ebook img

Environmental assessment and programmatic 4(f) statement for the City of Missoula : Orange Street Bridge and Riverfront Access Project PDF

256 Pages·1996·18.7 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Environmental assessment and programmatic 4(f) statement for the City of Missoula : Orange Street Bridge and Riverfront Access Project

S Missoula (Mont* )• 38d.U2 Dept. oi Public «26eaob Works 1996 Environmental assessment and Orange programmatic 4(f) Street Bridge statement for the VI J and Riverfront Access Project Montana Department ofTransportation STPU 8107(10) Control No. 2462 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration STATE DOCUMENTS COLLECTION U3 JUL 1886 MONTANA STATE LIBRARY 1515 E. 6th AVE. HELENA, MONTANA 59620 Environmental Assessment 3 0864 1006 4156 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and Programmatic 4(f) Statement for the CITY of MISSOULA ORANGE STREET BRIDGE AND RIVERFRONT ACCESS PROJECT State Project STPU 8107(10) City Project No. 93-073 Control No. 2462 Submitted Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c) and Executive Order 11988 by the CITY of MISSOULA and STATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION U.S. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION REGION 8 L^U ^ Date: P-/-*S/K , Director of Public Works, City of Missoula U^ LlJL lU ~~^^li/ 4I&I9& ? Date: . /Montana Department of Transportation document reviewed for coj and Approved for Cipstflation, ^-/S-fS Date: Federal Highway Administration This document is prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). EnvironmentalAssessment OrangeStreetBridgeandRiverfrontAccess STPU 8107 (10) LIST OF PREPARERS This document was prepared by the consulting firm of DRUYVESTEIN JOHNSON & ANDERSON, INC., Missoula, Montana, in association with HNTB CORPORATION of Bellevue, Washington, GCM SERVICES, INC., ofButte, MontanaandNATURALRESOURCE SERVICES, ofEureka, Montana. The followingpersons were the major contributors to this report: DRUYVESTEIN JOHNSON & ANDERSON, INC. Vaughn Anderson, P.E., Project Engineer/Manager Tom Picciano, Administrator Paul Druyvestein, P.E., Design Engineer Mark Lehman, Graphic Artist HNTB CORPORATION, INC. Gerald Dorn, P.E., Project Engineer John Jaeckel, P.E., Principal Engineer, Environmental Quality Matt Klein, E.I.T., Environmental Engineer Peter Smith, A.I.C.P., Planning and Traffic Engineer OTHERS - Sharon Campbell, Campbell Reynolds Associates Peter Reynolds, Campbell Reynolds Associates Lynn Fredlund, Project Manager - GCM Services, Inc. George Chaffee, Resource Consultant - Natural Resource Services Ed Anderson, Virtual Engineering and Graphics - Photorenditions & Jill Thornton, Landscape Architectural Planning Design PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Joseph Aldegarie, P.E. - Former Public Works Director, City of Missoula Bruce Bender, P.E. - Public Works Director, City of Missoula Martin VanMil, P.E. - DistrictConstruction Engineer, Montana Department ofTransportation Geoff Badenoch - Director, Missoula Redevelopment Agency Karen Jaworsky - Bicycle/PedestrianCoordinator, City of Missoula Doug Harrison - President Missoula City Council The following persons may be contacted for additional informationconcerning tliis document: Vaughn Anderson, P.E. or Tom Picciano Bruce Bender, P.E., Public Works Director & Druyvestein Johnson Anderson City of Missoula 3201 Russell 430 Ryman MT MT Missoula, 59801 Missoula, 59802 (406) 721-4320 (406) 523-4621 EnvironmentalAssessment OrangeStreetBridgeandRiverfrontAccess STPU 8107 (10) We would also like to gratefully ackowledge the hard work of our Stakeholder Concept Teams that assisted us throughoutthisproject. Withtheirhelp, the followingwasconscientiouslyaccomplished fortheprojectusing public comment and stakeholder input: generated and refined ideas identifiedand crystallizedproject issues and concerns assisted in developing and reviewing alternative concepts assisted in developing alternative selectioncriteria assisted in assigning weights to these criteria The followingmembers ofour communitygave oftheirpersonal time toparticipateon a StakeholderConceptTeam for the project: Chris Behan Bob Benson Greg DeShaw Bernadine Gantert Chris Gingerelli Richard Gotshalk John Herzer Jinny Iverson Terry Kelley Will Kerling Walt Kero Kevin Krebsbach Ron Klaphake Bob Oaks Kelly Rosenleaf Vi Seibert Rick Stephens Jim Toth Linda Tracy Anna Tucker Marji Wallinder Doug Waters John Williams Dermis Workman Again, our sincere thanks for their efforts and community service. We would also like to give our thanks to the public who participated in the several meetings that were held throughout the course of this project. Their input was greatly appreciated and the comments received were very valuable in the shaping of the final outcome. Thankyou for taking an interest in your community. 11 EnvironmentalAssessment OrangeStreetBridgeandRiverfrontAccess STPU 8107 (10) TABLE OF CONTENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SECTION DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION l. 1 1. Descriptionof the Project 1 1.2 Affected Environment 3 SECTION 2. PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED 7 2. Existing Conditions 7 2.2 Community Services 8 2.3 Air Quality 10 2.4 Existing Bridge Condition 11 2.5 Need for Action 11 SECTION 3. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 15 3.1 Development of Alternatives 15 3.2 Alignments Considered 15 3.3 Comparative Cost Estimates 18 3.4 Alternative Selection 26 3.5 Alternatives Eliminated from Consideration 34 3.6 Proposed Action 37 SECTION 4. IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 40 4.1 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS 40 4.2 RELOCATION IMPACTS 44 4.3 LAND USE IMPACTS 45 4.4 VISUAL IMPACTS 46 4.5 TRAFFIC IMPACTS 47 4.5.1 Traffic Forecasts 47 4.5.2 Traffic Operations Analyses 49 4.5.3 Parking 51 4.5.4 Transit 51 4.5.5 Traffic Control Plan 52 4.6 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPACTS - ROAD BRIDGE 52 4.7 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPACTS - TRAIL BRIDGE 53 4.7.1 California Street Trail Bridge 55 4.8 AIR QUALITY IMPACTS 56 4.8.1 Air Quality Modeling and Analysis - Roadway Bridge 59 4.8.2 Non-motorized Bridge 61 4.9 NOISE IMPACTS 62 4.10 HISTORICAL/CULTURAL IMPACTS 64 4.11 WATER QUALITY IMPACTS 67 4.12 FLOODPLAIN IMPACTS 68 4.13 VEGETATION 69 .1. EnvironmentalAssessment OrangeStreetBridgeand RiverfrontAccess STPU 8107 (10) 4.14 FARMLAND IMPACTS 70 4. 15 WETLAND IMPACTS 70 4. 16 FISH AND WILDLIFE IMPACTS 71 4.16.1 Fisheries 71 4.16.2 Wildlife 71 4.17 RARE AND SENSITIVE SPECIES 73 4.17.1 Terrestrial Resources 73 4.17.2 Aquatic Resources 75 4.17.3 Plant Species and Habitats 75 4.18 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES 76 4.19 UTILITIES IMPACTS 77 4.20 SECTION 4(f)/6(f) IMPACTS 78 4.20.1 Section4(f) 78 4.20.2 Section 6(f) 81 4.21 HAZARDOUS WASTES 82 4.22 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS 82 4.23 PERMITS, AUTHORIZATIONS AND REVIEW AGENCIES 83 4.24 FUNDING 84 SECTION 5. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION 86 5. EARLY COORDINATION 86 5.2 AGENCIES AND PERSONS CONTACTED 86 5.3 OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMENTS 86 APPENDIX 1, 2, 3 LIST OF FIGURES 1 Project Vicinity Map 1 2. Project Location Map 2 3. Typical Sections 4 4. Existing Orange Street Bridge 3 5. Old Milwaukee Railroad Overpass 5 6. Affected Environment 6 7. Orange Street/3rd Street South 9 8. Orange Street Bridge Inspection Photos 13 9. Milwaukee Overpass Inspection Photos 14 10. Alternative Rl - Refurbish and Widen Existing Bridge 19 11 Alternative R2 - Remove and Replace with New 3 Span 20 12. Alternative R3 - Remove and Replace with New 2 Span 21 13. Alternative RNB - No Build 22 14. Trail Alternatives 23 15. Preferred Alternative 39 15A. Existing and Proposed Bike/Ped Trails 39A 16. Pedestrian/BicycleTrail - south end bridge 53 17. Pedestrian/BicycleTrail - nordi end bridge 54 18. Existing Orange Street Bridge 66 19. Existing Dinsmore Irrigation Ditch 70 20. Spend the Money Wisely - MissoulianPoll 89 EnvironmentalAssessment OrangestreetBridgeandRiverfrontAccess STPU 8107 (10) LIST OF TABLES 1. Comparative Cost Summary - Roadway Structures 26 2. Alternative SelectionMatrix - Roadway Bridge 30 3. Alternative Selection Matrix - Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge 32 4. Missoula County Population Growth 41 5. Missoula County Building Permits 42 6. Missoula County Economic Base Comparison 43 7. Forecast Annual Traffic Growth Rates 47 8. Two-Way ADT Volumes 48 9. Orange Street Intersection P.M. Peak Hour Volumes 48 10. Intersection Operations 50 11. Accident Types and Occurrences Near the Orange Street Bridge (1988-1994) .... 50 12. National and Montana Ambient Air Quality Standards 57 13. Peak Hour Maximum Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm) 60 14. Eight Hour Maximum Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm) 60 in EnvironmentalAssessment OrangeStreetBridgeandRiverfrontAccess STPU 8107 (10) SECTION DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION 1. 1.1 Description of the Project City of Missoula, in conjunction with the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is proposing a Federal-Aid Project to modify the Orange Street Bridge and approaches to connect with the 5-lane roadways on each end of this short section of narrow 2-lane urban highway with considerations for pedestrian and bicycle traffic and access to the Riverfront Trails system. The proposed project, known as the Orange Street Bridge and Riverfront Access Project STPU 8107 (10), is located on Orange Street at the Clark Fork River crossing in the center of the City of Missoula, Montana. The project vicinity is shown on Figure 1. The project location is shown on Figure 2. PROJECT ^JqhhHl 3TJHIS W03 EOS QEBB Q0Q EfiHE^Jc^ E^fe gQ HEEDEOFt] HH fjWJt -Ql-J Figure 1 Project Vicinity EnvironmentalAssessment OrangestreetBridgeand RiverfrontAccess STPU 8107 (10) Figure 2 Project Location October 51, 1994(9:40am)

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.