DOCUMENT RESUME IR 055 731 ED 390 390 AUTHOR And Others Lawson, Mollie D. TITLE Team ApI:-oach to Staffing the Reference Center: A Speculation. PUB DATE [93] NOTE 29p. PUB TYPE Non-Classroom Use (055) Reports Guides Evaluative/Feasibility (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DZSCRIPTORS Academic Libraries; College Libraries; Group Dynamics; Higher Education; Leadership Responsibility; *Library Administration; *Library Personnel; *Management Teams; Models; Organizational Communication; *Participative Decision Making; Personnel Management; *Reference Services; *Scheduling; Staff Utilization Central Missouri State University; *Staffing IDENTIFIERS Patterns ABSTRACT This document applies theories of participatory management to a proposal for a model that uses a team approach to staffing university library reference centers. In particular, the Ward Edwards Library at Central Missouri State University is examined in terms of the advantages and disadvantages of its current approach. Special attention is given to the group dynamics aspects of the building of reference teams, to the logistics of scheduling with rotations and substitutions, and to the responsibilities of a team leader. The report suggests that team building would ensure more flexible and equitable scheduling, define supervisory responsibilities rather than leave them ambiguous and impede decision-mvking and coordination of activity, reduce reference "fatigue," and improve harmony and communication among staff members. All these conditions would ultimately benefit the clientele. (BEW) ************A.***,,,,,,,,********************* * Reproductions supplicd by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** TEAM APPROACH TO STAFFING THE REFERENCE CENTER: A SPECULATION c Authors: LLI Mollie D. Lawson Coordinator of Technical Services Library Services Central Missouri State University V. Lonnie Lawson Professor Library Services Central Missouri State University Stephen Walker Assistant Professor Library Services Central Missouri State University S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER !ERIC) O This document has been reproducer", as received from the person or organi/aton originating it O Minor changes have betwr made to Inn Prove repronfortnor quality Points ol vim or minions staled in this document Or not necessarily repie,ent QIlicral OERI posaion or policy PERMISSION 10 REPRODUCE 11-1IS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY V. Lonnie_ Lawson BEST COPY AVAILABLE TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES 2 INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC1" ABSTRACT Participatory management or team management have prompted a plethora of library discussion in the recent past. However, building no articles appear which discuss the formulation of teams to increase productivity and provide better service to The authors have developed a model for using teams clients. to staff the Reference Center at a university The purpose of this new Center. Reference/Information approach is to provide better service, define supervisory responsibilities, improve worker relations, reduce fatigue and improve communication between all staff members. 1 TEAM APPROACH TO STAFFING THE REFERENCE CENTER: A SPECULATION The concept of team participation receives idealistic lip service as a representation of harmony and efficiency. Thomas R. Horton writes -rs that are best There are many human endez. entrusted to a single creative individual - but getting things done through organizations is not among them. Instead, teamwork is needed, and so is delegation: Teamwork that exists between reference personnel is not Teamwork exists in such library areas as the same as a team. Teams working reference, but teams are another matter. They would consist of both reference might improve service. librarians and paraprofessionals who work together on a scheduled, proprietary time. However, there are questions about a library reference team's practicality and whether it brings improvement over the existing means of work. Current Reference Center Staffing at Central Missouri State University The staff at Central Missouri State University's Ward Edwards Library may one day work or manage reference teams. Central Missouri State University (CMSU) is a mid-size state university with an enrollment of approximately 12,000 The Ward Edwards Library serves the students, students. staff, faculty and general public with a full-time staff of approximately forty, fourteen of which are library faculty -- 2 six in Technical Services and eight in Public Services. Before the summer of 1989 Ward Edwards Library was a At that time the library was subject-divided library. reorganized into a centralized library, which included a new Near the Reference Reference Center on the main floor. Center was a bank of online catalog terminals, CD-ROM stations with nearly twenty database products, most of the paper indexes, and the entire print library reference collection. Since the reorganization, the Reference Center has undergone several changes in the way that it is staffed. At first most reference librarians and library assistants worked Now that has become at least twenty hours per week. twelve to fifteen hours per week, depending on a person's other assignments. In the beginning the Center had for the most of the day an abundance of staff (sometimes as many as five), and until 1992 library faculty could excuse themselves from duty at the Center for a liberal variety of reasons. New rules have reduced absenteeism, but the flexibility that was intended to be present has suffered. At least two workers are scheduled at any one time, and more than two are scheduled during the "peak" hours of 9 a.m. Duties involve all levels of reference service to 4 p.m. from instruction in the use of the online catalog and CD- 3 Workers also collect ROMs to general reference work. Interlibrary Loan requests, distribute Interlibrary Loan (Until March of 1993 orders, and answer telephone requests. the Reference Center was also in charge of receiving and sending FAX messages.) The pool of human resources comes from both the public Librarians and the technical services areas of the library. and paraprofessionals are scheduled daily at the Center, All profsssionals and Monday through Friday. paraprott_ssionals work at reference some time, but their job requirements determine the proportion of their duty hours. For public service workers this may amount to over a third of Amid this group most public service their daily work time. librarians and support staff work twelve to fifteen hours per week at the Center, while selected technical services personnel work an average of five hours per week during fall and spring semesters. Advantages to Current Staffing Approach There are positive aspects to the current scheduling At Central Missouri State University the procedure. Coordinator of Public Services develops the schedule for staffing the Reference Center, and since it remains the same for a full semester, one can make plans around one's existing schedule for this time. Another positive aspect is the rotation of the work time 6 4 The assignee of a particular time slot for that slots. semester will, for the next semester, move to the next slot. For example, a duty of 8:00 to 9:30 a.m. and 1:00 to 2:30 p.m. one semester may become 9:30 to 11:00 a.m. and 2:30 to This rotation equalizes any 4:00 p.m. for the next. perception of the "worst" or the "best" time slots, since eventually everyone will work during all of the time slots. Also, schedules for future semesters are fixed and predictable. Disadvantages to Current Staffing Approach At CMSU reference duty is of paramount importance and is treated as if each library faculty is a classroom instructor whose time at the Reference Center is a scheduled class To allow for absences requires finding a meeting. substitute. Unless attending the Annual Missouri Library Association Conference, or either the Annual or Mid-Winter American Library Association Conference, a faculty member who wishes This is to go to a meeting must arrange for a substitute. also required for attendance at a departmental, college, or For vacation university committees, or when taking a class. and "comp" (for compensation) times no substitute is required when the Coordinator of Public Services has been notified at Sick leave requires a least three days in advance. substitute only if it is a non-emergency medical appointment. 5 Working from one to three hours a day, some workers have both morning and afternocn shifts, which can complicate Difficulties scheduling appointments and reduce flexibility. result rthiefly from attending meetings, which perforate most Faculty must constantly consult personal calendars and days. re-schedule appointments in an effort to avoid conflict. Another problem is the supervision and management at the For example, the Coordinator et Public Reference Center. Services tries to "come around" as often as possible, but 'this does not occur enough for satisfactory evaluation of the Since all library faculty Reference Center personnel. members are evaluated each year, little documented evidence can be presented about the work done at the Reference Center, even though it constitutes about one-third of a Public Services faculty's workload. Since no single individual is officially in charge of daily activities at the Reference Center, the problem with With the coming and going of inter-communication is greater. scheduled workers, small, but important, aspects of providing For instance, a class service may fall through the cracks. is working on an assignment and a worker going off-shift Or a client leaves a paper forgets to inform a replacement. message that is lost in the shuffle of activities. Even though a Daily Information Sheet records information for all workers, such episodes continue to take place and create Th 6 problems. Team Approach to Staffing Reference Center In the fall of 1992 a Reference Center Task Force was created to suggest improvements to Reference Center service. One was that each day a fixed Several ideas were developed. By chance group of people should staff the Reference Center. the word "team" was applied to this group, and from this evolved a concept of "team" -- a group of the same people working together for the same purpose. Initially, team units were designed chiefly to solve the To see that everyone served problem of scheduling people. equally at reference, groups were assigned their own block of A leader was introduced to give direction and time. In formulating this accountability for the staffing. concept, the originators had no previous library model by However, models already exist in business. which to go. In the business world "team" is the buzzword that seems Over eighty percent of all to be used the most these days. U.S. business organizations with one hundred or more employees, utilize a portion of their employees as working According to Tom Brown the idea of organizations teams.2 building teams at every possible level is not a concept that The team concept that is is going away in the near future. now common in the United States probably began with the incorporation of the Japanese quality circle work ethic.3 In 7 the area of libratianship the concept of quality circles has In their 1983 article in the been around for some time. Journal of Academic Librarianship, Martell and Tyson define small groups of employees who meet quality circles as " . . voluntarily, usually on a weekly basis, to learn and to apply techniques for identifying, analyzing, and solving problems affecting their work or workplace."4 Basically, this work concept made use of the employees Rensis Likert expounded on mental and physical capabilities. this in his book, New Patterns of Management, when he stated that the new worker was better educated that those of the past and desired to participate in the managerial process.5 This is related to the concept of participatory management, a subject that has prompted an abundance of However, no library material over the past two decades. articles can be found in Library Literature or ERIC about teams formulated to provide better service or to increase productivity in libraries at the lowest decision-making level. In libraries a business team approach should improve the existing way of performing tasks, both in public services and Teams can be adapted to such daily technical services. They are confined services as answering reference questions. to specific responsibilities, and they do not go beyond them to become a de facto management level that makes i U