction Indicators
XII.
11
Fiscal Indicators
XIII.
11
Faculty Profile Indicators
XIV.
12
Faculty Satisfaction Indicators
XV.
12
Staff Satisfaction Indicators
XVI.
12
Academic Support and Administrative Efficiency/Satisfaction Indicators
XVII.
ACE Center
13
Academic Advising
13
Academic Support Services
13
Academic Vice President's Office
13
Admissions Office (Enrollment Services)
13
Adult Literacy
14
Bookstore
14
Business Office
14
Campus Security
14
Career Placement Services
15
Central Receiving
15
Computer Services
15
Continuing Education
15
Financial Aid Services
15
Food Services
16
Institutional Research and Planning
16
Intramural Sports
16
Learning Support
16
Library Services
17
Orientation Program
17
Parking Services
17
President's Office
17
Public Relations Office
18
Student Center and Activities
18
Student Government
18
Student Records
18
Tutorial Services
18
4
DSC Accountability Report Card, 2000-2003
Note:
The most current data was used as benchmarks for 2000-2001
"Improvement Target." That also became data for 2000-
2001"Improvement Target," and may not necessarily be data for
2000-2001. The DSC Institutional Effectiveness Subcommittee set
improvement targets for 2001-2002 and 2002-2003.
I. Incoming/New Freshman Cohort Achievement Indicators
Page 1
Improvement
Actual Actual
Improvement
Improvement
Actual
Target for
Target for
Results
Target for
Results
Results
KPI
Performance Indicator
2002-2003
2001-2002 2001-2002
2002-2003
2000-2001 2000-2001
KPI 1. Average SAT Verbal 474 482 N/A
474 480 485
score of incoming
freshmen
Average SAT 459
459 463 470 N/A
465
K PI 1.
Quantitative score of
incoming freshmen
Average SAT Composite
KPI 1. N/A
938
915 915 930 945
score of incoming
freshmen
Average ACT English
KPI 1. N/A
20
20 20
19
19
score of incoming
freshmen
Average ACT Math
KPI 1.
N/A
20
20
19 19
19
score of incoming
freshmen
Average ACT Reading
20
N/A
20
K PI 1.
21
21
21
score of incoming
freshmen
KPI 1.
Average ACT Science
N/A
20 20
20
21
21
Reasoning score of
incoming freshmen
KPI 1.
Average ACT score of
20
N/A
20
20
21
21
incoming freshmen
KPI 1. Average high school
2.6
2.6 3.3
N/A
2.6
3.3
GPA of incoming
freshmen
Percentage of incoming
KPI 1
47.2
47.2
47.7
48.5
N/A
50.0
freshmen who qualify as
HOPE Scholarship
recipients
Percentage of incoming
KPI 1
25.8
24.0
25.8 25.0
N/A
25.0
freshmen with CPC
deficiencies
Percentage of 2-and 4-
KPI 1
N/A
19.2 19.2
19.0
18.0
18.0
year degree program
incoming freshmen
enrolled in remedial
English courses
Percentage of certificate
KPI 1
N/A
16.3
15.4
16.3 15.0
14.0
program incoming
freshmen enrolled in
remedial English
5
DSC Accountability Report Card, 2000-2003
Page 2
II. Learning Support Indicators
Actual
Improvement
Improvement
Actual
Improvement
Actual
Target for
Target for
Results
Target for
Results
Results
2002-2003 2002-2003
2001-2002
2001-2002
Performance Indicator
KPI
2000-2001 2000-2001
N/A
59.0
58.2
60.5
Percentage of 2-and 4-
KPI I.
59.0
60.5
year degree program
incoming freshmen
enrolled in remedial
mathematics courses
N/A
7.0
7.0 7.0
KPI 1. Percentage of certificate
7.1
7.1
degree program
incoming freshmen
enrolled in remedial
mathematics courses
N/A
Percentage of 2-and 4-
KPI 1.
17.0
16.0
16.9
16.0
16.9
year degree program
incoming freshmen
enrolled in remedial
reading courses
21.2 N/A
21.0
Percentage of certificate 22.6
22.6 21.0
KPI 1
program incoming
freshmen enrolled in
remedial reading courses
KPI I.
N/A
Percentage of 2-and 4-
59.8 61.0 60.7 61.0
59.8
year degree program
incoming freshmen
whose COMPASS scores
in reading is above the
College's cutoff point
N/A
KPI 1.
Percentage of 2-and 4- 24.9 25.6
24.9 26.0 26.0
year degree program
incoming freshmen
whose COMPASS scores
in math is above the
College's cutoff point
KPI 1.
N/A
Percentage of 2-and 4-
76.6 76.6 78.0 77.0
78.0
year degree program
incoming freshmen
whose COMPASS scores
in writing is above the
College's cutoff point
KPI 1.
Percentage of certificate
N/A
20.0 20.0
18.3
18.3
19.7
program incoming
freshmen whose
COMPASS scores in
reading is above the
College's cutoff point
KPI 1.
Percentage of certificate
72.2
72.2 72.2
72.2 71.5
N/A
program incoming
freshmen whose
COMPASS scores in
math is above the
College's cutoff point
Percentage of certificate
KPI 1 58.7
60.0 60.8 60.0 N/A
58.7
program incoming
freshmen whose
COMPASS scores in
writing is above the
College's cutoff point
r*
DSC Accountability Report Card, 2000-2003
Pa e 3
III
Enrollment Indicators
Actual
Improvement
Improvement
Actual
Improvement
Actual
Target for
Results
Target for
Target for
Results
Results
2002-2003
2001-2002 2002-2003
Performance Indicator
2001-2002
KPI
2000-2001 2000-2001
4,135
3,350
3,139
Head count enrollment
3,275 3,647
3,139
KPI 2.
(fall)
60.0
60.0
61.0 60.0
59.7
Part-time enrollment as
61.0
KPI 2.
percentage of total
enrollment (fall)
2,483
2,190
KPI 3. EFT enrollment (fall)
1,880
1,860
1,841 1,841
75.0
53.0
Percentage of applicants
KPI 3.
67.0 67.0
70.5 53.0
offered admission who
enrolled
Percentage of students
2.0 2.7
2.1
KPI 4.
2.5 2.6
2.5
who are Black/Non-
Hispanic
Percentage of students
2.9
KPI 4.
3.3 5.0
2.8 2.8 3.0
who are Hispanic
Percentage of students
KPI 4.
0.3 0.3
0.1
0.3 0.1 0.3
who are American
Indian/Alaska Native
Percentage of students
KPI 4.
1.0 1.4
1.5 1.5
1.4
1.4
who are Asian/Pacific
Islander
91.0
Percentage of students
KPI 4.
92.6 92.6 91.0 90.0
92.5
who are White/Non-
Hispanic
Percentage of students
KPI 4.
4.0 4.2
3.2
3.3 3.5
3.3
who are international
students
IV. Efficiency Indicators
Annual total student
N/A
KPI 5.
73,700
61,418 65,000 65,000
61,418
credit hours generated by
undergraduate students
Student-faculty ratio
KPI 8.
N/A
20.0
18.0 18.0
18.0 18.0
(ratio of FTE students to
FTE teaching faculty)
Average class size
KPI 8.
20 22
18
18 18
18
KPI
Total volume of library
N/A
111,583
114,583
111,583 115,094 117,583
holdings
25.
KPI
Percentage of total
2.0
N/A
2.0 3.0 3.0
1.0
expenditures devoted to
25.
library acquisitions
7
DSC Accountability Report Card, 2000-2003
Pa e 4
V. De ree Pro ress and Student Achievement Indicators
Improvement Actual
Improvement
Actual
Improvement
Actual
Target for
Target for
Results
Target for
Results
Results
2002-2003
2002-2003
Performance Indicator
2001-2002
KPI
2001-2002
2000-2001 2000-2001
400 N/A
370
Total number of
298
367
298
KPI 9.
degrees/certificates
conferred
N/A
91.0
91.0
KPI 10
Percentage of first time
91.0
86.0
91.0
Regents' Test takers who
pass the essay test for the
first time
N/A
84.0
KPI 10. Percentage of first time
84.0
84.0
86.0 84.0
Regents' Test takers who
pass the reading test for
the first time
N/A
KPI 10 Two-year college GPA
3.07
3.07 N/A
3.1
3.1
average transfer rate at
DSC
N/A
KPI 12
N/A N/A
Gain in % between ETS N/A N/A
N/A
pretest (new students)
and ETS post-test
(graduating students) in
business
VI. General Education Indicators
KPI 12. Gain in % points
N/A
6.5 7.0
N/A
5.7
5.7
between CAAP pretest
(entering freshmen) and
CAAP post-test
(graduating students) in
math
Gain in % points
KPI 12.
N/A
6.8
N/A
6.8 7.5
8.0
between CAAP pretest
(entering freshmen) and
CAAP post-test
(graduating students) in
reading
KPI 12 Gain in % points
N/A
6.4 6.4
7.5
N/A
8.0
between CAAP pretest
(entering freshmen) and
CAAP post-test
(graduating students) in
science reasoning
KPI 12.
Gain in % points
N/A
N/A
4.8 4.8
6.0
5.5
between CAAP pretest
(entering freshmen) and
CAAP post-test
(graduating students) in
critical thinking
8
DSC Accountability Report Card, 2000-2003
Pa e 5
General Education Student Surve
Improvement Actual
Improvement
Improvement Actual
Actual
Target for Target for Target for
Results
Results
Results
KPI
Performance Indicator
2001-2002 2001-2002 2002-2003
2000-2001 2002-2003
2000-2001
N/A
KPI 12.
96.0
88.0
92.0 95.0
92.0
Percentage of graduates
who agree/strongly agree
that "As a result of my
education at DSC, I
learned to determine the
form of communication
appropriate to a
particular audience and
purpose"
N/A
KPI 12.
94.0 95.0
Percentage of graduates
87.8
93.0
93.0
who agree/strongly agree
that "As a result of my
education at DSC, I
learned to gather data for
research purpose from
various sources,
including the computer
and the Internet"
N/A
KPI 12
Percentage of graduates
93.0 95.0 98.0
93.0 90.4
who agree/strongly agree
that "As a result of my
education at DSC, I
learned to organize ideas
in a logical way"
N/A
KPI 12.
86.0
Percentage of graduates
90.0
96.0
86.0
86.3
who agree/strongly agree
that "As a result of my
education at DSC, I
learned to write well"
N/A
KPI 12.
Percentage of graduates
91.0
95.0
91.0 95.0
84.8
who agree/strongly agree
that "As a result of my
education at DSC, I
learned to speak well and
give oral presentations"
N/A
KPI 12.
Percentages of graduates
84.0 84.0
90.0
95.0
80.2
who agree/strongly agree
that "As a result of my
education at DSC, I
learned to apply my
knowledge of science to
solve problems"
KPI 12.
N/A
Percentage of graduates
79.0
79.0
85.0
90.0
72.1
who agree/strongly agree
that "As a result of my
education at DSC, I
learned to explain basic
principles governing
natural sciences and
scientific experiments"
DSC Accountability Report Card, 2000-2003
,
Pa e 6
Student Surve
Actual
Improvement
Actual
Improvement
Actual
Improvement
Target for
Results
Target for
Results
Target for
Results
2002-2003
2002-2003
2001-2002
2001-2002
2000-2001
Performance Indicator
KPI
2000-2001
N/A
97.0
91.4
97.0
95.0
Percentage of graduates 95.0
KPI 12.
who agree/strongly
agree that "As a result
of my education at
DSC, I learned to think
critically"
N/A
95.0
90.0 95.0
84.3
90.0
Percentage of graduates
KPI 12.
who agree/strongly
agree that "As a result
of my education at
DSC, I learned to
perform basic
mathematical
operations"
N/A
95.0
85.2
95.0
Percentage of graduates
88.0
88.0
KPI 12.
who agree/strongly
agree that "As a result
of my education at
DSC, I learned to use
and become familiar
with computers and
other forms of
electronic media, such
as the Internet"
N/A
90.0
76.7
90.0
KPI 12
Percentage of graduates
86.0
86.0
who agree/strongly
agree that "As a result
of my education at
DSC, I learned to
describe and
understand the major
forces and events that
shaped history and
society"
N/A
92.0
KPI 12
Percentage of graduates
91.0 91.0 92.0
89.8
who agree/strongly
agree that "As a result
of my education at
DSC, I learned to
analyze issues from
different perspectives
and to be open to
viewpoints other than
my own"
N/A
92.0
Percentage of graduates 90.0
85.8
92.0
90.0
KPI 12
who agree/strongly
agree that "As a result
of my education at
DSC, I learned to
analyze behavior of
individuals as well as
social groups and
institutions"
1 0