DOCUMENT RESUME ED 368 356 IR 054 872 TITLE School Library Snapshots: A Brief Survey of Illinois School Library Collections in Three Areas of Science. INSTITUTION Illinois School Library Media Association, Fairfield. PUB DATE [93] NOTE 15p. PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Communication (Thought Transfer); Elementary Secondary Education; Federal Aid; Financial Support; Learning Resources Centers; Library Associations; Library Collection Development; *Library Collections; Library Services; Library Surveys; Needs Assessment; *School Libraries; Science Education; *Sciences; State Aid; State Surveys; Tables (Data) IDENTIFIERS Illinois; Library Funding ABSTRACT To study the strengths and weaknesses of Illinois school library collections in science and to quantify the need for increased funding for collection development, a survey was completed by over 400 members of the Illinois School Library Media Association. Topics of interest were astronomy, space, the solar system, general biology, ecology, human anatomy, physiology, and hygiene. The findings present a series of snapshots that indicate that the majority of school libraries in Illinois have inadequate book collections in these vital areas of science education. Not only are there too few books on the shelves, there are many that are seriously outdated and sometimes inaccurate. The most obvious reason is lack of money. Only 50% of respondents received any federal funds in 1991-92, indicating that block grants are not being spent on libraries. Many respondents considered the survey useful in analyzing local collections, because 64% did not know whether or not their libraries met state goals. Since the survey only included members of the state school library association, it is assumed that many other school libraries are in worse shape. Recommendations are made for improvement centering on better communication and coordination and working for increased funding. Nine tables and three figures present study findings. (SLD) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******-**e(************************************************k************* Snapshots School Library U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIOM A Brief Survey of Otioce o4 EducatooN Resmach and tramoymnera EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Illinois School Library Collections 0 Thus doCurrtnt An boon (mxoduoad Se rechved from d pefsod of cal:Amason o(oginateng tt. in Three Areas of Science 0 AlinOr cher**, Arra been made to maprove reprOduction Qualrty Poods ol vow, or oIonsstatSdinth8dOCg. mer do not (womanly repaNNInt offoemi OERI taosa.on Or PoMY assumptions. We knew that budgets for school Quite honestly, this project began with some the costs of books and other materials have library resources have been tight for years while whenever the subject of science col- continued to escalate. We also have heard horror stories 'Some day man may walk on lections came up for discussion. "I still have books that say, ends with the vacuum tube" "If I the moon." "I have a book on modern inventions that be a book left on the shelves." really weeded our science collection, there wouldn't time to determine just how bad. Eventu- We knew the situation was bad. We decided it was ally, we set three goals for our survey: the need for increased funding for school li- 1) To produce statistics which would quantify brary collections. tool which would demonstrate the 2) To offer local libraries r ;ollection assessment strengths and weaknesses of their collections. had resources capable of supporting the 3) To determine whether Illinois school libraries State's goals for science education. general information about each library, along with A questionnaire was designed to gather three specific fields of science: detailed counts of the numbers and ages of books in 1) Astronomy, Space, and the Solar System; 2) General Biology and Ecology; and 3) Human Anatomy, Physiology, and Hygiene. subjects which are taught across the K- These fields were selected because they encompass in which many new developments have occurred 12 curriculum ar c! because they are area:, over the past 25 years. complete and easy to tabulate. A Scantron form was utilized to make the survey easy to cv Illinois School Library Media Associa- Over 800 questionnaires were sent to members of the tion (ISLMA), and an impressive 409 were returned. \\, T -PERMISSION FO REPRODUCE kr, MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED Carol J 2 TO THE EDUCATIONAL RES tNFORMATION CENTER (ERICV Since all respondents were members of the state's professional organization, the responses are not necessarily typical of all schools in Illinois. They do not reflect the many elementary schools where there is no professional staff, or those schools in situations where one media specialist is responsible for several libraries. Being ISLMA members, respondents had an interest in professional issues and by self-selection were concerned about collection devel- opment. It may be assumed that these responses reflect better than the average school li- brary collections in Illinois. Who Responded? Grade Level: Of the 409 re- Table 1: Responses by Grade Level sponses, 40% came from el- ementary schools and 15% Public Schools Private Schools Total from junior high schools, Elementary (K-5, K-6, K-8) 153 162 (40%) 9 meaning that these lower Junior High (6-7,6-8,6-9) 59 61 (15%) 2 grades were somewhat under- High School (9-12,10-12) 123 134 (33%) 11 represented. A total of 134 re- Other 47 52 (12%) 5 sponses from high schools 382 (93%) Total 27 (7%) 409 (100%) constituted 33% of the survey group. The remaining 12% were categorized as "other" and included a wide variety of grade combinations from K-12 to preschoolgrade 3. Private and parochial schools were repre- sented by 7% of the responses. (See Table 1.) School Size: Respondents Table 2: Responses by Student Population reported a wide range of <350 351-750 751-1,000 1,001-1,500 >1,500 Total school sizes based on student Elementary 97 55 population. The largest cat- 4 5 162 (39%) 1 Junior High 30 20 egory (46%) had populations 0 (15%) 11 0 61 from 351 to 750 students. High School 36 19 45 23 (33%) 134 11 Other 25% were smaller and 29% 26 4 18 (13%) 52 3 1 were larger. (See Table 2.) Total (25%) (46%) (10%) 189 103 (8%) 47 39 (11%) 409 (100%) 31 Geographic Location: Responses came from all areas of the state. Respondents were asked to identify their regional library system and 87% did so, using names of systems in ex- istence before recent mergers and consolidations. Those in the northern part of the state represented 52% of the total responses, with 35% coming from the southern systems and 13% not indicating system location. Unfortunately, the City of Chicago was greatly under- represented, with only five responses. (See Tables 3a-3b.) A Look at Total Collections Collections tended to be larger than the survey designers anticipated, with 45% having more than 10,000 book volumes and 30% having over 50 currcnt periodical titles. Neverthe- less, there were seven schools (including one high school) in this select group with less than 1,000 books and 45 schools with fewer than 10 periodical titles. (See Figures lalb.) School Library Snapshots Table 3a: Responses by System (Northern) Table 3b: Responses by System (Southern) Bur Oak Library System (3%) 14 Corn Belt Library System 9 (2%) Chicago Library System (1%) Great River Library System 5 3 (1%) Du Page Library System 46 (11%) Illinois Valley Library System 18 (4%) Northern Illinois Library System 24 (6%) Kaskaskia Library System 8 (2%) North Suburban Library System 56 (14%) Lewis & Clark Library System 3 (1%) Starved Rock Library System (2%) 7 Lincoln Trail Libraries System 19 (5%) Suburban Library System (15%) 61 River Bend Library System 23 (6%) Total (52%) 213 Rolling Prairie Library System 30 (7%) Shawnee Library System 21 (5%) Western Illinois Library System 10 (2°"...) in the audiovisual department, we also Total 144 (35%) found larger numbers than anticipated. No System Given: 52 (13%) Films and videos constituted the strongest section of AV resources, with 55% having over 50 titles and only 15 li- Figure 1a: Collections (Book Volumes) braries reporting none. This is espe- 50% cially surprising since instructions 41% were given to not include shared col- lections such as film co-ops. On the 0 24% 21% other hand, many comments indi- 12% cated that these AV collections were 2% old and in poor condition. (See Fig- 0% <1,000 1000-5.000 5 001-10,000 10.001-15,000 >15.000 ure lc.) Book Volumes Owned Newer items such as CD-ROMs and Figure 1b: Collections (Periodical Titles) laser disks were less common, al- 4011' though we were pleasantly surprised 32% to find that 222 libraries (54%) have 27% at least one CD-ROM, and 30 librar- 0 20% 16% 0 ies have 10 titles or more. Fewer li- 14% 11% braries have laser disks, but 30% have at least one title and 31 schools 0% 10 25 <10 51 100 26-50 >100 (7%) have 10 titles or more. (See Fig- Periodkal Tides Owned ldle.) ures Figure 1c: Collections (glm and Video Titles) 60% SS% Expenditures for Library Resources c 40.1 0 0 Of particular interest was the amount 20% IS% of money spent for library resources, 10% 5% not including equipment. It was a I 411.-. 0% 11 25 26 SO 10 >SO 1 pleasant surprise to find that 75% Film and Video Titles Owned School Library Snapshots 3 Figure ld: Collections (CD-ROM Titles) spent over $2,000 in 1991-92. That amount is less impressive, however, when calculated 60% as dollars per student. While 158 schools 47% 44% (39%) spent over $10 per student, nearly c 40% 20% (79 schools) spent less than $3 per stu- dent, and nine schools (including three high 20% schools) spent less than $1 per student. (See Table 4.) 7% 0% >10 1-10 None Illinois figures look even more pathetic CD-ROM Titles Owned when compared to a recent School Library Journal report' which indicates an average resource budget (including equipment) of Figure le: Collections (Laser Discs) $14,171 for the same year and an average 80% expenditure of $8.38 per student for books 71% alone. Since a few high expenditures can 60% S make these averages misleading, the SLI re- port also indicates a median figure, but 0 40% 0 again, the Illinois statistics fall short of a na- 22% 20% tional median budget of $9,609 ($5.88 per 7% student) for books. .01=0. 0% >10 1-10 None Given that the average price of a children's Laser Discs Owned hardcover book was $16.64 in 1992 and the average price of an adult book was $45.85,2 can't buy one book per student it's clear that nearly two-thirds of Illinois school libraries even if all their resource money is spent on books! Table 4: Expenditures Per Student Since many schools also are 54-7 >510 I 51-3 58-10 using their limited funds for <VI ... more expensive computer 54 44 Elementary 36 25 I 3 software, CD-ROMs, laser Junior High 0 15 18 13 13 disks, and audiovisual 64 30 High School 28 9 3 materials, the actual book 22 8 Other 4 12 3 purchases are even more 155 (38%) 96 (18%) 74 (25%) (17%) Total 70 (2%) limited. 9 Sources of Funds To give yet another perspective on school library funding, we asked respondents to check all the categories of funds received for library resources in 1991-1992. Logically, the cat- received some egory checked most often was "District Budget," with 94% indicating they source. funds from School Library Snapshots 4 Other sources of funds (in order of frequency) were State Grants, Donations, Federal Grants, and Other (Endowments, Fees, Private School Tuition, etc.). While the 6% who did not receive any District Table 5: Sources of Funds Funds could be those 27 private and parochial Other District Budget PTA/Donations Federal Grants State Grants schools, there is no logical Elementary 68 150 116 38 75 explanation for the fact Junior High 58 39 39 33 15 that only 58% reported re- High School 122 37 77 26 91 ceiving State funds. The Other 48 14 29 22 31 year 1991-92 was the sec- Total 378 (94%) 223 (55%) 200 (50%) 234 (58%) (23%) 93 ond time that the small Since many checked several categories, total equals more than 100%. but significant state per capita grants were made available to schools. (See Table 5.) Comments from respondents added a human dimension to these numbers. "Our annual budget is $1,500 for 1,450 students" "Our budget doesn't look bad but we can't buy books because we are responsible for buying computer software" "Our library is funded only by PTA donations" "We had a zero budget again this year we haven't bought books in years!" Astronomy, Space, and the Solar System Respondents were asked to count book titles in the Dewey categories of 520-523 and 629 by date of publication. Although some books on automobiles may have been included, the majority dealt with space (including space travel and the solar system). Over 88% reported that this subject is covered in their school's curriculum. Only 8% said it was not covered and 4% said they did not know. Given the high percentage of Table 6: Astronomy, Space, and the Solar System schools which include this topic in the curriculum, it is Table 6a: Number of Titles in Subject Area shocking to find that almost half (46%) have fewer than 20 51-75 21-30 0-20 31-50 >75 books in the field. On the Elementary 70 69 17 2 5 other side of the coin, 40% re- junior High 4 21 2 2 31 port having 75 books or more High School 10 64 2 6 51 on the topic, but 76 of this Other 0 4 group of 162 schools report 21 21 3 that more than 75 of their Total (4%) (40%) 186 (46%) (1%) (9%) 16 6 35 162 titles were published before 1970. In other words, even the largest collections are out of date. (See Tables 6a-6b.) Old titles are not necessarily bad titles, as several of our respondents reminded us. There are certainly aspects of astronomy which haven't changed since 1970. On the other hand, students using these dated collections won't learn about the first Skylab experiments School Library Snapshots 5 py OMAR! 6 (1973), the Columbia flight Table 6b: Number of Titles Published Before 1970 which first put a man in orbit 0-10 21-50 11-20 51-75 >75 (1981), Sally Ride becoming the first woman in space 16 17 Elen.entary 38 61 31 (1983), or the Challenger di- Junior High 14 9 9 11 1.9 saster (1986). 44 High School 22 39 14 15 Looking at newer titles, 43% Other 13 15 7 9 3 of the total reported having Total 76 (18%) (17%) 139 (34%) (12%) (18%) 73 67 51 only five or fewer titles pub- lished since 1990 and only Table 6c: Number of Titles Published 1990-1993 23% have as many as 20 new titles. Since respondents were 6-10 16-20 0-5 11-15 >20 asked to include reference re- 40 29 Elementary 17 17 59 sources in their counts, it's clear that most students have Junior High 29 6 7 15 5 very few opportunities to read High School 10 64 6 51 2 about current developments Other 4 6 23 12 2 in a subject of continuing fas- 93 (23%) Total 175 (43%) 36 (9%) (17%) (8%) 69 31 cination to young people. (See Table 6c.) General Biology and Ecology A similar pattern emerged when we looked at responses regarding collections in the Dewey categories of 333, 363, 574, and 591. The subjects of General Biology and Ecology were cov- ered in 91% of the schools, but once again, nearly half (47%) had only a small number of titles covering the subject, and those who had more reported a Table 7: General Biology and Ecology high percentage dated before 1970. (See Tables 7a-7c.) Table 7a: Number of Titles in Subject Area Once again, this is a subject 76-100 41-75 0-25 26-40 >100 with many significant develop- 67 Elementary 72 6 13 ments since those older books 3 were published. Among them Junior High 0 4 19 33 3 are the Three Mile Island Ex- High School 55 60 4 6 6 plosion (1979), the Exxon Other 4 19 2 21 1 Valdez Oil Spill (1989), and Total 160 (40%) 186 (46%) (6%) (5%) (3%) 19 23 10 the Chernobyl Fire (1986). Comments from respondents illustrate the real problems of trying to teach with such out- dated resources. One person noted a book on landscaping which recommends using asbes- tos stepping stones in the garden! Another reported having a book which recommends using DDT for pest control! School Library Snapshots 6 Human Anatomy, Physiology, and Hygiene Our third topic covered the Dewey categories of 611-613, and was included in the curricu- - lum of 96% of the schools. While these subjects were taught most often, this also was the field where the largest per- centage (48%) reported very Table 7b: Number of Titles Published Before 1970 small collections. (See Table 0-20 41-75 76-100 >100 21-40 8a.) 42 Elementary 42 10 15 51 Fortunately, the number of Junior High 14 10 6 9 21 extremely old titles (pub- High School 44 20 33 17 18 lished before 1970) also was smaller, with only 9% having Other 4 14 16 9 4 50 or more such relics in their 94 (24%) Total (10%) (17%) 85 110 (28%) (21%) 69 41 collections. On the other hand, 66% had fewer than six Table 7c: Number of Titles Published 1990-1993 new titles (published 1990 1993) in this field. One dra- 26-40 41-60 11-25 0-10 >60 matic example illustrates the 47 Elementary 76 9 7 21 real danger of such inadequate Junior High 0 4 19 33 3 collections: a respondent re- ported having a title which ex- High School 24 45 37 10 17 tols the benefits of smoking as Other 17 6 9 14 1 a means of healthy relaxation! Total 44 (11%) 171 (43%) (14%) (7%) 98 57 (25%) 29 (See Tables 8b-8c.) A Closer Look at Collections with the Fewest Titles When we pulled the responses of the libraries with the smallest collections in these three fields, we found 186 schools with minimal collections in Astronomy, 186 in Biology, and 192 in Anatomy. Of these three groups, 173 had minironl collections in all three areas. We compared these 173 Table 8: Human Anatomy, Physiology, and Hygiene schools with the group as a whole and found they were surprisingly similar. They Table 8a: Number of Titles in Subject Area were slightly more likely to be 31-50 16-30 0-15 >75 51-75 junior highs or high schools, slightly more likely to have a Elementary 24 24 72 18 23 student population of 351 Junior High 10 6 2 9 31 750, and a little more likely to 37 High School 66 4 9 16 be in the southern part of the Other 4 9 7 23 2 state. They were slightly more 74 (19%) Total 26 (6%) (14%) 192 (48%) SO (13%) likely to have over 50 periodi- 54 cal titles, but their total book School Library Snapshots 7 collections were almost Table 8b: Number of Titles Published Before 1970 identical to those of the group 21-50 11-20 0-10 51-75 >75 as a whole. In other words, in- adequate science collections 60 9 35 Elementary 54 2 appear at all grade levels, in 20 24 0 Junior High 15 1 schools of all sizes throughout 43 6 14 High School 38 31 the state. (See Figures 2a-2e.) Other 22 3 9 11 1 The one area where these 173 140 (35%) Total (27%) (28%) (6%) (3%) 113 25 109 11 schools differed significantly was in their expenditures per Table 8c: Number of Titles Published 1990-1993 student. A total of 52% of these schools spent less than >20 0-5 11-15 6-10 16-20 $8 per student, compared to Elementary 24 113 7 6 9 44% of all respondents. It Junior High 46 2 should come as no surprise 9 3 1 that inadequate funding High School 17 24 10 73 8 equates with inadequate col- IOther 32 2 2 9 1 lections. (See Figure 2f.) 26 (7%) Total 24 (6%) 264 (66%) (5%) 66 (16%) 18 Use of the Collection Another angle in our series of snapshots was taken from the point of view of collection use. We asked, "Do science classes use your library?" The majority (55%) responded "occasion- ally," while 24% said "often" and 21% said "rarely" or "never." Figure 2a: Total Respondents Compared to Those with the Fewest Books in Named Categories,* by Grade Level Looking at collection use from another 4 hv perspective, we asked "Do students se- 40% 34% lect science books and magazines when 34% 32% they have 'free choice' of reading mat- ter?" In this case, the number responding J 13% "often" increased to 32%, with another 17% 13% 13% 13% 42% checking "occasionally." From these figures, it looks as if both AMP science classes and individual students Other High School Junior High f lernentary are using their school libraries at least Grade Level "occasionally" in about 75% of the 0 foul f ewest °Named canon, am those hoed w, I able% 6 schools, and there is a distinct tendency for individual students to be more frequent users than classes. This section of the questionnaire drew comments which put a different light on the matter of collection use. Many indicated that science teachers don't give library assignments or will accept research only if based on current periodicals. Several complained that science depart- ments have their own resources, separated from the central library. Others pointed out that School Library Snapshots 8 Figure 2b: Total Respondents/Fewest Books Figure 2c: Total Respondents/Fewest Books in in Named Categories, by School Size Named Categories, by System Membership 55. 60% 51% 52% 46% IIu iiiii 43% 42% 3' 4 C ---. 35% 5% 21% I 18% --- I 15Ya 11% 12% 13% 0% am. 0% <350 351-750 751-1,000 1,000-1,500 >1,500 Northern Southern No System Given School Size System Membership 0 Total Fewest 0 Total 111 Fewest Figure 2d: Total Respondents/Fewest Books in Figure 2e: Total Respondents/Fewest Books in Named Categories, by Total Book Collection Named Categories, by Periodical Titles Owned 55% 40% 3.0% 4 32% 41.0% 27% C 37% 26% 21% o 20% 24.0% 26.0% 16% 0 21.0% 20.0% 14% 13% 13% taw I . 11% I 12.0% 11.0% 2.0% OS% ima 0% (1% 10-25 5 -100 <10 26-50 c1,000 100 1,000-5,000 5,001-10.000 10,001-15.000 >15.0(X) Periodical Titles Owned Total Book Collection 0 Total Fewest 111 Total Fewest : 11/ _ science books are so expensive, they don't Figure 2f: Total Respondents/Fewest Books in buy them. This seems to be a chicken- Named Categories, by Expenditures Per Student and-egg situation. If the science collection 42% 30% is small and outdated, it's no wonder that 32% science teachers don't give library assign- 20% 25% ments. On the other hand, librarians with 22% 11% extremely limited funds can hardly be 17% 16% blamed for purchasing in the fields that re- ceive the most use. 2% 1% 0% 4-7 $1-3 <$1 $8-10 >$10 Goals Expenditum Per Student 0 Total Fewest Perhaps the most startling statistics of this study appeared when we looked at library collections from the perspective of the State Goals. We askcd, "Do you personally feel that your library's science collection supports the four Illinois Education Goals for Biological and Physical Science?" A total of 60 respondents (15%) said "yes" and 87 (22%) said "no," but a significant majority (56%) said they had never seen the goals! (See Table 9.) School Library Snapshots 9 1 0